Company Tied to Investor William E. Ford Accused of Torture Illegal Gambling
Cases
Mark Heywood QC represented the Crown in this case about a plot by two people to kill the Prime Minister. The plan was to detonate a bomb at the gates of Downing Street and then kill Theresa May with a knife or gun. Here is the BBC report.
Operation Silk [Oxford] 2018
Orla Daly, led by Lucy Sweet QC, was the third of the Eleven defendants to face charges over six months in one of the biggest grooming cases ever prosecuted in the UK. The historic claims occurred in the early 2000s. He represented Gary Bloxsome of Blackfords LLP.
Operation Lunar [Birmingham] 2017
Sarah Forshaw QC and Robert Ellison represented the defendant, who was charged along with ten others in a multi-million pound conspiracy to defraud HMRC. At the heart of the fraud were multiple tax avoidance schemes. Following court arguments, the charges against our clients were dismissed. The trial of the remaining defendants is scheduled for six months in 2019. Instructed by King and Spalding LLP.
R v. Armstrong [Southwark] 2017
Sarah Forshaw QC represented Samuel Armstrong, chief of staff to Conservative MP Craig McKinley, who was accused of raping and sexually assaulting a young woman after an after-work drink in a bar in Parliament House. The case attracted significant media attention. Mr Armstrong was exonerated by a jury after a nine-day trial. He had trained with Taylor Haldane Barex. See the BBC report here.
Operation Canon [Southwark] 2016
Sarah Forshaw QC, instructed by the SFO, successfully prosecuted this £80 million "pyramid" scheme. The defendants represented themselves as successful suppliers of electrical products such as light bulbs, air conditioners, trouser presses and televisions to major hotel chains such as Marriott and Hilton. They also falsely represented themselves as the preferred supplier to the Olympic Village ahead of the 2012 Games. https://www. sfo. gov. uk/2016/05/24/ponzi-fraudsters-sentenced-total-21-years/
R v. Max Clifford [Southwark] 2016
Sarah Forshaw QC, who led Orla Daly, successfully defended a high-profile celebrity journalist who was cleared of further charges of historic sexual assault. See the BBC News report here.
Operation Cent [C.C.C.] 2013
Jonathan Polnay, aka Jonathan Higgs QC, represented the defence in the high-profile Bailey trial involving the global sale of "fake" bomb detectors. He trained with Gary Bloxsome of Blackfords LLP. See the BBC News report here.
HMRC v Peter Storrie [Southwark] 2011
Natasha Wong QC acted as junior barrister for the former chief executive of Portsmouth City Football Club who was found not guilty of misappropriating public funds. She trained with Paul Martin LLP.
“Baby P” Murder Trial [C.C.C.] 2009
Sue Rodam, led by Tim Roberts QC, was in charge of defending a "boarding person" in the infamous incident involving the death of a 1 7-mont h-old baby, where local authorities and other organizations were severely criticized for lack of child protection. The defendant was arrested for murder, but was convicted only for the crime that allowed the child's death by others. Successful appeal for the ruling. In a complex and detailed case, a huge survey was conducted by several ministries and agencies.
R v. B & ors [Harrow] 2013
Jonathan Higgs QC, led Jonathan Pornei and Con Sengin, prosecuted three defendants involved in the organizationalization of fake universities to assist in illegal immigrants. The defendants were convicted after three months. In this case, complex legal theory related to Griffit h-type conspiracy was developed, and evidence by a forensic accountant was greatly contested. Sengin Kong was eventually summoned in a thre e-day trial to prosecute the three QC and the junior without a leader. He was trained by the CPS central fraud team.
R v. F & ors [Canterbury] 2013
Mark Dacy is in charge of the security company's account manager. The defendant was charged with two collusions of assisting illegal immigrants. It was alleged that the company had illegally obtained a refugee passport from an office employee who had a corruption. At the end of the prosecutor's complaint, the defendant was innocent for one cause, and was acquitted by the jury after a thre e-month trial for another cause. He was trained at Thomas Boyd WHYTE SOLICITORS.
R v. A & ors 2014
Providing advice to companies on the potential responsibility of bribery / corruption crime caused by the act of civil litigation. Lawyer Burke and amplifier co.
Re: B Ltd 2015
Providing advice to companies on the potential responsibility of bribery / corruption crime caused by the act of civil litigation. Lawyer Burke and amplifier co.
R v. E & ors [Croydon] 2016
Sengin Kong has prosecuted six defendants, fighting in front of the public in the middle of West Croydon Station, with aggressive weapons, including a knife and teser gun. In the trial, an opposition to a facial mapping expert nominated by one of the accused of being convicted later. He was trained by CPS London.
R v. O [Croydon] 2016
Kong Shengyin ordered the prosecution of the latest defendant charged in a major NCA drugs investigation. The case involved complex mobile phone and telephone evidence. The case was led by the CPS Organised Crime Unit.
R v. A & anr [Inner London] 2016
Kong Shengyin represented a defendant charged with burglary of an elderly couple's home where the wife was sexually assaulted at knifepoint. The case involved cross-examination of the prosecution's cell expert and legal arguments over the admissibility of defence statements during examination of prosecution witnesses. Represented by Thomas Boyd Whyte.
R v. B [Southwark] 2016
Jonathan Goldberg QC led in repossession proceedings for a defendant who pleaded guilty to mortgage fraud. The benefit sought by the prosecution was negotiated down from over £1. 8 million (the amount of fraud to which the defendant pleaded guilty) to less than £140, 000. Represented by Burton Copeland.
R v. A & anr [Wood Green] 2016
Hong Kong Shengyin ordered the prosecution of two defendants charged with conspiracy to fraudulently obtain mobile phone upgrades. The two-year breach cost the mobile phone company over £40, 000. For CPS London.
R v M [Wood Green] 2016
Defending an NHS healthcare assistant accused of sexually assaulting a patient. After a four-day trial, the defendant was found not guilty. For Sternberg Reed.
Inquest into the Death of Callum Osborne 2014
Mark Dacey acted for the inquest into the death of Callum Osborne, who was buried alive in a "trench" collapse on his second day working at a construction site in Kent. The cause of death was cardiac arrest. Read the BBC news report here.
Inquest into the Death of Terrence Wooten 2014
Christopher Sutton-Mattox acted as advisor to the inquest and Mark Dacey represented the family at the two-week inquest into the death of Terence Wootton, who was stabbed to death by his schizophrenic son. Read the news here.
Inquest into the Death of Sapper Mark Smith 2013
Christopher Sutton-Mattox appeared as an inquest consultant at the inquest into the tragic deaths of "friendly fire" incidents in Afghanistan. Read the BBC report here.
Inquest into the Death of Cpl Sean Violino 2009
Assistant Coroner Christopher Sutton-Mattox presided over the inquest into Lt. Sean Violino, who died in action in Afghanistan. Read the news here
Inquest into the Death of Edward Barry 2013
Christopher Sato n-Matox has appeared as a research consultant during the fou r-week survey period on the tragic death of Teenager Kent Edward Barry, who died of Mesadon and Ziazepam. Click here for the news report
Inquest into the Deaths of Brown & Lynch 2011
Christopher Sato n-Matox is a survey during a si x-week survey on the tragic death of Darren Brown and Douglas Lynch as a result of the fatal fire of a conservative locomotive during the construction of the canal railway link. He appeared as a consultant. Click here for reports on BBC News.
R v. JLM & ors [C.C.C.] 2016
Jonathan Higgs QC, led by Valeria Swift, is a tw o-mont h-old Bailey defendant (5 others) who was charged with killing a 1 7-yea r-old "rap" artist in South London, and a 1 5-yea r-old youth defense. I was in charge. He was trained at Thomas Boyd White Law Office.
R v. Hashi & ors [C.C.C] 2016
Jonathan Higgs QC succeeded in defending Danny Robinson's charges of murder by a c o-company. He was trained at Thomas Boyd White Law Office. Click here for the daily telegraph report.
R v. Phillips & anr [C.C.C.] 2015
Jonathan Higgs QC defended a teenage boy who was prosecuted in another case in a youth stabbing in East London. Alexander Johnson & Partners is in charge.
R v. G [Snaresbrook] 2016
He succeeded in defending a man who was allegedly raped a teenager while his daughter was sleeping next to him. I received the training of Tuckers.
R v. Heir & ors [Blackfriars] 2015
Jonathan Higgs QC was in charge of a larg e-scale British money launderin g-related Indian case, which gave millions of British bank tickets to drug sellers. The defendant was hired by the Sahara Group and was said to have been involved in conspiracy. He was trained by EBR atlidge.
R v. Dirda & ors [Canterbury] 2015
Jonathan Higgs QC led Paul Jackson to defend a man who was charged with rape and forced prostitution. The plaintiff claims that he was forced to consume A-class drugs at the age of 13, was forced to prostitution, and was raped multiple times. The trial was interrupted at the middle point two months later, with the low reliability of the plaintiff, no answer, and no answer. In the case, a vulnerable 1 6-yea r-old witness was interrogated through interpreters and intermediaries, and a thir d-party disclosure was filed from other countries. In this case, the unused information disclosure was thousands of pages. This is required by the TS method. Click here for the press.
R v. Cohen & ors [Kingston] 2015
Jonathan Higgs QC is defended Haton Garden's jewelry dealers in the lon g-term trial of Kingston over the warehouse of Alexander McQueen, an Alexander McQueen in Izlin, the city of Mappin & Web, Bond Street, and Jimmy Chu in Bond Street. did. Requested from Blackfords LLP.
Appeal of DS 2016
Mark Haywood QC, led by Ben Temple, was in charge of a doctor who was convicted of a patient due to an unexpected illness after the knee surgery and was convicted of a death.
R v. Jose Sanchez [Cayman Islands] 2015
Mark Haywood QC succeeded in defending the JG Sanchez trial in the Cayman Islands, when the Olympic specialist, Solomon Webster, was killed in the Cayman Islands. Click here for the news link.
R. v. G; R. v. J [2009] UKHL 13; Archbold 2013: 25-67 2009
Mark Haywood QC was charged with Ben Temple in the first instance, a appeal court, and a noble house, defending David Perry QC. J has a wide range of libraries of religious, political, ideological, military, extreme Islamic materials, and some have obvious terrorist purposes. -Pod, mobile phones, hundreds of hours of audio, and thousands of documents, a number of digital disks consisting of thousands of documents were found digital. J was charged with the propert y-related items related to terrorism contrary to Article 57, Paragraph 1 of the 2000 Terrorism Act. J acknowledged four charges against Article 58 of the Act. Later, the appeal court defeated R. V. K [2008] EWCA CRIM. 185. J claims that he had received an incorrect legal advice in light of R. V. K., and succeeded in applying for a claim, but Birmingham Records were restrained by R. V. K. I thought and repeated innocent claims in the preparatory hearing. Birmingham Records, in consideration of being restrained by R. V. K., referring to R. V. K., when a reasonable excuse is made based on Article 58, the prosecutor must prove the purpose of the terrorist. He ruled on the legal issues raised by the royal family. Approval on the aristocracy was granted. The three certified issues have raised substantial and complex issues. The rational concept of excuse must be considered in many legal contexts. The prosecutor's appeal (G and J) was approved, and one year after the first appeal, he was convicted of four crimes against Article 58.
R v. Simpson-Kent [C.C.C.] 2016
Mark Haywood QC has prosecuted the terrible murder of E-Standers actress Cian Break and their two children, killed by his partner and father Arthur Simpson Kent. The defendant was sentenced to life imprisonment. Click here for reports on BBC News.
Operation Seagram [Woolwich] 2008
Mark Haywood QC and Jonathan Raidrow QC were charged with two NHS doctors for planning a car bomb terrorism in London West End Tiger Tiger Night Club and Glasgow International Airport in 2007. did. Click here for BBC reports.
Operation Crevice [C.C.C.] 2007
Mark Haywood QC has prosecuted the longest trials in Old Bailey, a plan that causes an explosion with David Walters QC and Duncan Atkinson.
R v. S [Chelmsford] 2016
As a result of the lon g-term investigation involved in the Federal Investigation Bureau (FBI), the National Crime Agency, and the Eastern District Special Operations Unit Duties Ta. The prosecutor's claim was that the defendant purchased and used the "BlackShades" remote access tool, and sold hundreds of dispersio n-type service refusal (DDOS) tools during advanced commercial activities. 。 In this case, a number of bank accounts, which were said to have been used to clean criminal revenue through the International Network of "Mule", and advanced financial analysis of PayPal accounts, were carried out in this case. 。 As a result of negotiations with the prosecutor, the defendant responded to half of the charged charges based on the agreement. As a result, the feeling was alleviated and a sentence with a suspended sentence was issued. According to the instructions of Stamburger Reed Law Office
Appeal of Johnson & ors 2016
SARAH FORSHAW QC has been involved in the quantitative prosecution following Jogee. It is a project considered by the Supreme Court. Click here for the judgment.
R v. D & ors [C.C.C.] 2015
He was in charge of a 1 7-yea r-old man who had been involved in the incident in which two men were killed in Leighton Stone in eastern London. Makomax is in charge. Click here for BBC reports.
R v. Kharrahassan & ors [C.C.C.] 2014
Under Charlotte Newwell, Sarah Four Show was charged with crime smuggling by mixing £ 5 million pounds into fruits and vegetables, and served as a greengrocer. The c o-defendant was sentenced to 17 years. Click here for Bark & Amp; amp?
R v. Thompson [Aylesbury] 2013
Sarah Four Show QC, led by the dec o-reed, was Asperger and was prosecuted by 42 historical assaults and succeeded in defendant who was proven to be innocent. The defendant had a similar previous criminal record, and was overturned after being updated in the appeal. I was trained in Edward Haze Law Office. Click here for online reports.
R v. Dr V [Wood Green] 2016
SARAH FORSHAW QC has succeeded in defending the doctor's sexual assault against young women. She was trained at EBR ATTRIDGE. Currently, he is instructed by BCL Solicitors LLP in regulation procedures for GMC and NHS Trust.
R v. Riaz & anr [C.C.C.] 2015
SARAH FORSHAW QC was in charge of defending a law student who was released on the charges of killing a dating partner by a former dating partner. Imlan Khan & Partners is in charge of defense. Click here for Daily Mail article.
Coats, R. v [2013] EWCA Crim 1472 (24 July 2013) 2013
SARAH FORSHAW QC was in charge of the appeal of the appellant in an incident from the Criminal Case Review Committee to the COA. After being convicted of cocaine smuggling, the appellant appealed mainly for "abused women's syndrome." I received the training of Blackfords LLP. The reported ruling can be read here. You can read the Guardian newspaper here.
R v. Brennan [2015] 1 WLR 2060 2015
Sarah Four Show QC was in charge of gay escort defending a ritual demonic attack, charged with killing a 5 3-yea r-old antique dealer. The murder conviction was overturned by the 2015 appeal, and was sentenced. The ruling is an important judgment in the case of imprisonment and special psychiatric evidence. The Court Court (Criminal Department) is currently quoting http: // www. Bailii. Org/eW/CASES/EWCA/CRIM/2014/2387. HTML. The ruling is also quoted to the current issued ArchBold and Blackstones.
R v. A [Aylesbury] 2015
Sarah Four Show's QC succeeded in defending a professional sourcer who was accused of rape and sexual assault against a teenage victim. Instructions from BCL Solicitors LLP.
Operation Farnhams [C.C.C.] 2012
In March 2010, 19 young gangs were killed by 19 young gangs at Victoria Station, and Sarah Four Show QC, who led Sue Rodam, was in charge of defendant in a trial of a brutal murder case. did. A joint investigation of a knife crime by gangs. http: // www. bbc. co. uk/news/UK-15310015
Operation Withern 2012
Rishi Nathwani represented one of 22 defendants charged with a premeditated conspiracy to rob wealthy victims and cause violent riots in the August 2011 riots, when London's notorious gangs joined forces to cause widespread rioting. He represented one of the main organizers. The case revolved around phone/cell phone location and video evidence.
Operation Shido 2012
Rishi Nathwani represented one of eight defendants charged with conspiracy to kidnap and rob a known cocaine drug dealer worth over £1 million and £100, 000 in cash. Trident officers conducted a surveillance operation against the defendant, who himself was conducting a surveillance operation against a desired target. The defendant agreed to purchase a surveillance device to be placed under the target's car, and also agreed to travel from London to Brighton at the same time that the target and its car would travel to this location, with the purpose of tailing the target, the Crown argued. The evidence against the defendant also extended to mobile phone website data and text messages. Four weeks into the trial, the court (HHJ Stow) upheld submissions that after careful analysis of the mobile phone sites, there was no case. The defendant was the only defendant to be acquitted of all charges, the others receiving sentences ranging from seven to ten years.
R v. Bucur & ors [Southwark] 2016
Hannah Wyatt's lead counsel, Rishi Nathwani, represented one of nine defendants charged with sex trafficking and related prostitution offences. He successfully applied to dismiss three of the four charges the defendant faced. The Crown was then successful in eliminating key elements of its case, including complex hearsay arguments. After further legal arguments regarding the disclosure of evidence tampered with by investigators and the admissibility of the evidence, the jury was dismissed after 12 days and the State did not formally present evidence on the remaining charges facing his client. Instructed by Hodge Jones Allen.
R v. Pandit [Blackfriars] 2016
Rishi Nathwani represented a payroll clerk accused of stealing £1. 44 million from his employer, the charity Mary Stops International. Bark & Co. Rishi Nathwani represented one of 22 defendants charged with a premeditated conspiracy to rob wealthy victims and cause violent riots in the August 2011 riots, when London's notorious gangs joined forces to cause widespread violence. He represented one of the key organisers. The case revolved around phone/mobile location and video evidence.
R v. Lategan [Isleworth] 2015
Rishi Nathwani represented one of eight defendants charged with conspiracy to kidnap and rob a known cocaine drug dealer worth over £1 million and £100, 000 in cash. Trident officers conducted surveillance operations against the defendants, who themselves conducted surveillance operations against the intended targets. The Crown argued that the defendant agreed to purchase a surveillance device to be placed under the target's car, and also agreed to travel from London to Brighton at the same time that the target and its car traveled to this location, with the purpose of tailing the target. The evidence against the defendant also extended to mobile phone website data and text messages. Four weeks into the trial, the court (HHJ Stow) upheld the submission that after careful analysis of the mobile phone sites, there was no case. The defendant was the only defendant to be acquitted of all charges, the others receiving sentences ranging from seven to ten years.
Operation Pod 2013
Hannah Wyatt's lead counsel, Rishi Nathwani, represented one of the nine defendants charged with sex trafficking and related prostitution offences. He successfully applied to have three of the four charges the defendant faced dismissed. The Crown's main elements were then successfully eliminated, including a complex hearsay argument. After disclosure of evidence tampered with by investigators and further legal arguments regarding the admissibility of the evidence, the jury was dismissed after 12 days and the State did not formally present evidence on the remaining charges facing his client. Instructed by Hodge Jones Allen.
Operation Diamond 2013
Rishi Nathwani represented a payroll clerk accused of stealing £1. 44 million from his employer, the charity Mary Stopps International. Bark & Co. Rishi Nathwani represented one of 22 defendants charged with a premeditated conspiracy to rob wealthy victims and cause violent riots in August 2011, when London's notorious gangs joined forces to cause widespread rioting. He represented one of the key organisers. The case revolved around phone/cell phone location and video evidence.
R v. Monteith & ors [C.C.C.] 2015
Rishi Nathwani represented one of eight defendants charged with conspiracy to kidnap and rob a known cocaine drug dealer worth over £1 million and £100, 000 in cash. Trident officers conducted a surveillance operation on the defendant, who himself conducted a surveillance operation on the intended target. The Crown argued that the defendant agreed to purchase a surveillance device to be placed under the target's car, and also agreed to travel from London to Brighton at the same time that the target and its car would travel to this location, with the purpose of tailing the target. The evidence against the defendant also extended to mobile phone website data and text messages. After four weeks of trial, the court (HHJ Stow) upheld submissions that after careful analysis of the mobile phone sites, there was no case. He was the only defendant to be acquitted of all charges, the others received prison sentences ranging from seven to ten years. Hannah Wyatt's lead lawyer, Rishi Nathwani, represented one of nine defendants charged with sex trafficking and related prostitution offences. He successfully applied to have three of the four charges the defendant faced dismissed. The Crown's main elements were then successfully removed, including a complex hearsay argument. After further legal arguments regarding the admissibility and disclosure of evidence that had been tampered with by investigators, the jury was dismissed after 12 days and the State did not formally present evidence on the remaining charges facing his client. Instructed by Hodge Jones Allen.
R v. GD [C.C.C.] 2015
Rishi Nathwani represented a payroll clerk accused of stealing £1. 44 million from his employer, the charity Marie Stopes International. Bark & amp; amp; Co.
R v. Ibrahim & ors [C.C.C.] 2016
Lisi Natwani succeeded in defending a famous photographer accused of sexual assault against a total of eight women. In this case, Lategan (Vogue magazine is regarded as one of the most influential photographers in the UK), Tiggie, Princess Anne, Margaretto City, McCartney, McCartney, McCartney, Salman Rashidi, Beckham, etc. It was a hig h-level incident because he was dating a royal family. Fortunately, psychiatric evidence has proved that Lategan was not appropriate for a trial, and that the violation had caused a brain damage caused by a terrible fall in 2008. Telegraph news report.
R v. A [AG Reference] 2014
A case, led by Kierran Vorn QC, is allegedly caused by the killing of five leases James Mungress related to drugs in Gangland. Three of the defendants moved from London to Bornemas early in the morning, went directly to the known drug dealer, entered the premises, and left 90 seconds later. This complicated case includes secret monitoring detectors, mobile sites / telephone evidence, anonymous witnesses, malicious personality / motivation issues, and the defending case is a firearm that the suspect died in an accident. It was a robbery that was manufactured. Despite the deceased and his friends, the court argument on poor personality succeeded and many of the evidence was excluded. After a long trial, the defendant was innocent in murder, but was convicted of negligence and death due to a majority vote of Mrs. Davy's QC and jury. He was trained in Gold Corns.
R v. B [AG Reference] 2016
Lisi Naswani, led by Jonathan Fuller QC, defended one of the six defendants charged with GBH's collusion of murder. This was an assault case to soothe the defendant's mistress. The culprit moved by car three times by car, finding her twice, and attacked with a hammer. In this case, it was secretly monitored in the form of evidence, charging mobile phones, location information of mobile phones, and important cell analysis. The defendant was convicted of GBH as a result of a trial by Jois and Jury. He was trained by EBR atlidge. < SPAN> Risi Natwani succeeded in defending a famous photographer who was accused of sexual assault on a total of eight women. In this case, Lategan (Vogue magazine is regarded as one of the most influential photographers in the UK), Tiggie, Princess Anne, Margaretto City, McCartney, McCartney, McCartney, Salman Rashidi, Beckham, etc. It was a hig h-level incident because he was dating a royal family. Fortunately, psychiatric evidence has proved that Lategan was not appropriate for a trial, and that the violation had caused a brain damage caused by a terrible fall in 2008. Telegraph news report.
R v. T.N & ors [Wood Green] 2014
A case, led by Kierran Vorn QC, is allegedly caused by the killing of five leases James Mungress related to drugs in Gangland. Three of the defendants moved from London to Bornemas early in the morning, went directly to the known drug dealer, entered the premises, and left 90 seconds later. This complicated case includes secret monitoring detectors, mobile sites / telephone evidence, anonymous witnesses, malicious personality / motivation issues, and the defending case is a firearm that the suspect died in an accident. It was a robbery that was manufactured. Despite the deceased and his friends, the court argument on poor personality succeeded and many of the evidence was excluded. After a long trial, the defendant was innocent in murder, but was convicted of negligence and death due to a majority vote of Mrs. Davy's QC and jury. He was trained in Gold Corns.
R v. K & ors [Bristol] 2015
Lisi Naswani, led by Jonathan Fuller QC, defended one of the six defendants charged with GBH's collusion of murder. This was an assault case to soothe the defendant's mistress. The culprit moved by car three times by car, finding her twice, and attacked with a hammer. In this case, it was secretly monitored in the form of evidence, charging mobile phones, location information of mobile phones, and important cell analysis. The defendant was convicted of GBH as a result of a trial by Jois and Jury. He was trained by EBR atlidge. Lisi Natwani succeeded in defending a famous photographer accused of sexual assault against a total of eight women. In this case, Lategan (Vogue magazine is regarded as one of the most influential photographers in the UK), Tiggie, Princess Anne, Margaretto City, McCartney, McCartney, McCartney, Salman Rashidi, Beckham, etc. It was a hig h-level incident because he was dating a royal family. Fortunately, psychiatric evidence has proved that Lategan was not appropriate for a trial, and that the violation had caused a brain damage caused by a terrible fall in 2008. Telegraph news report.
Army v. SB [Osnabruck] 2015
A case, led by Kierran Vorn QC, is allegedly caused by the killing of five leases James Mungress related to drugs in Gangland. Three of the defendants moved from London to Bornemas early in the morning, went directly to the known drug dealer, entered the premises, and left 90 seconds later. This complicated case includes secret monitoring detectors, mobile sites / telephone evidence, anonymous witnesses, malicious personality / motivation issues, and the defending case is a firearm that the suspect died in an accident. It was a robbery that was manufactured. Despite the deceased and his friends, the court argument on poor personality succeeded and many of the evidence was excluded. After a long trial, the defendant was innocent in murder, but was convicted of negligence and death due to a majority vote of Mrs. Davy's QC and jury. He was trained in Gold Corns.
G.M.C. v Dr K 2015
Lisi Naswani, led by Jonathan Fuller QC, defended one of the six defendants charged with GBH's collusion of murder. This was an assault case to soothe the defendant's mistress. The culprit moved by car three times by car, finding her twice, and attacked with a hammer. In this case, it was secretly monitored in the form of evidence, charging mobile phones, location information of mobile phones, and important cell analysis. The defendant was convicted of GBH as a result of a trial by Jois and Jury. He was trained by EBR atlidge.
R v. TH [Newcastle] 2015
Rishi Nathwani, led by Kieran Vaughan QC, acted as defence counsel for 8 Weeks Three Hands Murder in relation to the brutal murder of Danny Gough in his bed whilst he slept next to his pregnant girlfriend. The prosecution argued that Monteith and two co-defendants planned and carried out the attack as revenge for a man who had broken into Monteith's home a month earlier and cut off his face. The case involved a complex low level DNA copy of the accused found at the crime scene which was the subject of a legal fight and ultimately not relied upon by the defence. There was also eyewitness evidence, computer evidence, phone location/den evidence and CCTV evidence which gave the jury a motive for others who wanted the deceased killed. Monteith and his co-defendants were unanimously acquitted. Instructed by Goldkorn. BBC report
R v. A.N [Newcastle] 2016
Rishi Nathwani, led by Steven Kamlish QC, represented the lead defendant in a six-way, six-week murder trial. GD was the 16-year-old accused in the murder of James Hunter. In the case it was argued that the murder was the result of tensions between the defendant's team and the deceased's friends. The prosecution relied on mobile phones, mobile sites and Blackberry/WhatsApp messages and their interpretations. The case heavily involved complex hearsay arguments as well as the unincriminating and vicious character of both witnesses and defendants. Instructed by Goldcorns. ITV News report.
Thailand v. Aldhouse 2015
Rishi Nathwani, led by Kieran Vaughan QC, represented the lead defendant in a multiple murder trial in relation to the death of Hamdi Jiumale. The defendant was acquitted of half the murder charges, instructed by HHJ Wide QC. The defendant was found guilty of murder and manslaughter. Represented by Stokoe Partnership. Independent News.
R v. X 2013
Dominique Webber represented a 44-year-old mother who had sexual relations with a 14-year-old boy and had her suspended sentence overturned by the COA. http://www. mirror. co. uk/news/uk-news/mum-44-who-sex-boy-4371972
R v. E-J 2012
Dominique Webber represented the defendant in the Court of Appeal on charges of blackmail and payment of £30, 000 for intimidation of a family member. Read the news here
R v. F 2015
Irshad Sheikh represented the defendant in a lengthy Wood Green trial involved in a large-scale conspiracy to steal £10 million of high-value vehicles, including a Range Rover and a Ferrari.
R v. L 2015
Ilshad Shake served as the chief of the defendant in the fiv e-month Bristol's "Breaking Bad" trial, over the production and production of industrial production crystal female. He was trained in HP Gower. Click here for the BBC news report.
Operation Goomburra [C.C.C.] 2013
Ilshad Shake succeeded in defending the Army Senior Officer, accused of sexual activity with children. [Germany, Osuna Bucksack]
R v. M & ors [C.C.C.] 2015
Ilshad Shake succeeded in defending the doctor in front of the specialized institution, facing the alleged sexual misconduct. Direct access client
R v. LM [Inner London] 2015
Ilshad Shake succeeded in defending a 7 9-yea r-old care manager who was accused of a historical crime that caused an obvious harm to her daughter in the 1960s. Receive Thomas Boyd White's incense.
R v. MD [Southwark] 2015
Ilshad Shake was successful and succeeded as a defense in this notes that a 1 8-yea r-old girl was raped by six men.
R v. JK & ors [Reading] 2009
Alison Wilks is ordered by the CPS criminal delivery department and will be charged for the American Marine Corps killing the medal as a Thai British citizen. A wide range of discussions on the status of prison and the validity of diplomatic guarantee. Has the delivery secured? One acknowledged in Thailand and was sentenced to 25 years in prison.
R v. MS [Snaresbrook] 2015
Alison Wilks was a prosecutor on a trial of a man with a learning disability, in a crime of organizational economic exploitation against another man with a serious learning disorder. An intermediary is used to help communicate.
R v. FR [Basildon] 2015
Alison Wilks behaved on the prosecutor in the London riot, which was charged with the S18 GBH crime. A mastermind who breaks through the police car window and throws bricks to a police officer.
R v. BT [Snaresbrook] 2015
Alison Wilks is in charge of defendants who have been prosecuted for stealing drugs from the workplace (nursing home).
R v. DP [Snaresbrook] 2015
Alison Wilks led the royal junior in this case in which rape to the defendants and several allegations of historical child abuse. It was a complicated case because there were two previous cases where the defendant was charged with a similar chart, one of which contained the plaintiff. Complex evidence disclosure issues and huge information from family courts.
R v. JE & 6 ors [Winchester] 2013
Mark Haywood QC, Jonathan Pornei, and Alison Wilks are in the Central Criminal Court, including the use of a wide range of mobile sites, telephone recording, CCTV evidence, and electronic presentation auxiliary equipment (360 mapping). Protected the trial.
R v. Ashfield [Woolwich] 2015
Alison Wilks served as a single prosecutor of five trials in the Central Criminal Course. A case in which two armed robbery occurred in the remittance business in Bangladesh, and £ 340, 000 was stolen. In addition to mobile site data and calling pattern analysis, it is used using CCTV. Evidence of lifestyle and expenditure after violating a particular problem.
R v. D & ors [Winchester] 2015
Valeria Swift has been charged as a single administrative lawyer in an incident on housing rental fraud that identified remittances to multiple bank accounts. The defendant was convicted, and after fully submitting, the appeal was supported by the Court.
R v. Pasquale & ors [Isleworth] 2015
Valeria Swift has been a single lawyer in an unwellly motivated injury incident to a taxi driver by a woman with an extraordinary personality. Initially, the police investigated as an attempted murder and searched for a defense of heart loss and automatic symptoms, but as a result of evidence by experts, the defendant was relieved immediately.
R v. L F [Kingston] 2015
Mark Daticy led Valeria Swift in this complex drug supply conspiracy. As a result of a thre e-month trial, he was in charge of the only defendant who was acquitted. This success is due to cautious analysis of telephone evidence and a wide range of invasion monitoring permitted based on RIPA. Dhanju Mclean is in charge.
R v. Galvin & ors [Cambridge] 2015
Valeria Swift behaves on his defense as a chief junior. A baby shaking incident involving a lot of interdisciplinary experts, such as neurological radiology, infectious diseases, and hematology. The defendant was acquitted.
R v. Robbins & ors [C.C.C.] 2015
Valeria Swift was instructed as an exclusive lawyer in a child's obscene image possession. The defendant acknowledged that he had created a large number of children's obscene images, and concluded a palliative agreement, which resulted in an image of Class A, which resulted in avoiding immediate compliments. The Sexual World Prevention Order (SHPO) succeeded in submitting legal submissions to reduce the adverse effects of the defendant's employment and career prospects.
R v. Campbell & ors [Birmingham] 2016
Valeria Swift needs to carefully plan an opposition to minimize the pain of victims living in another judicial jurisdiction, taking into account the difficulty of logistics in two time zones. In the rape case, the prosecutor was instructed. The defendant was guilty. < SPAN> Alison Wilks was a single prosecutor in the Central Criminal Court. A case in which two armed robbery occurred in the remittance business in Bangladesh, and £ 340, 000 was stolen. In addition to mobile site data and calling pattern analysis, it is used using CCTV. Evidence of lifestyle and expenditure after violating a particular problem.R v. Dinsmore [St Albans] 2016
Valeria Swift has been charged as a single administrative lawyer in an incident on housing rental fraud that identified remittances to multiple bank accounts. The defendant was convicted, and after fully submitting, the appeal was supported by the Court.
R v. Owen & ors [C.C.C.] 2016
Valeria Swift has been a single lawyer in an unwellly motivated injury incident to a taxi driver by a woman with an extraordinary personality. Initially, the police investigated as an attempted murder and searched for a defense of heart loss and automatic symptoms, but as a result of evidence by experts, the defendant was relieved immediately.
R v. V C & 8 ors [Southwark] 2016
Mark Daticy led Valeria Swift in this complex drug supply conspiracy. As a result of a thre e-month trial, he was in charge of the only defendant who was acquitted. This success is due to cautious analysis of telephone evidence and a wide range of invasion monitoring permitted based on RIPA. Dhanju Mclean is in charge.
Operation Peltier 2016
Valeria Swift behaves on his defense as a chief junior. A baby shaking incident involving a lot of interdisciplinary experts, such as neurological radiology, infectious diseases, and hematology. The defendant was acquitted.
R v. AB 2014
Valeria Swift was instructed as an exclusive lawyer in a child's obscene image possession. The defendant acknowledged that he had created a large number of children's obscene images, and concluded a palliative agreement, which resulted in an image of Class A, which resulted in avoiding immediate compliments. The Sexual World Prevention Order (SHPO) succeeded in submitting legal submissions to reduce the adverse effects of the defendant's employment and career prospects.
Operation Ralemation 2014
Valeria Swift needs to carefully plan an opposition to minimize the pain of victims living in another judicial jurisdiction, taking into account the difficulty of logistics in two time zones. In the rape case, the prosecutor was instructed. The defendant was guilty. Alison Wilks served as a single prosecutor of five trials in the Central Criminal Course. A case in which two armed robbery occurred in the remittance business in Bangladesh, and £ 340, 000 was stolen. In addition to mobile site data and calling pattern analysis, it is used using CCTV. Evidence of lifestyle and expenditure after violating a particular problem.
Operation Listado 2014
Valeria Swift has been charged as a single administrative lawyer in an incident on housing rental fraud that identified remittances to multiple bank accounts. The defendant was convicted, and after fully submitting, the appeal was supported by the Court.
Operation Kennedy [Portsmouth] 2014
Valeria Swift has been a single lawyer in an unwellly motivated injury incident to a taxi driver by a woman with an extraordinary personality. Initially, the police investigated as an attempted murder and searched for a defense of heart loss and automatic symptoms, but as a result of evidence by experts, the defendant was relieved immediately.
Operation Lundie 2013
Mark Daticy led Valeria Swift in this complex drug supply conspiracy. As a result of a thre e-month trial, he was in charge of the only defendant who was acquitted. This success is due to cautious analysis of telephone evidence and a wide range of invasion monitoring permitted based on RIPA. Dhanju Mclean is in charge.
Operation Pearham 2013
Valeria Swift behaves on his defense as a chief junior. A baby shaking incident involving a lot of interdisciplinary experts, such as neurological radiology, infectious diseases, and hematology. The defendant was acquitted.
R v. T [Chelmsford] 2014
Valeria Swift was instructed as an exclusive lawyer in a child's obscene image possession. The defendant acknowledged that he had created a large number of children's obscene images, and concluded a palliative agreement, which resulted in an image of Class A, which resulted in avoiding immediate compliments. The Sexual World Prevention Order (SHPO) succeeded in submitting legal submissions to reduce the adverse effects of the defendant's employment and career prospects.
R v. S & ors [C.C.C] 2014
Valeria Swift needs to carefully plan an opposition to minimize the pain of victims living in another judicial jurisdiction, taking into account the difficulty of logistics in two time zones. In the rape case, the prosecutor was instructed. The defendant was guilty.
Operation Tineid [Blackfriars] 2015
Valeria Swift was in charge of prosecutors in the Relatio incident on sexual abuse of a 5-yea r-old child, a mediator. He was thought to have been the first counselor to meet with his child's witnesses in a remote room to help his weak witnesses, and this new approach was a great success. The defendant was guilty.
R v. A & ors [C.C.C] 2015
Christopher Sato n-Matox led Valeria Swift, who was in charge of the defense in the murder collusion, including attempted murder. The defendant was then guilty of attempted murder and was acquitted about the murder collusion. I was trained in the Grek Gorden partnership.
R v. M & M [Woolwich] 2015
James Martin is in charge of defense only. The defendant met the plaintiff through the dating site "PLENTY OF FISH". In the first encounter, they reached sexual activity in his car. The problem was a matter of consent. The next day, the plaintiff triggered a comprehensive communication with a friend with a friend. The mobile phone information was important in overturned her explanation about what happened that night. The defendant was acquitted by the jury.
R v. S 2015
James Martin was a lawyer. The defendant had joined a larg e-scale turbulence centered on Baging Stalk Poison Pub. Participating in the turbulence claimed that he split a bottle on someone's head and thrown two fingertips from the man's hands. His defense was a misconception that broke the bottle, and it was a legitimate defense to bite his finger. He was acquitted by the jury. He was trained in Gold Corns.
R v. R & ors [Croydon] 2013
James Martin is in charge of defending soccer violence by many people. A systematic struggle between the opposing fans was suspected. The case is greatly influenced by the accuracy of CCTV's police appraisal. After a few days of lawyer Martin, it was ruled that police officers did not properly obey the relevant code of conduct, so that no identification evidence was allowed. Later, the trial was abandoned by Passcale.
R v. S [Inner London] 2015
James Martin was a lawyer. He was alleged that the defendant took his partner to a remote place by car, dragged her out of the car and assaulted. Because it didn't work, she returned to the car with her and drove dangerously with the intention of killing them. Both of them were injured in the subsequent accident, but survived. He was trained in goldcorn.
R v. S [Guildford] 2015
James Martin has appeared as a lawyer in several armed collusions supplying cannabis and cocaine. The case was a large LED intelligence strategy focusing on one of the defendants, who was said to be the leader of the organizational crime group that supplies a large amount of cocaine and cannabis. Important evidence was obtained from the combination of telephone / mobile phones and the combination of products obtained from a secret eavesdropping device installed in the defendant's car.
R v. S [C.C.C.] 2016
James Martin served as a lawyer in a mult i-arm mortgage fraud collusion in CCC. Suspicion was developed mainly in a company, which is said to have been established to provide a mortgage loan without asking questions to the individual of the criminal fraternity. The defendant is an employee of the company and is said to have benefited from such a mortgage. Her husband was involved in money laundering and drug trafficking. She was trained by Thomas Boyd Wight.
R v. J & anr 2015
James Martin stood only as a junior. A larg e-scale conspiracy that supplies A and B-class drugs.
Kent Police v. M 2015
James Martin is in charge of defense only as a junior. The case was related to the revenue of the complex scam scheme in Europe. Various fake companies offered their customers to work as a luxury companion for the wealthy. Another aspect of the scam was a production that provided appear in pornographic films. Both were siam, and the gold received from the stakeholders in advance was in line with British law.
Appeal Re: F 2016
James Martin was in charge of defense only as a junior. The biggest firearm import case to the UK. The weapon was a military assault rifle that could be used for "Pari s-type" attacks in the UK. The weapon was smuggled on a boat in Kent, and was stopped by an armed infiltration investigator.
R v. Anwar & ors [C.C.C.] 2016
James Martin appeared as a top consultant. 9 The defendants have been charged with trafficking and money laundering for prostitution. In this case, an investigation of a conspiracy was lon g-term. The center of the evidence was the flight record, remittance record, mobile phone download, and anonymous evidence of anonymous eavesdropping, and anonymous evidence of anonymous eavesdropping evidence. After a substantial legal debate, the country was convinced to reduce the appeal to the defendant. < SPAN> James Martin has appeared as a lawyer in a multiple armed collusion case supplying cannabis and cocaine. The case was a large LED intelligence strategy focusing on one of the defendants, who was said to be the leader of the organizational crime group that supplies a large amount of cocaine and cannabis. Important evidence was obtained from the combination of telephone / mobile phones and the combination of products obtained from a secret eavesdropping device installed in the defendant's car.
R v. V & T [C.O.A] 2015
James Martin served as a lawyer in a mult i-arm mortgage fraud collusion in CCC. Suspicion was developed mainly in a company, which is said to have been established to provide a mortgage loan without asking questions to the individual of the criminal fraternity. The defendant is an employee of the company and is said to have benefited from such a mortgage. Her husband was involved in money laundering and drug trafficking. She was trained by Thomas Boyd Wight.
R v. N & ors [Bristol] 2015
James Martin stood only as a junior. A larg e-scale conspiracy that supplies A and B-class drugs.
R v. Y 2016
James Martin is in charge of defense only as a junior. The case was related to the revenue of the complex scam scheme in Europe. Various fake companies offered their customers to work as a luxury companion for the wealthy. Another aspect of the scam was a production that provided appear in pornographic films. Both were siam, and the gold received from the stakeholders in advance was in line with British law.R v. V 2016
James Martin was in charge of defense only as a junior. The biggest firearm import case to the UK. The weapon was a military assault rifle that could be used for "Pari s-type" attacks in the UK. The weapon was smuggled on a boat in Kent, and was stopped by an armed infiltration investigator.
R v. Davies & ors [Southwark] 2016
James Martin appeared as a top consultant. 9 The defendants have been charged with trafficking and money laundering for prostitution. In this case, an investigation of a conspiracy was lon g-term. The center of the evidence was the flight record, remittance record, mobile phone download, and anonymous evidence of anonymous eavesdropping, and anonymous evidence of anonymous eavesdropping evidence. After a substantial legal debate, the country was convinced to reduce the appeal to the defendant. James Martin has appeared as a lawyer in several armed collusions supplying cannabis and cocaine. The case was a large LED intelligence strategy focusing on one of the defendants, who was said to be the leader of the organizational crime group that supplies a large amount of cocaine and cannabis. Important evidence was obtained from the combination of telephone / mobile phones and the combination of products obtained from a secret eavesdropping device installed in the defendant's car.
H v. H 2015
James Martin served as a lawyer in a mult i-arm mortgage fraud collusion in CCC. Suspicion was developed mainly in a company, which is said to have been established to provide a mortgage loan without asking questions to the individual of the criminal fraternity. The defendant is an employee of the company and is said to have benefited from such a mortgage. Her husband was involved in money laundering and drug trafficking. She was trained by Thomas Boyd Wight.
LB of Waltham Forest v. M 2015
James Martin stood only as a junior. A larg e-scale conspiracy that supplies A and B-class drugs.
Kent CC v. B [Medway CC] 2016
James Martin is in charge of defense only as a junior. The case was related to the revenue of the complex scam scheme in Europe. Various fake companies offered their customers to work as a luxury companion for the wealthy. Another aspect of the scam was a production that provided appear in pornographic films. Both were siam, and the gold received from the stakeholders in advance was in line with British law.
R v. Prospere [Turks & Caicos Islands] 2014
James Martin was in charge of defense only as a junior. The biggest firearm import case to the UK. The weapon was a military assault rifle that could be used for "Pari s-type" attacks in the UK. The weapon was smuggled on a boat in Kent, and was stopped by an armed infiltration investigator.
R v Mote [Southwark] 2016
James Martin appeared as a top consultant. 9 The defendants have been charged with trafficking and money laundering for prostitution. In this case, an investigation of a conspiracy was lon g-term. The center of the evidence was the flight record, remittance record, mobile phone download, and anonymous evidence of anonymous eavesdropping, and anonymous evidence of anonymous eavesdropping evidence. After a substantial legal debate, the country was convinced to reduce the appeal to the defendant.
R v. O & ors [Snaresbrook] 2015
Gordon Curse was instructed as a prosecutor's lawyer in a multifaceted prosecution based on a joint investigation between Hungary and the Metropolitan Police in Hungary and the Metropolitan Police, which aimed at sexual exploitation. The trial is expected to last several months.
R v. W & ors [Bristol] 2015
Gordon Curse appeared as a single prosecutor's lawyer in a trial with a firearm possession with a firearm possession of life. The prosecution was caused by the investigation of the "Trident Operation", which was about the loaded sa w-cut shotgun and ammunition. The case was convicted based on the interpretation of DNA evidence.
R v. P [Inner London] 2015
Gordon Curse has served as a prosecutor's solo lawyer in an attempted simultaneous murder. The case was investigated by Trident East Gang Crime Command. As a result of a fou r-week trial, the defendants are convicted of attempted murder (firing) and many other firearm crimes. A total of 46 years was sentenced.
R v. Jones [C.C.C.] 2015
Gordon Curse was instructed as a sel f-defense lawyer in a mult i-level cocaine test bid. The observation case greatly depends on secret eavesdropping, mobile site data, ANPR records, call data, and text messages. The defendant was the only acquitted person.
R v. Paul [Blackfriars] 2015
Gordon Curse participates in this multiple conspiracy trial with Ben Holt as a lawyer. The defendant is said to have been involved in collusion to supply more than 600 pounds in the area around Portsmouth. The defendant's involvement and role were backed by cocaine, call data, and text messages. The defendant was acquitted. A total of 54 years were sentenced.
R v. Dwayne Henry [Blackfriars] 2015
Gordon Curse taught as a lawyer on the defense in a multiple armed collusion case that handles stolen goods. The defendant was a leader in a highly specialized car theft team targeting luxury BMW due to security flaws in alarms and immobilizer systems. The conspiracy operated a number of "chop shops" and often transported vehicles to dismantle within 24 hours before sending vehicles to Lithuania. The conspiracy is estimated to be involved in the theft of more than 10 million pounds. < SPAN> Gordon Curse was instructed as a prosecutor's lawyer in a multifaceted prosecution based on a joint investigation between Hungary and the Metropolitan Police in the Joint Shade and Metropolitan Police for sexual exploitation. The trial is expected to last several months.
R v. H & anr [Southwark] 2015
Gordon Curse appeared as a single prosecutor's lawyer in a trial with a firearm possession with a firearm possession of life. The prosecution was caused by the investigation of the "Trident Operation", which was about the loaded sa w-cut shotgun and ammunition. The case was convicted based on the interpretation of DNA evidence.
R v. Vassell & ors [C.C.C.] 2016
Gordon Curse has served as a prosecutor's solo lawyer in an attempted simultaneous murder. The case was investigated by Trident East Gang Crime Command. As a result of a fou r-week trial, the defendants are convicted of attempted murder (firing) and many other firearm crimes. A total of 46 years was sentenced.
Operation Lenwade [C.C.C.] 2016
Gordon Curse was instructed as a sel f-defense lawyer in a mult i-level cocaine test bid. The observation case greatly depends on secret eavesdropping, mobile site data, ANPR records, call data, and text messages. The defendant was the only acquitted person.
R v. Eren & ors [Wood Green] 2016
Gordon Curse participates in this multiple conspiracy trial with Ben Holt as a lawyer. The defendant is said to have been involved in collusion to supply more than 600 pounds in the area around Portsmouth. The defendant's involvement and role were backed by cocaine, call data, and text messages. The defendant was acquitted. A total of 54 years were sentenced.
R v. M [Maidstone] 2014
Gordon Curse taught as a lawyer on the defense in a multiple armed collusion case that handles stolen goods. The defendant was a leader in a highly specialized car theft team targeting luxury BMW due to security flaws in alarms and immobilizer systems. The conspiracy operated a number of "chop shops" and often transported vehicles to dismantle within 24 hours before sending vehicles to Lithuania. The conspiracy is estimated to be involved in the theft of more than 10 million pounds. Gordon Curse was instructed as a prosecutor's lawyer in a multifaceted prosecution based on a joint investigation between Hungary and the Metropolitan Police in Hungary and the Metropolitan Police, which aimed at sexual exploitation. The trial is expected to last several months.
R v. Raison & Dent [Snaresbrook] 2014
R v. Phillips & ors [C.C.C.] 2015
Gordon Curse appeared as a single prosecutor's lawyer in a trial with a firearm possession with a firearm possession of life. The prosecution was caused by the investigation of the "Trident Operation", which was about the loaded sa w-cut shotgun and ammunition. The case was convicted based on the interpretation of DNA evidence.
R v. Steinmetz [Snaresbrook] 2015
Gordon Curse has served as a prosecutor's solo lawyer in an attempted simultaneous murder. The case was investigated by Trident East Gang Crime Command. As a result of a fou r-week trial, the defendants are convicted of attempted murder (firing) and many other firearm crimes. A total of 46 years was sentenced.
R v. A & A [Portsmouth] 2015
Gordon Curse was instructed as a sel f-defense lawyer in a mult i-level cocaine test bid. The observation case greatly depends on secret eavesdropping, mobile site data, ANPR records, call data, and text messages. The defendant was the only acquitted person.
R v. Arthy & ors [C.C.C.] 2016
Gordon Curse participates in this multiple conspiracy trial with Ben Holt as a lawyer. The defendant is said to have been involved in collusion to supply more than 600 pounds in the area around Portsmouth. The defendant's involvement and role were backed by cocaine, call data, and text messages. The defendant was acquitted. A total of 54 years were sentenced.
R v. Huckle [C.C.C.] 2016
Gordon Curse taught as a lawyer on the defense in a multiple armed collusion case that handles stolen goods. The defendant was a leader in a highly specialized car theft team targeting luxury BMW due to security flaws in alarms and immobilizer systems. The conspiracy operated a number of "chop shops" and often transported vehicles to dismantle within 24 hours before sending vehicles to Lithuania. The conspiracy is estimated to be involved in the theft of more than 10 million pounds.
R v. Miakheel [C.C.C.] 2016
Gordon Curse appeared as a lawyer on the lawyer in a trial with a plurality of firearms with the intention of exposing life. The case was investigated by the West Yorkshire Police Murder and Complex Case Section. The defendant is said to have moved from London for the purpose of attacking a person related to multiple kilometers of heroin imports. During the incident, firearms were fired many times. The relationship and role between the defendant and the crime were backed by text messages, text calls, mobile phones, and ANPR records. The defendant was acquitted. The two c o-defendants, who have been refined separately, were convicted and were sentenced to 16 years in prison.
R v. Fruen [C.C.C.] 2016
R v. Salah & 4 ors [Chelmsford] 2016
Lawyer Ben Holt defended defendants who were charged with firearm possession and drugs on the intention of exposing life. Confirmed with drug crimes and simply possession of firearms. 8 years in prison.
R v. Mahmood & Smith - “The Fake Sheikh Trial” [C.C.C] 2016
Catherine Patisson led the prosecutor Ben Holt in two separate litigation procedures on Romanians accused of skimming in the ATM card fraud "Skimming". This was an advanced organizational crime group equipped to capture the details of the personal bank account when inserting a card into the ATM. A total of 13 defendants have been charged with a crime from conspiracy to disappearing, possession of goods used for fraud, and transfer of criminal assets. (DCPCU, who was instructed by CPS SCU, investigated). Mirror Online news.
R v. Edgington [C.C.C.] 2013
Catherine Farly defends Ben Holt. The defendants were charged with the union arranged for a driver's license test on behalf of others. An NCA survey entrusted by the CPS organizational crime team. Click here for the news report.
R v. AS & 17ors [Cambridge] 2015
Jonathan Pornei defended Ben Holt in a nin e-handed fraud incident, created by internal conversations working in the Nation Wide Bank. The incident included a large amount of forensic evidence and bank transaction evidence. (DCPCU, who was instructed by CPS SCU, surveyed). The jury could not make a decision to the defendant, who was called "insider." She was prosecuted himself, and the defendant was convicted. The e-mail report
Operation Volmar [Croydon] 2016
Ben Holt represented the husband of an NHS employee in a prosecution brought by NHS Protect. The wife allegedly stole £300, 000 from her employer whilst employed by the NHS. The husband allegedly obtained the criminal property. A significant amount of evidence was adduced (over 10, 000 pages). Ben acted alone. The other parties in the trial had two counsel. Hund jury. Reported by the Evening Standard.
R v. Oakley & ors [Birmingham] 2014
Ben Holt prosecuting counsel in an armed robbery trial. The prosecution case was based solely on ANPR, mobile site and other circumstantial evidence. The defendant was convicted and given a life sentence.R v. Bates & ors [Maidstone] 2014
Katherine Pattison defended Ben Holt and represented the prosecution in this case in five trials. Advice was given on the review of a significant amount of unused material in this case. This included downloads from over 40 mobile phones. There were numerous issues of disclosure of confidential information. The case against the defendant relied solely on mobile phone and tracker evidence. One of the accused was convicted and sentenced to 12 years imprisonment. Directed to plan notice of appeal for the accused. Leave refused and renewed in full court but refused. (Investigation by Idnap & amp; amp; Order of the MET's Special Investigation Unit, CPS SCU).R v. Oshodi & ors [Southwark] 2015
Charged a defendant with possession with intent to supply £20. 000 of Class A drugs and possession of a loaded firearm with intent to endanger life.R v. Cleland & 6 ors [Ipswich] 2012
Represented one of five defendants charged with conspiracy to extract a valuable motor vehicle worth over £100. 000. After plea bargaining, the grounds leading to a suspended sentence were challenged. He trained with Thomas Boyd Whyte Solicitors.
R v ABCD (Joint Enterprise) [2010] 2 Cr.App.R 32 2010
Charged a defendant extradited to the UK on multiple charges of theft by his employer.
R v Ramchurn (Diminished responsibility) [2010] 2 Cr.App.R.3 2010
Represented a company director accused of fraudulent transactions arising from what the prosecution described as a "copycat website". Initially the prosecution suggested the amount of the fraud to be £500. 000. Negotiations resulted in an accepted plea to breach of the Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 and the defendant received a very conditional discharge. The defendant also received a restraining order in the proceedings which the prosecution alleged the defendant had breached in contempt proceedings which were subsequently withdrawn. He trained at Thomas Boyd White LLP.
R v. B & ors [Maidstone] 2014
Represented the defendant over three days for the loss of approximately £100, 000 in cash through multiple seizures. There was a complex legal debate about the application of proportionality in such proceedings. Trained at Thomas Boyd Whyte Solicitors.
R v. H & ors [Croydon] 2011
Sengin Kong acted for the appellant in a successful appeal against the seizure order and praised Dr Davis JD for the clarity of his written and oral submissions. The appellant argued that debts incurred solely by the appellant using the family home as security should have been paid from the sale proceeds before being divided between the appellant and his wife, who shared equally in the beneficial interest in the property. On appeal the Crown accepted this was wrong and the Court of Appeal found that these debts should have been paid from the appellant's share of the sale proceeds or else it would have been disproportionate.
R v. B & ors [Cardiff] 2009
Katherine Farrelly represented Sengin Kong in a prosecution of six defendants for offences including attempted murder, possession of a firearm for the purpose of robbery and conspiracy to rob. At the end of the prosecution hearing, the judge upheld the plea of no contest to charges of attempted murder and possession of a firearm for the purpose of robbery. As a result, the prosecution moved for an expedited trial. The Court of Appeal allowed the prosecution's appeal and the trial continued on all charges. Leveson LJ delivered the court's judgment, which is reported here. The six defendants were ultimately convicted of possession of a firearm with intent to rob and conspiracy to rob. The case involved complex evidence and legal reasoning. Read the Guardian report here.
R v. M & ors [Winchester] 2007
Hannah Wyatt solicitor successfully appealed against sentences on fraud and money laundering. The sentence was reduced from three years to two years.
R v. H & ors [Southwark] 2005
Peter Briegel led Hannah Wyatt in defending the senior members of a conspiracy to manufacture crystal meth, amphetamine and MDMA and conducted this 12-week Bristol trial. It was an unusual case in the UK, where knowledge of crystal methamphetamine was scarce and over 500 hours of covert recordings were made. Trained at Blackfords LLP.
R v. T [Woolwich] 2014
Hannah Wyatt solicitor defended a fraud by misrepresentation claim. Successful application to dismiss.
R v. W [Canterbury] 2014
Defendant Hannah Wyatt in Access Trial. He succeeded in a court argument about the illegal police officer on the defendant's house. After that, no evidence was submitted.
R v. B [Canterbury] 2015
Christopher Sato n-Matox and Hannah Wyatt were in charge of the defense in the thre e-month Sazak trial, when the mastermind was charged with a gift scam over £ 5 million. The unexpected situation has led Hanna Wayatt to conduct the case after the third week. This includes court arguments, opposition to unions, including the son and daughter of the defendant, and the response of the speech.
R v. K [Canterbury] 2015
Hanna Wyatt served as a father's agent in a trial that was revealed in a private law procedure. The mother claimed many DV acts. The fact was not certified, and a childcare arrangement order was agreed.
R v. W [Inner London] 2016
Hannah Wyatt has served as a father's agent, who was allegedly trying to take her to Syria to kidnap her child and join ISIS to join ISIS.
R v. S [Canterbury] 2016
Hannah Wyatt served as an agent of his father, who was accused of being injured by a 1 0-day baby.
R v. C & ors [Kingston] 2016
Fiona Ryan appeared in the Providensian High Court in the Thaks Kaikos Islands in a court in an armed robbery case where the hearing was suspended after submitting the answer.
R v. B & ors [Basildon] 2014
Asuka Fujita served as an agent in the confiscation procedure of a former European Congress, who was convicted of fraud and money laundering crime. The case contained complex legal issues on the impact of the trust and the amount available. The lawyer was requested by Sternberg Reed. Click here for Daily Mail article.
R v. B I 2016
Christopher Sutto n-Matox defend Andrew Corps in the first instance, then defends Samantha Bonner, and in Snares Brook Crown Court, a lon g-term trial on multiple false accusations and injury incidents in failed drug transactions. And was in charge of the reinstatement trial. These kidnapper were burned by iron and body while being confined for false accusations.
R v. D [Inner London] 2016
Regarding collusion to produce female, MDMA and amphetamine crystals, he led Samantha Bonner in a 1 3-week trial at the Bristol Royal Palace. In this case, information disclosure and personal information issues were issues, and complicated legal controversy was developed on police investigations, which were the basis for the crown side.
R v. Miah [Bristol] 2016
Samantha Bonner assisted Mark Haywood QC and succeeded in a murder of London tourists who left the nightclub early in the morning.
R v. Coad [Maidstone] 2016
Jonathan Polnay appeared as a Crown witness in the prosecution of a City banker who defrauded friends and colleagues out of £1. 8 million in a fake investment scheme. Read the report here
R v. Kulczycki [Maidstone] 2016
Jonathan Higgs QC, who led Jonathan Polnay, prosecuted the prolific paedophile. Polnay was found guilty by a jury of serious sexual abuse of boys he looked after at a Lambeth children's home. http://www. bbc. co. uk/news/uk-england-london-35316685
R v. Porter [Maidstone] 2016
Mark Heywood QC, who led Jonathan Polnay, prosecuted and stood trial for the self-described "Hackney Ripper", who was convicted of a series of resource rapes and given a life sentence. He had previously been acquitted of rape charges. The defendant successfully applied to have his acquittal set aside under the double jeopardy provisions of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and was joined to a new trial with new proceedings. Read the Daily Mail article here.
R v. James [St Albans] 2016
Jonathan Polnay appeared as a Crown witness in the prosecution of a City banker who defrauded friends and colleagues out of £1. 8 million in a fake investment scheme. Read the report here
R v. W [Maidstone] 2016
Jonathan Polnay successfully prosecuted this case of kidnapping, blackmail and torture at the Central Criminal Court. Following a drug debt, the defendants kidnapped the victim and held him hostage. When the demanded ransom was not paid he was subjected to multiple sadistic attacks. http://www. mirror. co. uk/news/world-news/reservoir-dogs-inspired-gang-tortured-7313282
R v. N [Woolwich] 2015
Mark Heywood QC and Jonathan Polnay prosecuted this seven-count gang trial at the Central Criminal Court, which stemmed from a feud between two notorious Hackney gangs. Following the guilty verdicts, YouTube came under considerable pressure to remove videos that glorified gang activity. Read the Daily Mail article here
R v. England [Lewes] 2015
Jonathan Polnay was charged at Woolwich Crown Court with conspiring to escape the six-man gang and possessing a false firefighter as the sole underling. The case centred around a plot to free Izzet Eren while he was being transported to Wood Green Crown Court to be sentenced for firearms offences. During a police operation to disrupt the planned crime, firearms officers shot and killed a man in a car with his accomplice. Read the BBC News report here.
R v. R [Maidstone] 2015
Charlotte Newwell is in charge of a 8 5-yea r-old police officer suffering from Alzheimer's disease, who was sued in 1966 for abusing a 4-yea r-old child. The instructor is Thos Boyd WHYTE.
R v. J [Maidstone] 2015
Anthony Orchard QC defended Charlotte Newwell to the royal family in the Old Bailey Hackney Gangland murder. Click here for news
R v. D [Inner London] 2015
Charlotte Newwell appears as a prosecutor in a Jewish Halledi trial, who has been confined and raped his e x-wife in his own "dungeon". http: // www. Ibtimes. co. co-jewish-Jewish-who-tied-WHO-TIED-WIED-WIFED-WIFE-SEXON-DUNGEON-DUNGEON-MAKES-LEGAL-HISTORY-1510132
R v. N [Maidstone] 2015
Charlotte Newwell has succeeded in defending a couple's wife who is allegedly for child abuse among the ten children. Requested from Edward Hayes LLP.
R v. Capper [Maidstone] 2014
Charlotte Newwell was in charge of the defendant, and as a result of Old Bailey's lon g-term trial, he was innocent in the conspiracy of importing a large amount of automatic rifles. http: // www. Express. Co. co. UK/news/uk/663359/hary-shilling-michael-defraine-cuxton-cuxton-marina-rochester-michael-topolski.
R v. Langridge [Maidstone] 2014
Under the direction of Brian O'Neill QC, Charlotte Newwell has committed many victims, including infants, for 10 years, and is called "British the worst pediatrician", Richard Hackle. Protected. 22 times life sentence, at least 25 years in prison, http: // www. Bbc. Co. Co. UK/news/uk-36458472 http: // www. Dailymail. Co. Co. UK/news/Article-3620004/Britain-S-WORST- Paedophile-Richard-Huckle-Admits-Scores-Attack-children. HTML.R v. Collins [Maidstone] 2014
Charlotte Newwell was instructed by Brendan Fumukane QC in the case of a 1 5-yea r-old boy who was stabbed during drug trading and charged with murder, and was in charge of the British Prosecutor's Office. http: // www. bbc. co. co.
R v. O’Rahilly & ors [Southwark] 2014
Jonathan Higgs QC defended five men in the murder trial after victims were robbed in Bazildon, Essex. Stamburg Reed defends.
R v. Ford [Maidstone] 2014
Sarah Four Show, led by Danny Robinson, is charged with the charges of the "fake seque" and his driver to bend the "fake seque" and his driver over the prosecution of the failed pop star, Turisa Contrabros. I was instructed and succeeded. http: // www. Dailymail. co. UK/new/Article-3819690/FAKE-SHEIKH-MAZHER-GUILTY-TULISA-COCAINE-STING
R v. P [Kingston] 2014
Mark Heywood QC has dismissed the trial of psychiatric patient Nicola Edgington who murdered two women in Bexleyheath. Click here for more information about this trial.
R v. Olson [Maidstone] 2014
Irshad Sheikh defended in a case of conspiracy to supply class A and B drugs. The case involved hours of secret recordings and over 50, 000 pages of depositions and reports.
R v. Bailey [Snaresbrook] 2014
Irshad Sheikh defended in this significant conspiracy to obtain huge sums of money from local authorities and individuals through carers employed in breach of immigration laws, and then launder the proceeds of crime. He is EBR Attridge trained.
R v. Awoyemi & ors [Inner London] 2014
Mark Dacey defended in this large scale V. A. T. fraud case. He is Goldcornes trained.
R v. Rasalingham [Maidstone] 2013
Mark Dacey defended in a complex large scale pyramid scheme fraud. He is Berry & Lamberts trained.
R v. Haque [Snaresbrook & C.O.A.] 2013
Mark Dacey defended in a long running fraud trial in Southwark. He is Thomas Boyd Whyte trained.
R v. Idehen [Woolwich] 2013
Defended a lengthy trial of seven people for import duty evasion on over 20 million contraband cigarettes. Trained by Thomas Boyd Wight.
R v. John Davies & [Maidstone] 2013
Mark Dacey appeared under the direction of Ian Glen QC in this reported case of joint enterprise murder - R V ABCD (Joint Enterprise) [2010] 2 CR. APP. R 32.
R v. Carrington [Snaresbrook] 2013
Mark Dacey appeared under the direction of Ian Glen QC in this reported case of diminished responsibility in murder trials.
R v. Qasim & anr [Snaresbrook] 2013
Mark Dacey also appeared under the direction of Ian Glen QC in one of four people in a violent revenge attack in Kent. The victim's body was found on a beach, bludgeoned to death after an alleged sexual assault on the defendant's girlfriend, in a cleaned up condition.
R v. De-Castro [Inner London] 2013
Irshad Sheikh was appointed as lead counsel in a VHCC ("very expensive legal proceeding") which was over 80 pages long. This is seen as a sustained, substantial and serious attack on the UK income tax system.
R v. CO [Croydon] 2016
Irshad Sheikh acted as lead counsel in a major credit card company fraud case (VHCC).
R v. Abdelrahman [Blackfriars] 2012
Irshad Sheikh was called as lead counsel in a conspiracy to defraud National Westminster Bank Plc, involving identity theft and widespread and large scale breach of bank accounts.
R v. JS [C.C.C.] 2011
Irshad Sheikh was lead counsel in this multi-layered VHCC fraud report case involving a company that made millions of pounds by dumping letters and parcels that were paid for delivery by Royal Mail. Among the 360. 000 pieces of postal mail dumped were hospital blood test results, university acceptance letters and charity mail.
R v. Beckett [Inner London] 2012
Dominic Webber defended in a historic case of sexual assault by a 12 year old girl on her younger brother. At the time, facts were investigated but not prosecuted, so no evidence was offered after a skeleton argument alleging abuse of process.
R v. Caird & ors [Maidstone] 2012
Dominic Webber successfully defended an assault with penetration and other sexual offences against a 10 year old girl by an elderly relative who was cleared of all charges.
R v. Nash [Maidstone] 2012
Dominic Webber defended a lorry driver who imported 2kg of heroin and 18kg of cocaine into Holdall in an HGV trailer and was cleared of all charges.
R v. McElwaine [Woolwich] 2011
Dominic Weber successfully defended an SC18 assault charge, where the victim suffered multiple stab wounds, with the defence being self-defence.
R v. Newell [Reading] 2011
Dominic Weber represented a defendant who was cleared of charges of child sexual abuse and downloading indecent images.
R v. Swash [Snaresbrook] 2011
Dominic Weber represented a defendant who was cleared of charges of violent behaviour towards a colleague.
R v. Caird [Maidstone] 2011
Pieter Briegel defended the 8 week trial of a post office worker who was charged along with 5 other defendants in a complex high value fraud case against his employer. Trained by Thomas Boyd White.
R v. Tear & ors [Reading] 2011
Pieter Briegel led Danny Robinson in this 12 week drugs conspiracy trial in which an undercover police officer was attacked and had to escape his attackers by jumping from a first floor window. He was trained by Thomas Boyd Wight.
Essex CC v. C & M 2013
Paul Jackson represented a man accused of the verbal rape of an 8 year old boy. In this case, the defendant's grandmother became a foster carer and looked after a 7-year-old boy with autism from 2009 to 2011. In 2014, the boy alleged that the defendant, then aged 14 and 15, had repeatedly raped him while in his care. The case involved cross-examination of the 14-year-old autistic complainant and the analysis of a significant amount of third-party material. The defendant was acquitted.
R v. G [Maidstone] 2008
Paul Jackson was asked to defend a 8 3-yea r-old man who was charged with five girls from 1970 to 1975. After the crown trial was over, I applied for a suspension of prosecution because the delay in the trial prevented the defendant from receiving a fair trial, which would result in the abuse of the procedure. This application was successful.
R v. C & ors [Croydon] 2009
Paul Jackson was in charge of defending a man who was accused of Londo n-based gang leader. The gang was supplied to Swindon with a large amount of A-class drugs as part of multiple armed conspiracy. The incident focused on the careful analysis of mobile site data.
R v. K & ors [C.C.C.] 2010
Paul Jackson defended a man who was charged with hitting another man who lost consciousness in a drunken brawl. The defendant argued that it was a legitimate defense. The incident was shot by CCTV. The defendant was acquitted.
R v. R [Canterbury] 2011
Paul Jackson was in charge of defense of a man with an emotional unstable personality disorder prosecuted in the attempted murder. While driving the car, the defendant dropped the sidewalk and hit a man who had protested before. Kent Online News Report
R v. E [Canterbury] 2013
Paul Jackson served as an agent of a former scout leader who was accused of reckless acts on children 23 years ago. In the trial, the second child could be summoned as a witnesses. An important point in the trial was that the defendant succeeded in accepting the 2009 imprisonment for 15 crimes, which created about 2, 000 children's obscene images. The defendant was acquitted. Kent Online News Report
R v. J & ors [Snaresbrook] 2013
Paul Jackson is in charge of a man who was charged with hitting other men who lost their consciousness in a drunken brawl. The defendant claimed that he had just acted for legitimate defense. The incident was shot by CCTV. The defendant was acquitted.
R v. M & ors [Wood Green] 2013
Paul Jackson has been on behalf of a male defendant who was charged with 21 forced obscene crimes, including insertions to six complaints for 30 years. The plaintiff contained the defendant's daughter and two nephew niece.
R v. DC & ors [Birmingham] 2017
Paul Jackson has succeeded in defending a man who was charged with rape over the age of 13 over the years. In this case, it was necessary to analyze important thir d-party evidence.
R v. Richards [Basildon] 2014
Paul Jackson defended a male defendant, who was charged with rape a friend woman with a physical disability. In this case, the issue was whether there was an insert or whether it was inserted.
R v. Gurklytre [Inner London] 2014
Paul Jackson succeeded in defending a 1 6-yea r-old autism man who was charged with rape his fiv e-yea r-old cousin. The defendant determined that the diagnosis was determined to have no ability to take the trial, but did not prove that the act was not performed in the subsequent trial.
R v. Gibney & ors [C.C.C.] 2014
Paul Jackson, with his wife, was in charge of a man who was charged with his cousin's rape case. The cause was that the plaintiff was introduced to sex by a c o-defendant at an early age, then defendant, and was raped multiple times.
R v. Collier [Croydon] 2014
Paul Jackson defended a man who was charged with rape his cousin. The defendant rape his cousin while his cousin was staying in his cousin's parents' home after the New Year's Eve party. The defendant denied sexual intercourse. The defendant was acquitted.
R v. BD & 6 ors [C.C.C.] 2014
Paul Jackson defended a man who was accused of having sexually assaulted a fou r-yea r-old named parent. In this case, a fiv e-yea r-old plaintiff (now elderly) witness interrogation was held.
R v. Flynn & 9 ors [Southwark] 2014
Paul Jackson was in charge of a man who was charged with robbery, intentional injury, and aggressive weapons. The alleged was that the defendant attacked a man who had an affair with his e x-wife at midnight and revenge. A knife was used for the attack. Kent Online News Report
R v. Dennard & ors [Maidstone] 2014
Paul Jackson succeeded in defending a woman who was charged with fraud.
R v. Saunders & ors [Guildford] 2014
Paul Jackson succeeded in defending a woman who was charged with fraud.
R v. Smith & ors [Guildford] 2014
Paul Jackson was in charge of defending a man who was charged from April 05, 1988 to April 16, 2014, a man who was charged with more than £ 1 million from various local governments in DWP and London. 。 The charges were that the defendant adopted multiple identity and claimed the benefits with these fake identity for several years.
R v. Hillier & ors [Croydon] 2014
Paul Jackson defended a 2 5-yea r-old man who was charged with multiple charges that had 12 different children under the age of 16 or sacrificed sexual activity. The defendant was a soccer coach with high skills, spoofing a 1 6-yea r-old woman Sara Sawyer on Facebook, induced or incitement of sexual acts. In this case, digital forensic analysis was emphasized. Kent Online News Report
R v. W [Wood Green] 2014
Paul Jackson was in charge of defense for a 7 5-yea r-old man (4 to 9 years old at the time), who was charged with his daughter's obscene act from 1970 to 1976. The defendant denied the charges. An important issue in the trial was in 2001 convicted in 2001, from 1974 to 1983, when his child was eight to 16 years old.
R v. H & 6 ors [Winchester] 2013
Paul Jackson defended his former employer's chest with a shotgun from a close range and was charged with the murder. BBC News
R v. O’Reilly & ors [Reading] 2013
Paul Jackson defended a man who was intentionally charged with his brother injured. The defendant acknowledged that he had injured his younger brother, but only had the plaintiff injured a part of the defendant's nose, and had just injured his brother to defend. The incident was rejected in hal f-time.
R v. P [Woolwich] 2013
Paul Jackson defended a male defendant trying to kill two men on two different opportunities. The charges were associated with the gang activity and the firearms that the defendants had possessed a few days after the defendant's fatal firing incident. The first suspicion was rejected, and the second allegation ended in hal f-time. In this case, gang evidence was greatly involved. R v voyemi and Others (2016) 4 W. L. R. 114
R v. Folkes [Wood Green] 2013
Paul Jackson defended a man who was charged with the other six for the crime of collusion of the Sri Lankan. The defendant stopped with three foreigners on the truck bed. The case was conducted by police in the United Kingdom, France, Germany and the Netherlands. The incident was rejected in hal f-time. < SPAN> Paul Jackson defended a 2 5-yea r-old man who was charged with several different children under the age of 16 or sacrifice sexual activity. The defendant was a soccer coach with high skills, spoofing a 1 6-yea r-old woman Sara Sawyer on Facebook, induced or incitement of sexual acts. In this case, digital forensic analysis was emphasized. Kent Online News Report
R v. F & ors [Maidstone] 2013
Paul Jackson was in charge of defense for a 7 5-yea r-old man (4 to 9 years old at the time), who was charged with his daughter's obscene act from 1970 to 1976. The defendant denied the charges. An important issue in the trial was in 2001 convicted in 2001, from 1974 to 1983, when his child was eight to 16 years old.
R v. JS & ors [Woolwich] 2013
Paul Jackson defended his former employer's chest with a shotgun from a close range and was charged with the murder. BBC News
R v. Pooke [Maidstone] 2012
Paul Jackson defended a man who was intentionally charged with his brother injured. The defendant acknowledged that he had injured his younger brother, but only had the plaintiff injured a part of the defendant's nose, and had just injured his brother to defend. The incident was rejected in hal f-time.
Operation Castle [Maidstone] 2012
Paul Jackson defended a male defendant trying to kill two men on two different opportunities. The charges were associated with the gang activity and the firearms that the defendants had possessed a few days after the defendant's fatal firing incident. The first suspicion was rejected, and the second allegation ended in hal f-time. In this case, gang evidence was greatly involved. R v voyemi and Others (2016) 4 W. L. R. 114
R v. RB & ors [Maidstone] 2012
Paul Jackson defended a man who was charged with the other six for the crime of collusion of the Sri Lankan. The defendant stopped with three foreigners on the truck bed. The case was conducted by police in the United Kingdom, France, Germany and the Netherlands. The incident was rejected in hal f-time. Paul Jackson defended a 2 5-yea r-old man who was charged with multiple charges that had 12 different children under the age of 16 or sacrificed sexual activity. The defendant was a soccer coach with high skills, spoofing a 1 6-yea r-old woman Sara Sawyer on Facebook, induced or incitement of sexual acts. In this case, digital forensic analysis was emphasized. Kent Online News Report
Operation Vara 2012
Paul Jackson was in charge of defense for a 7 5-yea r-old man (4 to 9 years old at the time), who was charged with his daughter's obscene act from 1970 to 1976. The defendant denied the charges. An important issue in the trial was in 2001 convicted in 2001, from 1974 to 1983, when his child was eight to 16 years old.
R v. Dos Santos & ors [Blackfriars] 2012
Paul Jackson defended his former employer's chest with a shotgun from a close range and was charged with the murder. BBC News
R v. Rasalla & ors [Northampton] 2009
Paul Jackson defended a man who was intentionally charged with his brother injured. The defendant acknowledged that he had injured his younger brother, but only had the plaintiff injured a part of the defendant's nose, and had just injured his brother to defend. The incident was rejected in hal f-time.
R v. McKenzie-Hewitt [C.C.C.] 2009
Paul Jackson defended a male defendant trying to kill two men on two different opportunities. The charges were associated with the gang activity and the firearms that the defendants had possessed a few days after the defendant's fatal firing incident. The first suspicion was rejected, and the second allegation ended in hal f-time. In this case, gang evidence was greatly involved. R v voyemi and Others (2016) 4 W. L. R. 114
R v. Flinders [Kingston] 2005
Paul Jackson defended a man who was charged with the other six for the crime of collusion of the Sri Lankan. The defendant stopped with three foreigners on the truck bed. The case was conducted by police in the United Kingdom, France, Germany and the Netherlands. The incident was rejected in hal f-time.
R v. Pennells & ors [Winchester] 2005
Paul Jackson defended his brothers to a man who was sued by harassment that was terrified of violence. The plaintiff lost his trust during the confrontation, did not submit evidence, and explained to the jury that "the plaintiff's credibility had declined to the point where it disappeared." An innocent decision was given. The judge later imposed a prohibition order after acquitted, based on Article 5 A (1) of the Protection Law of the 1997 harassment, but was later destroyed by the Court of Appeal. R V Mohammed Emanul Haque (2014) EWCA CRIM 832 and R V Mohammed Emanul Haque (2015) EWCA CRIM 767.
R v. Geir & ors [Croydon] 2008
Paul Jackson served as a lawyer in a case where a man housed in a safe ward at a psychiatric hospital was killed.
R v. Iain Davis [H.O.L.] 2008
Paul Jackson intentionally beat the plaintiff's head and defended a man who was accused of being charged with the other three for severely injured. In the hal f-term sentence, the prison was not successful due to the inconvenience of identification evidence. The defendant was acquitted. Asked by Berry & Lumberz Law Office.
R v C & 8 ors [Snaresbrook] 2016
Paul Jackson defended a man who was charged with crime of cultivating cannabis on his home premises. The defendant's fingerprint was detected from the bulb in the building. The defendant denied any knowledge of cannabis. The defendant was acquitted.
R v A & ors [Southwark] 2016
Paul Jackson defended a man who was kidnapped and raped. He was alleged that the defendant and another man were mixed with the plaintiff, invited her to the store, forcibly restrained her with the help of another person and rape. The defense was an agreement. An important issue in the trial was evidence of the expert about the amount of alcohol drunk by the plaintiff and how long it would give her. The defendant was acquitted.
R v H [Hull] 2016
Paul Jackson defended a man who was intentionally injured. The defendant beat the plaintiff's head twice with a hammer. This was recognized, but the defense claimed that it was a legitimate defense and an act to protect others. What was particularly important for the defense was to convince the judge that the defendant had fled abroad and had fled for five years. The defendant was acquitted. < SPAN> Paul Jackson defended a man who was sued in a harassment of violence. The plaintiff lost his trust during the confrontation, did not submit evidence, and explained to the jury that "the plaintiff's credibility had declined to the point where it disappeared." An innocent decision was given. The judge later imposed a prohibition order after acquitted, based on Article 5 A (1) of the Protection Law of the 1997 harassment, but was later destroyed by the Court of Appeal. R V Mohammed Emanul Haque (2014) EWCA CRIM 832 and R V Mohammed Emanul Haque (2015) EWCA CRIM 767.
Appeal of P [C.O.A.] 2015
Paul Jackson served as a lawyer in a case where a man housed in a safe ward at a psychiatric hospital killed a nurse staff.
R v. Gutteridge [Portsmouth] 2016
Paul Jackson intentionally beat the plaintiff's head and defended a man who was accused of being charged with the other three for severely injured. In the hal f-term sentence, the prison was not successful due to the inconvenience of identification evidence. The defendant was acquitted. Asked by Berry & Lumberz Law Office.
R v. B [Guildford YC] 2016
Paul Jackson defended a man who was charged with crime of cultivating cannabis on his home premises. The defendant's fingerprint was detected from the bulb in the building. The defendant denied any knowledge of cannabis. The defendant was acquitted.
R v. Walker [Lewes] 2016
Paul Jackson defended a man who was kidnapped and raped. He was alleged that the defendant and another man were mixed with the plaintiff, invited her to the store, forcibly restrained her with the help of another person and rape. The defense was an agreement. An important issue in the trial was evidence of the expert about the amount of alcohol drunk by the plaintiff and how long it would give her. The defendant was acquitted.
R v. Traynor [Taunton] 2015
Paul Jackson defended a man who was intentionally injured. The defendant beat the plaintiff's head twice with a hammer. This was recognized, but the defense claimed that it was a legitimate defense and an act to protect others. What was particularly important for the defense was to convince the judge that the defendant had fled abroad and had fled for five years. The defendant was acquitted. Paul Jackson defended his brothers to a man who was sued by harassment that was terrified of violence. The plaintiff lost his trust during the confrontation, did not submit evidence, and explained to the jury that "the plaintiff's credibility had declined to the point where it disappeared." An innocent decision was given. The judge later imposed a prohibition order after acquitted, based on Article 5 A (1) of the Protection Law of the 1997 harassment, but was later destroyed by the Court of Appeal. R V Mohammed Emanul Haque (2014) EWCA CRIM 832 and R V Mohammed Emanul Haque (2015) EWCA CRIM 767.
R v. Ymeraj & ors [Portsmouth] 2015
Paul Jackson served as a lawyer in a case where a man housed in a safe ward at a psychiatric hospital was killed.
R v. Searle [Lewes] 2015
Paul Jackson intentionally beat the plaintiff's head and defended a man who was accused of being charged with the other three for severely injured. In the hal f-term sentence, the prison was not successful due to the inconvenience of identification evidence. The defendant was acquitted. Asked by Berry & Lumberz Law Office.
R v. Spruhan [Chichester] 2015
Paul Jackson defended a man who was charged with crime of cultivating cannabis on his home premises. The defendant's fingerprint was detected from the bulb in the building. The defendant denied any knowledge of cannabis. The defendant was acquitted.
R v. Carella [Hove] 2015
Paul Jackson defended a man who was kidnapped and raped a woman. He was alleged that the defendant and another man were mixed with the plaintiff, invited her to the store, forcibly restrained her with the help of another person and rape. The defense was an agreement. An important issue in the trial was evidence of the expert about the amount of alcohol drunk by the plaintiff and how long it would give her. The defendant was acquitted.
R v. Miller [Portsmouth] 2014
Paul Jackson defended a man who was intentionally injured. The defendant beat the plaintiff's head twice with a hammer. This was recognized, but the defense claimed that it was a legitimate defense and an act to protect others. What was particularly important for the defense was to convince the judge that the defendant had fled abroad and had fled for five years. The defendant was acquitted.
R v. Noon [Portsmouth] 2011
Irshad Shake was in charge of the prosecution of the PayPal fraud case, which was a million pounds, and the defendant played a leading role in the organizational crime network that performed the larg e-scale fraud. The defendant has accessed the security information of about 200 Paypal customer accounts with others, infringing the account, and caused millions of pounds to the company.
Thames Valley Police v. S & ors [Disciplinary Tribunal] 2010
Paul Jackson was in charge of defending a man found with many stolen electronic devices in a warehouse called the "modern faigan" by Crown. The defendant was innocent by the lobby activity.
R v. V & ors [Southwark] 2011
IRSHAD Sheikh was the chief lawyer of murder and attempted double murder by exile. The case was a defendant violently beat three men drunk at the evacuation site of Ilford's cemetery. This violent attack killed one, and the other three were seriously injured to threaten life.
R v. Iqbal & 18 ors [Southwark] 2014
Paul Jackson succeeded in defending Hamers Pub's male bouncer, who was charged for severely injured. The case was a different incident due to the lawyer provided the name of the perpetrator to the police. The investigation policy is fully pursued by the lawyer. After the legal discussion in the trial, the crown had to implement a proactive process in court, and the plaintiff confirmed the person's name as the perpetrator.
Operation Slate [Wood Green] 2016
Paul Jackson defended a man who was charged with kidnapping. When the accused's cousin made a false accusation that a man was raped by a man, three defendants abducted the man and made a violent assault. In the trial, the union was cut off and defended, and in the trial, prior acquittal and separation were issues.
Operation Sifiye [Snaresbrook] 2016
Paul Jackson succeeded in defending a man who was intentionally injured. It was alleged that the two defendants jumped until the plaintiff's legs broke. In the trial, evidence of drunkenness, identity confirmation, and blood evidence by appraisers were issues.
R v. J & ors [Isleworth] 2016
Paul Jackson succeeded in defending his mother who was accused of his cruel treatment. The center of the baby motion is certified that the baby has suffered chronic subdural hemorrhage by the baby's father (colleague), and the problem of evidence can be visible. Included sexual symptoms. < SPAN> Ilshad Shake was in charge of the prosecution of the PayPal fraud case of millions of pounds, and the defendant played a leading role in the organizational crime network that performed this larg e-scale fraud. The defendant has accessed the security information of about 200 Paypal customer accounts with others, infringing the account, and caused millions of pounds to the company.
R v. M & ors [Snaresbrook] 2016
Paul Jackson was in charge of defending a man found with many stolen electronic devices in a warehouse called the "modern faigan" by Crown. The defendant was innocent by the lobby activity.
Operation Crow [Maidstone] 2015
IRSHAD Sheikh was the chief lawyer of murder and attempted double murder by exile. The case was a defendant violently beat three men drunk at the evacuation site of Ilford's cemetery. This violent attack killed one, and the other three were seriously injured to threaten life.
R v. B & ors [Winchester] 2011
Paul Jackson succeeded in defending Hamers Pub's male bouncer, who was charged for severely injured. The case was a different incident due to the lawyer provided the name of the perpetrator to the police. The investigation policy is fully pursued by the lawyer. After the legal discussion in the trial, the crown had to implement a proactive process in court, and the plaintiff confirmed the person's name as the perpetrator.
R v. M & anr [C.C.C.] 2010
Paul Jackson defended a man who was charged with kidnapping. When the accused's cousin made a false accusation that a man was raped by a man, three defendants abducted the man and made a violent assault. In the trial, the union was cut off and defended, and in the trial, prior acquittal and separation were issues.
R v. Buchler [Isleworth] 2016
Paul Jackson succeeded in defending a man who was intentionally injured. It was alleged that the two defendants jumped until the plaintiff's legs broke. In the trial, evidence of drunkenness, identity confirmation, and blood evidence by appraisers were issues.
R v. S & ors [Snaresbrook] 2016
Paul Jackson succeeded in defending his mother who was accused of his cruel treatment. The center of the baby motion is certified that the baby has suffered chronic subdural hemorrhage by the baby's father (colleague), and the problem of evidence can be visible. Included sexual symptoms. Irshad Shake was in charge of the prosecution of the PayPal fraud case, which was a million pounds, and the defendant played a leading role in the organizational crime network that performed the larg e-scale fraud. The defendant has accessed the security information of about 200 Paypal customer accounts with others, infringing the account, and caused millions of pounds to the company.R v. TN [Guildford] 2016
Paul Jackson was in charge of defending a man discovered with many stolen electronic devices in a warehouse called "modern Faigan" by Crown. The defendant was innocent by the lobby activity.R v. X [Leamington Spa] 2016
IRSHAD Sheikh was the chief lawyer of murder and attempted double murder by exile. The case was a defendant violently beat three men drunk at the evacuation site of Ilford's cemetery. This violent attack killed one, and the other three were seriously injured to threaten life.R v. TG [Manchester] 2015
Paul Jackson succeeded in defending Hamers Pub's male bouncer, who was charged for severely injured. The case was a different incident due to the lawyer provided the name of the perpetrator to the police. The investigation policy is fully pursued by the lawyer. After the legal discussion in the trial, the crown had to implement a proactive process in court, and the plaintiff confirmed the person's name as the perpetrator.
R v. RS & ors [Snaresbrook] 2015
Paul Jackson defended a man who was charged with kidnapping. When the accused's cousin made a false accusation that a man was raped by a man, three defendants abducted the man and made a violent assault. In the trial, the union was cut off and defended, and in the trial, prior acquittal and separation were issues.
R v RW & ors [Bristol] 2014
Paul Jackson succeeded in defending a man who was intentionally injured. It was alleged that the two defendants jumped until the plaintiff's legs broke. In the trial, evidence of drunkenness, identity confirmation, and blood evidence by appraisers were issues.
R v. TB & ors [Isleworth] 2014
Paul Jackson succeeded in defending his mother who was accused of his cruel treatment. The center of the baby motion is certified that the baby has suffered both sides of chronic subdural hemorrhage by the baby's father (colleague), and the problem of evidence can be visible. Included sexual symptoms.
R v. AM [Snaresbrook] 2013
Paul Jackson defended a male defendant, who was charged with the A-class drug supply. Immediately before the trial, the defendant dismissed the initial lawyer and lawyer. In the trial, the defendant acknowledged possession of drugs, but denied the intention of procurement. The defendant's answer to the PCMH form question was "no possession." Crown sought an opposition, claiming that this statement was inconsistent with his defense and possession claims. As a result, R V Alan Newell (2012) 1 W. L. R. 3142 overturned the ruling of R (on Application of Firth) V EPPING COURT (2011) 4 All. E. R. 326.
R v. DT & ors [Bristol] 2013
Paul Jackson defended a case where a man with severe learning disabilities was charged with sexually stabbing multiple women in a lat e-night state.
R v. PG & anr [C.C.C.] 2012
Paul Jackson defended a male defendant who was charged with arson on the intention of exposing life. The former defendant's former partner was witnessed to pour gasoline cans while standing in the living room window with a young child. The incident included many legal issues, such as the possibility of recognition in the Federal District Court, which was created in parallel family court procedures. The defendant was acquitted.
R v. AH [Wood Green] 2012
Paul Jackson was instructed as a junior in defense of a man who was charged with six hands and murder. In this case, the defendants were said to have fired a gun several times at a personal home and tried revenge. In the crown trial, the analysis of mobile phone sites was an important part.R v. DV & anr [C.C.C.] 2012
Andrew Cornings was in charge of his father's defense in the Baby Case. In this case, a wide range of opposition interrogations were held against local authorities, regarding the 5-t o-one vaccination side reaction. Judge described Creams's opposition to Dr. Richards, led a global neurosurgery, as "well performed."
R v. AN [C.C.C.] 2011
Andrew Creamringes served as a prosecutor's prosecutor in the "Honor Murder" incident, which Indian leader Glavezend was conducted under the direction of John Price QC for revenge of his sister's unfaithful revenge.
R v. JB & ors [Croydon] 2011
Andrew Creamringes served as a defender in this long and complex money laundering case, suspected of the complexity of Bank Hawara as a 3, 000, 00 0-pound business defense. He was trained at Alexander Johnson Law Office.
Herts CC v B [Watford] 2014
Andrew Cornings was in charge of the murder trial of Ian Glenn's defense, and in the murder trial of a young gan g-related and dru g-related.
R v. RP & 11 ors [Manchester] 2010
Andrew Corps was a prosecutor in the historical rape case, which was the "unresolved case." He has considerable practical knowledge about the scientific development of DNA profiling.
R v. JR & ors [Croydon 2009
Andrew Corps succeeded in the prosecution of a large number of sex offenders who worked as a driving instructor in Kent. He was ultimately identified by DNA profiling in the "unresolved case."
R v. TM [Snaresbrook] 2009
Andrew Cornings has succeeded in defending the first defendant in the si x-week kidnapping / false confinement trial. A complicated fact related to the "territory battle" of the opposing drug gangs. The third defendant was an international singer, which attracted the attention of the media.
LB of Croydon v M 2013
Andrew Cornings was the top junior on the defender in a serious conspiracy case dealing with the stolen goods. The total conspiracy is BMW parts equivalent to 10. 5 million pounds.
R v KK & Ors [Portsmouth CC] 2014
James Martin's Court of Court and Retinification on Society for Larg e-scale asset fraud. As part of the discount plot, it was intentionally underestimated real estate to sell to others. Severn Trent Water's insider and other defendants were suspected. Others have made false offerings to advertise real estate and sell to one of the conspirators at a significant discounted price. At the order of Blackfords LLP, James Martin defended the defendant.
R v. LP [Woolwich] 2016
James Martin replaced the defendant with a man outside the nightclub. As a result of the injury, he had fallen into a coma for a while and died in danger. He was injured enough to change his life, and his prognosis was not good. On the night of the question, the defendant had always claimed justifiable defense and claimed that the man he had beaten had taken aggressive action before the evening. Many were evidence of a witness. The defendant was acquitted in a few minutes by the jury. < SPAN> Andrew Cornings was in charge of the murder trial of Ian Glenn's defense, and was involved in a stabbing case of a young gang and drugs.
R v. S [Snaresbrook] 2016
Andrew Corps was a prosecutor in the historical rape case, which was the "unresolved case." He has considerable practical knowledge about the scientific development of DNA profiling.
R v. A [C.C.C.] 2016
Andrew Corps succeeded in the prosecution of a large number of sex offenders who worked as a driving instructor in Kent. He was ultimately identified by DNA profiling in the "unresolved case."
R v. W [Maidstone] 2016
Andrew Cornings has succeeded in defending the first defendant in the si x-week kidnapping / false confinement trial. A complicated fact related to the "territory battle" of the opposing drug gangs. The third defendant was an international singer, which attracted the attention of the media.
R v. H & G [Snaresbrook] 2016
Andrew Cornings was the top junior on the defender in a serious conspiracy case dealing with the stolen goods. The total conspiracy is BMW parts equivalent to 10. 5 million pounds.
Thames Valley Police v. R & anr 2016
James Martin's Court of Court and Retinification on Society for Larg e-scale asset fraud. As part of the discount plot, it was intentionally underestimated real estate to sell to others. Severn Trent Water's insider and other defendants were suspected. Others have made false offerings to advertise real estate and sell to one of the conspirators at a significant discounted price. At the order of Blackfords LLP, James Martin defended the defendant.
W v. Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime 2015
James Martin replaced the defendant with a man outside the nightclub. As a result of the injury, he had fallen into a coma for a while and died in danger. He was injured enough to change his life, and his prognosis was not good. On the night of the question, the defendant had always claimed justifiable defense and claimed that the man he had beaten had taken aggressive action before the evening. Many were evidence of a witness. The defendant was acquitted in a few minutes by the jury. Andrew Cornings was in charge of the murder trial of Ian Glenn's defense, and in the murder trial of a young gan g-related and dru g-related.
D v. Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime 2015
Andrew Corps was a prosecutor in the historical rape case, which was the "unresolved case." He has considerable practical knowledge about the scientific development of DNA profiling.
R v. Reza & 5 ors [Southwark] 2015
Andrew Corps succeeded in the prosecution of a large number of sex offenders who worked as a driving instructor in Kent. He was ultimately identified by DNA profiling in the "unresolved case."
R v. James [Isleworth] 2015
Andrew Cornings has succeeded in defending the first defendant in the si x-week kidnapping / false confinement trial. A complicated fact related to the "territory battle" of the opposing drug gangs. The third defendant was an international singer, which attracted the attention of the media.
R v. Cisse & 5 ors [Croydon] 2014
Andrew Cornings was the top junior on the defender in a serious conspiracy case dealing with the stolen goods. The total conspiracy is BMW parts equivalent to 10. 5 million pounds.
R v. Kendrick [Luton] 2014
James Martin's Court of Court and Retinification on Society for Larg e-scale asset fraud. As part of the discount plot, it was intentionally underestimated real estate to sell to others. Severn Trent Water's insider and other defendants were suspected. Others have made false offerings to advertise real estate and sell to one of the conspirators at a significant discounted price. At the order of Blackfords LLP, James Martin defended the defendant.
R v. Armel Gnango [Supreme Court] 2011 UKSC 59 2011
James Martin replaced the defendant with a man outside the nightclub. As a result of the injury, he had fallen into a coma for a while and died in danger. He was injured enough to change his life, and his prognosis was not good. On the night of the question, the defendant had always claimed justifiable defense and claimed that the man he had beaten had taken aggressive action before the evening. Many were evidence of a witness. The defendant was acquitted in a few minutes by the jury.
R v. Philpott & ors [Nottingham] 2013
James Martin represented this defendant, who was a passenger in her own car driven by her partner. A fatal accident occurred, hitting and killing two pedestrians who were crossing the street. The car was then driven from the scene to a nearby car park and set on fire. The Crown argued that the defendant was a party to the destruction of the car and therefore guilty of attempting to pervert the course of justice. No plea was entered at the end of the trial, which was confirmed by the judge and the case was dismissed.
R v. Badran [Wood Green] 2016
James Martin was only the junior of this multi-armed conspiracy of kidnapping and blackmail. The case involved the enforcement of a drug debt. The former defendant was a drug dealer and a man was kidnapped for him. As he owed a large amount of money he was taken off the street and held captive for most of the day. His family was contacted and demands were made for money.
R v. Edwards [C.C.C.] 2016
James Martin represented Mr Collier, who ran a large yard for many years and had been the subject of police investigations on a number of occasions. At one point, an undercover officer was stationed at his yard, posing as someone selling stolen wiring. He was accused of fabricating large quantities of stolen metal, including stolen grave plates and high voltage cables.
R v. Aidid & ors [C.C.C.] 2016
James Martin was involved in this multi-person murder conspiracy, conducted at the CCC under the direction of Steven Camlish QC. The suspicion was that a BD associate had received a reduced sentence a few months before the murders. The killer was said to be a BD associate and a gang was called in to kill him. However, he was stabbed to death in a case of mistaken identity. The case relied heavily on telephone and mobile phone evidence. The case was eventually resolved when the Crown was persuaded to accept a guilty plea to GBH conspiracy.
R v. De Silva [C.C.C.] 2016
James Martin was only the last of a seven-hand conspiracy to commit fraud and launder the proceeds. The fraud was carried out with the help of an "insider". Funds were diverted from the Royal Marsden Hospital, which specialises in cancer treatment. A network of individuals was used to filter the funds after they were funneled through trusts.
R v. Mazikhana [Southwark] 2015
James Martin was merely one player in a multi-pronged conspiracy to defraud many elderly landowners and launder the proceeds. The case involved numerous victims over a significant period of time.
R v. Al-Bassam & ors [Southwark] 2013
James Martin Jr. was a single offense in several armed collusions trying to click money from a few elderly housing owners and to wash the price. The case has been involved in many victims for a long time.
R v. B & anr [C.C.C.] 2015
James Martin Jr. was involved alone in multiple armed collusions to deceive money from multiple elderly housing owners and clean their revenue. The case has been involved in many victims for a long time. Some of the victims are currently the deceased, and the royal family is trying to rely on their recorded testimony.
R v. Osolase [Canterbury] 2013
James Martin was the only junior in millions of pounds of money laundering. It is said that Hillia was the main character that the organizational crime organization established and managed a accounting firm to wash huge cash. The incident included a large amount of telephone data and the monitoring evidence.
R v. D & ors 2012
James Martin was in charge of defendant, who was seduced a woman in a nightclub, invited her apartment and raped. An additional survey of the Night Club CCTV was an important evidence that overturned the plaintiff's testimony. The defendant was acquitted.R v. H & ors 2012
James Martin was in charge of the many people at Winchester CC under the direction of Tim Roberts QC. The allegations were that Haram was the main culprit who organized a woman who was allegedly affected. Provision of substantial investigation materials, location information of mobile sites, and other telephone evidence.R v. Salami & ors [Southwark] 2011
James Martin alone was a multiple armed consolidation junior, importing and distributing millions of pounds and rolled cigarettes. In addition to the secret observations discovered by HMRC and the seizure of the warehouse, important tracer materials were evidence.
Operation Slick [Southwark] 2011
James Martin succeeded in defendant, who was charged with his stepmother. Both were alcoholic, and they had sexual intercourse after a large amount of alcohol. The problem was agreed. The defendant was acquitted.R v. Roope & ors [Worcester] 2010
James Martin served as a defendant in London, who was charged with the crime of pushing a person from the top floor window of a tw o-story bus. The man hit his head on the sidewalk when he fell from the driving bus, and became paralyzed. The defendant argued that he acted for legitimate defense because the man attacked himself and his girlfriend who tried to get off the bus. The defendant argued that he did not intend to kick a man over the window that retreated when the man fell off the window. The defendant was acquitted.R v. Orhon [Kingston] 2016
Jonathan Higgs QC defended James Martin and succeeded in defending the murder. The leading defendant, who was charged with a planned crime, was planned in advance, and was hidden in the trunk of the car when the victim was picked up by the defendant. He said he was urged by the defendant. The issue of the case of the case, the second party, the second party, the c o-project of the murder.
R v. Denning [Southwark] 2016
James Martin was a junior single crime in the Uridge CC, a 9-week mult i-person case. The charges were armed robbery, two men's kidnapping, two male false confinements, and blackmails. The crime dates back to 2008, and these charges were caused by an intensive investigation on the vast telephone traffic tracked by those who were convicted in the original trial. This evidence was supplemented by voyeurism. The central issue of the incident was an objection to both the evidence of the mobile phone site and the opinions of the expert on face mapping.
R v. Patel [Southwark] 2014
James Martin has been led by Trevar Bark QC in the armed robbery collusion since 2001. The defendant was the only man who was not involved in the first strategy in which four trials were conducted. There are other complicated issues on the abuse of procedures and the potential effects of evidence submitted by other defendants in the original trial.
R v. Oorloff & Dickinson [Guildford] 2016
James Martin was a small number of defendants in this mult i-person incident, which involved a conspiracy of hig h-valu e-valuable theft of cars on demand. The group worked in Kent, mainly the BMW M3, disabled the tracking device, and then dismantled the car to sell parts. It also includes suspicion of money laundering related to the disposal of funds obtained by crime.
R v. Shaibu & Nelson [C.C.C.] 2015
James Martin was the only young man who joined multiple armed conspiracy that imported hundreds of counterfeit cigarettes. He succeeded in defending a man who was charged with a part of the conspiracy of importing a ful l-fledged cigarette. The main defendant was accused of being at the center of the plan to use a legal shipping company to implement larg e-scale imports of counterfeit cigarettes from Europe to the UK. < SPAN> Jonathan Higgs QC defended James Martin and succeeded in defending the murder. The leading defendant, who was charged with a planned crime, was planned in advance, and was hidden in the trunk of the car when the victim was picked up by the defendant. He said he was urged by the defendant. The issue of the case of the case, the second party, the second party, the c o-project of the murder.
R v. Coe [Southwark] 2016
James Martin was a junior single crime in the Uridge CC, a 9-week mult i-person case. The charges were armed robbery, two men's kidnapping, two male false confinements, and blackmails. The crime dates back to 2008, and these charges were caused by an intensive investigation on the vast telephone traffic tracked by those who were convicted in the original trial. This evidence was supplemented by voyeurism. The central issue of the incident was an objection to both the evidence of the mobile phone site and the opinions of the expert on face mapping.
R v. Newman [C.C.C.] 2016
James Martin has been led by Trevar Bark QC in the armed robbery collusion since 2001. The defendant was the only man who was not involved in the first strategy in which four trials were conducted. There are other complicated issues on the abuse of procedures and the potential effects of evidence submitted by other defendants in the original trial.
R v. MSA & ors [Croydon] 2016
James Martin was a small number of defendants in this mult i-person incident, which involved a conspiracy of hig h-valu e-valuable theft of cars on demand. The group worked in Kent, mainly the BMW M3, disabled the tracking device, and then dismantled the car to sell parts. It also includes suspicion of money laundering related to the disposal of funds obtained by crime.
R v. Weise [Canterbury] 2016
James Martin was the only young man who joined multiple armed conspiracy that imported hundreds of counterfeit cigarettes. He succeeded in defending a man who was charged with a part of the conspiracy of importing a ful l-fledged cigarette. The main defendant was accused of being at the center of the plan to use a legal shipping company to implement larg e-scale imports of counterfeit cigarettes from Europe to the UK. Jonathan Higgs QC defended James Martin and succeeded in defending the murder. The leading defendant, who was charged with a planned crime, was planned in advance, and was hidden in the trunk of the car when the victim was picked up by the defendant. He said he was urged by the defendant. The issue of the case of the case, the second party, the second party, the c o-project of the murder.
R v. Smilginis [Snaresbrook & C.O.A.] EWCA Crim 550 2016
James Martin was a junior single crime in the Uridge CC, a 9-week mult i-person case. The charges were armed robbery, two men's kidnapping, two male false confinements, and blackmails. The crime dates back to 2008, and these charges were caused by an intensive investigation on the vast telephone traffic tracked by those who were convicted in the original trial. This evidence was supplemented by voyeurism. The central issue of the incident was an objection to both the evidence of the mobile phone site and the opinions of the expert on face mapping.
R v. MN & ors [Wood Green] 2015
James Martin has been led by Trevar Bark QC in the armed robbery collusion since 2001. The defendant was the only man who was not involved in the first operation in which four trials were conducted. There are other complicated issues on the abuse of procedures and the potential effects of evidence submitted by other defendants in the original trial.
R v. DW [Woolwich] 2014
James Martin was a small number of defendants in this mult i-person incident, which involved a conspiracy of hig h-valu e-valuable theft of cars on demand. The group worked in Kent, mainly the BMW M3, disabled the tracking device, and then dismantled the car to sell parts. It also includes suspicion of money laundering related to the disposal of funds obtained by crime.
R v PO [Inner London] 2015
James Martin was the only young man who joined multiple armed conspiracy that imported hundreds of counterfeit cigarettes. He succeeded in defending a man who was charged with a part of the conspiracy of importing a ful l-fledged cigarette. The main defendant was accused of being at the center of the plan to use a legal shipping company to implement larg e-scale imports of counterfeit cigarettes from Europe to the UK.
R v. ED [Woolwich] 2016
James Martin successfully defended a man charged for two years with evading duty and VAT on the import of gold jewellery. An international investigation unfolded from the UK to Europe, India and Dubai resulting in the evasion of over £8 million in tax. The case involved a conspiracy to evade duty and VAT on the import of gold jewellery. In total, over £8 million was allegedly absconded from the scene. Martin acted as lead counsel in the case, defending the defendant who was accused of being one of the people responsible for the import of gold jewellery from Dubai to Frankfurt. The fraudulent activity involved the transfer of bullion to another member of the conspiracy who would pass the import into the UK as intra-regional trade, thus evading VAT. Some of this activity was monitored by an undercover unit of the German police. The case involved complex VAT law issues and jurisdictional issues.
R v. MC [Woolwich] 2016
Martin Hooper acted as lead counsel for the prosecution. This was an alleged conspiracy to import and distribute crystal meth on a grand scale. The trial lasted two months, resulting in a guilty verdict and a maximum sentence of 15 years. The case was referred to the Court of Appeal, where the presiding judge asked the prosecution to assist in the preparation of sentencing guidelines, which are now the leading authority on the subject.
R v. VK [C.C.C.] 2016
Martin Hooper acted as lead counsel in this building/construction fraud case. There was a substantial hearing on complex factual and technical issues, as well as asset restrictions and confiscation procedures.
Inquest into the Death of Francesca Cappucini 2017
Martin Hooper acted as lead junior counsel for a man charged with attempted murder with a firearm in a crowded nightclub. Witnesses requested anonymity. This was the first case in the country where the law had been applied since R v Davis in the House of Lords.
R v. RM [Woolwich] 2016
Martin Hooper acted as junior counsel in this murder case involving diminished responsibility and self-inflicted drunkenness. The case was one of the first cases to follow the House of Lords to Dietchman law change.
R v. TB [Isleworth] 2016
Martin Hooper was lead junior counsel in this case involving an alleged large scale conspiracy to steal high value computer equipment from commercial premises. The case centred around surveillance evidence including covert intrusion, wiretapping and PII issues. The trials lasted for two and three months, resulting in both acquittals. James Martin successfully defended a man accused of evading import duty and VAT on gold jewellery over a two year period. An international investigation unfolded from the UK to Europe, India and Dubai resulting in the evasion of over £8 million in tax. The case involved a conspiracy to evade the payment of duty and VAT on the importation of gold jewellery. In total, over £8 million was allegedly absconded from the scene. Martin was lead counsel in the case, defending the defendant accused of being one of the people responsible for the importation of gold jewellery from Dubai to Frankfurt. The fraud involved the delivery of gold bars to another member of the conspiracy, who imported the goods into the UK as intra-regional trade, exempting them from VAT. Some of this activity was monitored by an undercover unit of the German police. The case involved complex VAT law issues and jurisdictional issues.
R v. WM [Snaresbrook] 2016
Martin Hooper acted as lead counsel for the prosecution. This was an allegation of a grandiose conspiracy to import and distribute crystal meth. The trial lasted two months, resulting in a conviction and a maximum sentence of 15 years. The case was referred to the Court of Appeal, where the presiding judge asked the prosecution to assist in drawing up sentencing guidelines, which are now the leading authority on the matter.R v. JW [Wood Green] 2015
Martin Hooper acted as lead counsel in this building/construction fraud case. There were complex factual and technical issues, as well as substantial hearings on asset restrictions and confiscation procedures.
XYZ v. Chief Constable of Gwent Constabulary: [2014] EWHC 1448 (QB) 2014
Martin Hooper acted as lead junior counsel for a man charged with attempted murder with a firearm in a crowded nightclub. The witness requested anonymity. This was the first domestic case to use the law since R v Davis in the House of Lords.
PBD v. Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [2013] EWHC 3559 2013
Martin Hooper acted as junior counsel in this murder case involving diminished responsibility and self-inflicted drunkenness. This case was one of the first to follow the House of Lords change to Dietchman.
West Midlands Police v. Lorenzo CA [2012] EWCA Civ 1863 2013
Martin Hooper acted as lead junior counsel in this case involving an alleged large-scale conspiracy to rob high-value computer equipment from commercial premises. The case centred on surveillance evidence, including covert entry, wiretapping and PII issues. The trials lasted two and three months, resulting in acquittals in both cases. James Martin successfully defended a man charged for two years with evading import duty and VAT on gold jewellery. An international investigation unfolded from the UK to Europe, India and Dubai resulting in tax evasion of over £8 million. The case involved a conspiracy to evade the payment of duty and VAT on the importation of gold jewellery. In total, over £8 million was allegedly absconded from the scene. Martin acted as lead counsel in the case, defending the defendant accused of being one of the individuals responsible for importing gold jewellery from Dubai to Frankfurt. The fraudulent activity involved the passing of bullion to another member of the conspiracy, who would pass the imports into the UK as intra-regional trade, thus evading VAT. Some of this activity was monitored by an undercover unit of the German police. The case involved complex VAT law issues and jurisdictional issues.
ABC, JKL & XYZ v. A Chief Constable (QB Div; 13 Sep 2012) 2012
Martin Hooper acted as lead counsel for the prosecution. This was an allegation of a grand scale conspiracy to import and distribute crystal meth. The trial lasted two months, resulting in a conviction and a maximum sentence of 15 years. The case was referred to the Court of Appeal, where the judge asked the prosecution to assist in drawing up sentencing guidelines, which are now the leading authority on the matter.
Hussain v. Chief Constable of West Mercia Constabulary [2008] EWC Civ 1205, [2008] WLR (D) 342 2008
Martin Hooper was lead counsel in this building/construction fraud case. There was a substantial trial on asset limitations and confiscation procedures, in addition to complex factual and technical issues.
JG ( A child) v. LSC, Law Society & Secretary of State for Justice [2013] 2 FLR 1174 , [2013] Fam Law 1125 (Ryder J) 2013
Martin Hooper was lead junior counsel for a man charged with attempted murder with a firearm in a crowded nightclub. The witness requested anonymity. This was the first case in the country where the law was applied since R v Davis in the House of Lords.
JG (Appellant) v. Lord Chancellor & Law Society [2014] 2 FLR 1218, [2014] 3 FCR 567, [2014] HRLR 18, [2014] Fam Law 1097 2014
Martin Hooper was junior counsel in this murder case involving diminished responsibility and self-inflicted drunkenness. This case was one of the first to follow the change in the law from the House of Lords to Dietchman.
Tinsa v. GMC [2008] All ER D 140 2008
Martin Hooper was lead junior counsel in this case involving an alleged large-scale conspiracy to rob high-value computer equipment from commercial premises. The case involved evidence relating to surveillance, including covert entry, wiretapping and PII issues. The trials lasted two and three months, resulting in acquittals in both cases.
Medway Council v. X 2016
Martin Hooper succeeded in defending a mult i-layered and clever VAT fraud focusing on "famous chefs" like Marco Pierre White.
Medway Council v. B 2016
R V. Iain Davis [2008] UKHL 36 In this innovative ruling on the use of anonymous witnesses in a criminal trial, Sue Rodam ruled under the command of Malcolm Swift QC in the aristocracy. The original case was a double murder case using a gun. A unique and definitive evidence was brought by a witness hidden by the defendant, and their evidence was emerged from the back of a distorted monitor to avoid identification. The aristocrat agreed that in this situation, the defendant could not receive a fair trial and the defendant had the right to know who was the defendant.
Kent County Council v. Y 2016
Asuka Fujita defended on e-third of the nine defendants who were charged with the employer for stealing a large amount of cash for eight and a half years. Asuka's client was unanimously innocent after five weeks. He was trained by Stamburg Reed.
Medway Council v A & Ors [2015] EWFC B66 2015
Asuka Fujita was called as a second defendant lawyer who was charged with unauthorized imports of collusion. Eventually, the country did not submit evidence, and the defendant was acquitted. The lawyer was trained by Stamburger Reed.
Kent CC v D & Ors [2015] EWFC 96 2015
Asuka Fujita served as an agent of Lorley driver, who was charged with illegally importing more than £ 200, 000 tobacco. As a result of the guilty and imprisonment, a 1 2-month penalty was sentenced. He was trained by Sternberg Reed.
London Borough of Barnet v M/F [2014] EWFC B152 2014
Asuka Fujita served as an agent of an appellant who had severe learning and mental health issues, and was sentenced to an extension, including a fou r-year treatment period and tw o-year long vacation due to sexual assault. The appeal court acknowledged the appeal and reduced the free period to two years and eight months. The sentence is quoted here as the Neutral City [2015] EWCA CRIM 1901 (subscription required). The appeal court praised Asuka's "eloquence of submitted documents." She was trained in GT Stewart. < SPAN> Martin Hooper has succeeded in defending a mult i-layered and clever VAT fraud focusing on "famous chefs" like Marco Pierre White.Medway Council v W [2015] EWFC B234 2015
R V. Iain Davis [2008] UKHL 36 In this innovative ruling on the use of anonymous witnesses in a criminal trial, Sue Rodam ruled under the command of Malcolm Swift QC in the aristocracy. The original case was a double murder case using a gun. A unique and definitive evidence was brought by a witness hidden by the defendant, and their evidence was emerged from the back of a distorted monitor to avoid identification. The aristocrat agreed that in this situation, the defendant could not receive a fair trial and the defendant had the right to know who was the defendant.
Hertfordshire CC v. F [2014] EWHC 2159 2014
Asuka Fujita defended on e-third of the nine defendants who were charged with the employer for stealing a large amount of cash for eight and a half years. Asuka's client was unanimously innocent after five weeks. He was trained by Stamburg Reed.Re: B (Children) [2012] EWCA Civ 1275 2012
Asuka Fujita was called as a second defendant lawyer who was charged with unauthorized imports of collusion. Eventually, the country did not submit evidence, and the defendant was acquitted. The lawyer was trained by Stamburger Reed.
R v. MA [Inner London] 2015
Asuka Fujita served as an agent of Lorley driver, who was charged with illegally importing more than £ 200, 000 tobacco. As a result of the guilty and imprisonment, a 1 2-month penalty was sentenced. He was trained by Sternberg Reed.
R v. TS [Snaresbrook] 2015
Asuka Fujita served as an agent of an appellant who had severe learning and mental health issues, and was sentenced to an extension, including a fou r-year treatment period and tw o-year long vacation due to sexual assault. The appeal court acknowledged the appeal and reduced the free period to two years and eight months. The sentence is quoted here as the Neutral City [2015] EWCA CRIM 1901 (subscription required). The appeal court praised Asuka's "eloquence of submitted documents." She was trained in GT Stewart. Martin Hooper succeeded in defending a mult i-layered and clever VAT fraud focusing on "famous chefs" like Marco Pierre White.
R v. TA [Aylesbury] 2015
R V. Iain Davis [2008] UKHL 36 In this innovative ruling on the use of anonymous witnesses in a criminal trial, Sue Rodam ruled under the command of Malcolm Swift QC in the aristocracy. The original case was a double murder case using a gun. A unique and definitive evidence was brought by a witness hidden by the defendant, and their evidence was emerged from the back of a distorted monitor to avoid identification. The aristocrat agreed that in this situation, the defendant could not receive a fair trial and the defendant had the right to know who was the defendant.
R v. CH [Wood Green] 2015
Asuka Fujita defended on e-third of the nine defendants who were charged with the employer for stealing a large amount of cash for eight and a half years. Asuka's client was unanimously innocent after five weeks. He was trained by Stamburg Reed.
R v. PM [Woolwich] 2015
Asuka Fujita was called as a second defendant lawyer who was charged with unauthorized imports of collusion. Eventually, the country did not submit evidence, and the defendant was acquitted. The lawyer was trained by Stamburger Reed.
R v. JK [Wood Green] 2009
Asuka Fujita served as an agent of Lorley driver, who was charged with illegally importing more than £ 200, 000 tobacco. As a result of the guilty and imprisonment, a 1 2-month penalty was sentenced. He was trained by Sternberg Reed.
R v. Chandler [C.C.C.] 2017
Asuka Fujita served as an agent of an appellant who had severe learning and mental health issues, and was sentenced to an extension, including a fou r-year treatment period and tw o-year long vacation due to sexual assault. The appeal court acknowledged the appeal and reduced the free period to two years and eight months. The sentence is quoted here as the Neutral City [2015] EWCA CRIM 1901 (subscription required). The appeal court praised Asuka's "eloquence of submitted documents." She was trained in GT Stewart.
R v. R [Croydon] 2017
Paul Walker defended the defendant, and the alleged allegations of possession of cocaine supply were clear. It was discovered that the defendant Guttallidge had a cocaine equivalent of £ 87 %. His mobile phone had a message about the supply of drugs. Prosecutor's drug expert Michael Ellis told the jury, convinced that Gatalge was involved in the supply of drugs. Paul proposed some alternative theory to the expert in an opposition interrogation. The defense said he had abandoned a message about the management of drugs and escort agencies. Ellis dismissed that his conclusion was wrong. Gutridge was unanimously innocent.
R v. Alasow [Snaresbrook] 2015
Paul Walker was in charge of defending in the old child rape case. The defendant was a 1 5-yea r-old boy. This case was particularly difficult because the defendant had extremely learning disabilities. Paul claimed that he should benefit from the intermediary and succeeded. Despite being convicted, Paul was convinced of the District Court's imposition of no n-detention.
R v. Castano & ors [Snaresbrook] 2015
Paul Walker is said to have been at the center of violence after marching to England in Brighton in Brighton. CCTV showed Walker hitting people with an umbrella and rushing into a hostile group. Paul reviewed the CCTV and was r e-screened by the lawyer, and Walker was acquitted.
R v. Beveridge [I.L.C.C.] 2016
Paul Walker succeeded in defending a man who was charged with rape. The defendant agreed to enter the woman's bedroom and touch the sleeping woman's feet. The plaintiff argued that Trainer had sought sex. The jury gave an acquittal judging less than 30 minutes after he left the court.
R v. Leppard [Maidstone] 2016
Paul Walker was the leader of the Albanian Connection with 1 4-handed collusion providing cocaine tests. The incident was related to the "millions of pounds" drug trading, which lasted eight weeks. Hanna Smith, a junior lawyer of Edward Haze LLP, is in charge.
R v. N.A. [Snaresbrook] 2016
Paul Walker was conducted by Peter Rush QC in the Gangland Double Murder Case, which occurred in 2001, a notorious hawing murder case. The trial verified thousands of pages collected over 14 years. < SPAN> Paul Walker defends the defendant, and the allegations of possession of cocaine supply have cleared. It was discovered that the defendant Guttallidge had a cocaine equivalent of £ 87 %. His mobile phone had a message about the supply of drugs. Prosecutor's drug expert Michael Ellis told the jury, convinced that Gatalge was involved in the supply of drugs. Paul proposed some alternative theory to the expert in an opposition interrogation. The defense said he had abandoned a message about the management of drugs and escort agencies. Ellis dismissed that his conclusion was wrong. Gutridge was unanimously innocent.
R v. Rahman [Snaresbrook] 2016
Paul Walker was in charge of defending in the old child rape case. The defendant was a 1 5-yea r-old boy. This case was particularly difficult because the defendant had extremely learning disabilities. Paul claimed that he should benefit from the intermediary and succeeded. Despite being convicted, Paul was convinced of the District Court's imposition of no n-detention.
R v. MB & ors [Croydon] 2017
Paul Walker is said to have been at the center of violence after marching to England in Brighton in Brighton. CCTV showed Walker hitting people with an umbrella and rushing into a hostile group. Paul reviewed the CCTV and was r e-screened by the lawyer, and Walker was acquitted.
R v. B [Lewes] 2016
Paul Walker succeeded in defending a man who was charged with rape. The defendant agreed to enter the woman's bedroom and touch the sleeping woman's feet. The plaintiff argued that Trainer had sought sex. The jury gave an acquittal judging less than 30 minutes after he left the court.
R v. Dobby [C.C.C.] 2017
Paul Walker was the leader of the Albanian Connection with 1 4-handed collusion providing cocaine tests. The incident was related to the "millions of pounds" drug trading, which lasted eight weeks. Hanna Smith, a junior lawyer of Edward Haze LLP, is in charge.
R v. SK [Reading] 2017
Paul Walker was conducted by Peter Rush QC in the Gangland Double Murder Case, which occurred in 2001, a notorious hawing murder case. The trial verified thousands of pages collected over 14 years. Paul Walker defended the defendant, and the alleged allegations of possession of cocaine supply were clear. It was discovered that the defendant Guttallidge had a cocaine equivalent of £ 87 %. His mobile phone had a message about the supply of drugs. Prosecutor's drug expert Michael Ellis told the jury, convinced that Gatalge was involved in the supply of drugs. Paul proposed some alternative theory to the expert in an opposition interrogation. The defense said he had abandoned a message about the management of drugs and escort agencies. Ellis dismissed that his conclusion was wrong. Gutridge was unanimously innocent.
Operation Linear [Nottingham] 2016
Paul Walker was in charge of defending in the old child rape case. The defendant was a 1 5-yea r-old boy. This case was particularly difficult because the defendant had extremely learning disabilities. Paul claimed that he should benefit from the intermediary and succeeded. Despite being convicted, Paul was convinced of the District Court's imposition of no n-detention.
R v. Sykes [C.C.C.] 2016
Paul Walker is said to have been at the center of violence after marching to England in Brighton in Brighton. CCTV showed Walker hitting people with an umbrella and rushing into a hostile group. Paul reviewed the CCTV and was r e-screened by the lawyer, and Walker was acquitted.
R v. H [Maidstone] 2016
Paul Walker succeeded in defending a man who was charged with rape. The defendant agreed to enter the woman's bedroom and touch the sleeping woman's feet. The plaintiff argued that Trainer had sought sex. The jury gave an acquittal judging less than 30 minutes after he left the court.
R v. M [Norwich] 2016
Paul Walker was the leader of the Albanian Connection with 1 4-handed collusion providing cocaine tests. The incident was related to the "millions of pounds" drug trading, which lasted eight weeks. Hanna Smith, a junior lawyer of Edward Haze LLP, is in charge.
R v. F [Maidstone] 2016
Paul Walker was conducted by Peter Rush QC in the Gangland Double Murder Case, which occurred in 2001, a notorious hawing murder case. The trial verified thousands of pages collected over 14 years.
R v. M [Maidstone] 2016
Paul Walker succeeded in defendant, who was charged with the arson with the intention of exposing life. Defendant Sultuhan applied gasoline to his sister in a wete rose store with many traffic. Later, he ignited gasoline and continued to burn until his brave shoppers managed to turn off the fire. As a result of a trial and a detailed analysis of CCTV, Sprehan (he did not submit evidence) was innocent in the arson with the intention of exposing life.
R v. F [Southampton] 2015
Paul Walker served as the defendant's agent, and as a result of a multifaceted child prostitution trial, it was proved to be innocent. Mr. Carrera was D2 and needed D1. Mr. Carrella was acquitted, but all other main defendants, including D1, were guilty.
R v. Roberts [Portsmouth] 2015
Paul Walker defended his retired 7 6-yea r-old businessman Miller, piercing his wife's back. He said, "You're dying anymore." When the police arrived, Miller said he tried to kill his wife. Miller was acquitted after attempted murder.
R v. Pentreath [Woolwich] 2016
Paul Walker led Risi Natwani and was in charge of the main defendant in the International Ring Trial of the International Ring for the last six weeks. Their client was the mother of the abused children, and the incident was advertised worldwide. After the ruling, Crown's proposal was 13 years in prison. Portsmouth was sentenced to four years in prison. Following a claim by the Justice Secretary, in March 2012, the appeal court raised the defendant to eight years.
R v. D,M,M [Maidstone] 2017
Robert Ellison has served as a police officer in the trial for two weeks by four police officers accused of violation of discipline and disadvantaged work. The allegations were that police officers received and supplied A-class drugs. The allegations of the police officer were clear.
Operation Kilburn [Maidstone] 2016
Robert Ellison defended the Spanish call center shares in this hig h-pressure boiler room. Approximately 1. 250 investors in the UK have been persuaded to buy more than £ 7 million. He used a contract with Gordon Gecko to complete the transaction. The POCA procedure involved a total of 4. 5 million pounds. < SPAN> Paul Walker has succeeded in defendant's defendant, who was charged with the arson with the intention of exposing life. Defendant Sultuhan applied gasoline to his sister in a wete rose store with many traffic. Later, he ignited gasoline and continued to burn until his brave shoppers managed to turn off the fire. As a result of a trial and a detailed analysis of CCTV, Sprehan (he did not submit evidence) was innocent in the arson with the intention of exposing life.
R v. Dubis [Canterbury] 2016
Paul Walker served as the defendant's agent, and as a result of a multifaceted child prostitution trial, it was proved to be innocent. Mr. Carrera was D2 and needed D1. Mr. Carrella was acquitted, but all other main defendants, including D1, were guilty.
R v. M [Canterbury] 2016
Paul Walker defended his retired 7 6-yea r-old businessman Miller, piercing his wife's back. He said, "You're dying anymore." When the police arrived, Miller said he tried to kill his wife. Miller was acquitted after attempted murder.
R v. Terry & ors [Maidstone] 2014
Paul Walker led Risi Natwani and was in charge of the main defendant in the International Ring Trial of the International Ring for the last six weeks. Their client was the mother of the abused children, and the incident was advertised worldwide. After the ruling, Crown's proposal was 13 years in prison. Portsmouth was sentenced to four years in prison. Following a claim by the Justice Secretary, in March 2012, the appeal court raised the defendant to eight years.
R v M [Inner London] 2017
Robert Ellison has served as a police officer in the trial for two weeks by four police officers accused of violation of discipline and disadvantaged work. The allegations were that police officers received and supplied A-class drugs. The allegations of the police officer were clear.
R v P [Basildon Crown Court] 2017
Robert Ellison defended the Spanish call center shares in this hig h-pressure boiler room. Approximately 1. 250 investors in the UK have been persuaded to buy more than £ 7 million. He used a contract with Gordon Gecko to complete the transaction. The POCA procedure involved a total of 4. 5 million pounds. Paul Walker succeeded in defendant, who was charged with the arson with the intention of exposing life. Defendant Sultuhan applied gasoline to his sister in a wete rose store with many traffic. Later, he ignited gasoline and continued to burn until his brave shoppers managed to turn off the fire. As a result of a trial and a detailed analysis of CCTV, Sprehan (he did not submit evidence) was innocent in the arson with the intention of exposing life.
R v. MP [Inner London] 2016
Paul Walker served as the defendant's agent, and as a result of a multifaceted child prostitution trial, it was proved to be innocent. Mr. Carrera was D2 and needed D1. Mr. Carrella was acquitted, but all other main defendants, including D1, were guilty.
R v. Kulczycki [Maidstone] 2016
Paul Walker defended his retired 7 6-yea r-old businessman Miller, piercing his wife's back. He said, "You're dying anymore." When the police arrived, Miller said he tried to kill his wife. Miller was acquitted after attempted murder.
R v. Ahmed [C.C.C] 2016
Paul Walker led Risi Natwani and was in charge of the main defendant in the International Ring Trial of the International Ring for the last six weeks. Their client was the mother of the abused children, and the incident was advertised worldwide. After the ruling, Crown's proposal was 13 years in prison. Portsmouth was sentenced to four years in prison. Following a claim by the Justice Secretary, in March 2012, the appeal court raised the defendant to eight years.
R v. Burke [Maidstone] 2016
Robert Ellison has served as a police officer in the trial for two weeks by four police officers accused of violation of discipline and disadvantaged work. The allegations were that police officers received and supplied A-class drugs. The allegations of the police officer were clear.
R v. Ifemade [Woolwich] 2016
Robert Ellison defended the Spanish call center shares in this hig h-pressure boiler room. Approximately 1. 250 investors in the UK have been persuaded to buy more than £ 7 million. He used a contract with Gordon Gecko to complete the transaction. The POCA procedure involved a total of 4. 5 million pounds.
R v. Vidler [Maidstone] 2017
Robert Ellison led the prosecution with Jonathan Polney leading thousands of pages of disclosed and unused evidence in this credit and bank fraud scheme by 19 defendants. It was a conspiracy to exploit technical weaknesses in the "chip and PIN" payment process to defraud creditors and "buyout companies". The fraud scheme was so complex that the judge described the scheme and money laundering as an "incomprehensible plan".
R v. P Rahman [Snaresbrook] 2016
Katherine Pattison led Dickon Reid in the case involving 10 defendants accused of supplying large quantities of heroin across north London.
R v. Scott [Maidstone] 2015
Katherine Pattison led Dickon Reid in the case involving 13 defendants accused of conspiring to import large quantities of cocaine hidden in clubs and golf bags. The two trials, involving sophisticated telephone evidence, lasted a total of five and a half months between 2015 and 2016.
R. v. B [Canterbury] 2017
Robert Ellison, defending Dickon Reid, represented four defendants charged with possession of a firearm with intent to endanger life, possession of cannabis with intent to supply, and supplying firearms and ammunition. The defendants were accused of robbing a drug dealer of cash and drugs at gunpoint.
R v. D [Canterbury] 2016
Dickon Reid, with Peter Clement as counsel, represented the case, which included six defendants charged with conspiracy to rob. The defendants were members of a group responsible for a series of robberies in East London in which victims were attacked with baseball bats.
R v. S [Maidstone] 2016
Ben Temple, defending Dickon Reid, represented the case, which included 14 defendants charged with conspiracy to import cocaine, amphetamines and cannabis into the UK.
Inquest into the Death of Ralph Brazier 2017
Mark Heywood QC, representing Dickon Reid, sought exoneration from one defendant's involvement in five counts of conspiracy to murder in which the defendants were charged with carrying out a series of vigilante attacks over a two-week period. Represented by Blackfords LLP.
R v. Te [C.C.C] 2017
Sarah Forshaw QC presided over the Dickon Reid murder trial which ran over four weeks at the Central Criminal Court.
R v. Khan & Barclay [C.C.C.] 2017
Jeffrey Israel, led by Jonathan Goldberg QC, defended David Buchler, the former vice-chairman of Tottenham Hotspur FC, accused of breaking the nose of a shopper while queuing for a croissant at Harrods. Read the Daily Mail article here.
R v. Rehman [Snaresbrook] 2017
Jeffrey Israel acted as defence consultant in the three-month arms and ammunition conspiracy case.
R v. Gale [Lewes] 2017
Jeffrey Israel presided over the defence of the case which included rape allegations against multiple dates.
R v. Pantellaro [I.L.C.C.] 2017
Jeffrey Israel has defended football managers and TV and radio pundits notorious for speeding offences.
R v. GS [C.C.C.] 2017
Jeffrey Israel was in charge of defending a famous teacher who was accused of multiple historical crimes against multiple victims. The case was widely reported as a groundbreaking case in the super orthodox Jewish society, and the accuser had not reported to the police.
R v. Pollard & anr [Maidstone] 2017
Jeffrey Israel was in charge of weapons and ammunition, and in several trials related to the alleged conspiracy for transporting a large amount of cocaine and heroin. Many of the evidence was developed mainly on telephone schedules.
R v. Clayson [Maidstone] 2017
Jeffrey Israel has defended the defendant in the UK's largest conspiracy, supplying a heroin equivalent to 20 million pounds (80 kilograms).
Operation Seale (Damilola Taylor Murder- trial 1) 2006
Operation Deliver [C.C.C.] 2009
Operation Devout [Birmingham] 2009
R v. Ruskuls [C.C.C.] 2017
Jeffrey Israel, a series of targeted weight robbery, deposits the first defendant in the case where the victim was woken up with a gun in the middle of the night, was threatened by KnifePoint, was connected, and the property was materialized. did.
Operation Tangelo 2 2010
Jeffrey Israeli, led by Ian Glenn QC, is in charge of Lorley driver, who was drunk and quarreled and was charged with violent killing his colleagues.
Operation Steamroller [Southwark] 2014
R v. Sroka [C.C.C.] 2017
Jeffrey Israel is in charge of defending a larg e-scale cocaine conspiracy case involving 11 defendants. The evidence was composed of more than 100 telephone call data and a wide range of secret monitoring.
R v. Timon [C.C.C.] 2017
Jeffrey Israel defended the mother of a delusional schizophrenic patient who attacked and killed men indiscriminately in the daytime. Jeffrey Israel's client was sued to hide, disguise him and escape from the UK.
Operation Arrow [Bristol] 2014
Jeffrey Israel is in charge of international soccer players accused of Date Rape.
R v. BM [Maidstone] 2017
SARAH FORSHAW QC led Jeffrey Israel and was in charge of a man who was charged with killing a tattoo man who had been unknown for several months. Behind it was the "territory struggle" over the provision of crystal methium.
R v. Defontaine [Croydon] 2017
Jeffrey Israel was in charge of a man who was charged with a police officer shooting and killing a police officer after working on a violent armed robbery. In this case, forensic evidence, especially DNA and firearm residue, triggered.
R v. Hood [Canterbury] 2017
Jeffrey Israeli has been charged with a man who was accused of buying and selling more than 50 women from Eastern Europe and working as a prostitute.
R v. Hussain [Snaresbrook] 2017
Hannah Wyatt was involved in childcare procedures as a mother who had severe learning disabilities and needed an intermediary. In 2013, Hannah Wyatt was successfully returned to the ICO under the custody order to her child. The child who was taken away at birth returned to his mother as a mother and child family.
Operation Boldo [I.L.C.C.] 2017
Geoffrey Israel represented a young defendant (15) who was charged with conspiring with 12 others to supply over 100 prohibited firearms, including machine guns and grenades, between criminal gangs across the country. Extensive phone evidence, surveillance evidence, CCTV and complex "low copy" DNA evidence.
Operation Polarity [C.C.C.] 2017
Geoffrey Israel represented a football fan who was murdered after a major violent incident between Charlton Athletic and Tottenham fans following a pre-season friendly match.
R v. Whitlock & Baker [Blackfriars] 2017
Geoffrey Israel represented an unknown rape case against an 18-year-old virgin by a man hiding in bushes, accused of assaulting her and then raping her metres from her front door.
R v H & ors [Guildford] 2017
Hannah Wyatt represented a father convicted of the manslaughter of his ex-partner, the mother of his child.
R v. Aziz & ors [C.C.C] 2017
Chris Sutton-Mattox represented 10 members of a conspiracy to supply £600, 000 worth of cocaine during an 8 week trial.
Operation Manningtree [Inner London] 2017 2017
Sam Bonner represented a defendant charged with S18 offences after breaking his ex-partner's jaw in three places. Following negotiations with the defence the appeal was accepted at ABH.
R v. Daniels & ors [Isleworth] 2017
Sam Bonner successfully defended the defendant charged with other offences of inflicting grievous bodily harm on the plaintiff who suffered a broken and dislocated shoulder. The GBH charge was closed after successful submission without indictment and the defendant was unanimously acquitted of all other charges at the end of the trial.
R v. Yogarajah & ors [Luton] 2017
Sam Bonner successfully defended at the Central Criminal Court a defendant charged with throwing boiling water on the alleged female victim and occasioning actual bodily harm.
R v. NC [Aylesbury] 2017
Sam Bonner defended in this sexual assault case where both the plaintiff and defendant had serious mental health issues. As a result of thorough preparation, the prosecution did not introduce evidence prior to trial.
R v. Mulligan & Clancy [C.C.C.] 2017
Robert Ellison successfully prosecuted a child abuse case involving sadistic torture of a young child. Issues included the admissibility of psychological evidence relating to the child's mother.
R v. Burton [Southwark] 2017
Robert Ellison defended police officers in the Thames Valley Police Misconduct case. Issues included breach of confidentiality and data protection regulations. Acting with Queen's Counsel, the client was cleared of any wrongdoing. Recruited by Cartwright King.
R v. Doherty & anr [Luton] 2017
Robert Ellison defended employees who were dissatisfied with the loss of police retirement rights. The appellant was involved in the "Prebgate Scandal."
Operation Marrick [C.C.C.] 2017
Robert Erison has undergone a senior police officer in the prosecution to the Criminal Case Review Committee and the loss of the police pension rights. The appellant was a senior police officer who has been prosecuted for more than 30 years.
Operation Mapledurwell [C.C.C.] 2017
Robert Ellison is in charge of defending a complex and large amount of benefits based on more than 16, 000 pages of evidence. The client was far away and lost his words.
R v. Shepherd & Cox [Maidstone] 2017
In charge of defending HIV infection cases where there were multiple victims. The legal discussions on the scope of the "knowledge" necessary until the plaintiff's "consent" for the risk of infection was issued.
K.C.C. v. S & C [Medway CC] 2017
Robert Ellison worked as a top junior. Armed robbery collusion. Complex situation evidence based on telephone data and vehicle monitoring systems data became an issue.
R v. S&H [Snaresbrook] 2017
Robert Ellison was in charge of the rape case for a 1 2-yea r-old girl. In this case, a lon g-term opposition to young plaintiffs with learning disabilities were required.
RB of Greenwich v O [Central Family Court] 2017
Mark Haywood QC and Brian Altman QC defended the royal family in a high law in this representative trial of collaborative / relocated malice. The Supreme Court abandoned Gnango's guilty guilty of the murder of Magda Punefska, and did not fire a bullet that caused Puneffska to kill him in a gunfight that died Puneffska. Despite having a fatal bullet, he ruled that he would be killed by him.
RB of Kensington & Chelsea v G [Central Family Court] 2017
Anthony Orchard QC was in charge of Michael Phil Pot, who was charged with a fire that caused six of the 17 children in Derby in May 2012. The incident was widely featured in the media. The issues were the past claims for historical sexual assault and abuse, the accompaniment of the defendant's assault and the attempted murder, and the detailed background. Other background issues, related to mobile phones, tolerance for monitoring evidence
R v. Garang & Galean [C.C.C.] 2017
Anthony Orchard QC charged the child rape criminal, which repeatedly attacked the 10 to 1 2-yea r-olds. Click here for the Daily Express report. < SPAN> Robert Ellison defended employees who were dissatisfied with the loss of police retirement rights. The appellant was involved in the "Prebgate Scandal."
R v. A [Southwark] 2017
Robert Erison has undergone a senior police officer in the prosecution to the Criminal Case Review Committee and the loss of the police pension rights. The appellant was a senior police officer who has been prosecuted for more than 30 years.
R v. X [Birmingham] 2009
Robert Ellison is in charge of defending a complex and large amount of benefits based on more than 16, 000 pages of evidence. The client was far away and lost his words.
R v. Vernarsky [Sheffield] 2012
In charge of defending HIV infection cases where there were multiple victims. The legal discussions on the scope of the "knowledge" necessary until the plaintiff's "consent" for the risk of infection was issued.
R v. Birch [Leeds] 2012
Robert Ellison worked as a top junior. Armed robbery collusion. Complex situation evidence based on telephone data and vehicle monitoring systems data became an issue.
R v. Fullam [Teeside] 2009
Robert Ellison was in charge of the rape case for a 1 2-yea r-old girl. In this case, a lon g-term opposition to young plaintiffs with learning disabilities were required.
R v. Iqbal & ors [Harrow] 2017
Mark Haywood QC and Brian Altman QC defended the royal family in a high law in this representative trial of collaborative / relocated malice. The Supreme Court abandoned Gnango's guilty guilty of the murder of Magda Punefska, and did not fire a bullet that caused Puneffska to kill him in a gunfight that died Puneffska. Despite having a fatal bullet, he ruled that he would be killed by him.
R v. KB & anr [Woolwich] 2017
Anthony Orchard QC was in charge of Michael Phil Pot, who was charged with a fire that caused six of the 17 children in Derby in May 2012. The incident was widely featured in the media. The issues were the past claims for historical sexual assault and abuse, the accompaniment of the defendant's assault and the attempted murder, and the detailed background. Other background issues, related to mobile phones, tolerance for monitoring evidence
R v. M & anr [CCC] 2017
Anthony Orchard QC charged the child rape criminal, which repeatedly attacked the 10 to 1 2-yea r-olds. Click here for the Daily Express report. Robert Ellison defended employees who were dissatisfied with the loss of police retirement rights. The appellant was involved in the "Prebgate Scandal."
R v. B [Wood Green] 2017
Robert Erison has undergone a senior police officer in the prosecution to the Criminal Case Review Committee and the loss of the police pension rights. The appellant was a senior police officer who has been prosecuted for more than 30 years.
R v S [Court of Appeal] 2017
Robert Ellison is in charge of defending a complex and large amount of benefits based on more than 16, 000 pages of evidence. The client was far away and lost his words.
R v. H [Canterbury] 2017
In charge of defending HIV infection cases where there were multiple victims. The legal discussions on the scope of the "knowledge" necessary until the plaintiff's "consent" for the risk of infection was issued.
R v. B [Southwark] 2017
Robert Ellison worked as a top junior. Armed robbery collusion. Complex situation evidence based on telephone data and vehicle monitoring systems data became an issue.
R v MS & Ors [Southwark] 2017
Robert Ellison was in charge of the rape case for a 1 2-yea r-old girl. In this case, a lon g-term opposition to young plaintiffs with learning disabilities were required.
R v MT & Ors [Blackfriars] 2017
Mark Haywood QC and Brian Altman QC defended the royal family in a high law in this representative trial of collaborative / relocated malice. The Supreme Court abandoned Gnango's guilty guilty of the murder of Magda Punefska, and did not fire a bullet that caused Puneffska to kill him in a gunfight that died Puneffska. Despite having a fatal bullet, he ruled that he would be killed by him.
R v WM & Ors [Isleworth] 2017
Anthony Orchard QC was in charge of Michael Phil Pot, who was charged with a fire that caused six of the 17 children in Derby in May 2012. The incident was widely featured in the media. The issues were the past claims for historical sexual assault and abuse, the accompaniment of the defendant's assault and the attempted murder, and the detailed background. Other background issues, related to mobile phones, tolerance for monitoring evidence
R v JH & Ors [C.C.C.] 2017
Anthony Orchard QC charged the child rape criminal, which repeatedly attacked the 10 to 1 2-yea r-olds. Click here for the Daily Express report.
R v JS [Kingston] 2017
Anthony Orchard QC defended Ben Temple for the Crown in this case where the defendant strangled his mother. The defendant had a history of mental illness dating back to 1991, involving violence towards his family. Three psychiatrists were of the opinion that he suffered from schizoaffective disorder. A typical report can be found here
R v SH [Inner London] 2016
Anthony Orchard QC led the prosecution of Ben Temple in the prosecution of three women who beat to death a 21-year-old woman in north London. Read the Evening Standard report here.
R v CG [Snaresbrook] 2017
Anthony Orchard QC led the prosecution of Ben Temple in this revenge killing in Wembley, north London, where a man opened fire after a dispute. Read the Evening Standard report here.
R v JH [Woolwich] 2015
Anthony Orchard QC prosecuted a defendant in a brutal murder case where he stabbed his wife to death. A typical report can be found here.
R v PT & ors [Central Criminal Court] 2014
Anthony Orchard QC defended in this complex conspiracy to carry out cyber attacks on organisations including Sony, EA Sports, News International and the Serious Organised Crime Agency. Orchard's client was the only one offered no strings attached. See the BBC report here.
R v FA [Inner London] 2017
Anthony Orchard QC defended an 18-year-old who was acquitted after six months of prosecution in this consortium's murderous knife attacks. See the Guardian report here.
R v DM [Wood Green] 2017
Anthony Orchard QC acted for this trial of a girl who was transported from Nigeria to Europe via the UK on suspicion of human trafficking, rape, sexual assault and ritual assault (voodoo). Issues considered included the admissibility of overseas evidence; mobile and cell phone analysis, character issues (defendant and witnesses) - extensive video evidence and allegations of organised ritual assaults allegedly used as a mechanism of control.
R v. JB [Basildon] 2016
Anthony Orchard QC was the dominant force in this complex, long-running, multi-armed conspiracy against HMRC.
R v. Bui & ors [Woolwich] 2013
Anthony Orchard QC defended in a £38 million international VAT fraud case.
R v. AH & ors [Woolwich] 2015
Anthony Orchard QC defended in a £4 million international mobile phone fraud case listed on O2.
R v. BH & ors [Isleworth] 2011
Anthony Orchard QC defended in a £27 million fraud case.
R v. HB & ors [Southwark] 2015
Anthony Orchard QC defended in a £2 million SFO investment fraud case.
R v. Kibusi & ors [C.C.C.] 2017
Jonathan Polnay prosecutes "deranged lone wolf" who randomly stabbed four women to death in a Hampton Court supermarket car park. News here
R v S [Snaresbrook] 2017
Jonathan Polnay prosecuted the former BBC DJ, who served 13 years in prison for a series of child crimes committed between 1969 and 1986. News here from the BBC
Operation Bloomeria [2017-2018] 2018
Jonathan Pornei is inspired by "Breaking Bad" and charges a young woman who has been accused of the first prosecution based on the Biological Weapons Law and attempted murder after trying to register her mother. Click here for the news report
R v B [Canterbury] 2017
Jonathan Pornei commanded Ben Holt in this "standard" rare earth metal fraud. The two defendants were convicted of the trial as a part of the investment, selling rare earth scraps. The total fraud was £ 1. 9 million, and the two defendants were convicted and sentenced to 11 years of imprisonment. I was trained by the CPS Central Scam Team. Click here for the news report
R v. Kamara & anr [C.C.C.] 2018
The tw o-handed trial, which Jonathan Pornei was charged with Old Bailey, was involved in a proposal for a revenge attack seeking compensation for a group that thought he was responsible for assaulting one of his partner with firearms. The PCSO who heard the obstruction intervened and was shot but intact. The defendant was sentenced to 24 and 12 years in prison. Click here for the news report.
R v. Davis [C.C.C.] 2017
Jonathan Pornei has prosecuted Angem Chodally's infamous companion for attacking teenage teenage Muslim children. Click here for the report
R v. Abifade & ors [I.L.C.C.] 2017
Sarah Four Show QC succeeded in defending a 1 8-yea r-old man who had a sunny murder and alleged suspicion of negligence in a 2 0-yea r-old man stabbed in Songton Heath. I acknowledged it. Click here for the news report.
R v. CS & ors [C.C.C.] 2017
Sue Rodam succeeded in defendant's defendant, and after detective discovered weapons, 300 bullets, thousands of cartriders, and bombs, the involvement of commercial firearms was innocent. Proof. He was trained in goldcorn.
R v. Khatri & ors [Snaresbrook] 2017
Sue Rodam defended the German, who was assigned to a jury, who was involved in the import of 42 kg of A-class drugs, using the "Eurotonnel" port in Kent. Instructions from Stermberg Reed Law Office.
R v. Zefi & ors [Kingston] 2017
Sue Rodam is in charge of this multiple rape alleged trials, and then advanced to the appeal court, and is now a guideline case that includes inconsistent judgments. Studied under Thomas Boyd Wight. < SPAN> Jonathan Pornei is inspired by "Breaking Bad" and prosecuts a young woman who has been accused of the first prosecution based on the Biological Weapons Law and attempted murder after trying to register her mother. Click here for the news report
R v. Agostinho & ors [Kingston] 2017
Jonathan Pornei commanded Ben Holt in this "standard" rare earth metal fraud. The two defendants were convicted of the trial as a result of selling rare earth scraps as part of the investment. The total fraud was £ 1. 9 million, and the two defendants were convicted and sentenced to 11 years of imprisonment. I was trained by the CPS Central Scam Team. Click here for the news report
R v. Sewell & ors [Canterbury] 2017
The tw o-handed trial, which Jonathan Pornei was charged with Old Bailey, was involved in a proposal for a revenge attack seeking compensation for a group that thought he was responsible for assaulting one of his partner with firearms. The PCSO who heard the obstruction intervened and was shot but intact. The defendant was sentenced to 24 and 12 years in prison. Click here for the news report.
R v. Slepcik [Inner London] 2017
Jonathan Pornei has prosecuted Angem Chodally's infamous companion for attacking teenage teenage Muslim children. Click here for the report
R v AS [Snaresbrook] 2017
Sarah Four Show QC succeeded in defending a 1 8-yea r-old man whose murder and negligence were suspected of being stabbed in Songton Heath, and his jury was a good defense. I acknowledged it. Click here for the news report.
R v MA [Maidstone] 2017
Sue Rodam succeeded in defendant's defendant, and after detective discovered weapons, 300 bullets, thousands of cartriders, and bombs, the involvement of commercial firearms was innocent. Proof. He was trained in goldcorn.
R v. KO [Blackfriars] 2017
Sue Rodam defended the German, who was assigned to a jury, who was involved in the import of 42 kg of A-class drugs, using the "Eurotonnel" port in Kent. Instructions from Stermberg Reed Law Office.
R v. RA [Maidstone] 2018
Sue Rodam is in charge of this multiple rape alleged trials, and then advanced to the appeal court, and is now a guideline case that includes inconsistent judgments. Studied under Thomas Boyd Wight. Jonathan Pornei is inspired by "Breaking Bad" and charges a young woman who has been accused of the first prosecution based on the Biological Weapons Law and attempted murder after trying to register her mother. Click here for the news report
Operation Tandil [Croydon] 2018
Jonathan Pornei commanded Ben Holt in this "standard" rare earth metal fraud. The two defendants were convicted of the trial as a result of selling rare earth scraps as part of the investment. The total fraud was £ 1. 9 million, and the two defendants were convicted and sentenced to 11 years of imprisonment. I was trained by the CPS Central Scam Team. Click here for the news report
R v. S [St Albans] 2017
The tw o-handed trial, which Jonathan Pornei was charged with Old Bailey, was involved in a proposal for a revenge attack seeking compensation for a group that thought he was responsible for assaulting one of his partner with firearms. The PCSO who heard the obstruction intervened and was shot but intact. The defendant was sentenced to 24 and 12 years in prison. Click here for the news report.
R v. Abdikarim [Isleworth] 2017
Jonathan Pornei has prosecuted Angem Chodally's infamous companion for attacking teenage teenage Muslim children. Click here for the report
R v. Ahmed [Snaresbrook] 2017
Sarah Four Show QC succeeded in defending a 1 8-yea r-old man who had a sunny murder and alleged suspicion of negligence in a 2 0-yea r-old man stabbed in Songton Heath. I acknowledged it. Click here for the news report.
R v. Abdallah [C.C.C.] 2017
Sue Rodam succeeded in defendant's defendant, and after detective discovered weapons, 300 bullets, thousands of cartriders, and bombs, the involvement of commercial firearms was innocent. Proof. He was trained in goldcorn.
Operation Primrose [Liverpool] 2018
Sue Rodam defended the German, who was assigned to a jury, who was involved in the import of 42 kg of A-class drugs, using the "Eurotonnel" port in Kent. Instructions from Stermberg Reed Law Office.
R v. A [Bournemouth] 2018
Sue Rodam is in charge of this multiple rape alleged trials, and then advanced to the appeal court, and is now a guideline case that includes inconsistent judgments. Studied under Thomas Boyd Wight.
R v. M [ILCC] 2018
Catherine Farly led Valeria Swift, instructed by the prosecutor, and was in charge of the six conspiracy injuries. In this case, an analysis of over 20. 000 telephone record experts was required. The defendant was convicted of conspiracy. Click here for news
R v. Theodore Johnson [C.C.C] 2018
Valeria Swift was defended by a man who was accused of assaulting by an 1 8-yea r-old motivation performed by a loan female overnight. In the case of being convicted, the defendant would take the risk of public protection because of the conviction (this was supported) who was convicted of a woman in the forest. The defendant was acquitted in Article 18, but was guilty in Article 20, so he was exempt from public protection.
R v. X [Teesside] 2018
Valeria Swift is in charge of a pilot who has been accused of working on violence while armed with a knife. The defendant was acquitted.
R v. IH & ors [C.C.C.] 2017
Valeria Swift is in charge of defense of his grandfather who was charged with rape his granddaughter. The defendant was acquitted.
R v. Giang Huong Tran [Stafford] 2017
Valeria Swift was in charge of his father, who was accused of sexual assault on his daughter. The defendant was acquitted.
R v Ruta Sperskaite & ors [Croydon] 2017
Valeria Swift has prosecuted a remarkable case, which was accused of sexual assault during an office party to a colleague of an international leading law firm. The defendant was guilty.
R v Mehdi Khashi [Chelmsford] 2016
Christopher Sato n-Matox is an investigation consultant in an investigation on the tragic death of two young children in Kent, who died of an emergency cesarean section after giving birth to her second child. Eight hours after giving birth to his son, Mrs. Cappuccini died after several liters of bleeding because the surgeon made a fatal mistake in leaving the large placenta in the uterine cavity. Click here for news
R v Tahir Mahmood [Leeds] 2016
Valeria Swift is in charge of defense of his brother who was charged with raping his sister. The defendant was acquitted.
R v Mirza Hussain & ors [Croydon] 2015
Valeria Swift has been charged with a woman who was charged with a sexual assault of a teenager. The defendant was convicted.
R v Anthony Okoh [Woolwich] 2014
Valeria Swift prosecuted a rape unresolved case by several others in 1990. The defendant was convicted.
R v Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust [Maidstone] 2014
Valeria Swift was guided by a defense in a rape trial with a number of people for several months. The defendant was acquitted.
N.M.C v Janice Harry [NMC] 2013
Steven Chepec served as an agent of the claimant in a petition for a public office abuse proposed by a police information provider, a fighters4 justice, arrested with bullet and gunpowder.
R v. Nazzary & ors [C.C.C.] 2018
Stephen Chippeck represented a witness protection scheme claimant in a breach of contract claim against Greater Manchester Police.
R v. Desai [Guildford] 2017
Stephen Chippeck represented a claimant in a jury action where a jury found that several police officers had committed a racist attack on a Rastafarian civilian. The decision was upheld in the Court of Appeal.
In the matter of M [Southwark] 2018
Stephen Chippeck represented a claimant in an action for damages for breach of contract and negligence for participation in the police witness protection scheme.
R v DE & ors [Kingston] 2018
Stephen Chippeck represented a claimant in a Master of the Rolls (what constitutes mental or physical injury for the purposes of negligence in public office).
R v J Smith & ors [Bristol] 2017
Stephen Chippeck represented a claimant in relation to the Legal Services Commission's obligation to pay the full costs of a single expert report ordered in proceedings under the Children Act 1989 in cases where a child holds a public funds certificate but the parents do not.
R v J Abidi & ors [Southwark] 2018
A decision not to pay the full costs of a joint expert report ordered by the LSC in private law proceedings under the Children Act 1989 is unlawful where the child has a public funds certificate but the parents do not.
R v S Roberts [Guildford] 2017
Stephen Chippeck solicitor represented a doctor in an appeal against a GMC decision to strike the doctor from the medical register.
R v Rezza [Southwark] 2014
Stephen Chippeck, under the direction of Lizzie Wilson, represented a learning disabled mother who was alleged to have made false allegations of rape and child abuse allegations against F. Following a hearing it was found that the allegations against the mother were false and those against F were true and the child was ordered to remain with the mother.
In the matter of W [Woolwich] 2016
Stephen Chippeck represented a learning disabled father with Paul Storey QC. He claimed that F had caused serious injuries to the baby. Following a hearing it was found that F was not liable for any injuries.
In the matter of L [Bristol] 2017
Stephen Chipek represented a young father who claimed he had caused serious injuries to his nine-day-old baby that were not an accident.
Council of Lloyds v J [Lloyds Enforcement Tribunal] 2013
Stephen Chipek also represented a mother with special learning needs whose claims of agitation were found to be false and her baby was returned.
R v C B [Wood Green] 2013
Kent CC v D & amp; amp; Ors [2014] EWFC 59 Kent CC v D & amp; amp; & amp; Ors (2) (Fact Finding) [2015] EWFC 93 Kent CC v. D & amp; amp; Ors (5) (Rehearing) [2015] EWFC 96 A series of High Court hearings in which Stephen Chippeck, alongside Paul Storey QC, represented a mother allegedly involved in complex child trafficking which, on review, was found to be false.
R v M [St. Albans] 2017
Stephen Chippeck is representing the mother in guardianship/Native Japanese proceedings.
R v G and C [Isleworth] 2017
Medway Council v W (Fact Finding: Familial Sexual Abuse allegations and Local Authorities Approach) [2014] EWFC B 190 Medway Council v W (2) (Welfare Hearing) [2015] EWFC B233 Medway Council v W (3) (Further Fact Finding Further Allegations) [2015] EWFC B234 A series of cases in which Stephen Chippeck represented a father who was alleged to have sexually abused his children. At trial the allegations were found to be false.
R v G [Wood Green] 2016
Representing a mother with severe learning disabilities.
Appeal of J V [Court of Appeal] 2016
Stephen Chippeck represented M at an intermediate stage where it was necessary and appropriate to immediately remove the child from the mother's custody.
Appeal of M S [Court of Appeal] 2017
Valeria Swift defended against the father's rape of a child and the falsification of indecent images. The case was investigated by the FBI and, following multi-agency cooperation, the defendant was arrested in the UK. Successfully filed legal submissions to exclude evidence obtained by the FBI, which led to further submissions regarding insufficient evidence. Defendant was acquitted.
R v L [Maidstone MC] 2017
Valeria Swift defended multiple allegations of historical rape. This case required sensitive cross-examination of a very vulnerable victim. Defendant was acquitted.
R v P West & ors [C.C.C.] 2015
Valeria Swift represented a rape case in which the victim sustained over 20 injuries during the assault. Defendant was acquitted of rape.
R v P and ors 2014
Valeria Swift represented a child abuse allegation involving the death of an infant. A mother was arrested for the death of her infant. Careful consideration of pathology evidence was required to negotiate the best outcome for the prosecution and defendant. Defendant pleaded guilty on very limited grounds, which resulted in her immediate release.
R v Van G [Reading] 2017
Valeria Swift prosecuted a father's cruelty to his young son. This case required sensitive examination of a very vulnerable victim. Defendant was found guilty.
R v W [St Albans] 2013
Valeria Swift acted as junior counsel in this drug supply conspiracy case. She represented the defendant in winning an acquittal after a very lengthy trial. Success depended on careful analysis of phone evidence and extensive intrusive surveillance approved by RIPA.
R v ADB [Kingston] 2014
Jonathan Polnay is prosecuting the defendant, who has been called one of the UK's worst sex offenders and who has received three further life sentences for a rape 30 years ago. News here.
R v H-G [Southwark] 2015
Sarah Forshaw QC successfully defended a 39-year-old father of two who was cleared of breaking into a married woman's home and raping her. The jury acquitted the defendant of four charges: sexual assault, rape and two attempted rape counts. Instructions from ABV Solicitors News here.
R v. G [Guildford)] 2018
Katherine Farrelly prosecuted the defendant, who was charged with possessing a firearm with intent to endanger life and possessing ammunition. He was stopped by police shortly after climbing over a garden fence in East London and disposing of a loaded firearm fitted with a "silencer". The case involved protracted court arguments over the admissibility of DNA and GSR evidence, all of which were admitted. News report available here.
R v. H [Southwark] 2018
Catherine Farrelly was instructed to prosecute these cases involving four defendants linked to the supply of one kilogram of cocaine with an estimated street value of £100. 000.
R v.P [Aylesbury] 2018
Catherine Farrelly led the prosecution of Paul Jackson, a defendant who sexually abused five young children with various learning disabilities over a period of several years. The case involved a significant amount of social service and education material, staff review, together with an appointed intermediary. The defendant was sentenced to 22 years imprisonment, with six years extended licence.
R v. H [Kingston] 2018
Catherine Farrelly defended a young man charged with two counts of rape. News here
Operation Willsbridge [Southwark] 2018
Catherine Farrelly acted as counsel in the prosecution of a defendant who raped his daughter between the ages of 13 and 15 and used sex toys and other paraphernalia during the abuse. The case involved a very sensitive response to the plaintiff. The defendant was subsequently sentenced to 20 years in prison.
R v. Glenn [ILCC] 2018
Catherine Farrelly was instructed to prosecute a defendant who kidnapped a 15-year-old girl off the street and then repeatedly raped her.
R v. T [Maidstone] 2018
Gordon Kearse defended in this multi-party conspiracy to commit cash van robberies. The defendant and his team were allegedly involved in all of the cash van robberies that took place in the South East of England in the first half of 2016. Following half-time submissions, a not guilty verdict was returned by the learned judge. Gordon Kearse, instructed by Goldcorns for the defence, represented the defendant, who raped a vulnerable man while he was interviewing for a job and sexually assaulted and raped him on other occasions over a period of four years. He pleaded guilty on the day of trial and was sentenced to three and a half years imprisonment. He was represented by Martin Hewett LLP. Anthony Orchard QC Jonathan Polnay appeared for the Crown in this case involving the deaths of an aunt and her 10-year-old nephew, who were killed by a drug addict during a police car chase. The defendant received a 12-year sentence. Read the news here
R v. C [Inner London] 2018
Anthony Orchard QC successfully defended a defendant who was acquitted of all charges of allegedly drugging and raping his common-law wife. Represented by BCL Solicitors LLP.
R v. P (Woolwich) 2018
23 defendants charged with 80 counts were prosecuted by Queen's Bench. Orla Daly secured the defence of the second defendant, a 17-year-old girl accused of offences including rape and human trafficking. The prosecution appealed against claims of abuse of process. He continued to represent the case at appeal and the judge's decision was upheld on all but one point. A complex case involving issues of capacity and consent as well as abuse of process. Currently representing a leading indecent image case, R v W (P) & others (2016) 2 Cr App. R. 27. Represented by EBR Attridge LLP.
R v. W [Cambridge] 2018
Sarah Forshaw QC led the defence for Orla Daly in a case prosecuted by Queen's Bench and Treasury Counsel. The case concerned the death of a pensioner who was beaten to death by a defendant with a learning disability. The issues were diminished responsibility and assisted suicide. Represented by Thomas Boyd Wight LLP.
R v. R [Central Criminal Court] 2017
Orla Daly defended an 82-year-old retired headmaster for the historical sexual abuse of pupils. The defendant was assessed as incompetent to stand trial and was unable to give instructions. At trial he was acquitted despite failing to clearly dispute the complainant's version of events. Represented by Berry & Lambert LLP.
R v. J [Chelmsford] 2017
Orla Daly successfully defended a businessman who was accused of multiple rapes of his daughter and exonerated him. Trained at EBR Attridge LLP.
R v. R [Highbury Corner Youth Court] 2017
Acted for a chiropractor accused of filming the sexual assault of a patient. Trained at Berry & Lambert LLP.
R v. I [Huntingdon] 2017
Orla Daly successfully defended an athletic coach who was exonerated of all previous rape and sexual assault allegations against five plaintiffs. She was trained at Berry & Lambert LLP.
R v. W & 7 ors [C.C.C] 2018
Orla Daly represented the same individual twice against separate allegations of rape by a stranger within a six month period. The defendant was acquitted at both trials. Trained at Edward Hayes LLP.
R v. V & 7 ors [C.C.C] 2018
Successfully defended a Royal Navy officer who was sexually assaulted on board the warship HMS Ramsay whilst anchored in Bahrain. Successfully obtained a no contest submission and was acquitted. Trained at Edward Hayes LLP. Article from the Portsmouth News.
R v. L [C.C.C] 2018
Orla Daly prosecuted a businessman and chess professional in a multiple historic rape case involving three plaintiffs 30-40 years ago. The lead plaintiff had serious mental health issues as an adult. The defendants were convicted on all 13 counts.
R v. H [Woolwich] 2018
Edmund Fowler successfully prosecuted three individuals in a complex multi-million pound carbon credit fraud. The defendants were represented by Queen's Counsel.
Operation Roburo [Kingston] 2017
Edmund Fowler led Dickon Reid to the Crown in a complex multiple armed conspiracy dealing with 83 illegal immigrants from France.
R v. K [St Albans] 2017
Edmund Fowler successfully prosecuted a defendant who stabbed a fellow Polish national to death during a drunken altercation. Read the news here.
R v.S (Canterbury) 2018
Edmund Fowler successfully prosecuted the taxi defendant for the violent rape and sexual assault of a 15-year-old girl.
R v AN [Blackfriars] 2018
Jonathan Higgs QC defended Edmund Fowler, who prosecuted these four defendants in the murder of a Kent man found naked on Leysdown beach. The alleged motive for the attack and murder was that he had allegedly been abusing a teenage girl on the night the victim was killed. Read the BBC report here.
R v E [Snaresbrook] 2018
Asuka Fujita was charged with confiscation proceedings having admitted a charge of conspiracy to steal a car worth over £750. She is being led by the CPS.
R v Seabrook & ors [Woolwich] 2018
Asuka Fujita represented a defendant charged with benefit fraud amounting to over £120, 000 over a 12-year period. Following negotiations with the prosecution, a plea was agreed on the merits and a suspended sentence was given. Paul Jackson, instructed by Sternberg Reid, defended the case.
R v TK [Kingston] 2018
Paul Jackson represented the male carer who was cleared of multiple counts of oral and vaginal rape of his step-daughter. Directed by Thos Boyd Whyte.
R v SB [Southwark] 2018
Paul Jackson represented a man charged with the attempted murder of his ex-partner's new lover. The defendant drove his car onto the pavement and ran over the victim, killing him. Read more Thos Boyd Whyte news articles here.
R v SC [Westminster] 2017
Jonathan Higgs QC led Paul Jackson in the defence of a young man accused of murdering his father and attempting to murder his young niece and nephew. The defendant was acquitted by reason of insanity. Emery Khalil & Brown represented the case. News here
R v AA [Central Criminal Court] 2017
Paul Jackson represents men accused of joint section 18 operation after "bottling" at a nightclub. Defence alleges use of intermediary. By BaileyNicholson Grayson.
R v DS [Snaresbrook] 2017
Paul Jackson represents a man accused of multiple stabbings, who was found not guilty by a jury at trial. Recruited by McCormacks.
R v LT [Snaresbrook] 2017
Paul Jackson represents former professional boxer Colin "The Hammer" Vidler, who was found not guilty of attempting to murder his cousin by striking him multiple times in the head with an axe. News here
R v DR [Harrow] 2017
Paul Jackson represents a man accused of dangerous driving causing the death of a cyclist. Rahman was recorded driving at 71mph in a 30mph speed zone, hitting the cyclist. He was given a four year prison sentence after pleading guilty. Represented by EHB Solicitors. News here.
R v SR [Harrow] 2017
Paul Jackson was retained to represent a man charged with manslaughter after delivering a blow to the head to a fellow HMP prisoner who had been taking spice. Read the TS Law news report here.
R v SV [City of London] 2017
Dominic Webber successfully defended a man who was acquitted of all charges of eight rapes committed whilst in a relationship with his ex-girlfriend, from whom he had split two years before he was charged. The offences are said to have taken place over a period of two years.
R v MC [Southwark] 2016
Dominik Weber succeeded in winning a man (convicted) of a man (convicted) of a man (conviction) in an attempted rape in a young woman who came home late at night. (He has been convicted by the other two minor crimes) here is the report of Daily Mail.
R v MV [Maidstone] 2016
Dominik Webber succeeded in defending himself in the case of a knife on the upper thigh from behind the fleeing young man.
R v BG [Blackfriars] 2016
Christopher Sato n-Matox served as a Sally State investigation committee on the death of a Sally state technical entrepreneur who died in a holes in a Wabridge bicycle club glue pride.
R v CC [Snaresbrook] 2016
Sarah Four Show QC served as a lawyer in an Old Bailey trial in a case where a 2 0-yea r-old man in front of a picnic family in an East London family died in a pierced neck and chest. The defendant was acquitted in murder and was convicted of intentional negligence. McCormacks teaches.
R v S & ors [Harrow] 2016
Catherine Farly served as a prosecutor in two defendants, who was charged with revenge stabs in connection with the failed drug trading. In this trial, a considerable amount of telephone evidence was analyzed in addition to the identified mobile site and voice recognition data. Click here for the Guardian News article.
R v AG [Maidstone] 2016
Catherine Farly was instructed to prosecute the defendant for false confinement and three rape crimes, including daytime assault on 1 6-yea r-old girls. Click here for the report of the evening standard.
The Army v PSP [Colchester Military Court Centre] 2017
Under Michael Bromle y-Martin QC, Risi Naswani was in charge of this remarkable murder on Mark Manning's death. The defendant claimed to the state side (the Ministry of Finance's senior adviser was prosecuted) that he had killed Manning. The state relied on a 1 4-yea r-old boy who testified that Gail's confession, which Gail was his wife, and that Gail and another man had talked about the murder of Manning. From shortly after the death of 2014 to November 2016, Gail denied involvement in death, providing fake witnesses to the police. In November 2016, he acknowledged that he had killed Manning for the first time, but said he had acted in justified and panicked to hide Manning's body. Manning was innocent in murder and was convicted for negligence, but it had been offered to the prosecutor from the beginning of the trial. Bambo Ciattalos of Stokoe Partnership was in charge of defense. Click here for reports on BBC News.
R v RC [Woolwich] 2017
Jonathan Porne was instructed to evacuate the Italian martial artist. The raid was indiscriminately due to racist motives. The judge was acquitted of the loss of sacred sints, and the defendant was detained to receive a spiritual appraisal. Click here for an article on the evening standard paper.
R v EL [Snaresbrook] 2017
Sarah Four Show QC was charged with sexual assault to a 5-yea r-old niece during the Parasomnia period, and after an eigh t-day trial in Old Bailey, he was acquitted. I defended. He was requested by BCL Solicitors LLP.
R v EZ [Guildford] 2017
Jonathan Higgs QC is a man whose involvement in the case stranged by a revenge attack on posting an aggressive material of a former girlfriend online by Pokemon GO fan. I was asked to defend. Click here for news.
R v KR [Snaresbrook] 2017
Jonathan Higgs QC defended James Martin in a trial involving a series of unknown guys who had been hit by a knife in the early 1990s. Several allegations have emerged from DNA's cold reviews recovered from socks left on rape sites by brutal others in the 1990s. The incident was associated with another rape attempted case at the same time, and was supported only to similar cases. What is important is that this hypothesis contains the correct interpretation of a new statistical analysis of a lo w-quality mixed profile DNA sample. Berry & Lambert's guidance.
R v SS [Westminster] 2017
Benjamin Temple abducted a 3 0-yea r-old woman on his way to work under the command of Crispin Eyelette QC, accused him of a homeless man who had been cruelly killed. The defendant was sentenced to life imprisonment (minimum sentence was 30 years). Click here for BBC reports.
R v OO [Wimbledon] 2017
Alcohol sideways, fraudulent scams, were very complicated, and larg e-scale personal trading networks were involved. In the second part, the bank of the "Scammer" was established.
R v EW [Highbury Youth Court] 2017
Anthony Orchard QC related to a 2 9-yea r-old woman who was killed brutally by jealous boyfriends (because a boyfriend discovered a redirection letter from a post office to confirm that she would break up with her). In Old Bailey's murder trial, he led Charlotte Newwell as a prosecutor's witness.
R v CF [Watford] 2017
Anthony Orchard QC charged a defendant who killed a bank clerk with a "indiscriminate" attack. Click here for news.
R v HK [Folkstone] 2017
Jeffrey Israel is in charge of defense in a 8-week trial over the supply of a large amount of cocaine and possession of firearms at 98 % purity. According to the instructions of Thos Boyd WHYTE.
R v PM [Bromley] 2017
Gregory Fishwick has succeeded in defendant, who has been allegedly accused of sexual assault with his six years of sexual assault. This suspicion was revenge by his e x-wife after divorce. I was trained in Edward Haze LLP.
R v LE [Canterbury] 2017
Catherine Farly charged a series of sexual assaults against six family members, prosecuted a relentless and manipulated child, and was sentenced to 18 years in prison.
R v SG [Basildon] 2018
Dominik Webber has been acquitted to a 5 0-yea r-old woman, who is said to have had a sexual assault to a 1 6-yea r-old male student who was working par t-time during the summer vacation. Click here for the press.
R v KS [Wood Green] 2018
Catherine Farely has prosecuted the Uber driver, who has been sentenced to 12 years in rape and sexual assault. Hussein was waiting for a drunk woman in front of a popular bar in London and was waiting for a woman coming out of a pub in Shodich in eastern capital, and attacked where she was sleeping. Click here for Daily Mail articles.
R v NM [Highbury Youth Court] 2018
Jonathan Pornei served as the chief of the royal family in this mult i-layered conspiracy in this mult i-layered conspiracy in which three famous businessmen who were trying to separate horset Meet from 100 % pure beef. 。 Click here for news
R v AE [Lewes] 2018
Jonathan Pornei has charged a teenage of a teenager who has created a computer hacking operation that has been confused around the world. At the age of 16, Adam Mad created a stressor titanium program, launched more than 1. 7 million attacks on sites such as Minecraft, Xbox Live, Microsoft, and Team Speak, making more than 386 pounds. The sale of the Cyber Criminals Program has gained more than 386. 000 pounds for US dollars and bitcoin. Click here for the news report.
R v BM [Various] 2018
Jonathan Pornei has charged jailbreak from HMP Penton Ville. The wit rock and baker passed through the bar, crossed the roof, fled with the CCTV pole, and was caught six days and two days later. Click here for the news report.
R v LT [Woolwich] 2018
Asuka defended the third defendant as a junior in a trial by six hands, a second defendant, and the second defendant, and the second defendant was defended by two juniors. Asuka's client was charged with three causes of fraud due to abuse of status with other families, with a total of £ 300. 000. In the trial, an analysis of important financial information that covers multiple bank accounts was sought. As a result of six weeks, Asuka's client was the only defendant, all of which was clear, and eventually received a suspended sentence. He was studying under Sterumberg Reed. Click here for the news report
CH v MH [Birmingham County Court] 2018
Tuckers led by Tucker, Lisi Natwann, in the unprecedented "Three Musketeer Terrorist Trial" in Old Bailey under Judge Globe, under the four of the four defendants. I defended. The trial was a hig h-ranking trial in British history, due to national security issues, and the media was interested. The defendants were under monitored by the West Midland Terrorism Special Project Team and were investigated by a courier. When Mi5 set up an eavesdropping device in the c o-defendant's car, a bag with a pipe bomb, imitation gun, live ammunition, and a scratched ax were found. In the case of the defense, these items were set up by the clerk because some of the defendants were convicted of terrorism in the past. In the trial procedure, many complicated and important legal issues such as the following were raised: -Secret / Private evidenc e-anonymous witnesse s-Evidence not included in the UK Secret Service (MI5) NCN D-PII / Disclosure One of the jury's unauthorize d-jury, which provided a personal phone number of several operatives, who was allegedly set up a bomb to fall into the defendant, is in charge of this case (the defense side is corresponding. Another jury asked about his dating status. -Post personalit y-extreme Islamic ideolog y-Low DNA evidenc e-Legal / prejudice / prejudice as a result of the four terrorist incidents (Westminster, Manchester, London Bridge, Finn's Berry Park) Discussion.
R v CA [Blackfriars] 2018
Catherine Patisson led Ben Holt and prosecuted 13 defendants on a violent disorderly act of illegal rave organized by a group called "Scumtek" on the night of Halloween in 2015. The violence was said to be the worst in London since the riot in 2011, and has been deployed in police since then. Rishi Natwani, led by Tuckers
R v AA [Isleworth] 2018
Ben Holt was on behalf of the Crown, and Daniels was charged with the other two for collusion of car theft. He worked for a BMW dealer, and was convicted that after stealing car keys and customer personal information, he gave a car sold from his workplace to other conspirators. The c o-defendant was convicted in PTph, and one of them testified about CROWN V. Daniels. After the conviction, Daniels was sentenced to 63 months in prison. Evening Standard Daily Mail
R v SB [Snaresbrook] 2018
Jonathan Higgs QC succeeded in defending a client in an eigh t-week murder trial, including kidnapping, torture, and murder of sexual rivals. Requested Faradese. Click here for BBC reports.
R v KW [Leamington Spa] 2017
Sarah Four Show QC was in charge of defending a retired former teacher, accused of a series of historical assaults in the 1980s. NC was repatriated by Spain to take a trial, but all alleged charges were clear. Sonn McMillan Walker.
Greenwich County Council v SB [Woolwich] 2018
Sarah White House QC, Ben Temple, was charged with two homeless men who were indiscriminately stabbed on the street evangelist on a road with a lot of lines of London's waist end.
R v A Ltd [Coventry] 2017
Ben Temple has prosecuted the righ t-wing radio moderator, who was sentenced to prison sentence for vulnerable ant i-racism vandalism. Independent daily mail newspaper
R v. GG [Maidstone] 2018
Ben Temple was asked by an EHB lawyer and was in charge of this 7 2-yea r-old man. Twelve years after her siste r-i n-law disappeared, she was prosecuted for hindering her legal burial of her siste r-i n-law and bending the flow of the judiciary after her body was discovered in the Luton garden. Ta. The court of the first instance was unable to judge, but Gregory Fishwick was a lawyer in a retrial. Daily mail report
R v C [Harrow] 2017
Ben Temple, Chief Executive Officer of Anthony Orchard QC, appeared on the crown in this Old Bailey murder in a gan g-related teenager killing in South Hello. Two teenagers of hostile gangs were sentenced to life sentence.
R v S [Inner London] 2017
Anthony Orchard QC defended Danny Robinson, an old Bailey's dru g-related murder. The victim was shot dead tonight at the entrance of Stratford's home in East London. < SPAN> Ben Holt was on behalf of the Crown, and Daniels was charged with the other two for collusion of car theft. He worked for a BMW dealer, and was convicted that after stealing car keys and customer personal information, he gave a car sold from his workplace to other conspirators. The c o-defendant was convicted in PTph, and one of them testified about CROWN V. Daniels. After the conviction, Daniels was sentenced to 63 months in prison. Evening Standard Daily MailR v V [Snaresbrook] 2017
Jonathan Higgs QC succeeded in defending a client in an eigh t-week murder trial, including kidnapping, torture, and murder of sexual rivals. Requested Faradese. Click here for BBC reports.
R v G [Kingston] 2018
Sarah Four Show QC was in charge of defending a retired former teacher, accused of a series of historical assaults in the 1980s. NC was repatriated by Spain to take a trial, but all alleged charges were clear. Sonn McMillan Walker.
R v. AT [Snaresbrook] 2018
Sarah White House QC, Ben Temple, was charged with two homeless men who were indiscriminately stabbed on the street evangelist on a road with a lot of lines of London's waist end.
R v DL [Snaresbrook] 2018
Ben Temple has prosecuted the righ t-wing radio moderator, who was sentenced to prison sentence for vulnerable ant i-racism vandalism. Independent daily mail newspaper
R v HM [Birmingham] 2018
Ben Temple was asked by an EHB lawyer and was in charge of this 7 2-yea r-old man. Twelve years after her siste r-i n-law disappeared, she was prosecuted for hindering her legal burial of her siste r-i n-law and bending the flow of the judiciary after her body was discovered in the Luton garden. Ta. The court of the first instance was unable to judge, but Gregory Fishwick was a lawyer in a retrial. Daily mail report
R v. T [I.L.C.C.] 2018
Ben Temple, Chief Executive Officer of Anthony Orchard QC, appeared on the crown in this Old Bailey murder in a gan g-related teenager killing in South Hello. Two teenagers of hostile gangs were sentenced to life sentence.
R v. M [I.L.C.C.] 2018
Anthony Orchard QC defended Danny Robinson, an old Bailey's dru g-related murder. The victim was shot dead tonight at the entrance of Stratford's home in East London. Ben Holt was on behalf of the Crown, and Daniels was charged with the other two for collusion of car theft. He worked for a BMW dealer, and was convicted that after stealing car keys and customer personal information, he gave a car sold from his workplace to other conspirators. The c o-defendant was convicted in PTph, and one of them testified about CROWN V. Daniels. After the conviction, Daniels was sentenced to 63 months in prison. Evening Standard Daily Mail
R v O & anr [Guildford] 2018
Jonathan Higgs QC succeeded in defending a client in an eigh t-week murder trial, including kidnapping, torture, and murder of sexual rivals. Requested Faradese. Click here for BBC reports.
Operation Northleigh [Isleworth] 2018
Sarah Four Show QC was in charge of defending a retired former teacher, accused of a series of historical assaults in the 1980s. NC was repatriated by Spain to take a trial, but all alleged charges were clear. Sonn Mcmillan Walker.
Operation Newlands [C.C.C] 2018
Sarah White House QC, Ben Temple, was charged with two homeless men who were indiscriminately stabbed on the street evangelist on a road with a lot of lines of London's waist end.
Operation Northacre [C.C.C] 2018
Ben Temple has prosecuted the righ t-wing radio moderator, who was sentenced to prison sentence for vulnerable ant i-racism vandalism. Independent daily mail newspaper
R v G & ors [C.C.C] 2018
Ben Temple was asked by an EHB lawyer and was in charge of this 7 2-yea r-old man. Twelve years after her siste r-i n-law disappeared, she was prosecuted for hindering her legal burial of her siste r-i n-law and bending the flow of the judiciary after her body was discovered in the Luton garden. Ta. The court of the first instance was unable to judge, but Gregory Fishwick was a lawyer in a retrial. Daily mail report
R v J [C.C.C] 2018
Ben Temple, Chief Executive Officer of Anthony Orchard QC, appeared on the crown in this Old Bailey murder in a gan g-related teenager killing in South Hello. Two teenagers of hostile gangs were sentenced to life sentence.
R v. G [Maidstone] 2018
Anthony Orchard QC defended Danny Robinson, an old Bailey's dru g-related murder. The victim was shot dead tonight at the entrance of Stratford's home in East London.
R v W & ors [C.C.C] 2018
Paul Jackson, under the direction of Nadine Radford QC, defended a father accused of causing the death of his five-month-old baby with a shaking injury that resulted in fatal brain damage. At the time of death, the baby had 28 fractures and had been exposed to cocaine and amphetamines. The case involved a significant amount of complex expert evidence. Ordered by TS Law. Read the news here.
Operation Patipo [Woolwich] 2018
Stephen Chipek represented a stepfather in five weeks of fact-finding over the death of a five-month-old boy after a frightening incident. Represented by Patrick Lawrence Solicitors.
R v E [Snaresbrook] 2018
Charlotte Newell prosecuted a 62-year-old ultra-Orthodox Jew serving 13 years for kidnapping and raping his ex-wife when she refused to give him a religious divorce. He held her captive in a secret dungeon in Hackney, East London. Daily Mail report
R v. R.B [Shrewsbury] 2018
Hannah Wyatt acted for the Guardian in care proceedings including the determination of facts and the final hearing. The case involved a large amount of police and medical evidence of non-accidental injuries to a two-year-old boy. The case concluded successfully with an SGO which included an international element.
G.M.C. v. Dr S 2018
Hannah Wyatt acted for the Guardian at the determination and final hearing. The main issue was that of child sexual abuse, which was contested. The case concluded successfully with the children being transferred to their father.
R v KW [Woolwich] 2018
Jonathan Polnay, led by Jonathan Lees QC, prosecuted two teenagers for the murder of a 23-year-old man in North London. The victim had been lured to a location just off Turnpike Lane under the guise of selling car insurance, but was robbed and murdered following an earlier dispute over the purchase of a laptop on the Gumtree site. Read the Guardian report here.
Operation Pleach [St Albans] 2018
Irshad Sheikh prosecuted the 50-year-old labour fraudster. He was tried and found guilty of facilitating the entry of a 13-year-old girl into the UK and forcing her to work as his personal slave, 16 hours a day, for 11 years. Read the Daily Mail article here.
R v. NT & ors [Maidstone] 2018
Dental surgeon accused of participating in an "honour killing" joint operation. Defendant acquitted.
R v. Levi BELLFIELD [C.C.C.] 2008
He defended against an allegation that a Czech national had killed Ugla's girlfriend by strangulation. Defendant acquitted of murder but convicted of manslaughter.
R v. Bell [Reading] 2018
The defendant pleaded guilty to murder, allegedly for stabbing the victim and stamping on his body, breaking his ribs. The defendant spat on the victim and used abusive language on him. The defendant was acquitted of manslaughter and convicted of manslaughter by unlawful conduct. After a considerable delay, the judge recalled the defendant and resentenced him for giving too much credence to the preliminary plea of manslaughter. The judge suspended the sentence after reading an extensive skeleton argument in which he considered all the authority on the issue.
Operation Eric [Chelmsford] 2018
He pleaded that his family was murdered on New Year's Eve. Although the jury disagreed, co-defendant Appleby was convicted of murder. At the retrial, the state accepted the plea of manslaughter and the defendant was sentenced to two years and six months in custody. Appleby reported on a guideline sentencing case for tortious manslaughter in JD App. No. 60 of 2009 [2010] 2 Cr. App. Rep. (S) 46.
R v. S [Westminster] 2018
Gordon Kurth represented an accused in a gang assault case where the accused chased a young man and threw him off the roof of a building, causing him life-threatening injuries. The accused resisted a motion to quash from the prosecution and obtained an acquittal. Instructed by Imran Khan & Partners.
Kent Trading Standards v. ADRIVEFORLIFE.COM [Maidstone] 2018
Gordon Kurth represented one of three accused in a two-week trial. The prosecution arose after a sting operation in which meetings and communications to purchase Glock and MP5 assault rifles and ammunition were secretly recorded. The accused was acquitted by the court. Represented by Thos Boyd Whyte.
R v. Rekaya [Isleworth] 2018
Sarah Forshaw QC represented a 17-year-old man who was acquitted of the murder and manslaughter of an 18-year-old man in Northbolt. After a three-week trial at the Old Bailey, the jury returned a unanimous verdict. Represented by McCormacks Solicitors. News here
R v. Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd [Maidstone] 2018
B, who seized over £200, 000 in cash in a joint investigation by the National Crime Agency and the Metropolitan Police, was charged with possession of criminal property. Instructed by CPS London.
R v. McLeod & ors [Croydon] 2018
Sengin Kong, led by Jonathan Goldberg QC, defended S in a appeal for convicted violations, such as rape crimes against his e x-wife. The prosecutor said that the e x-wife sent several letters from Israel, and some of them stated that the first filing to the police was false or inaccurate. It was an issue. Judge Fulford acknowledged the appeal that the court would be insufficient if the claimant made two inconsistent reports. According to the instructions of SONN MCMILLAN WALKER.
R v. Wojtkowiak [Maidstone] 2018
Dominique Weber succeeded in defending a male nurse, facing historical allegations of sexual contact with patients with mental disorders under the curtains of the ward. According to the instructions of MARTYN HEWETT SOLICITORS.
R v. OH [Isleworth] 2018
Dominic Weber has won the defendant's innocence, whose autism spectrum is vulnerable and has a strong desire to commit suicide. He was charged with threatening to kill his son's mother and killed a piece of glass. He also threw a bed headboard on her head, which was said to have hit her face. The defendant argued that the allegations were made up, and the basis of the photo was a wound that was previously attached by another person. The defendant was also innocent on all other DV crimes on the alleged assault of the petitioner. He claimed that another person was responsible for the plaintiff, and that the defendant was a victim of violence by his father. MARTYN HEWETT SOLICITORS defends.
R v. O & ors [Wood Green] 2018
James Martin led Lizzy Wilson as a lead junior. The case was related to the claim that the MS was the central figure of thef t-ordering a hig h-priced car by a robbery with a keyless theft or a car key. The incident was a complicated one to steal a car according to the order, with more than £ 2 million.
R v. F & ors [Southwark] 2018
James Martin is the youngest person in the case and is said to have been involved in kidnapping and extortion involving gangs related to drug distribution. The trial against MT was based on the concept of a collaborative project. She is said to have allowed her house to be used by other members for kidnapping, assaulting, and extortion. She was unanimous and innocent. Guidance is Hodge Jones Allen. < SPAN> Jonathan Goldberg QC Sengin Kong defended S in a appeal for convicted of rape and other convictions to his e x-wife. The prosecutor said that the e x-wife sent several letters from Israel, and some of them stated that the first filing to the police was false or inaccurate. It was an issue. Judge Fulford acknowledged the appeal that the court would be insufficient if the claimant made two inconsistent reports. According to the instructions of SONN MCMILLAN WALKER.
R v. K & ors [Snaresbrook] 2018
Dominique Weber succeeded in defending a male nurse, facing historical allegations of sexual contact with patients with mental disorders under the curtains of the ward. According to the instructions of MARTYN HEWETT SOLICITORS.
R v Y [Snaresbrook] 2018
Dominic Weber has won the defendant's innocence, whose autism spectrum is vulnerable and has a strong desire to commit suicide. He was charged with threatening to kill his son's mother and killed a piece of glass. He also threw a bed headboard on her head, which was said to have hit her face. The defendant argued that the allegations were made up, and the basis of the photo was a wound that was previously attached by another person. The defendant was also innocent on all other DV crimes on the alleged assault of the petitioner. He claimed that another person was responsible for the plaintiff, and that the defendant was a victim of violence by his father. MARTYN HEWETT SOLICITORS defends.
R v JP [Snaresbrook] 2018
James Martin led Lizzy Wilson as a lead junior. The case was related to the claim that the MS was the central figure of thef t-ordering a hig h-priced car by a robbery with a keyless theft or a car key. The incident was a complicated one to steal a car according to the order, with more than £ 2 million.
R v X [Central Criminal Court] 2018
James Martin is the youngest person in the case and is said to have been involved in kidnapping and extortion involving gangs related to drug distribution. The trial against MT was based on the concept of a collaborative project. She is said to have allowed her house to be used by other members for kidnapping, assaulting, and extortion. She was unanimous and innocent. Guidance is Hodge Jones Allen. Sengin Kong, led by Jonathan Goldberg QC, defended S in a appeal for convicted violations, such as rape crimes against his e x-wife. The prosecutor said that the e x-wife sent several letters from Israel, and some of them stated that the first filing to the police was false or inaccurate. It was an issue. Judge Fulford acknowledged the appeal that the court would be insufficient if the claimant made two inconsistent reports. According to the instructions of SONN MCMILLAN WALKER.
R v. KS [Croydon] 2019
Dominique Weber succeeded in defending a male nurse, facing historical allegations of sexual contact with patients with mental disorders under the curtains of the ward. According to the instructions of MARTYN HEWETT SOLICITORS.
R v. GJ [Youth Court] 2019
Dominic Weber has won the defendant's innocence, whose autism spectrum is vulnerable and has a strong desire to commit suicide. He was charged with threatening to kill his son's mother and killed a piece of glass. He also threw a bed headboard on her head, which was said to have hit her face. The defendant argued that the allegations were made up, and the basis of the photo was a wound that was previously attached by another person. The defendant was also innocent on all other DV crimes on the alleged assault of the petitioner. He claimed that another person was responsible for the plaintiff, and that the defendant was a victim of violence by his father. MARTYN HEWETT SOLICITORS defends.
R v. SC [Magistrates Court] 2018
James Martin led Lizzy Wilson as a lead junior. The case was related to the claim that MS was the central figure of thef t-ordering a hig h-priced car by a robbery with a keyless or car key. The incident was a complicated one to steal a car according to the order, with more than £ 2 million.
R v JN [Isleworth] 2018
James Martin is the youngest person in the case and is said to have been involved in kidnapping and extortion involving gangs related to drug distribution. The trial against MT was based on the concept of a collaborative project. She is said to have allowed her house to be used by other members for kidnapping, assaulting, and extortion. She was unanimous and innocent. Guidance is Hodge Jones Allen.
Operation Pearland [Isleworth] 2018
It is said that James Martin was in charge of kidnapping and extortion related to gangs related to drug distribution. WM is said to have been the leader of a local drug dealer gang who abducted a rival drug dealer girlfriend. He was later detained until he was released by an armed police officer. Prosecutors referred to telephone contacts, mobile sites, posts on social media, and infiltrated investigations, trying to connect WM and these crimes. At that time, an infiltration investigation was conducted related to other alleged alleged drug supply. He was unanimous and innocent. With the goldcorn instructions
Operation Major [Guildford] 2019
James Martin was conducted by Michael Ivars QC in a 2017 Halloween, a group of youth armed with sticks and knives attacked another group in a cellHurst park near Croydon. The charges were raised based on the classic common cause of the crown. He depended greatly on the evidence of CCTV and mobile site.
Operation Italici [C.C.C] 2019
Nick Robinson behaved on behalf of the defendant and was exempted by Article 18 GBH. The defendant was charged with a crime that he assaulted the accused after a quarrel after the night. Gold corners instructed.
R v. John Worboys [C.C.C.] 2019
Nick Robinson served as a lawyer in the GBH incident in Article 18. The defendant has been charged with assaulting his partner on / off glass bottle. Both the defendant and the victim were socially vulnerable. As a result of the trial, the defendant was acquitted. Goldkorns is an agent.
R v. Drenova [C.C.C] 2019
Nick Robinson was in charge of defendant who was acquitted in the armed robbery collusion. The defendant was one of the several teenagers involved in the 22 knives robbery, aiming for a taxi driver in East London. Ask THE STOKOE PARTNERSHIP.
R v Abdi-Jalebi [Southwark] 2018
Nick Robinson is in charge of defending in this 18GBH section. The defendant was hit by a hammer during the dispute between the landlord and the borrower. According to GOLDKORNS instructions.
R v Freddy David [Southwark] 2018
Nick Robinson was the main offender boy in this case involving a firearm possession of murder and life in a case of shooting a completely innocent person in a gan g-related struggle with a firearms with a saw. 。 The defendant was acquitted for murder. According to the goldcorn instructions
R v Ngueyn [Southwark] 2018
Nick Robinson was in charge of defendant who was convinced of persuading her to come to her apartment before raping a 1 3-yea r-old female student and adding a sexual assault. Requested Brady Eastwood Pierce Solicitors.
R v. KK & 5 ors [C.C.C.] 2019
After the sexual assault, Nick Robinson was in charge of defendant, who was proven to be innocent. The defendant was sued to a teenager for having a sexual assault, such as chewing his chest. He was trained in Stoco Partnership.
Operation Suina [Kingston] 2019
Nick Robinson is in charge of this historic sexual assault. The defendant was sued from the late 1970s to the early 1980s in a series of forced obscene cases against twin daughters. He was trained by EBR ATTRIDGE.
R v. Donovan & Woolcock [C.C.C.] 2019
Nick Robinson is a junior in the case that defendants were tricked by the defendant's vulnerable, Gypsy Roma, colluding to conclude a "fake marriage," and was sued for multiple rape. Instructions from Lawyer Vickers
R v. KM & 2 ors [C.C.C.] 2019
Nick Robinson was in charge of the defendant, who was charged with cocaine and heroin supply. A few weeks, the trial was based in London, and was involved in gangs, which operated the "drug line" in Heartfordshire. He was trained in goldcorn.
R v IH & Ors [Kingston] 2019
Nick Robinson was a junior of this lon g-term trial over the import of 16 tons of £ 50 million pounds. He was trained at Parfitt Law.
R v [Youth] 2019
Nick Robinson served as a junior LED in an incident related to a systematic and illegal transaction with a stolen mobile phone of about £ 5 million. In this case, a few months of secret video and audio recorded from the warehouse where the gang was active was performed. Instructions from MTG lawyers
R v [VD] [Isleworth] 2019
Anthony Orchard QC was in charge of Charlotte Newwell and prosecuted three men who "retaliated" after the stab killing the previous day. The victim was shot with an automatic pistol from a close range on the altar road in Ilford in eastern London in the daytime. Each was sentenced to a minimum of 30 years of life imprisonment. Click here for the news report
R v M (Central Criminal Court) 2019
Charlotte Newwell was accused of being "forced and dominant to his wife" and succeeded in defending his husband, facing a fou r-day trial. The defendant was innocent for all charges. Instructions from ABV lawyerR v K (Southwark Crown Court) 2019
Charlotte Newwell received the guidance of CPS International & AMP; organizational crime departments, including children's rape live streaming in the United States, including child sexual abuse on the online conference platform So, I prosecuted this personal network. Click here for BBC News reportR v T (Inner London Crown Court) 2019
Charlotte Newell represented a vulnerable adult with a learning disability accused of historical sexual offences against his daughter who has a learning disability. Following trial he was cleared of all charges. Represented by Bond Joseph Solicitors.
R v V (St Albans Crown Court) 2019
Jeffrey Israel, instructed by John Ross of EBR Attridges and directed by James Scobie QC, secured an acquittal for Siddiq Kamara, accused of murder for executing a teenager by thrusting a large knife into his victim's chest in revenge after he had been taunted that a gang member with a Samurai sword had been caught by police. The murder took place outside a Tesco Express in Southampton Way, Peckham, in front of several witnesses. Siddiq Kamara was identified by a friend of the victim who was standing next to him when he was killed. The prosecution further relied on mobile phone location evidence, evidence of gang membership, extensive CCTV footage and a 'no comment' police interview of Siddiq Kamara. The trial lasted five weeks. There were two defendants, Siddiq Kamara was charged as the knife and was the main perpetrator in the incident. Both defendants were unanimously acquitted.
R v S (Kingston-upon-Thames) 2019
Jonathan Higgs QC led Paul Jackson in the defence of the young man who was charged with murder. The Crown's case was that the defendant stabbed the deceased 14 times in a matter of seconds. The defendant accepted that he had caused the deceased's death but argued that he acted in self-defence as the deceased had come at him with a knife and he was able to remove it. The defendant was acquitted. Read the BBC report here.
R v P (Central Criminal Court) 2019
Paul Jackson defended a banker who had given account details of clients to others and obtained money by falsely representing those clients. Read the news here.
R v N-H (Luton Crown Court) 2019
Paul Jackson defended a woman who was charged with perverting the course of justice by knowingly assisting a man charged with murder to avoid arrest. This included discarding his clothes, dyeing his hair, changing his skin colour, helping him flee the scene of the murder and even providing him with an address to hide. News here Charlotte Newell represented a vulnerable adult with a learning disability accused of historical sexual offences against his daughter who also has a learning disability. Following a trial he was cleared of all charges. Represented by Bond Joseph Solicitors.
R v H (Croydon Crown Court) 2019
Jeffrey Israel, instructed by John Ross of EBR Attridges and directed by James Scobie QC, secured an acquittal for Siddiq Kamara, accused of murder for executing a teenager by plunging a large knife into his victim's chest in revenge after he had been taunted that a gang member with a samurai sword had been caught by the police. The murder took place outside a Tesco Express in Southampton Way, Peckham, in front of several witnesses. Siddiq Kamara was identified by a friend of the victim who was standing next to him when he was killed. The prosecution further relied on mobile phone location evidence, evidence of gang membership, extensive CCTV footage and a "no comment" police interview of Siddiq Kamara. The trial lasted five weeks. There were two defendants, Siddiq Kamara was charged as the knife and main perpetrator in the incident. Both defendants were unanimously acquitted.
R v C (Maidstone Crown Court) 2018
Jonathan Higgs QC led Paul Jackson in the defence of the young man who was charged with murder. The Crown's case was that the defendant stabbed the deceased 14 times within a matter of seconds. The defendant accepted that he had caused the deceased's death but argued that he acted in self-defence as the deceased had come at him with a knife and he was able to remove it. The defendant was acquitted. Read the BBC report here.R v E (Snaresbrook Crown Court) 2018
Paul Jackson defended a banker who gave account details of clients to others and made money by falsely representing those clients. Read the news here.
R v O & One Other (Guildford Crown Court) 2018
Paul Jackson represented a woman accused of intentionally aiding a man charged with murder to avoid arrest and thus perverting the course of justice by discarding his clothes, dyeing his hair, changing his skin colour, helping him to flee the scene of a murder and providing an address for his concealment. News here Charlotte Newell represented a vulnerable adult with a learning disability accused of historical sex offences against his learning disabled daughter. He was cleared of all charges at trial. Represented by Bond Joseph Solicitors.
R v AN (Blackfriars Crown Court) 2018
Jeffrey Israel, instructed by John Ross of EBR Attridges and directed by James Scobie QC, secured an acquittal for Siddiq Kamara, accused of murder for executing a teenager by thrusting a large knife into his victim's chest in revenge after he had been taunted that a gang member with a samurai sword had been caught by police. The murder took place outside a Tesco Express on Southampton Way in Peckham, in front of several witnesses. Siddiq Kamara was identified by a friend of the victim who was standing next to him when he was killed. The prosecution further relied on mobile phone location evidence, evidence of gang membership, extensive CCTV footage and a "no comment" police interview of Siddiq Kamara. The trial lasted five weeks. There were two defendants, Siddiq Kamara was charged as the knife and main perpetrator in the incident. Both defendants were unanimously acquitted.
R v C (Croydon Crown Court) 2018
Jonathan Higgs QC led Paul Jackson in the defence of the young man who was charged with murder. The Crown's case was that the defendant stabbed the deceased 14 times within a matter of seconds. The defendant accepted that he caused the deceased's death but argued that he acted in self-defence as the deceased had come at him with a knife and he was able to remove it. The defendant was acquitted. See the BBC report here.R v D (Basildon Crown Court) 2016
Paul Jackson represented a banker who had given bank details to others and obtained money from them by falsely representing those customers. News here.
R v A-A (Inner London Crown Court 2017
Paul Jackson represented a woman accused of intentionally aiding and abetting a man charged with murder to avoid arrest and thus perverting the course of justice by discarding his clothes, dyeing his hair, changing his skin color, helping him flee the scene of a murder, and providing him with an address for concealment. News here.R v L (Aylesbury Crown Court) 2017
Paul Jackson represented a woman accused of defrauding others of £550. 000. The defendant, together with another defendant (who pleaded guilty), had won £46. 5 million in gambling but had falsely represented to a friend to pay legal fees to release the funds. The defendants were acquitted. He was trained by Shaw Graham Kirsch. News report here
R v S (Southampton Crown Court) 2017
Danny Robinson represented Paul Jackson, prosecuting men accused of conspiring to supply large quantities of Class A drugs and laundering the money from them. This was an NCA investigation. The defendants were sentenced to a total of 44 years in prison. News report here
R v C (Sheffield Crown Court) 2017
Paul Jackson represented a man charged with conspiracy to possess a firearm with intent to endanger life and conspiracy to possess a prohibited weapon. The incident began with armed police forcing entry into a floor containing nine men. Upon entry, three of the men were seen entering the balcony and throwing objects outside. Police subsequently recovered a loaded handgun and a loaded Uzi pistol from the grounds around that floor. The State argued that the nine accused were members of a gang plotting revenge. Agostinho had been convicted of armed robbery of a cash-in-transit van. He was acquitted. Jackson's experience with serious gang-related offences (see Awoyemi for example) proved indispensable.
R v B (Guildford Crown Court) 2017
Paul Jackson successfully defended a man who was stopped by armed police whilst driving with two others through Kent. Police who located the car found a knife and a balaclava. Paul Jackson is Imran Khan trained. Paul Jackson trained with Imran Khan Law Firm.
R v F (Central Criminal Court) 2018
Paul Jackson defended men accused of controlling desire for profit, trafficking people in the UK for sexual exploitation and sexual assault. The incident took place in Kosice, Slovakia. News here here here
R v K (Lewes Crown Court) 2018
Paul Jackson acted as counsel for the Crown in the prosecution of a minicab driver accused of sexually assaulting a female passenger during a drunken night out.
R v T (Blackfriars Crown Court) 2018
Paul Jackson defended the man, who was charged with rape. The Crown's case was that the complainant had not consented or lacked the capacity to consent due to voluntary toxicity. The complainant also suffered from a serious mental illness. The defendant was acquitted.
R v S [Isleworth] 2018
Paul Jackson was in charge of historical assault on children aged 8 to 9, whose mother was taking care of her as a childminder, and a man who was charged with rape. The defendant was acquitted. He was trained by Emery Halil Brown.
R v P [Snaresbrook] 2018
Paul Jackson was in charge of the man, who was sued for his fiance's sisters skillfully and was sued for sexual assault. This is obliged by the TS method.
R v N & anr [Central Criminal Court] 2019
Two related trial Jonathan Pornei was in charge of the first instance Ben Holt, and Ben Holt was in charge of the second instance, Dicon Reed. A total of 14 defendants have been charged with violent disorders due to assault on the exile in Croydon. The incident attracted international media attention. There is an instruction to CPS London SCU. Report DAILY MIRROR Click here here
R v Ma [C.C.C.] 2019
Ben Holt was asked to defend a criminal accused of extortion and public affairs misconduct. S used PNC to obtain personal information of the person using the prostitute service. And he threatened him. He was convicted. A-G pointed out that the penalty was too sweet. He was trained in a slator & Gordon. Click here for BBC reports Click here for daily telegraph reports
R v Shariashvili & 6 Ors [Isleworth CC] 2019
Ben Holt served as a prosecutor's lawyer in the trial of the "acid attack" case. The victim was invited to a park in Isleworth by the defendant. The victim was invited by a defendant to a park in Isleworth and was thrown an acid to another stranger. The victim lost his eyes with this attack. He submitted evidence with the help of an intermediary. The defendant was convicted and was sentenced to nine years in prison. Click here here
R v Abubakar Salim & ors [Blackfriars Crown Court] 2019
Ben Holt was the prosecutor's consultant in the attempted murder. The defendant ran over an acquaintance in the opinion. He was convicted of Article 18 and was sentenced to nine years in prison.
Operation Banjax [Southwark] 2019
Mark Haywood QC has been on behalf of the British royal family when he owns AK47 rifle, receiving £ 2, 000 for terrorism, and prosecution by British men who have been commissioned as ISIS members. Click here for BBC's report here is Guardian's report
Operation Gwendreath [Southwark] 2019
James Martin was called as a top junior, including HMRC in a huge infiltration investigation over the national red diesel allegations. It is said that there are two legal authorities facilities in two places near Barkenhead and Ashford, Kent. As a result of more than 12 months of confidential surveillance and thre e-year investigations, 11 men have been accused of being involved in conspiracy, which is said to have losing more than £ 500, 000 pai d-added tax. The incident was divided into two trials. During the first trial, it was revealed that there was a problem in disclosure of the incident. This was followed by the r e-disclosure request from the lawyer. In the early week of the fourth week, after submitting OIC to the opposition in the Voir Dir (Voir Dir), HMRC noticed the size of the information disclosure and had to seek the postponement of the trial. The application was strongly opposed by the defense and was ultimately rejected by Judge Trevor Jones. In the convicted judge, he stated that he had "miserable negligence", "showing a more systematic failure." As a result of the judge's judgment, HMRC did not submit evidence to the defendant remaining in the trial. Educed by Stoco Partnership.
R v T & 2 ors [Court of Appeal Criminal Division] 2019
Jonathan Ruben finished three more than 100 robbery cases, and had a 59 robbery case during the sentence, and was in charge of defending multiple thieves known as the "robbery master." I was sentenced to 5 years and 4 months in prison. Times Daily Mail Paper Bone Mass Echo Paper
Operation Auxin [Maidstone] 2019
Defendant Jonathan Ruben was in charge of Sarah Four Show's QC for a rape case of multiple crimes. The lawy side was discovered by the defendant's inconvenience, and the trial had to be closed. In 1985, he succeeded in charging CPS based on Article 19 of the Criminal Law.
Operation Cranfield [Southwark] 2019
Mark Haywood QC and Jonathan Pornei were in charge of the Royal Family in the Defendant Theodore Johnson. The defendant was sentenced to life imprisonment in March 2018, a minimum of 26 years, but was imprisoned in an unreasonable appeal of the sweet judgment by 30 years. Johnson was ruled by Partners of Partners in 1981 and 1993. His third victim, Angela Best, was killed in a cla y-hammer in an apartment in northern London in December 2016. Click here for BBC reports.
Operation W 2019
SARAH FORSHAW QC was in charge of the case on the suspicion of a historical sexual assault, which was held in 2002 when he was a gap year of a prestigious dating school in northern England in 2002. The defendant was guilty of all charges in 14 minutes by the jury. Lecture by Ellen Part of BCL LLP.
Operation Mutisia [C.C.C.] 2019
William Davis served as a defendant who was sued for bending the judiciary. The defendant was sued in the investigation of the murder case that the first suspect had a false witness testimony for several hours after the murder, and escaped the police by arranging the accommodation and escaped the arrest for five months. Ta.
R v A 2019
William Davis was the first lawyer of the 2015 Contemporary Slave Law to be charged with the victim engaged in forced labor. The defendant was a Vietnamese, and runs a nail barber in Bath and Burton Apon Trent. Police found a young Vietnamese girl working there, but they were illegally entered the UK and were working unpaid in exchange for meals and accommodation. The case will be the subject of the BBC documentary series in 2018. Click here for BBC reports.
Operation Wintergreen [Southwark] 2019
William Davis was one of the six defendants charged with conspiracy that promoted illegal immigrants by false marriage. The defendants were Lithuanians and arranged women who traveled to the UK to marry no n-EEA nationals. Click here for an article on the evening standard paper. Click here for telegraph news reports here for daily mail newspapers.
R v P [Chelmsford Magistrates’ Court] 2018
William Davis has served as one of the defendants, one of the defendants, who was accused of rape, sexual activity with children, recruitment of prostitution, and providing regulatory drugs. Click here for news
R v. K [Lewes] 2019
William Davis has served as one of the 25 defendants, allegedly committing a vulnerable girl. As a result of the investigation, the four series of trials conducted in 2016 was part of the trial program of the pr e-recorded confrontation test. Click here for BBC reports.
Operation Baghrash [Bristol] 2019
William Davis was a lower prosecutor. The defendants were charged with conspiracy that promoted the violation of the Immigration Law. They colluded, provided false Dutch passports to the third nation, so that they could make false applications for the Ministry of Home Affairs. Click here for news
R v. T [Durham] 2019
William Davis acted as a junior prosecuting lawyer in a multi-count indictment charged with conspiracy to aid in the breach of immigration laws. The defendants set up and ran a company that provided security guards to the construction industry. They employed illegal immigrants as security guards and exploited them by making them work excessive hours for little pay. News here
R v. O [Isleworth] 2019
William Davis was a prosecuting lawyer instructed by the Health and Safety Executive. A patient was injured during a routine procedure. He was severely burned by a heating pad on the operating table. A bag of salt water had been placed over a temperature sensor, causing the pad to overheat. Subsequent investigations revealed serious flaws in the equipment procurement process and in the training of staff. BBC report here
R v. Petrovic & ors [C.C.C.] 2019
William Davis was summoned by the NMC to a hearing at the gym to prosecute the former head of nursing at Mid Staffordshire NHS Trust. The registrant was found guilty of misconduct including by failing to ensure adequate staffing and an appropriate skills mix at Stafford Hospital, resulting in an unsafe situation for the patient who reports here.
R v. EG [C.O.A.] 2019
Natasha Wong QC represented Dickon Reid Solicitors, representing a vulnerable young man with very poor English who was acquitted of joint management murder and manslaughter as a second party to a gang stabbing case involving drugs allegations. She trained at Thomas Boyd White LLP.
PS, Abdi Dahir, CF v R [2019] EWCA Crim 2286 2019
Natasha Wong QC acted as lead counsel for the pharmacist who was acquitted of murdering his elderly father by giving him a smoothie laced with morphine. The defence case was that she had made the smoothie at the father's request to help him commit suicide. See the Daily Telegraph report here.
R v Muhammed Hussain [C.C.C.] 2019
Natasha Wong QC represented a former derivatives trader in regulatory proceedings before the FCA and criminal proceedings relating to alleged price manipulation of interbank rates. She trained at Withers Worldwide/Sternberg Reid.
R v Anwar Hussain & ors [Southwark] 2019
Natasha Wong QC acted for the case which involved a conspiracy to defraud the Revenue by importing counterfeit goods into the UK and the proceeds of crime. She trained at Paul Martin LLP.
R v Jalal Uddin [C.C.C.] 2019
Natasha Wong QC represented the directors of this company in an unconstitutional conspiracy to steal £1. 9m of telecommunications equipment and launder the proceeds by creating false documents through the company's network. She trained at JD Law.
R v. Michael Weir [C.C.C.] 2019
Natasha Won QC serves as a legal advisor to the owner/ director of the money service office charged with a drug/ income crime of 60 million pounds, and performs detailed analysis of monitoring/ secret recorded materials and books. Ta. Ask Hodge Jones & Allen Law Office.
R v. Gordon Park [C.O.A.] 2019
Natasha Wong QC was charged with cleaning criminal revenue through various bank accounts, and served as a very bad, vulnerable woman in a healthy state with immersion procedures. Requested by Duncan Luis
R v M [CCC] 2019
Charlotte Newwell was accused of being "forced and dominant to his wife" and succeeded in defending his husband, facing a fou r-day trial. The defendant was innocent for all charges. Instructions from ABV lawyerR v. G & ors [Southwark] 2019
Natasha Wong QC has secured her third party rights for vast property as an agent of a clerk's sinutty pupil sister. Request from LP Evans
Operation Zajic [Southwark] 2019
Natasha Won QC has undergone a thir d-party right to his home and pensions, on behalf of his convicted corporate officer's wife. Request from LP Evans
Operation Buster [Leicester Crown Court] 2020
Natasha Wong QC eventually led to the Lloyd's Executive Court as an underwriter junior lawyer, in a case of misconduct on a loss of 235 million pounds, as an agent of Wizards Worldwide.
R v. D [Wood Green] 2020
Natasha Won QC was charged with illegally concealing and trading 4. 5 million pounds equivalent to 4. 5 million pounds, and served as a court lawyer of a corporate officer. The minutes of Business Innovation and Skills. Ask Paul Martin Law Office.
Operation Pescara [Blackfriars] 2019
Natasha Wong QC served as a professional male lawyer who was acquitted for assaulting his wife. Requested by Sturnberg Reed Law Office
Rv. RB [Snaresbrook] 2019
The Natasha Wong QC made a guilty answer and a suspended sentence in the crowded ai r-lage case on a crowded flight.
R v. JO’C [Kingston] 2019
Natasha Won QC served as a male lawyer who was involved in a claim for sexual assault. I was guided by the Uing Law Office.
R v. IT & anr [Woolwich] 2020
Natasha Won QC was not fair based on a new expert evidence that was not submitted in his original institution, in the prosecution of a severe autism man who was convicted of fraud. Was acting to prove by referring to a wide range of records. According to the instructions of Hodge Jones & Allen
R v. SK & anr [Snaresbrook] 2020
Natasha Wong QC defended an appeal for a young man with severe learning disabilities and very limited cognitive functioning after being convicted of attempted murder and possession of a shotgun with intent to endanger life, adding a joint enterprise "joggy" plea based on new expert evidence about his condition and the fairness of the original trial. Instructed by Paul Martin LLP.
R v. N [Newcastle] 2020
Natasha Wong QC represented a retired defendant charged with making indecent images on various electronic devices. Instructed by Kingsley Napley.
Operation Hillside [CCC] 2020
Natasha Wong QC acted for an alleged hired killer who was acquitted of a gang-related axe murder following extensive analysis of mobile site, DNA and phone data. Instructed by Burke & Co., Natasha Wong QC represented the defendant.
Operation Tennyson [Southwark] 2020
Natasha Wong QC acted as trial counsel for the first defendant acquitted of conspiring to import cocaine by boat into the UK over a four year period and assisting a police officer in committing official misconduct. Instructed by Paul Martin LLP.
R v. Biomy & Yusuf [Inner London] 2020
Natasha Wong QC acted for a horse dealer who was acquitted of importing Class A drugs hidden in horse boxes and laundering over £200, 000 of the alleged proceeds of drug offences. Instructed by LP Evans.
R v. C [Guildford] 2020
Acting for W, who was acquitted of indecent assault by his grandsons. Represented by Sternberg Reid.
Operation Northleigh [Isleworth CC] 2020
Natasha Wong QC acted for the trial of a director who was acquitted of rape after allegedly throwing alcohol at an actress and luring her into his apartment. Instructed by Burke & Company.
R v. KB [Woolwich] 2020
Acted for the barrister for the defendant charged with conspiring to conceal 100kg of cocaine in pallets of bananas and import it from Colombia to the UK. Represented by LP Evans
R v AI [Central Criminal Court] 2019
Paul Jackson represented a killer for hire who was acquitted of attempted murder. The case involved significant cross-examination of the Crown's medical expert and detailed analysis of CCTV evidence. Instructed by Imran Khan & Associates.R v JK [Southwark] 2019
Paul Jackson represented a man charged with conspiracy to commit theft and robbery. He was alleged to have been part of a gang which stole motorbikes and used them to rob high-value items in London's West End. Represented by Joseph Hill LLP.R v TH [Inner London] 2019
R v A [Central Criminal Court] 2020
Sarah Forshaw QC represented Paul Jackson and successfully defended a father accused of the anal rape of his four-year-old son. The court acquitted him in 10 minutes. Rob Borwick of ABV Solicitors represented him.
Operation Digamy - R v AK & Ors [Snaresbrook] 2018
Paul Jackson led Charlotte Hall to defend a man who was charged with historical rape, abuse, and sexual assault over eight men for over 30 years. In this trial, the claims were stopped as abuse of procedures, the analysis of a large number of thir d-party materials, the claim under Article 41, the claim under Article 100 and the 101, and the no case were submitted. This is obliged by the TS method.
R v PD [Woolwich] 2018
James Martin was an agent of SH, accused of a larg e-scale international fraud for many movie rental companies. The fraud was organized in the UK, and the organizational crime group took over the legal corporate identity of the industry. They were weakened by insurance companies and were able to arrange a variety of lon g-term rental contracts over £ 2 million. Eventually, the crown was convinced that there was no global conspiracy evidence in the SH case, and the indictment was revised to a single substantive crime called money laundering in the SH case. SH was officially acquitted by the jury. Burke and amplifier? Co.
R v BD [St. Albans] 2018
Catherine Farly rejected this matter, where the defendant abducted a 1 3-yea r-old student from the street and photographed himself. 11 years in prison. Click here for news.R v AM [Snaresbrook] 2019
Jonathan Ruben defended the defendant, who was acquitted after three days of a thre e-day trial for weighty assault. Ant i-interrogation between plaintiffs and witnesses.R v GH & Ors [Basildon] 2019
Jonathan Ruben won the defendant's innocence after a thre e-day trial, despite having a mobile phone with cocaine wrapping paper and cash and receiving a message of drug trading.Operation Nemo - R v DP & Ors [Swansea] 2019
Jonathan Ruben was in charge of the defendant, who was acquitted after three days of trial. The defendant had a good personality, but was observed in CCTV a struggle with the spinal cord injury.
Grenfell Tower Inquiry 2019
Jonathan Ruben was in charge of the case after a si x-day trial, but was not required to be rejected. In the counting line case, it was discovered that the defendant had a large amount of A-class drugs at his vulnerable home. Some drugs were said to have been excreted from the rectum.
R v CA [Woolwich] 2019
Jonathan Ruben packed multiple cocaine and heroin, and was arrested for having a mobile phone containing a drug treatment message, but secured the defendant's innocence after two days of trial. < SPAN> Paul Jackson led Charlotte Hall to defend a man who was charged with historical rape, abuse, and sexual assaults for over 30 years. In this trial, the claims were stopped as abuse of procedures, the analysis of a large number of thir d-party materials, the claim under Article 41, the claim under Article 100 and the 101, and the no case were submitted. This is obliged by the TS method.R v SA [Woolwich] 2019
James Martin was an agent of SH, accused of a larg e-scale international fraud for many movie rental companies. The fraud was organized in the UK, and the organizational crime group took over the legal corporate identity of the industry. They were weakened by insurance companies and were able to arrange a variety of lon g-term rental contracts over £ 2 million. Eventually, the crown was convinced that there was no global conspiracy evidence in the SH case, and the indictment was revised to a single substantive crime called money laundering in the SH case. SH was officially acquitted by the jury. Burke and amplifier? Co.R v AK [Blackfriars] 2019
Catherine Farly rejected this matter, where the defendant abducted a 1 3-yea r-old student from the street and photographed himself. 11 years in prison. Click here for news.
R v AM [Isleworth] 2020
Jonathan Ruben defended the defendant, who was acquitted after three days of a thre e-day trial for weighty assault. Ant i-interrogation between plaintiffs and witnesses.R v FA [Isleworth] 2020
Jonathan Ruben won the defendant's innocence after a thre e-day trial, despite having a mobile phone with cocaine wrapping paper and cash and receiving a message of drug trading.R v HS [Snaresbrook] 2020
Jonathan Ruben was in charge of the defendant, who was acquitted after three days of trial. The defendant had a good personality, but was observed in CCTV a struggle with the spinal cord injury.
Operation Sacramento - R v AO & Ors [Woolwich] 2020
Jonathan Ruben was in charge of the case after a si x-day trial, but was not required to be rejected. In the counting line case, it was discovered that the defendant had a large amount of A-class drugs at his vulnerable home. Some drugs were said to have been excreted from the rectum.
R V S & 3 [Ipswich Crown Court] 2020
Jonathan Ruben packed multiple cocaine and heroin, and was arrested for having a mobile phone containing a drug treatment message, but secured the defendant's innocence after two days of trial. Paul Jackson led Charlotte Hall to defend a man who was charged with historical rape, abuse, and sexual assault over eight men for over 30 years. In this trial, the claims were stopped as abuse of procedures, the analysis of a large number of thir d-party materials, the claim under Article 41, the claim under Article 100 and the 101, and the no case were submitted. This is obliged by the TS method.
R v C & 7 Others [Southwark Crown Court] 2020
James Martin was an agent of SH, accused of a larg e-scale international fraud for many movie rental companies. The fraud was organized in the UK, and the organizational crime group took over the legal corporate identity of the industry. They were weakened by insurance companies and were able to arrange a variety of lon g-term rental contracts over £ 2 million. Eventually, the crown was convinced that there was no global conspiracy evidence in the SH case, and the indictment was revised to a single substantive crime called money laundering in the SH case. SH was officially acquitted by the jury. Burke and amplifier? Co.
R v C [Guildford Magistrates’ Court] 2020
Catherine Farly rejected this matter, where the defendant abducted a 1 3-yea r-old student from the street and photographed himself. 11 years in prison. Click here for news.
R v A [CCC] 2020
Jonathan Ruben defended the defendant, who was acquitted after three days of a thre e-day trial for weighty assault. Ant i-interrogation between plaintiffs and witnesses.
Operation Radiator [Manchester Crown Court] 2021
Jonathan Ruben won the defendant's innocence after a thre e-day trial, despite having a mobile phone with cocaine wrapping paper and cash and receiving a message of drug trading.
R v G & 5 Others [Southwark Crown Court] 2021
Jonathan Ruben was in charge of the defendant, who was acquitted after three days of trial. The defendant had a good personality, but was observed in CCTV a struggle with the spinal cord injury.
R v T & 12 Others [Leeds Crown Court] 2020
Jonathan Ruben was in charge of the case after a si x-day trial, but was not required to be rejected. In the counting line case, it was discovered that the defendant had a large amount of A-class drugs at his vulnerable home. Some drugs were said to have been excreted from the rectum.
R v IA [Aylesbury Crown Court] 2020
Jonathan Ruben packed multiple cocaine and heroin, and was arrested for having a mobile phone containing a drug treatment message, but secured the defendant's innocence after two days of trial.
R v DC [Croydon Crown Court] 2020 2020
Jonathan Reuben defended a defendant found in possession of Class A drugs after a police search of his house. The defendant admitted returning a mobile phone containing drug trafficking messages. After a successful PACE section 78 claim and a failed bad character application, the Crown offered no evidence.
R v SA [C.C.C.] 2020 2020
Jonathan Reuben obtained an acquittal for a defendant in a knife robbery. The defendant's DNA was found on the knife used in the robbery. He was found not guilty after half-time submissions contesting insufficient statistical analysis of the DNA evidence.
R v Bryan & Ahwan [Kingston] 2020 2020
Paul Walker led Jonathan Reuben in this complex conspiracy to obtain criminal property. A £300, 000 fraud similar to the film Catch Me If You Can.
R v. A [Aylesbury] 2020
Valeria Swift defended this defendant, one of two defendants acquitted after a three-month Old Bailey trial of a Kent-based gang accused of smuggling migrants into the UK. Cantaris Locke Solicitors were retained. BBC report here Daily Mail report here
R v W & Others [Norwich] 2020
Dominic Webber represented one of two defendants acquitted at the end of a three-month Old Bailey trial of a Kent-based gang accused of smuggling migrants into the UK. He was represented by Martyn Hewett Solicitors. BBC report here Daily Mail report here
R v T & Others [Wood Green] 2020
Paul Jackson represented one of eight men charged with conspiracy to aid in the commission of UK immigration offences. The alleged modus operandi was to transport illegal Albanians across the Channel in RHIBs. The NCA investigation included mobile site, phone analysis, CCTV, ANPR and tracking devices. It was ordered under the TS Act. BBC report here
R v M&F [Kingston] 2020
Pauline Thompson represented a defendant accused of rape and successfully applied to have a juror dismissed for failure to disclose information. Instructed by O'Keefe Solicitors.
R v L&A [Kingston] 2020
Pauline Thompson successfully defended against charges of conspiracy to possess a firearm with intent to endanger life, conspiracy to possess a prohibited weapon and conspiracy to commit violent disorder, winning nine trials. Represented by EBR Attridge Solicitors.R v D & Others [Southwark] 2020
Pauline Thompson defended Peter Eguaye against nine charges of conspiracy to commit robbery with a knife. The 15-year-old defendant was acquitted of the charges. Represented by F. A. Lee & amp; Co Solicitors.
R v N Operation Arnold [Maidstone] 2020
Pauline Thompson successfully prosecuted a construction fraudster who was sentenced to 61 months for a £38, 000 fraud. She was disqualified from acting as a company director for 10 years and given an indefinite CBO. News hereInquest into the death of SMV 2020
Jonathan Reuben was acquitted after a three day trial. He took his £100 Apple laptop to a repair shop two days after it was stolen.
R v. Long and ors [CCC] 2020
Jonathan Reuben represented a defendant who smashed a bottle over his friend's head, leaving him with permanent damage to his left eye. Negotiated an appeal to S20 and obtained a sentence of two years and four months.
R v Robinson and ors [CCC] 2020
Charlotte Hall, under the direction of CPS SE Complex Casework and under the direction of Senior Crown Solicitor Martin Yale, prosecuted five defendants over a five week period accused of conspiracy to supply drugs with a street value of over £10 million following the discovery of 951 kilograms of cannabis in a shipment of rabbit hay. The case involved extensive phone records, mobile phone evidence and evidence of cohabitation. News here here here
R v Fuller [Kingston] 2020
Charlotte Hall defended in the Trident case where live ammunition was found in the bedroom of a 21 year old social worker. The defendant faced a mandatory minimum sentence of five years but was acquitted at trial.
R v David [Southwark] 2019
Charlotte Hall represented an 84 year old man with Alzheimer's who was accused of assaulting his elderly partner, causing serious injuries to her face. There was a problem with the hearing as the plaintiff was unable to attend court and the defendant was not competent to plead.
R v Gopaul and Bannerman [C.C.C.] 2020
Charlotte Hall prosecuted police officers who had been appointed by the CPS Casework Complex Unit to carry out forceful acts on two teenagers who had been called to a domestic dispute.
Operation Footprint [CCC] 2020
Charlotte Hall represented a 25-year-old young man with autism and a learning disability who was charged with aggravated communications offences relating to threatening phone calls she made to the police. He was found unfit to plead and acquitted of one count and was admitted to the National Autism Unit after the Probation Service had failed for several years.
Operation Photal [CCC] 2020
Leah Banerjee represented the defendant charged with robbery. Successfully secured a case based on DNA evidence.
R v LG & 4 ors [Manchester CC] 2020
Leah Banerjee successfully represented a defendant accused along with others in a series of knife robberies against taxi drivers. Successfully secured a refusal application based on ID and mobile phone location data.
R v A & 8 Ors [Southwark Crown Court] 2020
Leah Banaelge was in charge of defendant, who was charged with assault and knife intimidation. In the crown case, some witnesses testified that the defendant threatened himself and his friends with a knife. The incident was included in CCTV and mobile phones. The defendant was interviewed without a comment without a lawyer. As a result of the trial, both were guilty of both charges.
R v A & 8 Ors [Kingston Crown Court] 2020
The Leah Banelgy defendant has won the defendant's innocence charged for the murder notice. The defendant argued that he had a knife during the intimidation. The opposition interrogation of a civilian witness has been extended.
R v N [Maidstone Crown Court] 2020
Leah Banaelge was in charge of defendants, who were charged with sexual assault and acts against public order and morals. The defendant was noticeable and was said to have inappropriately touched four women on the Piccadilly subway on two separate days. The defense said that it was not sexually touched. The crown's claim for a separate trial was contested, but after submitting a detailed osteomy and long oral argument, the district court agreed. The defendant was innocent after two separate trials.
R v W [Isleworth] 2020
A historical sexual assault case. As a member of the defense team led by SARAH FORSHAW QC, he helped a legal investigation. As a result of the trial, the defendant was acquitted.
Operation Mowhawk [Croydon Crown Court] 2019
In the Dartford High Street, he succeeded in winning an innocence to the defendant, who was accused of having a knife in the public, or a Samurai sword. Evidence of a police officer who was swinging a sword. The incident was shot by CCTV.
R v CU & others [Kingston] 2020
R v PS & MO [Woolwich] 2020
The Leah Banaelge lawyer was in charge of defendant, who was charged with attempted robbery. The plaintiff was a no n-corrected staff, and testified that the defendant threatened him to stab himself and steal his wallet. She succeeded in the declaration of the defendant's robbery and attempted robbery, and opposed the country's malicious personality claims to correct the wrong impression. As a result of the trial, I was acquitted.
R v LV [Guildford] 2019
Acquired an innocence to the defendant, who was charged with two guilty and weapon possession. The incident is recorded in CCTV. The defendant was interrogated without comments.
R v H [Maidstone] 2019
Leah Banaelge lawyer has sentenced each client immediately on behalf of six defendants. She succeeded in claiming legitimate reliability, and as a result, the judge has sentenced to local community / suspended sentence. < SPAN> League Banelgy lawyer was in charge of defendants, who were charged with assault and knife threats. In the crown case, some witnesses testified that the defendant threatened himself and his friends with a knife. The incident was included in CCTV and mobile phones. The defendant was interviewed without a comment without a lawyer. As a result of the trial, both were guilty.
R v BH & 3 others [Blackfriars] 2018
The Leah Banelgy defendant has won the defendant's innocence charged for the murder notice. The defendant argued that he had a knife during the intimidation. The opposition interrogation of a civilian witness has been extended.
Operation Edge [Woolwich] 2020
Leah Banaelge was in charge of defendants, who were charged with sexual assault and acts against public order and morals. The defendant was noticeable and was said to have inappropriately touched four women on the Piccadilly subway on two separate days. The defense said that it was not sexually touched. The crown's claim for a separate trial was contested, but after submitting a detailed osteomy and long oral argument, the district court agreed. The defendant was innocent after two separate trials.
R v FP [CCC] 2020
A historical sexual assault case. As a member of the defense team led by SARAH FORSHAW QC, he helped a legal investigation. As a result of the trial, the defendant was acquitted.
R v SF & Ors [CCC] 2020
In the Dartford High Street, he succeeded in winning an innocence to the defendant, who was accused of having a knife in a public, or a Samurai sword. Evidence of a police officer who was swinging a sword. The incident was shot by CCTV.
R v DW [Ipswich Court Court] 2021
The Leah Banaelge lawyer was in charge of defendant, who was charged with attempted robbery. The plaintiff was a no n-corrected staff, and testified that the defendant threatened him to stab himself and steal his wallet. She succeeded in accepting the defendant's robbery and attempted robbery, opposed to a petition of the country's malicious personality, calling for the wrong impression. As a result of the trial, he was acquitted.
R v PK [Isleworth Crown Court] 2021
Acquired an innocence to the defendant, who was charged with two guilty and weapon possession. The incident is recorded in CCTV. The defendant was interrogated without comments.
R v CU & Ors [Kingston] 2020
Leah Banaelge lawyer has sentenced each client immediately on behalf of six defendants. She succeeded in claiming legitimate reliability, and as a result, the judge has sentenced to local community / suspended sentence. Leah Banaelge was in charge of defendant, who was charged with assault and knife intimidation. In the crown case, some witnesses testified that the defendant threatened himself and his friends with a knife. The incident was included in CCTV and mobile phones. The defendant was interviewed without a comment without a lawyer. As a result of the trial, both were guilty of both charges.
Operation Merseyside [Isleworth Crown Court] 2019
The Leah Banelgy defendant has won the defendant's innocence charged for the murder notice. The defendant argued that he had a knife during the intimidation. The opposition interrogation of a civilian witness has been extended.
Operation Merseyside-1 [Isleworth Crown Court] 2020
Leah Banaelge was in charge of defendants, who were charged with sexual assault and acts against public order and morals. The defendant was noticeable and was said to have inappropriately touched four women on the Piccadilly subway on two separate days. The defense said that it was not sexually touched. The crown's claim for a separate trial was contested, but after submitting a detailed osteomy and long oral argument, the district court agreed. The defendant was innocent after two separate trials.
R-v-M & G [Harrow Crown Court] 2019
A historical sexual assault case. As a member of the defense team led by SARAH FORSHAW QC, he helped a legal investigation. As a result of the trial, the defendant was acquitted.
R-v-R & Others [Maidstone Crown Court] 2019
In the Dartford High Street, he succeeded in winning an innocence to the defendant, who was accused of having a knife in the public, or a Samurai sword. Evidence of a police officer who was swinging a sword. The incident was shot by CCTV.
R v. Sahayb Abu - [C.C.C.] 2021
The Leah Banaelge lawyer was in charge of defendant, who was charged with attempted robbery. The plaintiff was a no n-corrected staff, and testified that the defendant threatened him to stab himself and steal his wallet. She succeeded in accepting the defendant's robbery and attempted robbery, opposed to a petition of the country's malicious personality, calling for the wrong impression. As a result of the trial, I was acquitted.
R v. Long & ors [C.C.C.] 2020
Acquired an innocence to the defendant, who was charged with two guilty and weapon possession. The incident is recorded in CCTV. The defendant was interrogated without a comment.
R v. Hughes & ors [C.C.C.] 2021
Leah Banelgy's lawyer on behalf of six defendants and sentenced each client to be charged immediately. She succeeded in claiming legitimate reliability, and as a result, the judge had a local / suspended sentence.
R v. Abdullah [C.C.C.] 2020
Leah Banerjee represented the defendant who was charged with harassment and a life license for murder. If convicted of the charges he faces serious consequences of imprisonment. The trial resulted in an acquittal of "conduct amounting to harassment" after lengthy cross-examination of the complainant and legal submissions involving various authorities.
R v KR [Maidstone Crown Court] 2021
Elizabeth Wilson represented the defendant who appeared at court martial for possession with intent to procure.
R v JC [Chelmsford Youth Court] 2021
Elizabeth Wilson represented the defendant at trial for multiple robbery and successfully presented a no answer case.
R v TB [Highbury Youth Court] 2021
Elizabeth Wilson represented the defendant who was charged with assaulting his wife and son. The defendant was acquitted of assaulting his wife.
R v Wayne [Court of Appeal] 2020
Elizabeth Wilson represented the defendant who was charged with driving offences and found himself in a very unusual position. He was a foreigner who could not speak English and was deaf and unable to speak. Therefore a Jewish interpreter who could also translate into BSL was needed, but this interpreter was not available to attend court. After successful submission, the charges were dropped and the case dismissed.
R v SE and FE [Highbury Magistrates Court] 2020
Elizabeth Wilson represented a juvenile in a case involving armed robbery. The defendant was sentenced to a two-year detention and training order.
R v IC & Ors 2021
Elizabeth Wilson represented a defendant who pleaded guilty to common assault on a security guard. After mitigation, the defendant was given a conditional discharge and all costs, including mandatory criminal court costs, were waived.R v LP & CJ [Central Criminal Court] 2021
Obtained an acquittal for a defendant charged with domestic violence. Successfully presented evidence of assault by the complainant and two prosecution witnesses in a domestic violence case. Successfully challenged a post-conviction restraining order application.
R v Cole [Reading Magistrates Court] 2021
Elizabeth Wilson obtained an acquittal for a juvenile defendant charged with attempted robbery and possession of property.
Operation Melrose [CCC] 2020
Represented a defendant charged with speeding. After mitigation, the defendant admitted to speeding at 130 miles per hour and was not disqualified from driving.
R v IS [Harrow Crown Court] 2021
Elizabeth Wilson secured the acquittal of this juvenile defendant charged with multiple robbery and theft from a motor vehicle.
R v AM [Woolwich Crown Court] 2020
Elizabeth Wilson represented the defendant in a plea of guilty to a common count 1 assault charge against a TFL bus driver. The judge, after mitigation, sentenced without a PSR and imposed fines, costs and compensation.
R v MA [Wood Green Crown Court] 2020
Elizabeth Wilson acted for the defendant in a commercial burglary and multiple theft case. The defendant suffered from a learning disability and required an intermediary for the trial. Successfully submitted a no case response.
R v T [Hove Crown Court] 2021
Phoebe Bragg represented the defendant in a road traffic collision where he was acquitted of dangerous driving causing death and ABH resulting from the collision. Successfully excluded evidence of drink driving.
R v F [Preston Crown Court] 2021
Phoebe Bragg successfully obtained a suspended sentence for the trial of an Uber driver in a multi-level Uber fraud case, along with other defendants who were summarily charged.
R v K [CCC] 2020
Phoebe Bragg represented the defendant in a youth gang trial. Persuaded the Crown to accept S20 GBH instead of S18 GBH.
R v M [CCC[ 2020
Phoebe Bragg acted for this defendant at length in a violent pursuit involving a National Railway employee. The defendant received a suspended sentence.
Inquest LW 2020
Phoebe Bragg secured for this defendant the dismissal of two separate charges relating to the same complainant following the production of evidence from the complainant in both trials.
R v W & Ors [Basildon Crown Court] 2020
Phoebe Bragg acted for the defence in this firearm possession case. Successfully submitted for the enforcement of a probation order.
R v GO [CCC] 2021
Phoebe Bragg successfully applied for a civil harassment injunction in the County Court based on written submissions.
R v MGK [Southwark] 2021
Phoebe Bragg is representing a client in a trial relating to drug smuggling and other contraband in prison. The case is ongoing.
R v G [Kingston CC & Court of Appeal] 2019
Phoebe Bragg successfully defended a client in a confiscation action relating to the proceeds of drug trafficking. An order was made in the conditions requested.
R v H [Southwark] 2020
Phoebe Bragg represented a defendant charged with a multi-party juvenile armed robbery. She successfully sought a community sentence in lieu of direct custody.
R v Dr V [GMC & Crown Court] 2019
Phoebe Bragg successfully appealed the cross-enforcement of EU (Austrian) financial sanctions in the UK, following legal arguments on the principles of EU law and ECHR principles on the right of appeal.
Operation Docwu [Isleworth CC] 2021
Phoebe Bragg successfully applied to set aside a guilty plea after a Newton hearing and subsequent court argument.
R v L [Snaresbrook] 2021
Phoebe Bragg successfully filed a six-month plea for a large company prosecuted for failure to provide information.
Operation Antelope [Maidstone] 2021
Orla Daly acted alone for the defendant who faced 12 allegations against three complainants of rape, sexual activity with a child, indecent assault, attempted rape and causing or inciting a child to engage in sexual activity. After a three week trial, the defendant was unanimously acquitted of all 12 counts. He was represented by Matthew Nicholls of Berry & amp; Lamberts LLP.
R v. S [Norwich] 2021
Orla Daly obtained a suspended sentence for an accountant who pleaded guilty to endangering the safety of an aircraft.
R v. Walker [Cambridge] 2021
Orla Daly secured an acquittal for an autistic man accused of rape by a colleague.
R v K [Snaresbrook Crown Court] 2021
Represented V, accused of historic child sex offences by two complainants. After discussions on disclosure, the prosecution offered no evidence.
R v N [Basildon Court Court] 2021
Represented a businessman accused of five counts of rape against two complainants. Trained by Nigel Richardson at Hodge Jones Allen.R v B [Wood Green Crown Court] 2021
Orla Daly acted for this prosecution of a religious minister accused of historic child sex offences allegedly involving his ex-partner's cousin between 1996 and 1998.
R v R [Inner London Crown Court] 2021
Orla Daly represented a property developer accused of multiple sexual and physical assaults by his ex-partner. Instructed by Wiseman Lee Solicitors.
R v M [Snaresbrook Crown Court] 2021
Paul Jackson represented by Imran Khan QC. Obtained a special verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity for a 25 year old man with paranoid schizophrenia who murdered his friend by decapitating him and removing his eyes, tongue and four fingers. Instructed by IK Solicitors and P Solicitors.R v W [Southampton Crown Court] 2021
Sarah Forshaw QC represented a defendant cleared of 13 charges of sexually assaulting a boy between 1998 and 2004. After a two week trial the defendant was acquitted of all charges. Represented by Gary Rubin of Blackfords LLP.R v T [Wood Green Crown Court] 2021
Paul Jackson represented by Imran Khan QC. Obtained a special verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity for a 25 year old man with paranoid schizophrenia who murdered his friend by decapitating him and removing his eyes, tongue and four fingers. Instructed by IK Solicitors and P Solicitors.R v R [Maidstone Crown Court] 2021
Jonathan Ruben was in charge of the defendant's defendant, who was prosecuted for possession of aggressive weapons. As a result of the trial, the defendant was acquitted. The defendants and the passengers had a "key chain". The defendant was initially arrested for alleged kidnapping.
Operation Localizer [Kingston] 2021
Ben Holt has prosecuted the Glenfell Finance Group's finance director. He was hired by RBK & amp; C and provided funding to the victims of Glenfel Tower disasters. But he stole £ 62. 062. During this suspicion, it was found that the defendant had fraudulent NHS, the previous employer. The defendant was sentenced to five and a half years. He was trained at SCU in London. Click here for BBC News reports here for news Guardian reports
Operation Lexes [Southwark] 2021
Anthony Orchard QC led Danny Robinson and prosecuted four murder defendants in a thre e-month trial. The defendants were convicted of the murder, violent disorders, and the flow of justice, and were sentenced to life sentence. Click here for news reports
Operation Localizer [Kingston Crown Court] 2022
Anthony Orchard QC led the prosecutor in a gan g-related murder case where a bullet from the wall hit a woman and killed a woman. Click here for news
Operation Scouttish [Kingston Crown Court] 2021
Anthony Orchard QC dismissed this trial and retrial for murder. The two defendants were convicted of murder and another was convicted of a judicial diversion. The victim was stabbed at home many times and fled to the road below 200 feet, but died there. Click here for news
R v AS [Bromley Youth Court] 2021
Anthony Orchard QC appeared in Old Bailey for the crown, and the defendant acknowledged negligence on the first day of the trial. The defendant was sentenced to 14 years and 9 months in prison. The victims and the defendant were childhood friends, promised to meet them to resolve the unresolved squirrels at the time of the incident. The victim's death was one chest trauma. < SPAN> Sarah Four Show QC was charged with the defendant, who was charged with the suspicion of rape and sexual assault between seven years of rape over a 1 0-yea r-old couple. After the trial in February 2018 failed due to information disclosure issues, the crown finally submitted evidence a few days before the second trial list started. He was defended by Paul Morris of BCL Solicitors LLP.
R v SR [Wood Green Crown Court] 2021
Jonathan Ruben was in charge of the defendant's defendant, who was prosecuted for possession of aggressive weapons. As a result of the trial, the defendant was acquitted. The defendants and the passengers had a "key chain". The defendant was initially arrested for alleged kidnapping.
R v DC [Huntingdon Crown Court] 2021
Ben Holt has prosecuted the Glenfell Finance Group's finance director. He was hired by RBK & amp; C and provided funding to the victims of Glenfel Tower disasters. But he stole £ 62. 062. During this suspicion, it was found that the defendant had fraudulent NHS, the previous employer. The defendant was sentenced to five and a half years. He was trained at SCU in London. Click here for BBC News reports here for news Guardian reports
R v S & 3 Ors [Southwark Crown Court] 2021
Anthony Orchard QC led Danny Robinson and prosecuted four murder defendants in a thre e-month trial. The defendants were convicted of the murder, violent disorders, and the flow of justice, and were sentenced to life sentence. Click here for news reports
R v C & 7 Ors [Southwark Crown Court] 2021
Anthony Orchard QC led the prosecutor in a gan g-related murder case where a bullet from the wall hit a woman and killed a woman. Click here for news
R v YM [Harrow Court Court] 2021
Anthony Orchard QC dismissed this trial and retrial for murder. The two defendants were convicted of murder and another was convicted of a judicial diversion. The victim was stabbed at home many times and fled to the road below 200 feet, but died there. Click here for newsOperation Nimrod [Southwark Crown Court] 2021
Anthony Orchard QC appeared in Old Bailey for the crown, and the defendant acknowledged negligence on the first day of the trial. The defendant was sentenced to 14 years and 9 months in prison. The victims and the defendant were childhood friends, promised to meet them to resolve the unresolved squirrels at the time of the incident. The victim's death was one chest trauma. Sarah Four Show QC was charged with the defendant, who was charged with the suspicion of rape and sexual assault between seven couples over a 1 0-year year, and was proven to be innocent. After the trial in February 2018 failed due to information disclosure issues, the crown finally submitted evidence a few days before the second trial list started. He was defended by Paul Morris of BCL Solicitors LLP.
R v RG & Ors [Southwark Crown Court] 2021
Jonathan Ruben was in charge of the defendant's defendant, who was prosecuted for possession of aggressive weapons. As a result of the trial, the defendant was acquitted. The defendants and the passengers had a "key chain". The defendant was initially arrested for alleged kidnapping.
R v TT [Woolwich Crown Court] 2021
Ben Holt has prosecuted the Glenfell Finance Group's finance director. He was hired by RBK & Amp; C and provided funding to the victims of Glenfel Tower disaster. But he stole £ 62. 062. During this suspicion, it was found that the defendant had fraudulent NHS, the previous employer. The defendant was sentenced to five and a half years. He was trained at SCU in London. Click here for BBC News reports here for news Guardian reportsR v EH [Lewes Crown Court] 2022
Anthony Orchard QC led Danny Robinson and prosecuted four murder defendants in a thre e-month trial. The defendants were convicted of the murder, violent disorders, and the flow of justice, and were sentenced to life sentence. Click here for news reportsR v ML [Croydon] 2018
Anthony Orchard QC led the prosecutor in a gan g-related murder case where a bullet from the wall hit a woman and killed a woman. Click here for news
R v TM & another [CCC] 2018
Anthony Orchard QC dismissed this trial and retrial for murder. The two defendants were convicted of murder and another was convicted of a judicial diversion. The victim was stabbed at home many times and fled to the road below 200 feet, but died there. Click here for news
R v MW & Others [Liverpool] 2019
Anthony Orchard QC appeared in Old Bailey for the crown, and the defendant acknowledged negligence on the first day of the trial. The defendant was sentenced to 14 years and 9 months in prison. The victims and the defendant were childhood friends, promised to meet them to resolve the unresolved squirrels at the time of the incident. The victim's death was one chest trauma.
R v TDN & Others [Wood Green] 2018
Paul Jackson represented a man who falsely imprisoned and tortured his victim. The assault involved punching the victim in the face and then shoving a hot iron in his face. Instructed by T. S. Law News.
R v CB & Others [Inner London] 2019
Charlotte Newell, together with Mark Cotter QC, successfully defended a 14-year-old boy charged with murder, possession of an offensive weapon and attempted manslaughter. The client was part of a group armed with a zombie knife and an axe who allegedly attacked two young people on a London street. Instructed by Lisa Towell of Blackfords Solicitors, he was acquitted at trial of all charges. Read the news here
R v KG & Others [Nottingham 2020
Charlotte Newell represented a young woman charged with conspiracy to possess a firearm and live ammunition with intent to endanger life, and conspiracy to import and possess a large quantity of Class A drugs into the UK via the Eurotunnel. She was acquitted at trial of all charges. Bark and Co.
R v JB & Another [Inner London] 2020
Jonathan Reuben represented a 17-year-old defendant with an extensive criminal record. He pleaded guilty to witness intimidation and possession of an offensive weapon before trial and was acquitted of two further charges after trial. CCTV was used in the case and cross-examination of the complainant and independent witnesses was undertaken.
R v JL & Others [Newcastle] 2021
Sarah Forshaw QC represented a professional man accused of raping and sexually assaulting a young woman he met using Ashley Madison, a dating site for married men. RB successfully submitted at half-time and was cleared of all charges. Represented by Paul Morris of BCL Solicitors LLP.
R v SB & Others [Southwark] 2021
Sarah Forshaw QC represented the doctor at a successful hearing into his fitness to practise under the MPTS. After a four-day contested hearing the court found no "adverse findings". Represented by Zahir Ahmed of ABV Solicitors.
R v JW & Another [Coventry] 2022
Alister McDonald's QC defended James Martin. In this case, a very difficult problem was raised about how the jury should approach thre e-step tests if the "control" defap was contested and the power was so extreme. Ta. In such cases, the true complexity of the answer to the last question was revealed. If the jury determined that there was an unable to control the qualified trigger, would the jury be convinced that if he was a rational person in the same situation as the defendant, he did not respond similarly? Thinking about what kind of action of a rational person who has lost sel f-control in a different situation different from normal is a very difficult task because the appeal court has hardly advised this issue. be. He was trained by EBR atlidge.
R v MS [Southwark Crown Court] 2021
James Martin was in charge of defendant in this complicated fraud case. Operation Pleas was an investigation of Heartfordshire Police for 36 postal fraud crimes conducted throughout England between March 1 and November 2016. The case was also a case where the Crown accidentally accused the global conspiracy, despite the clearly multiple transactions among various defendants. As a result, the crown acknowledged that position, effectively had to change the indictment, and the prosecutor was no longer charged with any conspiracy. He is Bark & amp; amp? Co.
R v BH [Westminster Magistrates Court] 2021
Jonathan Higgs QC led James Martin of Gold Corns Law Office. A body was found in the stairs of the apartment in Chatham, and three were charged with murder. The dead and the three defendants were all known as drug regular users, and death was in an apartment near one of the defendants. The investigative team carefully connected the CCTV videos, witness testimony, call records, mobile phones, etc., and carefully connected the days before. The pos t-death findings, especially the results of the neuropathics, had complicated causal relationships. In addition to the actual complications, there were also issues regarding identity confirmation and joint proposals. < SPAN> Alister McDonald's QC defended James Martin. In this case, a very difficult problem was raised about how the jury should approach thre e-step tests if the "control" defap was contested and the power was so extreme. Ta. In such cases, the true complexity of the answer to the last question was revealed. If the jury determined that there was an unable to control the qualified trigger, would the jury be convinced that if he was a rational person in the same situation as the defendant, he did not respond similarly? Thinking about what kind of action of a rational person who has lost sel f-control in a different situation different from normal is a very difficult task because the appeal court has hardly advised this issue. be. He was trained by EBR atlidge.R v AB [Westminster Magistrates Court] 2022
James Martin was in charge of defendant in this complicated fraud case. Operation Pleas was an investigation of Heartfordshire Police for 36 postal fraud crimes conducted throughout England between March 1 and November 2016. The case was also a case where the Crown accidentally accused the global conspiracy, despite the clearly multiple transactions among various defendants. As a result, the crown acknowledged that position, effectively had to change the indictment, and the prosecutor was no longer charged with any conspiracy. He is Bark & amp; amp? Co.
R v LV [Nottingham Crown Court] 2022
Jonathan Higgs QC led James Martin of Gold Corns Law Office. A body was found in the stairs of the apartment in Chatham, and three were charged with murder. The dead and the three defendants were all known as drug regular users, and death was in an apartment near one of the defendants. The investigative team carefully connected the CCTV videos, witness testimony, call records, mobile phones, etc., and carefully connected the days before. The pos t-death findings, especially the results of the neuropathics, had complicated causal relationships. In addition to the actual complications, there were also issues regarding identity confirmation and joint proposals. Alister McDonald's QC defended James Martin. In this case, a very difficult problem was raised about how the jury should approach thre e-step tests if the "control" defap was contested and the power was so extreme. Ta. In such cases, the true complexity of the answer to the last question was revealed. If the jury determined that there was an unable to control the qualified trigger, would the jury be convinced that if he was a rational person in the same situation as the defendant, he did not respond similarly? Thinking about what kind of action of a rational person who has lost sel f-control in a different situation different from normal is a very difficult task because the appeal court has hardly advised this issue. be. He was trained by EBR atlidge.
R v J&H [Woolwich Crown Court] 2019
James Martin was in charge of defendant in this complicated fraud case. Operation Pleas was an investigation of Heartfordshire Police for 36 postal fraud crimes conducted throughout England between March 1 and November 2016. The case was also a case where the Crown accidentally accused the global conspiracy, despite the clearly multiple transactions among various defendants. As a result, the crown acknowledged that position, effectively had to change the indictment, and the prosecutor was no longer charged with any conspiracy. He is Bark & amp; amp? Co.
R v S [Woolwich Crown Court] 2020
Jonathan Higgs QC led James Martin of Gold Corns Law Office. A body was found in the stairs of the apartment in Chatham, and three were charged with murder. The dead and the three defendants were all known as drug regular users, and death was in an apartment near one of the defendants. The investigative team carefully connected the CCTV videos, witness testimony, call records, mobile phones, etc., and carefully connected the days before. The pos t-death findings, especially the results of the neuropathics, had complicated causal relationships. In addition to the actual complications, there were also issues regarding identity confirmation and joint proposals.
R v B-L & J [CCC] 2020
Mark Haywood QC is the foundation of a 2 2-yea r-old French international student, Amey Deragrange and a 1 9-yea r-old female Marsha McDonnel and trying to kill Kate Sedi, the indictment of Levi Bellfield. He was in charge of defending the country with his first senior advisor. In 2011, Belfield was convicted of the murder of Millie Dowler and was sentenced to life sentence. Click here for Wikipedia items.
R v S [CCC] 2021
Fiona Ryan was in charge of the crown in the first (CID) prosecution based on Article 53 of RIPA in 2000. The defendant, who was accused of having an obscene image, did not follow the S. 49 requirements to provide passwords in the encrypted unit. The defendant was sentenced to 9 months of prohibition and sexual danger prevention order.
R v C [Chelmsford] 2022
William Davis led the Dicon Reed and prosecuted five defendants accused of 3. 6 million pounds and accused of tax evasion fraud. The masterminds were importing beer, wine and spirits from Europe using elaborate mirror roads. The incident was clearly complicated, with many evidence, including surveillance cameras, telephone records, CCTV, business records, mobile sites, handwriting, and evidence of ocographic evidence. The top two defendants were sentenced to the highest prison for statutory. Training by CPS special case work. Click here for news
R v. S, W and W [Wood Green] 2022
Jeffrey Israel has succeeded in defending a remarkable case, which is said to have dominated by a boyfriend of Socialite, a fashion designer of Carla Delvinne, repeatedly assaulted her. Legal discussions have withdrawn Jeffrey's client, and he has been acquitted from all charges. News here
R v TK [Kingston Crown Court] 2022
Polin Thompson succeeded in the prosecution of AdriveForlife. com and acknowledged 19 fraud and one money laundering. He was sentenced to 38 months of being sentenced and was disqualified as a director for four years. News hereR v MK [Bristol Crown Court] 2022
Catherine Farely was impersonated by Glenfel Tower's tragedy and succeeded in accommodating a man who spent about £ 90, 000 for accommodation and travel expenses. I was sentenced to four years and six months in prison. You can see the news here. < SPAN> Mark Haywood QC kills a 2 2-yea r-old French student, Amey Deragrange, and a 1 9-yea r-old female Marsha McDonnel and tried to kill Kate Sedi, the notorious serial murderer, Levi Bellfield. He was in charge of defending the country with the first senior adviser of the Ministry of Finance. In 2011, Belfield was convicted of the murder of Millie Dowler and was sentenced to life sentence. Click here for Wikipedia items.R v DO & Ors [Central Criminal Court] 2022
Fiona Ryan was in charge of the crown in the first (CID) prosecution based on Article 53 of RIPA in 2000. The defendant, who was accused of having an obscene image, did not follow the S. 49 requirements to provide passwords in the encrypted unit. The defendant was sentenced to 9 months of prohibition and sexual danger prevention order.R v. Ali Ali 2022
William Davis led the Dicon Reed and prosecuted five defendants accused of 3. 6 million pounds and accused of tax evasion fraud. The masterminds were importing beer, wine and spirits from Europe using elaborate mirror roads. The incident was clearly complicated, with many evidence, including surveillance cameras, telephone records, CCTV, business records, mobile sites, handwriting, and evidence of ocographic evidence. The top two defendants were sentenced to the highest prison for statutory. Training by CPS special case work. Click here for news
R v AL [Luton Crown Court] 2022
Jeffrey Israel has succeeded in defending a remarkable case, which is said to have dominated by a boyfriend of Socialite, a fashion designer of Carla Delvinne, repeatedly assaulted her. Legal discussions have withdrawn Jeffrey's client, and he has been acquitted from all charges. News here
R v LCpl L [Court Martial Centre Bulford] 2019
Polin Thompson succeeded in the prosecution of AdriveForlife. com and acknowledged 19 fraud and one money laundering. He was sentenced to 38 months of being sentenced and was disqualified as a director for four years. News hereMB v Regina [Court of Appeal] 2020
Catherine Farely was impersonated by Glenfel Tower's tragedy and succeeded in accommodating a man who spent about £ 90, 000 for accommodation and travel expenses. I was sentenced to four years and six months in prison. You can see the news here. Mark Haywood QC is the foundation of a 2 2-yea r-old French international student, Amey Deragrange and a 1 9-yea r-old female Marsha McDonnel and trying to kill Kate Sedi, the indictment of Levi Bellfield. He was in charge of defending the country with his first senior advisor. In 2011, Belfield was convicted of the murder of Millie Dowler and was sentenced to life sentence. Click here for Wikipedia items.
LCpl TL v Regina 2021
Fiona Ryan was in charge of the crown in the first (CID) prosecution based on Article 53 of RIPA in 2000. The defendant, who was accused of having an obscene image, did not follow the S. 49 requirements to provide passwords in the encrypted unit. The defendant was sentenced to 9 months of prohibition and sexual danger prevention order.
R v Sig Q [Court Martial Centre Bulford] 2021
William Davis led the Dicon Reed and prosecuted five defendants accused of 3. 6 million pounds and accused of tax evasion fraud. The masterminds were importing beer, wine and spirits from Europe using elaborate mirror roads. The incident was clearly complicated, with many evidence, including surveillance cameras, telephone records, CCTV, business records, mobile sites, handwriting, and evidence of ocographic evidence. The top two defendants were sentenced to the highest prison for statutory. Training by CPS special case work. Click here for news
R v MMJ [Woolwich Crown Court] 2021
Jeffrey Israel has succeeded in defending a remarkable case, which is said to have dominated by a boyfriend of Socialite, a fashion designer of Carla Delvinne, repeatedly assaulted her. Legal discussions have withdrawn Jeffrey's client, and he has been acquitted from all charges. News here
R v ARF [Kingston Crown Court] 2021
Polin Thompson succeeded in the prosecution of AdriveForlife. com and acknowledged 19 fraud and one money laundering. He was sentenced to 38 months of being sentenced and was disqualified as a director for four years. News here
R v AB [Winchester Crown Court] 2021
Catherine Farely was impersonated by Glenfel Tower's tragedy and succeeded in the prosecution of a man who spent about £ 90, 000 for accommodation and travel expenses. I was sentenced to four years and six months in prison. You can see the news here.
London Borough of Barking & Dagenham v AM & Ors [Snaresbrook Crown Court] 2019
William Davis prosecuted Network Rail for breaching health and safety regulations at East Farleigh level crossing after an accident in which a signalman was seriously injured. The trial included complex expert evidence about the process of risk assessment at the crossing and the mathematical modelling used. The jury heard evidence from the signalman working at East Farleigh, his line manager and Network Rail's Director of Public and Passenger Safety. Network Rail was found guilty at trial and fined £200. 000. BBC News Kent Online William Davis led the prosecution of a group of accountants who defrauded the Reimbursement Payment Service (RPS), a government body that pays workers who are owed money when their employers become insolvent, to the tune of £700, 000. The defendants arranged for 105 false claims to be submitted, in some cases supported by false identities and false documents. This was the first prosecution of fraud against the RPS. In a separate investigation, William Davies again prosecuted Lennox MacLeod for a VAT fraud committed around the same time as the RPS case. He took over the VAT work of a company after the death of the director and fraudulently claimed over £100, 000 in VAT refunds. Here is the HMRC press release:
R v LCpl BM [Court Martial Centre Bulford] 2022
William Davies acted for the Crown in this case, a prosecution for revenue fraud, and was instructed by the CPS Specialist Fraud Unit. The defendant was a Polish lorry driver who was caught hiding 4 million cigarettes in a lorry transporting parts for a major UK car factory. The total absconding income was over £1 million.
R v ME [Bournemouth Crown Court] 2022
James Brown acted for the Crown in this trial following the murder of a homeless man in a drunken brawl at a Westminster shelter. News here
R v MF [Lewes Crown Court] 2022
James Brown acted as lead counsel for the Crown in the "County Lines" drugs conspiracy trial, which ran over five weeks in August 2018. News here
R v MB & GB [Salisbury Crown Court] 2022
James Brown acted as lead counsel for the Crown in the case which involved a helicopter landing at a luxury hotel in Kent and the importation of 100kg of cocaine. News here
R v AD [Bournemouth Crown Court] 2022
James Brown prosecuted the East London organised crime network for a multi-kilo Class A drugs conspiracy in a five-week trial at Snaresbrook CC in January 2018.
R v Sqn Ldr J [Court Martial Centre Catterick] 2022
Nick Robinson represented a young defendant accused of armed robbery and blackmail against a boy from his class. The case was dismissed at the end of the prosecution case and the defendant was acquitted. He was trained by Phil Emery of Emery Halil & amp; Brown.
R v CK [Central Criminal Court] 2022
Nick Robinson represented a defendant accused of conspiracy to supply 3 kilos of ultra-pure cocaine to the Island of Dogs. Instructed by Duncan Frost of Foxes Solicitors.
R v JD & Others [Isleworth Crown Court] 2022
Nick Robinson represented a 16-year-old defendant charged with conspiracy to commit manslaughter with intent. The case involved a large fight outside a 16th birthday party in East London which escalated until the victim was stabbed to death by a co-defendant. The defendant was said to have been part of a group who chased the victim before attacking him as he fell to the ground. He was trained by Talia Coles of Edwards Ducey. News here here
R v AJ [Kingston Crown Court] 2022
Phoebe Bragg was called to the defence in this matter involving sexual activity with a child. Phoebe applied and succeeded in excluding the Crown's evidence as to age on the grounds that it was insufficient evidence. This resulted in the Crown not giving evidence of the more serious offence of section 9 SOA 2003. Trained by Blackfords LLP.
R v JZ & ors [Inner London Crown Court] 2023
Phoebe Bragg acted for the defence in a trial for sexual assault on a child under 15 years of age, which involved the evidence and cross-examination of an autistic child. Burke & amp; Co.
R v N [Nottingham Crown Court] 2022
Phoebe Bragg acted for the defence in this matter involving the mining of a public order offence in relation to a child under 16 years of age. The defendant was acquitted in the Magistrates' Court at trial. Instructed by Joseph Hill Solicitors
R v B [Snaresbrook Crown Court] 2022
Instructed by Ben Holt, CPS's Lasso Unit and conducted by Katherine Pattison. Trial of a defendant accused of raping his ex-wife and two daughters. He was convicted and sentenced to 27 years deprivation of liberty with an eight year extension.R v O-C [Inner London Crown Court] 2022
Ben Holt led junior counsel in the prosecution of two defendants charged with a 'pyramid scheme' fraud. Losses between the defendants exceeded £7 million. Both defendants were convicted following a trial. Both received the maximum sentence of 10 years imprisonment.R v MA [Snaresbrook Crown Court] 2022
Jonathan Polnay defended Ben Holt on seven counts of conspiracy to launder £2 million of fraudulent proceeds. Jonathan Polnay was trained by the CPS Specialist Fraud Unit.R v MS [Woolwich Crown Court] 2022
Ben Holt succeeded in the import of no n-regular Anabolic Steroids (AAS) from India and Singapore. The gang has imported more than 40 tons of illegal analytic steroids and is said to be "the largest among this kind of gang that has been caught so far." The members of the gang were connected to another gang that were involved in steroid production and distribution at the UK underground AAS factory. As a result of the si x-week trials, five defendants were convicted. Guidance by CPS organizational crime department. Belfast NCA investigated. Click here for news reports
R v O & Others [Sheffield Crown Court] 2022
Jonathan Pornei, led by Duncan Penny QC, has been charged with a crime of destroying four other passengers with a sexual intention. In early 2018, all the women were in prison for less than nine years of irregular imprisonment, and after the time of r e-detention, the expulsion council was appropriate for the exile to leave prison. Was done. Click here for news articlesR v. Newport [Snaresbrook] 2022
Jonathan Pornei, led by Tim Clay QC, was in charge of the prosecutor in the case of a serial murderer called a scarface, which repeated bloody crimes throughout Europe. He was sentenced to at least 20 years in his fifth murder. Click here for news articles
R v. Varga [Harrow] 2022
Jonathan Pornei predicted a scholar at the Cambridge University, who worked for 2. 5 million pounds on government subsidies. Dr. Ehasan Abd i-Jalevi, 38, a former student of the Faculty of Engineering and the university ant i-Northern European, a counterfeit documents to divert their accounts from the funds assigned to the development of renewable energy projects. I used it. Click here for news articles
R v. Waheed [Snaresbrook] 2022
Jonathan Porne has stealed nearly 15 million pounds from wealthy customers and prosecuted Logg's financial advisor, which paid for gambling poisoning and children's tuition. Click here for news articles
R v. Clarke [Snaresbrook] 2022
Jonathan Porneii, who seemed to have died of his wife and son in the Glenfel Tower Fire, and received a 2 1-month prison sentence as a "depressing" attempt by 12. 500 pounds donated for the victims of the earthquake. He has prosecuted a scammer. Click here for the news article, Ben Holt, succeeded in the incident involving the import of no n-regular Anabolic steroids (AAS) from India and Singapore. The gang has imported more than 40 tons of illegal analytic steroids and is said to be "the largest among this kind of gang that has been caught so far." The members of the gang were connected to another gang that were involved in steroid production and distribution at the UK underground AAS factory. As a result of the si x-week trials, five defendants were convicted. Guidance by CPS organizational crime department. Belfast NCA investigated. Click here for news reports
R v. H [Wood Green] 2021
Jonathan Pornei, led by Duncan Penny QC, has been charged with a crime of destroying four other passengers with a sexual intention. In early 2018, all the women were in prison for less than nine years of irregular imprisonment, and after the time of r e-detention, the expulsion council was appropriate for the exile to leave prison. Was done. Click here for news articles
R v. O’Brien [Wood Green] 2021
Jonathan Pornei, led by Tim Clay QC, was in charge of the prosecutor in the case of a serial murderer called a scarface, which repeated bloody crimes throughout Europe. He was sentenced to at least 20 years in his fifth murder. Click here for news articles
R v R [Central Criminal Court] 2021
R v SJ [Kingston Crown Court] 2021
Jonathan Pornei predicted a scholar at the Cambridge University, who worked for 2. 5 million pounds on government subsidies. Dr. Ehasan Abd i-Jalevi, 38, a former student of the Faculty of Engineering and the university ant i-Northern European, a counterfeit documents to divert their accounts from the funds assigned to the development of renewable energy projects. I used it. Click here for news articles
R v TP and AP [Inner London Crown Court] 2021
Jonathan Porne has stealed nearly 15 million pounds from wealthy customers and prosecuted Logg's financial advisor, which paid for gambling poisoning and children's tuition. Click here for news articles
R v C [Croydon CC] 2021
Jonathan Porneii, who seemed to have died of his wife and son in the Glenfel Tower Fire, and received a 2 1-month prison sentence as a "depressing" attempt by 12. 500 pounds donated for the victims of the earthquake. He has prosecuted a scammer. Click here for the news article, Ben Holt succeeded in the incident involving the import of no n-regular Anabolic steroids (AAS) from India and Singapore. The gang has imported more than 40 tons of illegal analytic steroids and is said to be "the largest among this kind of gang that has been caught so far." The members of the gang were connected to another gang that were involved in steroid production and distribution at the UK underground AAS factory. As a result of the si x-week trials, five defendants were convicted. Guidance by CPS organizational crime department. Belfast NCA investigated. Click here for news reports
R v B [Woolwich Crown Court] 2021
Jonathan Pornei, led by Duncan Penny QC, has been charged with a crime of destroying four other passengers with a sexual intention. In early 2018, all the women were in prison for less than nine years of irregular imprisonment, and after the time of r e-detention, the expulsion council was appropriate for the exile to leave prison. Was done. Click here for news articles
R v B & M [Snaresbrook Crown Court] 2021
Jonathan Pornei, led by Tim Clay QC, was in charge of the prosecutor in the case of a serial murderer called a scarface, which repeated bloody crimes throughout Europe. He was sentenced to at least 20 years in his fifth murder. Click here for news articles
R v AT & Ors [Central Criminal Court] 2022
R v RH [Inner London Crown Court] 2022
Jonathan Pornei predicted a scholar at the Cambridge University, who worked for 2. 5 million pounds on government subsidies. Dr. Ehasan Abd i-Jalevi, 38, a former student of the Faculty of Engineering and the university ant i-Northern European, a counterfeit documents to divert their accounts from the funds assigned to the development of renewable energy projects. I used it. Click here for news articles
R v IK [Oxford Crown Court] 2022
Jonathan Porne has stealed nearly 15 million pounds from wealthy customers and prosecuted Logg's financial advisor, which paid for gambling poisoning and children's tuition. Click here for news articlesR v A Youth [Liverpool Crown Court] 2022
Jonathan Porneii, who seemed to have died of his wife and son in the Glenfel Tower Fire, and received a 2 1-month prison sentence as a "depressing" attempt by 12. 500 pounds donated for the victims of the earthquake. He has prosecuted a scammer. Click here for news articles
R v MA [Isleworth Crown Court] 2021
Natasha Won QC and Valeria Swift have won the innocence of a client, a sel f-closed teenager with severe learning disabilities, after a 1 2-week murder trial involving six defendants in Old Bailey. 。 A woman died a few hours before she returned to Sierra Leone and died, becoming innocent victims of the drug dispute. The 4 6-yea r-old teacher stayed at a relative's house in Uridge, southeast of London, and a fire broke out. The client was innocent for a general business murder, negligence, and a sin of intentionally injured several victims. JATINDER SOKHAL of TBW Attorneys is in charge of defense.
Operation Tambov [Iselworth CC] 2022
Charlotte Newwell has led a Dicon Reed lawyer and charged an organizational crime network, including 11 defendants involved in a million pounds, for millions of pounds, for two months, and its revenue was a series of revenue. It was washed through the paper company. Click here for the news report.
Operation Tembe [Wood Green Crown Court] 2022
Anthony Orchard QC led the prosecutor's prosecutor Charlotte Newwell in a murder case in which two cousins killed his uncle. The first defendant claims to lose sel f-control. The two defendants were convicted as a result of the trial. Click here for BBC reports.
Operation Venetic [Southwark Crown Court] 2022
Jonathan Higgs QC succeeded in defending a client, who was acquitted in a crushed c o-management murder, which was stabbed several times after the North London student was stabbed several times after midnight distribution. Another victim survived with multiple stabs. The other two defendants were convicted and were sentenced to a minimum of 29 years. Click here for news.
R v S [Isleworth CC] 2022
Phoebie Blug is in charge of defending a 1 7-Bangladesh, a Bangladesh, who deceived the Immigration Bureau and tried to get a visa using false documents. The mult i-layer fraud was involved in the UK and the US Immigration Bureau.
R v B [Central Criminal Court] 2022
Phoeby succeeded in sending an order in a case, including multiple sexual assaults. Instructions from BCL's clerk lawyer.
Operation Tambo [Central Criminal Court] 2022
Foebey Blug was succeeded in a fraud case involving defendants, stolen from the Berlin gallery and sold in Lucian Froit in Francis Bacon, stolen and sold. 。
R v JD [Luton Crown Court] 2017
He was acquitted after two reconstruction.
R v NDT [Wood Green Crown Court] 2019
The defendant did not attend the trial-he was acquitted as a result of a lawyer's trial.R v C [Woolwich Crown Court] 2020
The defendant dumped the knife under the car. I didn't respond to the comments. As a result of the trial, he became acquitted because of a reasonable excuse.
R v AB [Newcastle Crown Court] 2021
He was found with a knife in his backpack outside a house party. Tried on knowledge and found not guilty.R v MB [Wood Green Crown Court] 2020
Domestic incident where his girlfriend fell down the stairs and broke her neck. Tried on knowledge and found not guilty. Retrial in closed session early in the new year.R v IB [Central Criminal Court] 2022
Found with a large knife in his backpack at Notting Hill carnival. Tried on knowledge and found not guilty.
R v AO [Central Criminal Court] 2022
Picked up by police with knife under seat of car. Tried on reasonable excuse and found not guilty.
R v NH [Central Criminal Court] 2022 2022
Arrested at 2am with a Stanley knife. Tried on reasonable excuse and found not guilty. Jury took less than 10 minutes to reach verdict.
R v AK [Southwark Crown Court] 2023
Fight between friends. Tried on self-defence and found not guilty.
R v. Finch - C.C.C. 2021
Possession of an offensive weapon, witness intimidation, possession of property, criminal damage - 17-year-old defendant with extensive criminal record who pleaded guilty before trial to witness intimidation and possession of an offensive weapon was found not guilty of two further counts after trial. CCTV and cross-examination of the plaintiff and an independent witness.
Operation Balaban - Southwark 2019
Trial resulted in acquittal. The defendant and his passenger were found to have a "key ring" joint. Initially arrested on suspicion of kidnapping.
Operation Cullinan 2021
Found not guilty after a three day trial. The defendant took his Apple laptop, purchased for £100, to a repair shop two days after it was stolen.
Operation Kandla 2022
Despite two witnesses, including an independent witness, he was found not guilty after a three day trial.
Operation Rayak 2022
The defendant received a 15 month deprivation of liberty sentence for five counts of burglary, possession of a replica firearm and possession of live ammunition.
R v. Dr S [Isleworth] 2021
He was found not guilty after a three day trial and cross-examination of witnesses.
R v. AS [Maidstone] 2022
The jury was acquitted after a successful half-time presentation put forward by the defence at the end of the trial.
R v. Dr B [Southwark] 2022
The trial concerned an armed robbery of a brothel. The defence put forward by Paul Walker was that the defendant was merely an innocent client. Defendant found not guilty.
R v. LD & ors [Wood Green] 2022
Defendant, represented by Paul Walker, was alleged to have been a violent gangster and member of the Turkish Mafia. In a trial for extortion charges, after defence submissions, the judge urged the jury to acquit.
Operation Caliadne [Woolwich] 2022
The defendant was facing multiple alleged sexual assaults. 42 political witnesses, who submitted a disadvantageous evidence, accused him of an abuse campaign from the 1970s to the 1980s. At that time, he was a parish priest. Paul had to overcome the fact that Bennett was convicted (and sentenced to imprisonment) for almost the same crime. Despite the evidence of poor personality and the enormous weight of the prosecutor's evidence, Paul won the guilty of Bennett for each of the 25 filed filing. The defense speech was praised by Gilford Records.
Operation Lynne [Chelmsford] 2023
Heavy possession with multiple violence disorders and life with the intention of exposing life. In this case, an incredible CCTV video was played in a small corner shop in northern London. There was a firing and the store was effectively destroyed. Paul carefully analyzed the evidence of CCTV and won the defendant's innocence.
R v T & 7 Ors [Leeds Crown Court] 2022
Paul Walker defended a defendant who was charged with a rape attempt to a friend's woman, who was invited to invite him to use KFC's leftovers at work. The download of the telephone, which was revealed by the lawyer's claim, had persuaded the jury and gained unanimous reviews.
R v IA & Others [Southwark Crown Court] 2021
The defendant is said to be a conspiracy mastermind that supplies Uji Machine Gun to London gangs. He was arrested by lowering the revolver from his neck. Despite the evidence of shooting people on a road with a lot of traffic and evidence that he had a bad personality, the jury left for four days after Paul's speech. The defendant was sentenced to life after conviction.
R v DB & Others [Central Criminal Court] 2021
The trial was involved in providing A-class drugs at the immigration center. According to the defendant's individual claims, an expensive drug was found. As a result of a wid e-ranging interrogation of Paul's search members and bod y-dressed body checks, the defendant was acquitted about all the accused of the prosecution.
R v HS [Snaresbrook Crown Court] 2022
Paul Walker was in charge of defendant 1 5-yea r-old boy. He is said to have joined the youth stabbing case in a park in East London. The plaintiff's life was saved by a rescue team on the site. The incident was particularly difficult because there were many children's witnesses. Despite being convicted, Paul was able to persuade the judge to make a very generous judgment. < SPAN> The defendant was facing multiple alleged sexual assault. 42 political witnesses, who submitted a disadvantageous evidence, accused him of an abuse campaign from the 1970s to the 1980s. At that time, he was a parish priest. Paul had to overcome the fact that Bennett was convicted (and sentenced to imprisonment) for almost the same crime. Despite the evidence of poor personality and the enormous weight of the prosecutor's evidence, Paul won the guilty of Bennett for each of the 25 filed filing. The defense speech was praised by Gilford Records.
R v RK & Others [Central Criminal Court] 2022
Heavy possession with multiple violence disorders and life with the intention of exposing life. In this case, an incredible CCTV video was played in a small corner shop in northern London. There was a firing and the store was effectively destroyed. Paul carefully analyzed the evidence of CCTV and won the defendant's innocence.
R v DG and Another [Croydon Crown Court] - Ongoing 2022
Paul Walker defended a defendant who was charged with a rape attempt to a friend's woman, who was invited to invite him to use KFC's leftovers at work. The download of the telephone, which was revealed by the lawyer's claim, had persuaded the jury and gained unanimous reviews.
R v DO & Others [Croydon Crown Court] - Ongoing 2022
The defendant is said to be a conspiracy mastermind that supplies Uji Machine Gun to London gangs. He was arrested by lowering the revolver from his neck. Despite the evidence of shooting people on a road with a lot of traffic and evidence that he had a bad personality, the jury left for four days after Paul's speech. The defendant was sentenced to life after conviction.
R v KS – [Central Criminal Court] - Ongoing 2022
The trial was involved in providing A-class drugs at the immigration center. According to the defendant's individual claims, an expensive drug was found. As a result of a wid e-ranging interrogation of Paul's search members and bod y-dressed body checks, the defendant was acquitted about all the accused of the prosecution.
R v DB & Another – [Snaresbrook Crown Court] - Ongoing 2022
Paul Walker was in charge of defendant 1 5-yea r-old boy. He is said to have joined the youth stabbing case in a park in East London. The plaintiff's life was saved by a rescue team on the site. The incident was particularly difficult because there were many children's witnesses. Despite being convicted, Paul was able to persuade the judge to make a very generous judgment. The defendant was facing multiple alleged sexual assaults. 42 political witnesses, who submitted a disadvantageous evidence, accused him of an abuse campaign from the 1970s to the 1980s. At that time, he was a parish priest. Paul had to overcome the fact that Bennett was convicted (and sentenced to imprisonment) for almost the same crime. Despite the evidence of poor personality and the enormous weight of the prosecutor's evidence, Paul won the guilty of Bennett for each of the 25 filed filing. The defense speech was praised by Gilford Records.
R v TP & Others – [Wood Green Crown Court] - Ongoing 2022
Heavy possession with multiple violence disorders and life with the intention of exposing life. In this case, an incredible CCTV video was played in a small corner shop in northern London. There was a firing and the store was effectively destroyed. Paul carefully analyzed the evidence of CCTV and won the defendant's innocence.
R v. Akhtar [Southwark & C.O.A.] 2016, R v. Akhtar [2016] EWCA Crim 390 2016
Paul Walker defended a defendant who was charged with a rape attempt to a friend's woman, who was invited to invite him to use KFC's leftovers at work. The download of the telephone, which was revealed by the lawyer's claim, had persuaded the jury and gained unanimous reviews.
R v AA [CCC] 2021
The defendant is said to be a conspiracy mastermind that supplies Uji Machine Gun to London gangs. He was arrested by lowering the revolver from his neck. Despite the evidence of shooting people on a road with a lot of traffic and evidence that he had a bad personality, the jury left for four days after Paul's speech. The defendant was sentenced to life after conviction.
R v BS [Basildon] 2022
The trial was involved in providing A-class drugs at the immigration center. According to the defendant's individual claims, an expensive drug was found. As a result of a wid e-ranging interrogation of Paul's search members and bod y-dressed body checks, the defendant was acquitted about all the prosecuted filing.
R v S, B, P, Q, R [Snaresbrook] 2022
Paul Walker was in charge of defendant 1 5-yea r-old boy. He is said to have joined the youth stabbing case in a park in East London. The plaintiff's life was saved by a rescue team on the site. The incident was particularly difficult because there were many children's witnesses. Despite being convicted, Paul was able to persuade the judge to make a very generous judgment.
R v FD & RJ [Guildford] 2022 2022
Natasha Won QC led Paul Walker in a revolutionary Old Bailey trial over the defense of mothers and partner under the Female Extensions. The case contained a wide range of evidence that complicated medical evidence, children's witnesses, and the defendant were religious and worshiped. The incident attracted the media's attention. Sky News --BBC News --CNN
R v D, H, H, M, D, L-F [Guildford Crown Court] 2021
In charge of defendant's defendant, who was involved in a murder case in a park in Northern London. After a detailed analysis of Paul's CCTV shooting time and a series of o n-site inspections, the defendant was able to show the jury a completely different perspective on the case. The jury made a unanimous decision on the number of murders.
R v S-P & T [Southwark] 2023
Martin was the chief consultant of D1, and Peter Eguee was a junior. The case (Operation Mandebras) is related to the Ministry of Interior survey on the suspicion of the Organized Crime Group, which has abused the "common travel area" with the Ireland Republic of Ireland. As a legal problem, the royal family violation of the Immigration Law, the continuity between various complaints, and whether there are multiple agreements have been in violation of a single conspiracy. It was considered. After a wide range of legal arguments (and the end of all evidence) were held at the end of the national proof, the indictment was a very wide claim for the substantial crime against the main defendants that the jury should consider. Only one was left. As a result, the jury was dismissed and was ordered to retrial the remaining one cause of the four defendants.
R v Kersys [Kingston] 2022
Martin was the chief lawyer of Sarim. The case was mainly based on the activities of two men working in a high steering bank, helping to open a considerable number of bank accounts to use for wire fraud. The legal problem was the correct application of the definition of "criminal property" following cases such as R V GH [2015] UK 24 and R V Loizou [2005] 2 CR App R 37. < SPAN> Natasha Won QC led Paul Walker in an innovative Old Bailey trial over defense of mothers and partners under the Female Extensions. The case contained a wide range of evidence that complicated medical evidence, children's witnesses, and the defendant were religious and worshiped. The incident attracted the media's attention. Sky News --BBC News --CNNOperation Locomotion [Southwark] 2022
In charge of defendant's defendant, who was involved in a murder case in a park in Northern London. After a detailed analysis of Paul's CCTV shooting time and a series of o n-site inspections, the defendant was able to show the jury a completely different perspective on the case. The jury made a unanimous decision on the number of murders.
R v O [Wood Green] 2022
Martin was the chief consultant of D1, and Peter Eguee was a junior. The case (Operation Mandebras) is related to the Ministry of Interior survey on the suspicion of the Organized Crime Group, which has abused the "common travel area" with the Ireland Republic of Ireland. As a legal problem, the royal family violation of the Immigration Law, the continuity between various complaints, and whether there are multiple agreements have been in violation of a single conspiracy. It was considered. After a wide range of legal arguments (and the end of all evidence) were held at the end of the national proof (and the end of all evidence), the indictment was a very wide claim for the substantial crime against the main defendants that the jury should consider. Only one was left. As a result, the jury was dismissed and was ordered to retrial the remaining one cause of the four defendants.
R v Charkaoui & Ors [Southwark] 2022
Martin was the chief lawyer of Sarim. The case was mainly based on the activities of two men working in a high steering bank, helping to open a considerable number of bank accounts to use for wire fraud. The legal problem was the correct application of the definition of "criminal property" following cases such as R V GH [2015] UK 24 and R V Loizou [2005] 2 CR App R 37. Natasha Won QC led Paul Walker in a revolutionary Old Bailey trial over the defense of mothers and partner under the Female Extensions. The case contained a wide range of evidence that complicated medical evidence, children's witnesses, and the defendant were religious and worshiped. The incident attracted the media's attention. Sky News --BBC News --CNN
R v BL [Wood Green Crown Court] 2023
In charge of defendant's defendant, who was involved in a murder case in a park in Northern London. After a detailed analysis of Paul's CCTV shooting time and a series of o n-site inspections, the defendant was able to show the jury a completely different perspective on the case. The jury made a unanimous decision on the number of murders.
R v AN [Central Criminal Court] 2023
Martin was the chief consultant of D1, and Peter Eguee was a junior. The case (Operation Mandebras) is related to the Ministry of Interior survey on the suspicion of the Organized Crime Group, which has abused the "common travel area" with the Ireland Republic of Ireland. As a legal problem, the royal family violation of the Immigration Law, the continuity between various complaints, and whether there are multiple agreements have been in violation of a single conspiracy. It was considered. After a wide range of legal arguments (and the end of all evidence) were held at the end of the national proof (and the end of all evidence), the indictment was a very wide claim for the substantial crime against the main defendants that the jury should consider. Only one was left. As a result, the jury was dismissed and was ordered to retrial the remaining one cause of the four defendants.
R v JB [Woolwich Crown Court] 2023
Martin was the chief lawyer of Sarim. The case was mainly based on the activities of two men working in a high steering bank, helping to open a considerable number of bank accounts to use for wire fraud. The legal problem was the correct application of the definition of "criminal property" following cases such as R V GH [2015] UK 24 and R V Loizou [2005] 2 CR App R 37.
R v BAC [Woolwich Crown Court] 2023
James Martin, who was driving Ben Holt, was Burke and amplifier as an agent of Aslam, which was a MTIC fraud, part of beer, wine, and spirits imported tariffs. 。 According to HMRC, OCG caused a huge loss to HM Treasury with related larg e-scale added value and goods tax. The group also made larg e-scale money laundering in connection with the revenue of these crimes, which seem to exceed £ 86 million. It is said that 13 different individuals are involved with a large number of MTIC and buffer companies, and some of them were sold to BWS to the en d-o f-th e-art cache and carry end users. The case was divided into two trials, and Aslam D1 appeared in the second trial. At the time of the trial, the disclosure was held by HMRC, and there was a serious problem with evidence related to the materials that should have been disclosed long before the trial. An important legal discussion in Aslam's case has reduced the loss of HMRC to less than 7, 000 pounds. Eventually, Aslam was convicted, but was just suspended.
R v DA [Cardiff Crown Court] 2023
Lupert Kent was instructed as a junior of the Comple CaseWork CPS unit in this 1 8-hand collusion case, which would change the prosecution of criminal property. The case contained 8, 000 pages of evidence and 270 witnesses, divided into four trials.
R v ME [St Albans Crown Court] 2023
Loped Kent has responded to the three convictions of these three convictions as a Junior Junior CPS appeal. The appeal was related to the approval and instructions of a wide range of gang evidence.
R v VC [Southwark Crown Court] 2023
Lupert Kent was called a major advisor by CPS scams in seven tricks surveyed by the Revenue and Customs (HER Majesty's Revenue and Customs). In this case, complex compatibility was evaluated.
Operation Arabica [Isleworth Crown Court] 2023
CaspWork Complex UNIT was instructed only by CaspWork Complex UNIT in the confiscation procedure caused by the prosecution of 7 million pounds of drug imports by Lupert Kent as a junior LED. In the POCA procedure, a European investigation warrant was used to collect information on existing foreign confiscation orders from Belgium.
R v MM [Isleworth Crown Court] 2023
Lupert Kent will provide specialized legal advice on materials seized during a survey of lawyer offices, which had been investigated by SFO for repeated criminal interests through an international customer account. I was instructed.
Anjorin [2022] EWCA Crim 1931 2022
Lupert Kent has been indicted by CPS's International Bureau and Organized Crime Bureau to prosecute the money laundering incident, which is equivalent to 6 million pounds equivalent to a large number of international invoices. The case caused a larg e-scale investigation that spans multiple jurisdiction by the National Criminal Investigation Agency, and the evidence disclosed was 6, 000 pages.
R v. S and A [Luton] 2023
Under the instructions of the CPS Criminal Benefits Division, Lupert Kent applied for a unilateral restriction based on Article 41 of the 2002 Criminal Failure Law as a pr e-calculation of Article 22 applications to recalculate the amount available for the immersion procedure. Rely on Article and 22).
R v. P [Southwark] 2023
Lupert Kent was a junior lawyer in a CPS scam section in a scam conspiracy due to a larg e-scale and complex carbon credit "investment" fraud. .
As a junior sole partner for bankruptcy services, Lupert Kent is charged with the guilty of hiding property crimes due to the issuance of a bankruptcy order from the first neglect of tax payment to HMRC. He prosecuted the defendant.
Sam Willis, led by Paul Walker, was in charge of the fiv e-week trials for the suspicion of stalking. The prosecutor's evidence was 74. 000 pages of Facebook quotes and computer downloads. The ability to analyze a large amount of digital evidence is indispensable to the defense side, and as a result, a 4 0-page defense evidence was submitted to the jury to balance 550 pages of prosecutors.
Operation Forte [Croydon] 2023
Ben Holt, a junior leader, has appeared in an eigh t-week trial with seven hands. A claim on the Ministry of Health to apply for a subsidy from the hospice of Sama Set to improve the care house. Regarding the bidding of the architectural project, seven hands colluding between the NHS and the Ministry of Health. According to the instructions of CPS SFD Manchester. < SPAN> Loper Kent has given a professional legal advice from SFO during the investigation of a lawyer's office, which had been investigated for criminal interests through an international customer account. I was instructed to provide it.
R v W & 1 Other [Central Criminal Court] 2023
Lupert Kent has been indicted by CPS's International Bureau and Organized Crime Bureau to prosecute the money laundering incident, which is equivalent to 6 million pounds equivalent to a large number of international invoices. The case caused a larg e-scale investigation that spans multiple jurisdiction by the National Criminal Investigation Agency, and the evidence disclosed was 6, 000 pages.
R v S & 6 Others [Bournemouth Crown Court] 2023
Under the instructions of the CPS Criminal Benefits Division, Lupert Kent applied for a unilateral restriction based on Article 41 of the 2002 Criminal Failure Law as a pr e-calculation of Article 22 applications to recalculate the amount available for the immersion procedure. Rely on Article and 22).
R v A & 2 Others [St Albans Crown Court] 2023
Lupert Kent was a junior lawyer in a CPS scam section in a scam conspiracy due to a larg e-scale and complex carbon credit "investment" fraud. .
R v B & 3 Others [Southwark Crown Court] 2022
As a junior sole partner for bankruptcy services, Lupert Kent is charged with the guilty of hiding property crimes due to the issuance of a bankruptcy order from the first neglect of tax payment to HMRC. He prosecuted the defendant.
R v G & 1 Other [Isleworh Crown Court] 2022
Sam Willis, led by Paul Walker, was in charge of the fiv e-week trials for the suspicion of stalking. The prosecutor's evidence was 74. 000 pages of Facebook quotes and computer downloads. The ability to analyze a large amount of digital evidence is indispensable to the defense side, and as a result, a 4 0-page defense evidence was submitted to the jury to balance 550 pages of prosecutors.
R v. V [CCC] 2023
Ben Holt, a junior leader, has appeared in an eigh t-week trial with seven hands. A claim on the Ministry of Health to apply for a subsidy from the hospice of Sama Set to improve the care house. Regarding the bidding of the architectural project, seven hands colluding between the NHS and the Ministry of Health. According to the instructions of CPS SFD Manchester. Lupert Kent will provide specialized legal advice on materials seized during a survey of lawyer offices, which had been investigated by SFO for repeated criminal interests through an international customer account. I was instructed.
Six-handed murder 2023
Lupert Kent has been indicted by CPS's International Bureau and Organized Crime Bureau to prosecute the money laundering incident, which is equivalent to 6 million pounds equivalent to a large number of international invoices. The case caused a larg e-scale investigation that spans multiple jurisdiction by the National Criminal Investigation Agency, and the evidence disclosed was 6, 000 pages.
R v AK [Southwark Crown Court] 2023
Under the instructions of the CPS Criminal Benefits Division, Lupert Kent applied for a unilateral restriction based on Article 41 of the 2002 Criminal Failure Law as a pr e-calculation of Article 22 applications to recalculate the amount available for the immersion procedure. Rely on Article and 22).
R v LM Kingston Crown Court 2023
Lupert Kent was a junior lawyer in a CPS scam section in a scam conspiracy due to a larg e-scale and complex carbon credit "investment" fraud. .
R v Youth Isleworth Crown Court 2023
As a junior sole partner for bankruptcy services, Lupert Kent is charged with the guilty of hiding property crimes due to the issuance of a bankruptcy order from the first neglect of tax payment to HMRC. He prosecuted the defendant.
R v T [Snaresbrook Crown Court] 2023
Sam Willis, led by Paul Walker, was in charge of the fiv e-week trials for the suspicion of stalking. The prosecutor's evidence was 74. 000 pages of Facebook quotes and computer downloads. The ability to analyze a large amount of digital evidence is indispensable to the defense side, and as a result, a 4 0-page defense evidence was submitted to the jury to balance 550 pages of prosecutors.
R v T & 2 Others [Leeds Crown Court] 2023
Ben Holt, a junior leader, has appeared in an eigh t-week trial with seven hands. A claim on the Ministry of Health to apply for a subsidy from the hospice of Sama Set to improve the care house. Regarding the bidding of the architectural project, seven hands colluding between the NHS and the Ministry of Health. According to the instructions of CPS SFD Manchester.
R v Keet and Others [Kingston Crown Court] 2022
Sarah Forshaw QC successfully persuaded the prosecution not to give evidence on the second day of this sexual assault trial, where evidence and disclosure issues continued. The defendant was accused of sexually assaulting a colleague in his accommodation. He was trained by DJMS solicitor Andy Malik.
R v SO and Others [Central Criminal Court] 2022
R v DC [Central Criminal Court] 2022
Sarah Forshaw QC was privately retained to represent a music producer facing eight counts of historical child abuse, indecent assault and rape. After a three-week trial, the jury unanimously acquitted him on all counts. Trained by Mathias's incapacitated solicitor Zaheer Ahmed.
R v A&MD [Woolwich Crown Court] 2022
Sarah Forshaw QC represented the first of four defendants in the Jodie Chesney murder trial. After a highly publicised eight-week trial, Forshaw's client was acquitted of both murder and manslaughter. She was instructed by Sunita Mehta of ABV Solicitors. Read the BBC News report here.
R v HU [Central Criminal Court] 2023
Sarah Forshaw QC successfully overturned the appellant's conviction in the Crown Division Court in a case involving an alleged BDSM rape. The original trial had attracted significant media attention and involved multiple claimants. Instructed by Nigel Richardson of Hodge Jones Allen.
Op Melrose [CCC] 2023
Successfully appealed against a sentence for article 18 manslaughter in a case involving a sustained assault on the victim's face and neck with a broken glass bottle. Successfully argued that the appellant's previously undiagnosed mental health problems reduced his culpability. A sentence of 14 years was reduced to 10 years. The judgment of the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Justice Fulford and Lord Justice Holroyde included guidance on offenders with mental conditions and disabilities (PS, Abdi Dahir, CF V R [2019] EWCA Crim 2286). Joe Davies of the National Legal Service defended.
Op Tamora [Isleworth] 2023
William Davis was the junior prosecuting counsel (led by Lewis Mable QC) charged with the murder of a defendant who stabbed his neighbour following a confrontation in the street. News report here.
R v MR [Snaresbrook CC] 2024
Jonathan Polnay led William Davis in this long-running MTIC fraud. There were multiple transaction chains underpinned by an abundance of forged documents, with the proceeds of the fraud moving offshore via banks in Eastern Europe and Hong Kong.
Op Vivalas and Kikifeet [CCC] 2024
Danny Robinson QC led William Davis, charged with murder, having slashed his wife at least 58 times in an attack described by a pathologist as "extreme" force. News here
R v. AS [Snaresbrook CC] 2023
Louise Oakley appeared in front of Junior Junior, a defendant led by Tom Little QC. The defendant was charged with two murders caused by Leonard Harris and Rose Cefelian in 1998. When Wear was convicted, the incident became historic! Wear was initially convicted in July 1999 by the murder of Leonard Harris. The conviction was overturned by the appeal court in 2000 because the DNA profile should not have been held in the DNA database used for comparison. In 2017, Wear's palm crest, which was on the site of the Sefelian incident, matched. As a result, the Harris murder case was reviewed, and it was found that the palm crest in Harris's address matched Wear, and a new DNA evidence was discovered due to the advancement of DNA. The prosecutor carefully analyzed the past records owned by the fingerprint bureau to strictly prove the continuity of the palm crest discovered at the site. Click here for the BBC News Report,
Operation Star [Basildon Crown Court] 2024
Louise Oakley is a junior prosecutor led by Richard Wittam QC in front of Judge Sharp, Judge Swoney, and Mrs. May, in response to CCRC, one of the largest murder in the UK, "Lady in Lake Case." I was the government. Carol Park disappeared on July 17, 1976, and his family did not see his life. In 1997, her body was discovered by a diver at Conniston Water. She was called by detectives with a nickname "Lake Woman." Her husband Carol Park (Gordon Park) was convicted in 2005 for her murder. He appealed for conviction, but was overturned in 2008. Just a year later, Gordon Park committed suicide in HMP Garth's solo on his 65th birthday. Gordon Park's family applied to CCRC on behalf of him, and after eigh t-year investigations, in 2018, the Court of Appeal was entrusted to the appeal court, saying that the Court could have a realistic possibility. CCRC suggests that the Gordon Park mountain climbing ax may have been a weapon, not disclosed the prosecutor's claim, and that Gordon Park did not provide a DNA preserved in a knife. It has a cumulative impact of many issues, including new scientific evidence, Gordon Park, which suggests that it did not provide a DNA preserved in a knife. A new scientific evidence suggesting that Park does not provide the DNA that was used to tie his wife's body, the information that impairs the trust of the prosecutor's witnesses who testified for confession in prison The no n-disclosure, the rocks found in the pond near the body of Carroll Park cannot be specially associated with Bluestone's rock, the family's house. The appeal includes the guidance of a forensicist, medical scientist, and a forensic dentist, and a review of legal, dental and medical records dating back to 1976. Click here for BBC news.R v Dhir & Raijada [Southwark Crown Court] 2024
I was acquitted in two reconstruction. < SPAN> Louise Oakley, in response to CCRC, one of the largest murder in the UK, CCRC, Richard Wetum QC in front of Judge Shar, Judge Swoney, and Mrs. May. He was a junior prosecutor led. Carol Park disappeared on July 17, 1976, and his family did not see his life. In 1997, her body was discovered by a diver at Conniston Water. She was called by detectives with a nickname "Lake Woman." Her husband Carol Park (Gordon Park) was convicted in 2005 for her murder. He appealed for conviction, but was overturned in 2008. Just a year later, Gordon Park committed suicide in HMP Garth's solo on his 65th birthday. Gordon Park's family applied to CCRC on behalf of him, and after eigh t-year investigations, in 2018, the Court of Appeal was entrusted to the appeal court, saying that the Court could have a realistic possibility. CCRC suggests that the Gordon Park mountain climbing ax may have been a weapon, not disclosed the prosecutor's claim, and that Gordon Park did not provide a DNA preserved in a knife. It has a cumulative impact of many issues, including new scientific evidence, Gordon Park, which suggests that it did not provide a DNA preserved in a knife. A new scientific evidence suggesting that Park does not provide the DNA that was used to tie his wife's body, the information that impairs the trust of the prosecutor's witnesses who testified for confession in prison The no n-disclosure, the rocks found in the pond near the body of Carroll Park cannot be specially associated with Bluestone's rock, the family's house. The appeal includes the guidance of a forensicist, medical scientist, and a forensic dentist, and a review of legal, dental and medical records dating back to 1976. Click here for BBC news.
R v TK [Kingston Crown Court] 2024
I was acquitted in two reconstruction. Louise Oakley is a junior prosecutor led by Richard Wittam QC in front of Judge Sharp, Judge Swoney, and Mrs. May, in response to CCRC, one of the largest murder in the UK, "Lady in Lake Case." I was the government. Carol Park disappeared on July 17, 1976, and his family did not see his life. In 1997, her body was discovered by a diver at Conniston Water. She was called by detectives with a nickname "Lake Woman." Her husband Carol Park (Gordon Park) was convicted in 2005 for her murder. He appealed for conviction, but was overturned in 2008. Just a year later, Gordon Park committed suicide in HMP Garth's solo on his 65th birthday. Gordon Park's family applied to CCRC on behalf of him, and after eigh t-year investigations, in 2018, the Court of Appeal was entrusted to the appeal court, saying that the Court could have a realistic possibility. CCRC suggests that the Gordon Park mountain climbing ax may have been a weapon, not disclosed the prosecutor's claim, and that Gordon Park did not provide a DNA preserved in a knife. It has a cumulative impact of many issues, including new scientific evidence, Gordon Park, which suggests that it did not provide a DNA preserved in a knife. A new scientific evidence suggesting that Park does not provide the DNA that was used to tie his wife's body, the information that impairs the trust of the prosecutor's witnesses who testified for confession in prison The no n-disclosure, the rocks found in the pond near the body of Carroll Park cannot be specially associated with Bluestone's rock, the family's house. The appeal includes the guidance of a forensicist, medical scientist, and a forensic dentist, and a review of legal, dental and medical records dating back to 1976. Click here for BBC news.Op Serious [Snaresbrook] 2024
I was acquitted two times.
R v K [Kingston CC] 2023
Natasha Wong QC, driving for Mary Van Woudenberg in 2 Hare Court, defended a compliance officer who was acquitted of conspiracy to defraud legal aid services and pervert the course of justice. The defendant was a compliance officer for a firm of immigration solicitors in London who was alleged to have played a central role in a scheme to create and submit fraudulent invoices to the Legal Aid Agency (LAA, formerly the Legal Services Commission) over a six-year period. A compliance manager, a former employee of the LAA, was also alleged to have helped to deceive them through letters and telephone calls during the investigation. The Crown had alleged that the firm made more than 4, 000 fraudulent invoices on behalf of fake clients and produced convincing false documents as those of genuine clients to support supposedly genuine claims to the Home Office. The scheme accounted for 40% of the firm's income from legal aid services during this period. The total amount of the fraud was estimated to be around £4 million. The client was acquitted by a jury that deliberated for less than an hour. The firm's director was convicted of conspiracy last year. He trained under Graeme Hydari of Hodge Jones & Allen.
R v E [Wood Green CC] 2023
Sarah Forshaw QC handled this multi-million pound charity fraud case. Our client, a rabbi, is alleged to have facilitated the laundering of millions of pounds by using the Chabad UK charity as a front for his illegal activities, and the account was allegedly used to process the proceeds of the sale of counterfeit medicines, prescription medicines and non-genuine medicines sold over the internet. The funds were then withdrawn through currency exchange, payments to money service offices, cheques and cash withdrawals. 234 Transfers totalling £8. 4 million were made to 51 different overseas entities, mainly based in Hong Kong and Cyprus, to withdraw funds from the UK.R v S [Isleworth Crown Court] 2023 2023
Instructions from ABV Solicitors
Operation Ananke [Southwark CC] 2023
Rupert Kent was instructed only as a junior by ABV Solicitors in this 11-count drugs conspiracy case, involved in the importation and wholesale supply of drugs into the UK. The case contained 12, 000 pages of evidence and the trial (one of four) was recorded over 12 weeks. Natasha Wong QC, driving for Mary Van Woudenberg in the 2 Hare Court, defended a compliance officer who was acquitted of conspiracy to defraud legal aid services and pervert the course of justice. The defendant was a compliance officer at a London firm of immigration solicitors who allegedly played a central role in a scheme to create and submit fraudulent claims to the Legal Aid Agency (LAA, formerly the Legal Services Commission) over a six-year period. A compliance manager, a former employee of the LAA, is also said to have helped to deceive them through letters and telephone calls during the investigation. The Crown had alleged that the firm made more than 4000 fraudulent claims on behalf of fake clients and created convincing false documents as those of genuine clients to support supposedly genuine claims to the Home Office. The scheme accounted for 40% of the firm's income from legal aid services during this period. The total fraud was estimated at around £4 million. Our client was acquitted by a jury that deliberated for less than an hour. The firm's director was convicted of conspiracy last year. He was trained by Graeme Hydari of Hodge Jones & Allen.
Operation Elite [Kingston CC] 2023
Sarah Forshaw QC tried this multi-million pound charity fraud case. Our client, a rabbi, is alleged to have facilitated the laundering of millions of pounds by using the Chabad UK charity as a front for his illegal activities, and the accounts were allegedly used to process payments for the sale of counterfeit medicines, prescription medicines and non-genuine medicines sold over the internet. Funds were then withdrawn through currency exchanges, payments to money service offices, cheques and cash withdrawals. 234 A total of £8. 4 million was transferred to 51 different overseas entities, mainly based in Hong Kong and Cyprus, to withdraw funds from the UK. Instructions from ABV Solicitors Rupert Kent was instructed only as a junior by ABV Solicitors in this 11-count drug conspiracy case, involved in the importation and wholesale supply of drugs into the UK. The case contained 12, 000 pages of evidence and this trial (one of four) was recorded over 12 weeks. 2 Natasha Wong QC, driving for Mary van Woudenberg in Hare Court, represented a compliance officer who was acquitted of conspiracy to defraud legal aid services and pervert the course of justice. The defendant was a compliance officer for a firm of immigration solicitors in London who allegedly played a central role in a scheme to prepare and submit fraudulent invoices to the Legal Aid Agency (LAA, formerly the Legal Services Commission) over a six-year period. A compliance manager, a former employee of the LAA, is also said to have helped them deceive through letters and telephone calls during the investigation. The Crown alleged that the firm made more than 4, 000 fraudulent claims on behalf of fake clients and created convincing false documents as those of genuine clients to support supposedly genuine claims to the Home Office. The scheme accounted for 40% of the firm's income from legal aid services during this period. The total amount of the fraud was estimated at around £4 million. The clients were acquitted by a jury that deliberated for less than an hour. The firm's director was convicted of conspiracy last year. He had trained under Graeme Hydari of Hodge Jones & Allen.
R v S [Harrow CC] 2023
Sarah Forshaw QC tried the multi-million pound charity fraud case. Our client, the rabbi, is alleged to have facilitated the laundering of millions of pounds by using the Chabad UK charity as a front for his illegal activities, and the accounts were allegedly used to process payments for the sale of counterfeit, prescription and non-genuine medicines sold over the internet. The funds were then withdrawn through currency exchanges, payments to money service offices, cheques and cash withdrawals. 234 Transfers totalling £8. 4 million were made to 51 different overseas entities, mainly based in Hong Kong and Cyprus, to withdraw funds from the UK. Instructed by ABV Solicitors Rupert Kent was instructed only as a junior by ABV Solicitors in this 11-count drugs conspiracy case, involved in the importation and wholesale supply of drugs into the UK. The case involved 12, 000 pages of evidence and the trial (one of four) was recorded over 12 weeks.
R v G [Croydon CC] 2023
Natasha Won QC and Valeria Swift succeeded in defending a man who was charged with killing a friend after drinking and taking drugs. The deaths had severe heart disease and brain damage. In this case, causal relationships were investigated by many leading medical experts, including neurologists, cardiacists, pathologists, poisonists, and forensic sciologists. He was instructed by Ben Thomas of Sturnberg Reed.
Operation Westable [CCC] 2023
Gregory Fishwick was instructed to defend a financial institution senior broker. The charges were generally used in order to persuade the elderly, which used to put pressure on carbon credits at first and later to invest in diamonds. In fact, the investment was worthless or much lower than the reported value. Gregory dispatched a lawyer from the company and was instructed, and the defendant was acquitted by the jury.