What You Should Know About COVID-19 and the ADA the Rehabilitation Act and Other EEO Laws U. S.

What You Should Know About COVID-19 and the ADA, the Rehabilitation Act, and Other EEO Laws

This document was issued prior to the Supreme Court's decision in Groff v. DeJoy, 143 S. Ct. 2279 (2023). Groff clarified that the "appearance" of one or more de minimis costs "is not sufficient to create an undue hardship under Title VII...." Instead, the Supreme Court stated that "undue hardship arises when the burden is substantial in the context of an employer's operations as a whole" and that it "will consider all factors relevant to the case, including the particular accommodation at issue and its practical impact in light of the employer's nature, size, and operating costs." "Groff takes precedence over information posted on this site. For EEOC resources on religious discrimination, see https://www. eeoc. gov/religious-discrimination.

INTRODUCTION

Technical Assistance Q& A - Updated May 15, 2023.

EEOC's full resources on Covid-19 can be found at www. eeoc. gov/coronavirus.
The EEOC enforces laws to combat discrimination in the workplace, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act (which includes provisions requiring reasonable accommodation, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of disability, and regarding medical examinations and employer investigations), Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, and sex, including pregnancy), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age 40 or older), and the Genetic Information Discrimination Act. Note: Other federal, state, and local laws may also provide additional protections to employees.
Title I of the ADA applies to private employers with 15 or more employees. It also applies to state and local government employers, hiring agencies, and labor unions. All nondiscrimination standards under Title I of the ADA also apply to federal agencies under Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act. Basic information about the ADA and the Rehabilitation Act can be found on the EEOC's Disabilities page.
The EEO laws, including Title I of the ADA and the Rehabilitation Act, remain in effect during the COVID-19 pandemic but do not prevent or preclude employers from following current guidance or recommendations made by the CDC or state and local public health authorities regarding actions employers should take regarding COVID-19.
This book widely features a wide range of COVID-19 issues under the Federal EEO law. This includes disabilit y-related inquiries, health examinations, confidentiality, rational consideration based on disability, harassment, vaccination (including rational consideration based on disability and religious beliefs). We are also considering how the definition of disability is applied to COVID-19 and Long Covid.
This book continues to be associated with the end of the COVID-19 public health emergency on May 11, 2023. The emergency declaration focused on access to medical and treatment. Even after the declaration is completed, the requirements of the Federal Employment Opportunity Law have been featured in this book. See D. 20.
EEOC offers guidance on pandemic measures (PDF version) ("Pandemic Countermeasures Guidance") To avoid the impact of the workplace It will be a reference for the employer to implement the strategy. The publications related to this pandemic were written during the previous H1N1 epidemic, but are still appropriate, and the principles of the established ADA and rehabilitation methods to answer questions often asked about the workplace at the time of pandemic. I have identified it. Updated on March 19, 2020, examples and information about COVID-19 are described. New information in 2020 is displayed in bold and has an asterisk.
On March 27, 2020, EEOC held Webinar ("3/27/20 Webinar"), which was recorded and recorded, and was released in www. Eeoc. Gov/Coronavirus. The World Health Organization (WHO) has declared that COVID-19 is an international pandemic. EEOC's pandemi c-related materials include answers to general questions from employers regarding the response after the pandemic declaration.
Find guidance on COVID-19 on this site, information on a wide range of topics related to COVID-19, such as treatment, testing, special consideration for immunodeficiency patients, and various information about COVID for long-term COVIDs (such as how to participate in research surveys). Is provided. This information can be obtained by telephone (1-800-232-0233) or TTY (1-888-720-7489).

Throughout this pandemic, it is critical for employers and employees to follow current medical and public health guidelines. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and other medical and public health authorities have issued new guidance and updated some of their existing guidance as the situation evolves. Guidance from medical and public health authorities may relate to certain legal determinations under one or more EEO laws (e. g., “imminent threat” under the ADA). Because such changes in guidance may affect legal determinations under Title I of the ADA and other EEO laws, as discussed below, the EEOC encourages employers and employees to regularly review the latest information on guidance from medical and public health authorities, such as the CDC and the FDA.

A. Disability-Related Inquiries and Medical Exams

The ADA places limitations on when and how much medical information an employer can obtain from an applicant or employee.

Disability-related inquiries and medical examinations are generally prohibited before making a conditional offer of employment to an applicant. Between the offer and the start date, they are permitted if necessary for all individuals in the same position. See Section C for more information regarding the timing of disability-related inquiries and medical examinations for applicants.

Under the ADA (implemented in the federal sector through the Rehabilitation Act of 1973), disability-related investigations and medical examinations after an employee begins employment must be "job-related and consistent with job necessity." One way that investigations and medical examinations meet this "job necessity" standard is if they are necessary to determine whether a particular employee has a medical condition that poses an "imminent threat" to health or safety (a substantial risk of serious harm to self or others that cannot be addressed with reasonable accommodation). For more information on reasonable accommodations, see Section D. For questions about disabilities and COVID-19 vaccinations, see K. 7.-K. 9. Throughout this pandemic, it is critical for employers and employees to follow current medical and public health guidelines. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and other medical and public health authorities have issued new guidance and updated some of their existing guidance as the situation evolves. Guidance from medical and public health authorities may be relevant to a particular legal determination under one or more EEO laws (e. g., "imminent threat" under the ADA). Because such changes in guidance may affect legal decisions under Title I of the ADA and other EEO laws, as discussed below, the EEOC encourages employers and employees to regularly review guidance from medical and public health authorities, such as the CDC and the FDA.

The ADA places limitations on when and how much medical information an employer can obtain from an applicant or employee.

Disability-related inquiries and medical examinations are generally prohibited before making a conditional offer of employment to an applicant. Between the offer and the start date, they are permitted if necessary for all persons in the same occupation. See Section C for more information regarding the timing of disability-related inquiries and medical examinations of applicants.

Under the ADA (implemented in the federal sector through the Rehabilitation Act of 1973), disability-related investigations and examinations after an employee begins employment must be "job-related and consistent with business necessity." One way that an investigation or medical examination meets this “business necessity” test is if it is necessary to determine whether a particular employee has a medical condition that poses an “imminent threat” to health or safety (a substantial risk of serious harm to self or others that cannot be addressed by reasonable accommodation). For more information about reasonable accommodation, see Section D. For questions about disabilities and COVID-19 vaccinations, see K. 7.-K. 9. Throughout this pandemic, it is critical for employers and employees to follow current medical and public health guidelines. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and other medical and public health authorities have issued new guidance and updated some of their existing guidance as circumstances change. Guidance from medical and public health authorities may be relevant to a particular legal determination under one or more EEO laws (e. g., “imminent threat” under the ADA). Because such changes in guidance may affect legal determinations under Title I of the ADA and other EEO laws, as discussed below, the EEOC encourages employers and employees to regularly check for updates on guidance from medical and public health authorities, such as the CDC and FDA. The ADA limits how much and when employers can obtain medical information from applicants and employees.

Disability-related inquiries and medical examinations are generally prohibited before making a conditional offer of employment to an applicant. Between the offer and the start date, they are permitted if necessary for all individuals in the same occupation. For more information on the timing of disability-related inquiries and medical examinations for applicants, see Section C.

Under the ADA (implemented in the federal sector through the Rehabilitation Act of 1973), disability-related inquiries and medical examinations after an employee begins employment must be "job-related and consistent with business necessity." One way that an investigation or examination meets this "business necessity" test is if it is necessary to determine whether a particular employee has a medical condition that poses an "imminent threat" to health or safety (a substantial risk of significant harm to self or others that cannot be addressed by reasonable accommodation). For more information on reasonable accommodations, see Section D. For questions about disabilities and COVID-19 vaccinations, see K. 7.-K. 9.

The CDC has updated guidance among pandemic, and as the pandemic progresses and the CDC gains more information about viruses and different variants, it may continue to update. ADA's "Business Preparation" criteria call the employer to use the latest medical / public health information to determine which survey / medical testing is appropriate.

A. 1. In the event that an employee contacts the disease, the employer asks how much information from the employees to protect other employees and other people (eg, customers) from COVID-19 infections. Can you do it? (5/15/23 update)

If an employee contacts the illness, the employer may ask if the employer is affected by the general symptoms of COVID-19 or CDC identified by CDC. If an employee has a COVID-19 or COVID-19 symptoms, the employer is the isolated period recommended by the CDC regarding the time when employees can return to work or work close to others. You may follow. See A. 4 for the corresponding isolation period recommended by CDC. A. 1. Employers must hold all information about employee illness as a confidential medical record based on ADA.

A. 2. Where can the employer get the latest information on the symptoms related to COVID-19? (5/15/23 update)

As public health authorities and doctors deepen their knowledge and the appearance of different variants, the list of general symptoms related to this disease may be changed. Employers should rely on CDC as a guideline for the symptoms that are currently related to the disease. These materials are guidelines for the employer to ask an employee asking an employee. A. 8 also refer to "Employers' abilities asking employees to see if they have undergone a COVID-19 diagnosis or testing."

A. 3. When can the employer of the ADA measure the employee's body temperature for screening of COVID-19? (5/15/23 update)

Employee body temperature measurement is a medical examination. See A. 6. Based on ADA's "Business Needs" standards, the types of evaluations that the employer should justify the health checkup (or oblige employees to respond to disability questions) is a. See 6. The employer recommends that the rise in body temperature may refer to the CDC guidance or the guidance of other public health authorities to determine if it may be a sign of infection. If so, measuring the employee's body temperature will meet the ADA standard.

A. 4. Is ADA acknowledged that the employer would ask an employee to wait home if the symptoms of COVID-19 or COVID-19? (5/15/23 update)

The employer should refer to the current CDC guidance to clarify when a person with COVID-19 or COVID-19 recommends to wait at home. ADA does not prevent the employer from following the CDC advice. See also A. 1, which features the information that the employer requires when an employee calls for a disease.

A. 5. If an employee returns to work without taking COVID-19, the employer is safe even if the employee returns (that is, no danger of infection), And can I request a medical certificate of a qualified medical specialist who explains that employees can do their job? (Updated 7/12/22)

yes. Or, in accordance with the CDC guidance, the employer can judge whether it is safe to return an employee to the workplace without confirming a medical specialist.

If an employee who has left COVID-19 returns to work, the ADA acknowledges the employer to confirm a qualified medical specialist who explains that the person can return safely. 。 Such requests are recognized under ADA. First, COVID-19 is not always a disability, so confirmation requests may not be a question related to disability. Alternatively, if this request is regarded as an inquiry related to disability, it will be justified based on the ADA criteria that requires that such an inquiry from an employee is associated with the business and meets the need for business. 。 The request here is related to the possibility of the transmission and is associated with the objective concerns of the employer regarding the employee's work resume ability, so it meets the "business need" standard. 。 For example, employers may ask medical experts to confirm whether employees can resume certain duties that require physical labor.

As a realistic problem, the employer determines whether a doctor or other medical specialist cannot provide such documents in a timely manner, if they allow employees to return to work, it is safe. We recommend that you consider the method. This also includes a format, seal, or a local clinic that provides e-mail to confirm that individual infectivity is eliminated and returning to work.

A. 6. Under the ADA, the employer will test the Cobid 19 virus test (Cobid 19 virus existence (Cobid 19 virus) as a forced screening measure when evaluating the existence of employees in the first or continuous workplace. Is it possible to perform a test)? (Updated 7/12/22)

Yes, it is possible if the employer can indicate that it is in line with the need for work.

The COVID-19 virus test is a medical examination in the meaning of ADA. Therefore, if the employer conducts a screening protocol including COVID-19 virus testing, ADA has a forced medical examination for employees "in line with the need for business in connection with duties." Is requested. When using COVID-19 virus tests to screen employees who are planning to be in the workplace or in the workplace, it is the latest diseases prevention center (CDC), and the Food Pharmaceutical Bureau (FDA). ) If it matches the guidance of / or the public health authorities in the state / region, it will meet the "business needs" standards. CDCs and other public health authorities regularly update and revise recommendations related to Cobi d-19 tests, and FDA may revise guidance and emergency use permissions based on new information and changes in circumstances. Please note that there is.

The positive virus test means that SARS-COV-2, the virus of COVID-19, was detected at the time of the test. Negative means that SARS-COV-2 was not detected at the time of inspection. However, even if the test results are negative, it does not mean that the worker is not infected with or infected with the virus. It just means that the virus that caused SARS-COV-2 was not detected by the test. ADA, the employer, as a forced screening measure, the employer evaluates the employee's first or continuous workplace, as a forced screening measure, the existence of Cobid 19 viruses (the existence of Cobid 19 viruses. Is it possible to perform a test to detect)? (Updated 7/12/22)

Yes, it is possible if the employer can indicate that it is in line with the need for work.

The positive virus test means that SARS-COV-2, the virus of COVID-19, was detected at the time of the test. Negative means that SARS-COV-2 was not detected at the time of inspection. However, even if the test results are negative, it does not mean that the worker is not infected with or infected with the virus. It just means that the virus that caused SARS-COV-2 was not detected by the test. A. 6. Under the ADA, the employer will test the Cobid 19 virus test (Cobid 19 virus existence (Cobid 19 virus) as a forced screening measure when evaluating the existence of employees in the first or continuous workplace. Is it possible to perform a test)? (Updated 7/12/22)

Yes, it is possible if the employer can indicate that it is in line with the need for work.

When the employer tries to screen an employee, the tests must meet the "business needs" criteria based on the related facts. Consideration for evaluating "business needs" include infection levels in the local community, employee vaccination, different types of COVID-19 virus test accuracy, processing speed, and vaccination are "latest". It is conceivable to see how much discovery of employees is, the ease of infection of the current mutant type, the potential severity of the disease due to the current mutant type, and what kind of contact person is possible. Masu. When performing these evaluations, the employer needs to check the latest CDC guidance (and other related sources) and determine whether screening tests are appropriate for these employees.

Note: A. 6. and A. 8. Employee examination in general. See Question A. 9. About the decision to test only individual employees.

A. 7. Based on ADA, are the employers obliged their employees before they allow employment to reemployment in the workplace? (Updated 7/12/22)

no. Antibody tests must be in line with the need for business, related to the work of ADA medical tests. As of July 2022, CDC guidance does not determine whether employees are currently affected by employees, nor decide whether employees have immunity to infectious diseases. It is explained. Therefore, it should not be used to determine whether employees can enter the workplace. Based on this CDC guidance, such tests do not meet the ADA's "business necessity" standards for medical examination and surveys for employees. Therefore, it is not allowed under ADA to obligate antibody tests before employee returning to work. Antibodies are different from tests (viral tests), which examines whether SARS-COV-2 infection and COVID-19 infection. Regarding the virus test of COVID-19, A. 6.

A. 8. If the employer is diagnosed with COVID-19, or if a COVID-19 is tested, can all employees be required to enter the workplace? (Updated on May 15, 2013)

Yes. Employers may ask all employees who physically enter the workplace (or work in close proximity to others, such as customers) if they have COVID-19 or any of the common COVID-19-related symptoms identified by the CDC. Employers may also ask whether these employees have been tested for COVID-19 (and, if so, seek the results). Employers may exclude individuals with COVID-19 or symptoms related to COVID-19 from the workplace if they meet the CDC-recommended isolation protocols. See also A. 2.

A. 9. Can managers require temperature checks or COVID-19 testing for certain employees, rather than requiring these medical tests for all employees? (Updated 5/15/23)

If an employer seeks to require temperature checks or COVID-19 testing for certain employees or all employees, the ADA requires that the employer meet the "business necessity" test because these tests are medical tests. It is therefore important for employers to consider why they want to require medical screening. The ADA does not prevent an employer from conducting screening tests (or other medical screening tests) in accordance with CDC recommendations because the CDC recommendations meet the ADA's "business necessity" test. For general employee screening tests, see A. 6. For temperature measurement as a screening mechanism, see A. 3. Employers should not unlawfully discriminate based on a protected characteristic to determine who should be subject to medical testing.

B. Confidentiality of Medical Information

A. 10. May an employer ask employees who come to the workplace if they have a family member with COVID-19 or symptoms related to COVID-19? (Updated 5/15/23)

no. The Gene Information Law does not prohibit employers from asking employees medical questions about their family. For example, Gina prohibits employees to provide employees to provide their family medical test results, including COVID-19 test results. However, Gina is prohibited to ask employees to ask their employees if they have been in contact with "someone", which may have been diagnosed with COVID-19 or have symptoms related to this disease. Not done. Furthermore, from the viewpoint of public health, only in contact with the employee's family unnecessarily restricts the information that employees may be exposed to COVID-19. Employers should not do illegal discriminatory treatment based on protected characteristics in order to decide who they ask for exposure to COVID-19.

Α. 11. Employees refuse to measure their employees' body temperature, employees are infected with COVID-19, or have symptoms related to COVID-19, COVID-19. If you refuse to answer questions about whether you have been tested, what can the employer do under the ADA? (5/15/23 update)

The employer may ask employees to ask the employees whether they have been tested for COVID-19, identified by CDC, or have ever been tested for COVID-19. Is the result.) See A. 1. And a. 8. Employers may measure their employees' body temperature or request viral COVID-19 tests if these medical tests meet the ADA's "business needs" standards. See A. 3, A. 6, A. 9. If an employee refuses to respond to these questions or cooperate in medical examination, the employer follows the applied policy and procedure, and seems to be appropriate (eg, employees are physically present in the workplace. Can be prohibited or prohibited from cooperating closely with other people). No. The Gene Information Law does not prohibit employers from asking employees medical questions about their family. For example, Gina prohibits employees to provide employees to provide their family medical test results, including COVID-19 test results. However, Gina is prohibited to ask employees to ask their employees if they have been in contact with "someone", which may have been diagnosed with COVID-19 or have symptoms related to this disease. Not done. Furthermore, from the viewpoint of public health, only in contact with the employee's family unnecessarily restricts the information that employees may be exposed to COVID-19. Employers should not do illegal discriminatory treatment based on protected characteristics in order to decide who they ask for exposure to COVID-19.

The employer may ask employees to ask the employees whether they have been tested for COVID-19, identified by CDC, or have ever been tested for COVID-19. Is the result.) See A. 1. And a. 8. Employers may measure their employees' body temperature or request viral COVID-19 tests if these medical tests meet the ADA's "business needs" standards. See A. 3, A. 6, A. 9. If an employee refuses to respond to these questions or cooperate in medical examination, the employer follows the applied policy and procedure, and seems to be appropriate (eg, employees are physically present in the workplace. Can be prohibited or prohibited from cooperating closely with other people). no. The Gene Information Law does not prohibit employers from asking employees medical questions about their family. For example, Gina prohibits employees to provide employees to provide their family medical test results, including COVID-19 test results. However, Gina is prohibited to ask employees to ask their employees if they have been in contact with "someone", which may have been diagnosed with COVID-19 or have symptoms related to this disease. Not done. Furthermore, from the viewpoint of public health, only in contact with the employee's family unnecessarily restricts the information that employees may be exposed to COVID-19. Employers should not give illegal discriminatory treatment based on protected characteristics in order to decide who they will ask about the possibility of exposure to COVID-19.

However, in order to gain the cooperation of employees, the employer may ask why the employee refuses. For example, the employer provides information and guarantees that the employer has taken such measures to ensure the safety of the whole workplace, and that this measure is in line with the CDC health checkup recommendation. You may be able to do it. Employees are reluctant to provide medical information because they are afraid that employers will spread such personal medical information widely throughout the workplace. Employers can reconfirm their employees that the ADA prohibits employee disclosure of medical information, except for a limited exception. If an employee demands rational consideration in connection with the audit, it should follow the normal consideration procedure. See g. 7 for this.

Α. 12. 12. Employers are in poor physical condition while working due to COVID-19-related symptoms to protect other employees and other people (eg, customers) affected by COVID-19. Can I ask the employees who sued for information? (Updated 5/15/23)

yes. If an employee working on the spot (or working close to others) reports that he feels sick during his work, the employer has a CDC identified by CDC. You can ask if you are affected by the general symptoms of COVID-19. If an employee has a COVID-19 or COVID-19 symptoms, the employer will be the Espder in the isolated period recommended by the CDC regarding the time when employees can return to work or work near others. Good. See A. 4, which also mentions about the isolation period recommended by the CDC. The employer must hold all information about employee illness as a confidential record based on ADA.

Α. 13. Can the employer ask employees why they are absent? (9/8/2 0-Quote from Questions 15 regarding pandemic measures)

yes. Asking why you didn't go to work is not a question related to disability. Employers always have the right to know why their employees did not go to work.

A. 14. COVID-19 If an employee returns from a travel during a pandemic, should the employer ask questions about where the employee travels until the employee develops COVID-19 symptoms? (5/15/23 update)

No. A question about travel destination does not constitute a disability question. Employers may wish to consult the latest CDC guidance for domestic or international travel regarding what precautions are recommended upon return from a particular travel destination. If an employer wishes to require a medical screening (e. g., to require COVID-19 virus testing), the ADA's "business necessity" test must be met. See A. 6. and A. 9.

With limited exceptions, the ADA requires employers to maintain confidentiality of medical information learned about applicants and employees. Medical information includes not only diagnosis and treatment, but also the fact that an individual has requested or received a reasonable accommodation.

B. 1. May an employer store information it receives about COVID-19, including the results of an employee's temperature check or identification that the employee has the disease, in existing medical records, or must the employer establish a new medical records system solely for this information? (Updated 5/15/23)

The ADA requires that all medical information about a particular employee be kept separate from that employee's personnel file, thereby limiting access to this confidential information. Employers may keep all medical information related to COVID-19 in existing medical records. This includes the employee's statement that the employee has or is suspected of having the disease, as well as the employer's notes and other documentation when questioning the employee about symptoms. Similarly, information about employees who have long-term COVID-19 should also be treated as confidential information. Information about confidentiality and COVID-19 vaccinations is provided in K. 4.

B. 2. If an employer requires all employees to take their temperature daily before entering the workplace, may the employer keep a log of the temperature check results? (4/9/20)

C. Hiring and Onboarding

Yes. The employer must maintain the confidentiality of this information.

B. 3. May an employer disclose an employee's name to a public health agency if the employer learns that the employee has COVID-19? (4/9/20)

B. 4. Can an emergency office or contractor that has employees at an employer's workplace notify the employer if they learn that the employee has COVID-19? (4/9/20)

Yes, because the employer must determine whether the employee has come into contact with anyone at the workplace.

B. 5. Some administrators know that employees have a COVID-19 or that they have symptoms related to this disease. The administrator knows that it should be reported, but is concerned about ADA's violation of confidentiality. What should the administrator do? (September 8, 2006-March 27, 2012 Quoted from the question 5 of Webinar)

ADA asks the employer to confidential all medical information about employees, even if the information is not related to the disability. The information that employees have symptoms and diagnosis are clearly medical information. However, just because it is medical information does not prevent the administrator from reporting to the employees of the employer to take measures in accordance with the guidance of CDC and other public health authorities. 。

The problem is what kind of information you report: Is it the fact that a certain employee has a COVID-19 symptoms or diagnosis, or is it? 。 Who needs to know the identity of the employees in the organization depends on each workplace, and why a specific employee needs this information. Employers should make every effort to limit the number of people who know the names of employees.

ADA is an employee so that the employer can take action to notify employees who may have come into contact without disclosing employee identity. It does not prevent interviews with employees to get a list of people who may have contacted through the workplace. For example, the use of general explanations, such as "someone in this position" or "someone on the 4th floor" is affected by COVID-19, provides notifications for the use of general explanations and provides notifications and ADA's medical confidential information. It does not violate the ban on disclosure. If you are a small employer, your colleagues may be able to know who the employees are, but in such a situation, the employer is forbidden to check and disclose the employees. I am. In addition, all employers who are identified that they need to know the identity of employees must clearly notify that they must maintain the confidentiality of this information. The employer decides in advance what kind of supervision and management actions should be taken in the event of such a situation, who will obtain information and take responsibility for the next step. That's good.

Β. 6. An employee who is required to report to a workplace knows that a coworker who also reports to the workplace has symptoms related to COVID-19. Would the ADA’s confidentiality prohibit the first employee from disclosing the coworker’s symptoms to the supervisor? (Sep 8, 2020, taken from question 6 of the webinar on Mar 27, 2020)

No. The ADA’s confidentiality prohibition does not prevent the employee from telling the coworker’s supervisor about the coworker’s symptoms. In other words, it is not a violation of the ADA’s confidentiality prohibition for this employee to tell the supervisor about the coworker’s symptoms. After learning of this situation, the supervisor should contact the appropriate supervisor to report this information and discuss next steps.

Β. 7. An employer knows that an employee is working remotely because he or she has symptoms related to COVID-19 or a disease and is in quarantine. Can the employer tell staff that this employee is teleworking without telling them why? (Cited from 9/8/20, 3/27/20 webinar Question 7)

Yes. If you need to know how to contact the employee or that the employee is working, even if the employee is not at work, disclose that the employee is working remotely without saying why that is permissible. Also, if an employee is on leave because they have COVID-19 or symptoms related to that disease, or another medical condition, and are not working from home, the employer cannot disclose the reason for the leave, only the fact that they are on leave.

D. Disability and Reasonable Accommodation

Β. 8. As a result of COVID-19, many employees, including managers and supervisors, are now working remotely. How can I maintain the confidentiality of employees' medical information while working remotely? (Cited from 9/8/20, 3/27/20 webinar Question 9)

The ADA requirement to keep medical information confidential includes the requirement that it be kept separate from regular personnel files. If a manager or supervisor receives medical information about COVID-19 or other medical information while working from home and is unable to follow the employer's existing confidentiality protocols while working remotely, the supervisor must do so. However, if that is not possible, the supervisor must protect this information to the maximum extent possible until the supervisor is able to properly store the information. This means that paper notebooks, laptops, and other devices should not be left in a location where others could access protected information.

Similarly, documents should not be stored electronically in a location where they can be accessed by others. Managers may choose to use initials or a different password to further ensure confidentiality of employees' names.

Under the ADA, disability questions or medical exams are generally prohibited before making a conditional offer to an applicant. They are permitted for all employees in the same occupation if necessary during the time between the offer and the start of the job.

C. 1. If an employer is recruiting, may it screen applicants for COVID-19 symptoms? (Updated 5/15/23)

Yes. Employers may screen job applicants for COVID-19 symptoms after making a conditional offer, as long as the screening is done for all employees in the same occupation. This ADA rule applies whether or not the applicant has a disability.

In addition, if an employer screens everyone for COVID-19 before allowing them to enter a work site (i. e., checks all applicants, employees, contractors, and visitors because anyone can have COVID-19), then pre-offer applicants who need to be at the work site as part of the application process (e. g., for an interview) may also be screened for COVID-19. Employers may also screen a subset of pre-offer applicants if they fall into a specific category of individuals (including employees) that are subject to COVID-19 screening. For example, if everyone entering a particular building on a campus must be screened for COVID-19, the employer may subject applicants entering that building to the same screening, but this screening would not typically occur when entering other buildings. However, employers should not use this COVID-19 screening as an opportunity to ask applicants disability-related questions before they are offered a job or to conduct a medical examination that can only be conducted after they are offered a job. See Section A for ADA rules governing such questions and tests.

C. 2. May an employer take an applicant's temperature as part of a pre-offer pre-employment medical examination? (18/3/20)

Yes. Any medical examination is possible after the employer has made a conditional offer of employment. However, employers should be aware that some people may be infected with COVID-19 but do not develop a fever.

C. 3. Can employers delay the start date of an applicant who has COVID-19 or related symptoms? (18/3/20)

Yes. Per CDC guidance, anyone with COVID-19 or related symptoms should not be in the workplace.

C. 4. Can an employer revoke an offer if the applicant is required to start work immediately, in the physical presence of others, or outside the workplace, because the applicant has tested positive for a virus that causes COVID-19 symptoms, has symptoms of COVID-19, or has recently been exposed to a person with COVID-19? (Updated 7/12/22)

Employers should refer to and follow the latest CDC guidance that describes when and how it is safe for a person who currently has COVID-19, COVID-19 symptoms, or has recently been exposed to a person with COVID-19 to end isolation or quarantine and safely enter the workplace or work in areas where others are physically present. (2) If CDC guidance recommends that the person not be in close proximity to others, or (3) If close proximity to others is required in the workplace or elsewhere. Because some individuals may require less time to quarantine or isolate, employers may adjust start dates or allow employees to work from home.

C. 5. Can an employer postpone a start date or revoke an offer because an employee is older, pregnant, or has an underlying medical condition that puts them at higher risk from COVID-19? (Updated 7/12/22)

No. An employer’s concern for the health of an applicant and its intent to protect the applicant from the risk of COVID-19 illness does not justify conduct that would otherwise be unlawful discrimination. The fact that the CDC has noted that older adults, people with certain medical conditions, and pregnant and recently pregnant women may be at higher risk for severe illness from COVID-19 does not unilaterally justify postponing a start date or rescinding an offer. Thus, an employer cannot discriminate on the basis of age (over 40 years of age) or pregnancy or related circumstances. If the underlying medical condition is a disability, the employer must determine whether the individual’s disability poses an “imminent threat” to starting work immediately and, if so, whether it can provide a reasonable accommodation to adequately reduce or eliminate the risk without causing undue hardship. See G. 4. and G. 5. for the evaluation of imminent threat and reasonable accommodation in these circumstances. See G. 4. and G. 5. for potential issues regarding discrimination on the basis of age and pregnancy. See Sections H and J. Under the ADA, a reasonable accommodation is an adjustment or modification that an employer provides to an individual with a disability to enable that individual to enjoy equal employment opportunities. When a reasonable accommodation is required and requested by an individual with a disability to apply for employment, perform the work, or enjoy the benefits and privileges of employment, the employer must provide it unless it causes an undue hardship, i. e., substantial difficulty or expense. Employers have the discretion to choose among effective accommodations. If the requested accommodation would result in undue hardship, the employer must provide an alternative accommodation unless there is undue hardship. When discussing requests for accommodation, employers and employees may find it useful to refer to the Job Action Network (JAN) website (www. askjan. org) for information on types of accommodations. JAN resources specific to Covid-19 can be found at https://askjan. org/topics/covid-19. cfm.

See section g for reasonable accommodation issues that may arise as employees return to the workplace. For more information about reasonable accommodations and pregnancy-related disability issues, see section j. For more information about reasonable accommodations and Covid-19 vaccinations, see sections j. K. 1, K. 2, K. 5, K. 6, and K. 11.

D. 1. Is there a reasonable consideration for people with disabilities so that if you can only work at the workplace, you can protect workers with high risk of COVID-19 due to disorders, unreasonable difficulties. ? (4/9/20)

Disability increases the risk of COVID-19, which may have a reasonable convenience that can protect individuals seeking such convenience to eliminate exposure potential. Even if there is a pandemic restriction, there is a convenience that the employer can temporarily meet the needs of employees without forcing the employer to overdo the difficulties.

A lo w-cost solution that is already available or easy to obtain is effective. Changes to work environment, such as specifying a on e-way passage for convenience for workers who need to reduce contact with others for disability if they have not yet been implemented. Includes the use of prexiglasses, tables and other barriers to ensure the minimum distance between customers and colleagues as much as possible for the convenience of reducing the potential of exposure.

The flexibility of employers and employees is important to determine whether it is possible to have some convenience in a situation. Due to the temporary reorganization of the limit duties, temporary transfer to another duties, or changes in the work schedule and shift distribution, people with disabilities reduce exposure to others in the workplace or commuting. In some cases, you can safely carry out the essentials of duties.

D. 2. COVID-19 COVID-19 If an employee has been suffering from mental illness or disability that has deteriorated by pandemic for a long time, can the employee be rational consideration (if there is no unreasonable difficulty)? (4/9/20)

Many people feel great stress from the Pandemic COVID-19, but for example, workers with a certain mental health, such as anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorders, and post-traumatic stress disorders, pandemic COVID-. It can be more difficult to deal with the turmoil of everyday life associated with 19. D. 1. If you can only work at work, unless you have an unreasonable difficulty, you can protect workers with high risk of COVID-19 due to problems with previous illnesses Is there? (4/9/20)

Many people feel great stress from the Pandemic COVID-19, but for example, workers with a certain mental health, such as anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorders, and post-traumatic stress disorders, pandemic COVID-. It can be more difficult to deal with the turmoil of everyday life associated with 19. D. 1. Is there a reasonable consideration for people with disabilities so that if you can only work at the workplace, you can protect workers with high risk of COVID-19 due to disorders, unreasonable difficulties. ? (4/9/20)

A lo w-cost solution that is already available or easy to obtain is effective. Changes to work environment, such as specifying a on e-way passage for convenience for workers who need to reduce contact with others for disability if they have not yet been implemented. Includes the use of prexiglasses, tables and other barriers to ensure the minimum distance between customers and colleagues as much as possible, for the convenience of reducing the potential of exposure.

As with other acomo dations requests, the employer can do the following: Discuss with employees how the demanded acomodations support employees and enable employees to continue their work, and examine alternatives that can effectively meet employee needs. Request a medical document if necessary.

D. 3. In a workplace where employees are forced to work remotely due to the candy of COVID-19, the employer has been forced to work from employees with disabilities, and employees have an employee. Should we postpone the demands that are not needed until we return to to to to to to to to to to? (5/15/23 update)

Not always. Employers can discuss the requirements of rational consideration required during work at home with a greater priority, but they can start discussing this demand right away. Employers may be able to get all the information required for the decision. Also, if rational consideration is found, the employer may be able to provide some convenience in advance.

D. 4. COVID-19 What happens if an employee who has been rational consideration for pandemic has been requested for additional or changed? (4/9/20)

Employees who have already received rational consideration before the pandemic of COVID-19 have the right to be added or modified unless they have an unreasonable difficulty. For example, employees who work in remote areas due to pandemic may need a different type of acomoid than what they use at work. Employers can discuss with employees how the basis for this new demand is the same or different obstacles, and why an additional or modified accommodation is needed.

D. 5. In the case of a pandemic (global trend), if an employee demands a health status at home or at work, the employer requests information to determine whether the condition is disability. Can you do it? (17/4/20)

Yes, if it is not clear or already known, the employer is "disability" (physical or mental disability that substantially restricts major living activities, or substantially restrictions. You can ask questions or request medical documents to judge whether you have a history of disability). As well as other acomoid requests, the employer can do the following: Discuss with employees how the demanded acomodations support employees and enable employees to continue their work, and examine alternatives that can effectively meet employee needs. Request a medical document if necessary.

D. 4. COVID-19 What happens if an employee who has been rational consideration for pandemic has been requested for additional or changed? (4/9/20)

Yes, if it is not clear or already known, the employer is "disability" (physical or mental disability that substantially restricts major living activities, or substantially restrictions. You can ask questions or request medical documents to judge whether you have a history of disability). As with other acomo dations requests, the employer can do the following: Discuss with employees how the demanded acomodations support employees and enable employees to continue their work, and examine alternatives that can effectively meet employee needs. Request a medical document if necessary.

D. 4. COVID-19 What happens if an employee who has been rational consideration for pandemic has been requested for additional or changed? (4/9/20)

D. 6. Can an employer engage in a two-way process and ask an employee for information about why a stay is needed, even during a pandemic? (4/17/20)

E. Pandemic-Related Harassment Due to National Origin, Race, or Other Protected Characteristics

Yes, if it is not clear or already known, an employer may ask questions about the employee's requested or other accommodations and request medical documentation to determine whether the employee's disability requires an accommodation. Possible questions to ask an employee include: (1) what limitation the disability creates; (2) how the requested accommodation would effectively address the limitation; (3) whether another form of accommodation would effectively address the issue; and (4) whether the proposed accommodation would enable the employee to continue to perform the "essential functions" of the job (i. e., the essential job functions).

D. 7. Can an employer provide a temporary accommodation when an emergency accommodation is needed? (Updated 5/15/23)

Yes. In light of the pandemic, some employers may choose to waive or omit the employer-employee information exchange known as the "two-way process" (described in D. 5 and D. 6 above) and grant the request. Additionally, changes in government regulations may impact the need for accommodation. Employers may need to modify how they conduct their interactive process to accommodate changing circumstances based on current public health guidance.

Whatever the reason for shortening or adjusting the interactive process, employers may also provide an end date for the temporary accommodation (e. g., a specific date such as "May 30"). Employers may also provide the requested accommodation on a temporary or interim basis, pending receipt of medical documentation, with an expiration date. Choosing one of these options is particularly useful if the requested accommodation provides protections that an employee may need due to a disability that puts the employee at greater risk during the pandemic. This may also apply to employees with disabilities that are exacerbated by the pandemic.
If an employee requests an extension of the temporary accommodation, employers should consider it. Employers may take into account current circumstances, such as current disability-related needs and applicable government restrictions or public health guidelines).
- D. 8. May an employer invite employees to request reasonable accommodations they may need in the future before they return to work? (Updated 5/15/23)
- Yes. Employers may inform all employees that employees with disabilities may request in advance any accommodations they may need upon returning to work part-time or full-time. This is discussed in more detail in this G. 6. If a request is received in advance, the employer may initiate an “interactive process” (a discussion between the employer and employee that focuses on whether the disability is a disability and why an accommodation is needed). If an employee chooses not to request an accommodation in advance and requests an accommodation at a later date, the employer must consider the request at that time.
- D. 9. Do pandemic circumstances have a bearing on whether a requested accommodation may be denied for undue hardship? (Updated 4/17/20)
Yes. Employers are not required to provide a particular reasonable accommodation if it would cause “undue hardship” (meaning “substantial hardship or expense”). As discussed in the next two questions, an accommodation that did not pose an undue hardship before the pandemic may now pose an undue hardship.

D. 10. Can an employer consider the circumstances surrounding the Covid-19 pandemic when determining whether a requested accommodation would pose a “significant hardship” (and therefore constitute an undue hardship)? (Updated 5/15/23)

Employers may consider whether the current circumstances related to the Covid-19 pandemic would pose a “significant hardship” to obtaining or providing a particular accommodation, given the facts of the particular job and workplace. For example, it may become significantly more difficult for employees, particularly those working from home, to conduct needs assessments or obtain certain items, which could affect deliveries. Or it may become much more difficult to give employees temporary assignments, eliminate marginal functions, or readily hire temporary workers for specialized jobs. If circumstances related to the pandemic would cause an undue hardship to a particular accommodation, employers and employees should work together to consider whether alternatives could be provided that would not create such problems.

Δ. 11. Employers consider the status of COVID-19 pandemic when determining whether the requested accommodation is accompanied by a "large cost" Can you do it? (5/15/23 update)

Before the COVID-19 pandemic, most accommodations are not important expenses, taking into account the budget and resources of the entire employer (always considering not only the components, but also the budget and resources of the entire company). Ta. From the current pandemic situation (global trend), it is unlikely that the pandemic will be the basis for being judged to be a "large expense", but when the employer evaluates unreasonable hardships. , It is possible to consider the situation related to pandemic. However, considering the reasons related to pandemic does not mean that the employer can refuse the costly convenience. The employer must compare the convenience costs with the current budget, taking into account the restrictions caused by pandemic. Even in pandemi c-related situations, there may be many convenience of employee disabilit y-related needs, or are not expensive, or very lo w-cost.

Δ. 12. Is the ADA and rehabilitation method applied to applicants or workers classified as "important infrastructure workers" or "important workers" by CDC? (23/4/20)

yes. The specification of these CDCs or the other specification for specific workers does not eliminate the application of ADA, rehabilitation method, or other employment opportunities. Therefore, employers who have received a rational consideration based on the ADA or rehabilitation method from employees who fall under these duties must accept and handle the requests like other employees. Whether or not the demand is accepted depends on whether the employee is a disabled person and whether there is a reasonable consideration that can be provided unless there is excessive difficulties.

Δ. 13. Is it the right to use ADA to avoid exposure to families with high risk of severe illness due to COVID-19 for basic diseases? (6/11/20) δ. 11. The employer determines whether the requested accommodation is accompanied by a "heavy cost" (therefore an unreasonable hardship). Can you take into account the situation related to the COVID-19 pandemic? (5/15/23 update)

F. Furloughs and Layoffs

Before the COVID-19 pandemic, most accommodations are not important expenses, taking into account the budget and resources of the entire employer (always considering not only the components, but also the budget and resources of the entire company). Ta. From the current pandemic situation (global trend), it is unlikely that the pandemic will be the basis for being judged to be a "large expense", but when the employer evaluates unreasonable hardships. , It is possible to consider the situation related to pandemic. However, considering the reasons related to pandemic does not mean that the employer can refuse the costly convenience. The employer must compare the convenience costs with the current budget, taking into account the restrictions caused by pandemic. Even in pandemi c-related situations, there may be many convenience of employee disabilit y-related needs, or are not expensive, or very lo w-cost.

Δ. 12. Is the ADA and rehabilitation method applied to applicants or workers classified as "important infrastructure workers" or "important workers" by CDC? (23/4/20)

yes. The specification of these CDCs or the other specification for specific workers does not eliminate the application of ADA, rehabilitation method, or other employment opportunities. Therefore, employers who have received a rational consideration based on the ADA or rehabilitation method from employees who fall under these duties must accept and handle the requests like other employees. Whether or not the demand is accepted depends on whether the employee is a disabled person and whether there is a reasonable consideration that can be provided unless there is excessive difficulties.

Δ. 13. Is it the right to use ADA to avoid exposure to families with high risk of severe illness due to COVID-19 for basic diseases? (6/11/20) δ. 11. The employer determines whether the requested accommodation is accompanied by a "large amount of cost" (thus whether or not it will be an unreasonable hardship). Is it possible to take into account the situation related to pandemic? (5/15/23 update)

G. Return to the Workplace

Before the COVID-19 pandemic, most accommodations are not important expenses, taking into account the budget and resources of the entire employer (always considering not only the components, but also the budget and resources of the entire company). Ta. From the current pandemic situation (global trend), it is unlikely that the pandemic will be the basis for being judged to be a "large expense", but when the employer evaluates unreasonable hardships. , It is possible to consider the situation related to pandemic. However, considering the reasons related to pandemic does not mean that the employer can refuse the costly convenience. The employer must compare the convenience costs with the current budget, taking into account the restrictions caused by pandemic. Even in pandemi c-related situations, there may be many convenience of employee disabilit y-related needs, or are not expensive, or very lo w-cost.

Δ. 12. Is the ADA and rehabilitation method applied to applicants or workers classified as "important infrastructure workers" or "important workers" by CDC? (23/4/20)

yes. The specification of these CDCs or the other specification for specific workers does not eliminate the application of ADA, rehabilitation method, or other employment opportunities. Therefore, employers who have received a rational consideration based on the ADA or rehabilitation method from employees who fall under these duties must accept and handle the requests like other employees. Whether or not the demand is accepted depends on whether the employee is a disabled person and whether there is a reasonable consideration that can be provided unless there is excessive difficulties.

Δ. 13. Is it the right to use ADA to avoid exposure to families with high risk of serious illness due to COVID-19 for basic diseases? (6/11/20)

No. The ADA prohibits discrimination based on disability-related factors, but this protection is limited to discriminatory treatment and harassment. The ADA does not require employers to accommodate employees who do not have disabilities based on the disability-related needs of family members or other people related to the employee.

D. 14. If an employer has some or all of its employees work from home because of Covid-19 or government authorities require employers to close facilities and have employees work from home, must the employer provide the telecommuting employee with the same reasonable accommodation for disability under the ADA or the Rehabilitation Act that it provides to that individual in the workplace? (Taken from Question 20 of the Webinar 09/08/20-03/27/20)

If such a request is made, the employer and employee should discuss what the employee needs, why, and whether the same accommodation can be made at home or if a different accommodation can be made. For example, it may not be necessary to make all accommodations at work because the employee already has what he or she needs to do the job at home.

Also, undue hardship may be different when evaluating a request for accommodation to telecommute instead of working in the office. Considering the circumstances, such as where telecommuting is required and the reasons for telecommuting, reasonable accommodations that are feasible and do not cause undue hardship in the workplace may be required. For example, if telecommuting is temporary or of unknown duration, a particular accommodation may not be feasible or may pose an undue hardship. There may also be constraints on commonly available items or on the employer's ability to make the necessary assessments.

As a practical matter, and given the circumstances that led to the need to telecommute, employers and employees should be creative and flexible about what can be done if an employee needs a reasonable accommodation to telecommute. If possible, it may be appropriate for the employer to provide a temporary accommodation while the employer discusses the request with the employee or awaits additional information.

D. 15. Suppose that one employer acknowledged employees to work at home for the purpose of delaying or eating Cavid 19. If the employer resumes the workplace and recalls an employee to the workplace, the employer automatically works at home as a reasonable consideration for employees with disabilities who wish to continue this agreement for the convenience of ADA/ rehabilitation. Do I have to admit it? (September 8, 2006-March 27, 2012 quoted from a question 21 of Webinar)

no. If an employee demands rational consideration, the employer has the right to understand the restrictions related to disabilities that require consideration. If there are no restrictions on disability that requires work from home, the employer does not need to work at home. Alternatively, if the employer can effectively deal with the necessity with another reasonable consideration of the workplace, even if there are restrictions related to disability, the employer can choose the option to work at home. 。

If the employer permits employees to work at home due to COVID-19 and choose employees to exempt one or more basic duties, continue working at home as a reasonable consideration. If you request again, you do not need to permit if your employees require that they will continue to exempt the basic duties. ADA does not require employers to eliminate core functions as consideration for individuals with disabilities.

Employer closed his workplace to protect the safety of employees from COVID-19, allowed telework, or when he permitted telework in other ways, exempted one or more essential functions. That does not mean that the employer has been constantly changing the essential function of his duties, that telework is always executed, or telework does not cause unreasonable hardship. These are the judgments according to the facts. Employers avoid recovering all the essential functions of employees who chose to return to the previous work form under the ADA, and then continuously or newly demanded based on the normal ADA rules. There is no obligation to evaluate. D. 15. Suppose that a certain employer has acknowledged employees working at home to delay or stop the spread of Cavid 19. If the employer resumes the workplace and recalls an employee to the workplace, the employer automatically works at home as a reasonable consideration for employees with disabilities who wish to continue this agreement for the convenience of ADA/ rehabilitation. Do I have to admit it? (September 8, 2006-March 27, 2012 quoted from a question 21 of Webinar)

no. If an employee demands rational consideration, the employer has the right to understand the restrictions related to disabilities that require consideration. If there are no restrictions on disability that requires work from home, the employer does not need to work at home. Alternatively, if the employer can effectively deal with the necessity with another reasonable consideration of the workplace, even if there are restrictions related to disability, the employer can choose the option to work at home. 。

If the employer permits employees to work at home due to COVID-19 and choose employees to exempt one or more basic duties, continue working at home as a reasonable consideration. If you request again, you do not need to permit if your employees require that they will continue to exempt the basic duties. ADA does not require employers to eliminate core functions as consideration for individuals with disabilities.

Employer closed his workplace to protect the safety of employees from COVID-19, allowed telework, or when he permitted telework in other ways, exempted one or more essential functions. That does not mean that the employer has been constantly changing the essential function of his duties, that telework is always executed, or telework does not cause unreasonable hardship. These are the judgments according to the facts. Employers avoid recovering all the essential functions of employees who chose to return to the previous work form under the ADA, and then continuously or newly demanded based on the normal ADA rules. There is no obligation to evaluate. D. 15. Suppose that one employer acknowledged employees to work at home for the purpose of delaying or eating Cavid 19. If the employer resumes the workplace and recalls an employee to the workplace, the employer automatically works at home as a reasonable consideration for employees with disabilities who wish to continue this agreement for the convenience of ADA/ rehabilitation. Do I have to admit it? (September 8, 2006-March 27, 2012 quoted from a question 21 of Webinar)

no. If an employee demands rational consideration, the employer has the right to understand the restrictions related to disabilities that require consideration. If there are no restrictions on disability that requires work from home, the employer does not need to work at home. Alternatively, if the employer can effectively deal with the necessity with another reasonable consideration of the workplace, even if there are restrictions related to disability, the employer can choose the option to work at home. 。

If the employer permits employees to work at home due to COVID-19 and choose employees to exempt one or more basic duties, continue working at home as a reasonable consideration. If you request again, you do not need to permit if your employees require that they will continue to exempt the basic duties. ADA does not require employers to eliminate core functions as consideration for individuals with disabilities.

Employer closed his workplace to protect the safety of employees from COVID-19, allowed telework, or when he permitted telework in other ways, exempted one or more essential functions. That does not mean that the employer has been constantly changing the essential function of his duties, that telework is always executed, or telework does not cause unreasonable hardship. These are the judgments according to the facts. Employers avoid recovering all the essential functions of employees who chose to return to the previous work form under the ADA, and then continuously or newly demanded based on the normal ADA rules. There is no obligation to evaluate.

D. 16. Before the COVID-19 pandemic occurs, the employees with disabilities have demanded telework as reasonable consideration. The employee had shown this convenient need for disability, but rejected the employer, concerned that the employee could not perform the basic functions remotely. Until now, employees have been working at work. However, after the crisis of the COVID-19 was concluded, the employees have renewed their demands for home from a reasonable consideration. Can the employer reject this request again? (September 8, 2005-March 27, 2012 quoted from a question from Webinar)

Assuming that all of these rational consideration is satisfied, temporary work experience may be related to the review of r e-application. For example, in this case, the period of providing a home-inducement due to COVID-19 can function as a trial period that indicates whether employees with disabilities can fully perform all essential duties while remotely. There is, the employer should consider any of the requests of Any, based on this information. If this problem occurs, employees and employers should proceed with flexible and cooperative dialogue processes, as in all the demands for all acomo dations.

D. 17. Is there a possibility that a pandemic (global epidemic) may cause a delay that can be excused in the tw o-way process? (Updated 7/12/22)

yes. There are no issues of the delay in providing a tw o-way process or providing rational consideration originally caused by pandemic. However, as the pandemic continues to evolve and a new problem occurs, the employer may face new tasks that prevent prompt response to the request for rational consideration. Similarly, the resumption of the workplace may increase the request for rational consideration. In such a case, the employer shall show a specific situation related to pandemic in order to justify the employee that the employee has been delayed in providing rational consideration in legal rights. Employers and employees can continue to work as much as possible, as long as the changes in the situation caused by pandemic can delay the legitimate delay in the tw o-way process, that is, to delay the decision on the claim. It is encouraged to use a solution. D. 16. Covid-19 Before the pandemic occurs, the employee with a disability demands telework as a reasonable consideration. The employee had shown this convenient need for disability, but rejected the employer, concerned that the employee could not perform the basic functions remotely. Until now, employees have been working at work. However, after the crisis of the COVID-19 was concluded, the employees have renewed their demands for home from a reasonable consideration. Can the employer reject this request again? (September 8, 2005-March 27, 2012 quoted from a question from Webinar)

Assuming that all of these rational consideration is satisfied, temporary work experience may be related to the review of r e-application. For example, in this case, the period of providing a home-inducement due to COVID-19 can function as a trial period that indicates whether employees with disabilities can fully perform all essential duties while remotely. There is, the employer should consider any of the requests of Any, based on this information. If this problem occurs, employees and employers should proceed with flexible and cooperative dialogue processes, as in all the demands for all acomo dations.

D. 17. Is there a possibility that a pandemic (global epidemic) may cause a delay that can be excused in the tw o-way process? (Updated 7/12/22)

yes. There are no issues of the delay in providing a tw o-way process or providing rational consideration originally caused by pandemic. However, as the pandemic continues to evolve and a new problem occurs, the employer may face new tasks that prevent prompt response to the request for rational consideration. Similarly, the resumption of the workplace may increase the request for rational consideration. In such a case, the employer shall show a specific situation related to pandemic in order to justify the employee that the employee has been delayed in providing rational consideration in legal rights. Employers and employees can continue to work as much as possible, as long as the changes in the situation caused by pandemic can delay the legitimate delay in the tw o-way process, that is, to delay the decision on the claim. It is encouraged to use a solution. D. 16. Before the COVID-19 pandemic occurs, the employees with disabilities have demanded telework as reasonable consideration. The employee had shown this convenient need for disability, but rejected the employer, concerned that the employee could not perform the basic functions remotely. Until now, employees have been working at work. However, after the crisis of the COVID-19 was concluded, the employees have renewed their demands for home from a reasonable consideration. Can the employer reject this request again? (September 8, 2005-March 27, 2012 quoted from a question from Webinar)

Assuming that all of these rational consideration is satisfied, temporary work experience may be related to the review of r e-application. For example, in this case, the period of providing a home-inducement due to COVID-19 can function as a trial period that indicates whether employees with disabilities can fully perform all essential duties while remotely. There is, the employer should consider any of the requests of Any, based on this information. If this problem occurs, employees and employers should proceed with flexible and cooperative dialogue processes, as in all the demands for all acomo dations.

H. Age

D. 17. Is there a possibility that a pandemic (global epidemic) may cause a delay that can be excused in the tw o-way process? (Updated 7/12/22)

yes. There are no issues of the delay in providing a tw o-way process or providing rational consideration originally caused by pandemic. However, as the pandemic continues to evolve and a new problem occurs, the employer may face new tasks that prevent prompt response to the request for rational consideration. Similarly, the resumption of the workplace may increase the request for rational consideration. In such a case, the employer shall show a specific situation related to pandemic in order to justify the employee that the employee has been delayed in providing rational consideration in legal rights. Employers and employees can continue to work as much as possible, as long as the changes in the situation caused by pandemic can delay the legitimate delay in the tw o-way process, that is, to delay the decision on the claim. It is encouraged to use a solution.

Δ. 18. Federal agencies shall provide a timeline in a document on the procedures for rational consideration, how to quickly handle the request and provide rational consideration. What happens if an institution cannot keep this timeline depending on the situation caused by the pandemic? (Updated 7/12/22)

The current situation caused by the current COVID-19 pandemic may fall under the "emotional drink" (something that can not control the federal agency), and in that case, the federal government has adopted the internal reasonable consideration. Exceeding the normal schedule you are doing may be justified.

There may no longer be some of the issues that are initially arising from pandemic to delay the provision of a tw o-way process and provide rational consideration. However, as pandemic continues to evolve and new problems occur, institutions are likely to face new tasks that prevent accommodation requests in the service timeline. Similarly, the opening of the workplace may increase the request for rational consideration. In all of these cases, Agency must show a specific pandemi c-related situation that makes up "emotional drink". As long as there are circumstances to be taken, institutions and employees are encouraged to use temporary solutions so that employees can continue their work as much as possible.

Δ. 19. What are the rational consideration for supporting Long Covid employees? (15/5/23)

I. Caregivers/Family Responsibilities

The type of reasonable adjustment possible to deal with the various symptoms of long COVID depends on various factors, such as the nature of the symptoms, the contents of the job, and the design of the workplace. For general reasonable adjustments, a quiet workplace for dealing with fog in the brain, the use of noise canceling equipment and white noise devices, working hours that are not interrupted, reducing alternative lighting and dullness to deal with headaches. There are breaks to cope with joint pain and shortness of breath, flexible schedule adjustments for dealing with fatigue, and work from home. Delete "boundary function" including exercise to cope with shortness of breath. The Job Accommodation Network contains information on various reasonable considerations that can be dealt with for specific symptoms of long COVID.

Δ. 20. COVID-19 COVID-19 Is an emergency situation on May 11, 2023, can the employer automatically disconnect the rational consideration provided by pandemic-related circumstances? (15/5/23)

No, this emergency declaration deals with issues related to medical insurance and treatment. It is not mentioned in the requirements of ADA or rehabilitation law on providing reasonable consideration. Therefore, just because the public health emergency declaration has ended, the continuous situation associated with pandemic (for example, if a person with a specific disability is infected with COVID-19, there is a high risk, etc.) It is not a reason to automatically discontinue the rational consideration necessary to deal with it. However, the employer can evaluate the consideration provided during the public health emergency, consult with employees, and evaluate whether reasonable consideration is still needed. Under ADA's "Business Needs" standards, this evaluation is to submit a document that indicates the reason why it is necessary to make convenience and whether alternative convenience may satisfy its necessity. Includes.

Q. 1. What kind of practical means can the employer use to reduce and deal with harassment in workplaces, which can occur due to large trends of COVID-19? (4/9/20)

The employer clearly tells employees that fear of COVID-19 pandemic must not be directed to individuals for protected characteristics, such as ethnic groups, races, and other prohibited bases. , You can reduce the potential of harassment.

Click here for practical harassment prevention tools provided by EEOC for SMEs:

Tips for preventing harassment for small and mediu m-sized enterprises

SELECT TASK FORCE OF HARASSSMENT in The WORKPLACE Introduction of Included).

Report

Checklist for employers who want to reduce harassment in the workplace. And

Chart on dangerous factors that lead to harassment and appropriate response.

Q. 2. Is there any measures that the employer should take to deal with potential harassment and discrimination against employees in connection with pandemic? (5/15/23 Update) No, this emergency declaration deals with issues related to medical insurance and treatment. It is not mentioned in the requirements of ADA or rehabilitation law on providing reasonable consideration. Therefore, just because the public health emergency declaration has ended, the continuous situation associated with pandemic (for example, if a person with a specific disability is infected with COVID-19, there is a high risk, etc.) It is not a reason to automatically discontinue the rational consideration necessary to deal with it. However, the employer can evaluate the consideration provided during the public health emergency, consult with employees, and evaluate whether reasonable consideration is still needed. Under ADA's "Business Needs" standards, this evaluation is to submit a document that indicates the reason why it is necessary to make convenience and whether alternative convenience may satisfy its necessity. Includes.

Q. 1. What kind of practical means can the employer use to reduce and deal with harassment in workplaces, which can occur due to large trends of COVID-19? (4/9/20)

The employer clearly tells employees that fear of COVID-19 pandemic must not be directed to individuals for protected characteristics, such as ethnic groups, races, and other prohibited bases. , You can reduce the potential of harassment.
- Click here for practical harassment prevention tools provided by EEOC for SMEs:
- Tips for preventing harassment for small and mediu m-sized enterprises
- SELECT TASK FORCE OF HARASSSMENT in The WORKPLACE Introduction of Included).
- Report
- Checklist for employers who want to reduce harassment in the workplace. And
- Chart on dangerous factors that lead to harassment and appropriate response.
- Q. 2. Is there any measures that the employer should take to deal with potential harassment and discrimination against employees in connection with pandemic? (Updated 5/15/23) No, this emergency declaration deals with issues related to medical insurance and treatment. It is not mentioned in the requirements of ADA or rehabilitation law on providing reasonable consideration. Therefore, just because the public health emergency declaration has ended, the continuous situation associated with pandemic (for example, if a person with a specific disability is infected with COVID-19, there is a high risk, etc.) It is not a reason to automatically discontinue the rational consideration necessary to deal with it. However, the employer can evaluate the consideration provided during the public health emergency, consult with employees, and evaluate whether reasonable consideration is still needed. Under ADA's "Business Needs" standards, this evaluation is to submit a document that indicates the reason why it is necessary to make convenience and whether alternative convenience may satisfy its necessity. Includes.
- Q. 1. What kind of practical means can the employer use to reduce and deal with harassment in workplaces, which can occur due to large trends of COVID-19? (4/9/20)
- The employer clearly tells employees that fear of COVID-19 pandemic must not be directed to individuals for protected characteristics, such as ethnic groups, races, and other prohibited bases. , You can reduce the potential of harassment.
- Click here for practical harassment prevention tools provided by EEOC for SMEs:
Tips for preventing harassment for small and mediu m-sized enterprisesSELECT TASK FORCE OF HARASSSMENT in The WORKPLACE Introduction of Included).ReportChecklist for employers who want to reduce harassment in the workplace. AndChart on dangerous factors that lead to harassment and appropriate response.Q. 2. Is there any measures that the employer should take to deal with potential harassment and discrimination against employees in connection with pandemic? (5/15/23 update)Yes. Employers can remind all employees that harassing or otherwise discriminating against coworkers on the basis of race, national origin, color, sex (including sexual orientation, gender identity, and pregnancy), religion, age (over 40 years of age), disability, or genetic information is a violation of federal EEO law. It is especially helpful for employers to advise their supervisors and role managers on how to monitor, prevent, and report harassment and other discrimination. Employers can provide illustrations of pandemic harassment related to harassment for supervisors, managers, and all other employees to help them understand what conduct may violate EEO laws. For example, one illustration shows how a supervisor or coworker could violate the ADA/Rehabilitation Act by harassing an employee who is required to wear a mask or take other precautions related to a disability. Another illustration shows how a supervisor or coworker could violate Title VII by harassing an employee who has a religious accommodation, such as an exemption from vaccination requirements. (See E. 3 for additional examples of pandemic-related harassment.) Finally, employers can also make it clear that they will promptly reconsider any exemption from vaccination. Q. 3. How should employers respond to pandemic-related harassment, especially harassment of workers who are or are perceived to be of Asian descent? (6/11/20)

J. Pregnancy

Managers should be on the lookout for derogatory, degrading, or hostile remarks against employees who are or are perceived to be of Chinese or other Asian ethnicity, including crowns and origins.

All employers covered by Title VII must ensure that managers know in advance how to recognize such harassment. Harassment can occur through the use of electronic communication tools, whether employees are in the workplace, telecommuting, or on leave. Harassment of construction site workers can also come from contractors, business partners, customers, or even patients and family members in medical facilities, welfare facilities, and nursing homes. Managers should be aware of their legal obligations and instructed to promptly identify and resolve potential issues before they rise to the level of illegal discrimination.

Employers may choose to send a notice to all employees that refers to Title VII's prohibition on harassment, reminds employees that harassment will not be tolerated, and urges employees to report harassment in the workplace to management. Employers may remind employees that harassment may be subject to disciplinary action, including termination.

Notice concerning the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act of 2022

E. 4. An employer learns that an employee who is working from home due to the pandemic is sending harassing emails to other employees. What action should the employer take? (6/11/20)

Employers should take the same action as if the employee were in the workplace. Employees may not harass other employees through email, calls, video communications, chat or collaboration platforms, etc.

Q. 1. Under EEOC law, what exemptions apply if an employer lays off an employee? (4/9/20)

K. Vaccinations - Overview, ADA, Title VII, and GINA

Special rules apply when an employer offers severance pay to an employee on the condition that the employee waives all discrimination claims against the employer. More details are provided in the EEOC's Technical Assistance on Severance Agreements.

Q. 2. What additional EEO considerations should I take when planning furloughs and layoffs? (Excerpt from Question 13 of the 9/8/20 - 3/27/20 Webinar)

EEOC law prohibits employers from firing or laying off employees because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, age, disability, protected genetic information, or in retaliation for EEO activities.

G. 1. If government restrictions are imposed, lifted, or modified during the pandemic, how can employers know what steps they can take consistent with the ADA to screen employees for the COVID-19 virus when they enter the workplace? (Updated 5/15/23)

The ADA allows employers to make disability-related inquiries and conduct medical examinations to screen for COVID-19 when employees enter the workplace if it is "job-related and consistent with business necessity." For information regarding reasonable accommodation requests related to screening protocols, see Section G. 7.

Employers should be careful not to unlawfully discriminate on the basis of protected characteristics in their screening and exclusionary decisions.

G. 2. Employers Require Employees to Wear Personal Protective Equipment and Participate in Other Infection Prevention Measures. Some employees may request accommodations because of disabilities or sincerely held religious beliefs, practices, or observances that affect their ability to wear personal protective equipment and participate in other infection prevention measures. How should employers respond? (Updated 7/12/22)

In most cases, federal EEO laws allow employers to require employees to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) (e. g., masks and gloves) and follow other infection prevention measures (e. g., regular hand washing and physical removal protocols). Some employers may also need to comply with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations that require the use of PPE. OSHA regulations do not prohibit the use of reasonable accommodations under EEO laws, so long as they do not violate OSHA requirements. Employers may also follow the CDC's current guidance on who must wear a mask.

Regardless of the reason why an employer requires PPE (or other infection control measures), if an employee with a disability needs a reasonable accommodation under the ADA to comply with the employer's PPE requirements (e. g., non-latex gloves, modified face masks for interpreters who communicate with employees who lip-read, undergarments designed for people who use wheelchairs), or if the employee needs a religious accommodation under Title VII (e. g., religious dress or grooming modifications or alternative accommodations), the employer must discuss the request and provide an accommodation (either what the employee requests or an effective alternative to meet the employee's request).

G. 3. What must I do to ask my employer for a reasonable accommodation because my employee has one of the medical conditions that the CDC has said may put me at higher risk for more severe illness than COVID-19? (Updated 7/12/22)

Third parties, such as employees, or employees, must notify the employer that the employee needs to be changed for reasons related to the medical condition. Individuals can seek the convenience by verbal or written. Employees (or third parties) do not need to use the word "rational consideration" or mention ADA, but employees can mention.

Employees or employees must clarify that employees are a medical condition that requires convenience for employees to meet medical needs. After receiving the request, the employer can ask questions or ask for medical documents to determine whether the person has a disability, but all the medical condition is the "obstacle" of the ADA. It does not satisfy the definition, but can be provided with unreasonable hardships if there is reasonable consideration. For additional information on rational consideration based on ADA, see Section D. See Section D for pregnanc y-related disorders to be targeted by ADA. For general information on rational consideration related to religious beliefs, practice, or compliance that you have sincerely, see K. 12.

Ζ 4. CDC lists some medical conditions that are likely to become more severe when infected with COVID-19. The employer knows that employees are affected by any of these diseases, and are concerned that their employees will be damaged after returning to work, but employees have demanded accommodation. Not. In this case, how is ADA applied? (Updated 7/12/22)

ADA does not require employers to deal with this situation if they do not require rational consideration. In addition, the employer's obligation to provide rational consideration applies only if an employee has a history of actual disability or disability defined in ADA. In other words, individuals who have any of the risks of complications that may increase the risk of complications will not automatically satisfy the obstacles defined by these ADAs. Third parties, such as employees, or employees, must notify the employer that employees need to change due to their condition. Individuals can seek the convenience by verbal or written. Employees (or third parties) do not need to use the word "rational consideration" or mention ADA, but employees can mention.

Employees or employees must clarify that employees are a medical condition that requires convenience for employees to meet medical needs. After receiving the request, the employer can ask questions or ask for medical documents to determine whether the person has a disability, but all the medical condition is the "obstacle" of the ADA. It does not satisfy the definition, but can be provided with unreasonable hardships if there is reasonable consideration. For additional information on rational consideration based on ADA, see Section D. See Section D for pregnanc y-related disorders to be targeted by ADA. For general information on rational consideration related to religious beliefs, practice, or compliance that you have sincerely, see K. 12.

Ζ 4. CDC lists some medical conditions that are likely to become more severe when infected with COVID-19. The employer knows that employees are affected by any of these diseases, and are concerned that their employees will be damaged after returning to work, but employees have demanded accommodation. Not. In this case, how is ADA applied? (Updated 7/12/22)

ADA does not require employers to deal with this situation if they do not require rational consideration. In addition, the employer's obligation to provide rational consideration applies only if an employee has a history of actual disability or disability defined in ADA. In other words, individuals who have any of the risks of complications that may increase the risk of complications will not automatically satisfy the obstacles defined by these ADAs. Third parties, such as employees, or employees, must notify the employer that the employee needs to be changed for reasons related to the medical condition. Individuals can seek the convenience by verbal or written. Employees (or third parties) do not need to use the word "rational consideration" or mention ADA, but employees can mention.

Employees or employees must clarify that employees are a medical condition that requires convenience for employees to meet medical needs. After receiving the request, the employer can ask questions or ask for medical documents to determine whether the person has a disability, but all the medical condition is the "obstacle" of the ADA. It does not satisfy the definition, but can be provided with unreasonable hardships if there is reasonable consideration. For additional information on rational consideration based on ADA, see Section D. See Section D for pregnanc y-related disorders to be targeted by ADA. For general information on rational consideration related to religious beliefs, practice, or compliance that you have sincerely, see K. 12.

Ζ 4. CDC lists some medical conditions that are likely to become more severe when infected with COVID-19. The employer knows that employees are affected by any of these diseases, and are concerned that their employees will be damaged after returning to work, but employees have demanded accommodation. Not. In this case, how is ADA applied? (Updated 7/12/22)
- ADA does not require employers to deal with this situation if they do not require rational consideration. In addition, the employer's obligation to provide rational consideration applies only if an employee has a history of actual disability or disability defined in ADA. In other words, individuals who have any of the risks of complications that may increase the risk of complications will not automatically satisfy the obstacles defined by these ADAs.
- Assuming that employees have a "disability", as described above, the employer is generally an employee if an employer may be concerned about the possibility that his health will be damaged when a disability returns to work. Employers have eliminated employees because they have an employee determined by the CDC that the risk of severe illness when a member is infected with COVID-19 is high. I do not admit that I will take measures. Under the ADA, such disadvantages are unless such disadvantages are "imminent threats" for employee health and security, and cannot be eliminated or reduced by reasonable consideration. Not recognized.
- ADA's direct threat requirements are high level. The direct threat of the employer is 29 C. F. R. Sec. 1630. 2 (R) (R) (R) (R), which handles direct threats to the health or safety of the self or others), and the employees or others in the workplace Requests the employer to indicate that the individual has a disability that brings the "substantial danger of the harmful harm" for health or safety. The decision must be assessed individually using the latest medical knowledge and/ or the best objective evidence that can be obtained based on the reasonable medical judgment on employee disability, not general disability. It will not be blurred. Thus, the employer who analyzes the potentially imminent threats must consider the duration of risk, the nature of potential disorders, the potential, and the potential disorder, and the imminent potential disorder. yeah. The analysis of these factors shows the severity of pandemic in a specific region, the health status of workers themselves (for example, whether the disability of workers is sufficiently controlled), and the specific duties of workers. Is likely to be included. The decision on the imminent threat also includes whether the workers are informed about vaccination or whether they may be vaccinated. Assuming that employees have a "disability", as described above, as described above, if the employer may be concerned about the possibility that the employer with a disability returns to the workplace, the ADA is common. The employer eliminates employees because the employees have a high risk of severe illness when employees are infected with COVID-19, and employees have eliminated employees because they have a disability in CDC. We do not accept disadvantageous measures. Under the ADA, such disadvantages are unless such disadvantages are "imminent threats" for employee health and security, and cannot be eliminated or reduced by reasonable consideration. Not recognized.
- ADA's direct threat requirements are high level. The direct threat of the employer is 29 C. F. R. Sec. 1630. 2 (R) (R) (R) (R), which handles direct threats to the health or safety of the self or others), and the employees or others in the workplace Requests the employer to indicate that the individual has a disability that brings the "substantial danger of the harmful harm" for health or safety. The decision must be assessed individually using the latest medical knowledge and/ or the best objective evidence that can be obtained based on the reasonable medical judgment on employee disability, not general disability. It will not be blurred. Thus, the employer who analyzes the potentially imminent threats must consider the duration of risk, the nature of potential disorders, the potential, and the potential disorder, and the imminent potential disorder. yeah. The analysis of these factors shows the severity of pandemic in a specific region, the health status of workers themselves (for example, whether the disability of workers is sufficiently controlled), and the specific duties of workers. Is likely to be included. The decision on the imminent threat also includes whether the workers are informed about vaccination or whether they may be vaccinated. Assuming that employees have a "disability", as described above, the employer is generally an employee if an employer may be concerned about the possibility that his health will be damaged when a disability returns to work. Employers have eliminated employees because they have an employee determined by the CDC that the risk of severe illness when a member is infected with COVID-19 is high. I do not admit that I will take measures. Under the ADA, such disadvantages are unless such disadvantages are "imminent threats" for employee health and security, and cannot be eliminated or reduced by reasonable consideration. Not recognized.
- ADA's direct threat requirements are high level. The direct threat of the employer is 29 C. F. R. Sec. 1630. 2 (R) (R) (R) (R), which handles direct threats to the health or safety of the self or others), and the employees or others in the workplace Requests the employer to indicate that the individual has a disability that brings the "substantial danger of the harmful harm" for health or safety. The decision must be assessed individually using the latest medical knowledge and/ or the best objective evidence that can be obtained based on the reasonable medical judgment on employee disability, not general disability. It will not be blurred. Thus, the employer who analyzes the potentially imminent threats must consider the duration of risk, the nature of potential disorders, the potential, and the potential disorder, and the imminent potential disorder. yeah. The analysis of these factors shows the severity of pandemic in a specific region, the health status of workers themselves (for example, whether the disability of workers is sufficiently controlled), and the specific duties of workers. Is likely to be included. The decision on the imminent threat also includes whether the workers are informed about vaccination or whether they may be vaccinated.
- Even if the employer has determined that employee disability will bring out the health and security of the employees themselves to "the danger of causing substantial harm", there is no way to provide rational consideration (unreasonable difficulty (unreasonable difficulty). Unless otherwise, you cannot eliminate employees from the workplace or take other disadvantages. According to the ADA rules, the employer is rational to eliminate or sufficiently reduced risks so that employees can perform the essential functions of their duties, so that they are safe even if they return to work. It is required to consider whether there is any consideration.
- Examining the possibility of rational consideration by the employer should include tw o-way processes with employees. If the employee is currently in the workplace and has no convenience to reduce or remove the imminent threats in the workplace, the employer is relocated as a home, vacation, or a last resort (perhaps for employees). You should consider the convenience such as relocation to another work in a safer place or a place where you can work from home).
The employer has concluded that after all of these steps, there is a risk of serious harm to the employee's own health and security, and that reasonable consideration cannot be reduced or removed. Only in this case, employees can prohibit employment based on imminent threat analysis. See Section D for general information on rational consideration under the ADA (that is, if the individual's request for rational consideration is not related to the potentially imminent threats).

Ζ. 5. If there is no unreasonable difficulty, what are the rational consideration of rational consideration to remove (or reduce the tolerated level) to remove threats that are imminent in self or others? (Updated 7/12/22) Even if the employer determines that employee disorders can bring their own health and security to "the danger of harmful harm". Unless there is a way to provide (unreasonable difficulties), employees cannot be eliminated from the workplace or other disadvantaged measures. According to the ADA rules, the employer is rational to eliminate or sufficiently reduced risks so that employees can perform the essential functions of their duties, so that they are safe even if they return to work. It is required to consider whether there is any consideration.

Examining the possibility of rational consideration by the employer should include tw o-way processes with employees. If the employee is currently in the workplace and has no convenience to reduce or remove the imminent threats in the workplace, the employer is relocated as a home, vacation, or a last resort (perhaps for employees). You should consider the convenience such as relocation to another work in a safer place or a place where you can work from home).

The employer has concluded that after all of these steps, there is a risk of serious harm to the employee's own health and security, and that reasonable consideration cannot be reduced or removed. Only in this case, employees can prohibit employment based on imminent threat analysis. See Section D for general information on rational consideration under the ADA (that is, if the individual's request for rational consideration is not related to the potentially imminent threats).
- Ζ. 5. If there is no unreasonable difficulty, what are the rational consideration of rational consideration to remove (or reduce the tolerated level) to remove threats that are imminent in self or others? (Updated 7/12/22) The employer provides reasonable considerations even if employees have determined that employee disability will bring the health and security of their own health and security. Unless there is a method (unreasonable difficulties), employees cannot be eliminated from the workplace or other disadvantaged measures. According to the ADA rules, the employer is rational to eliminate or sufficient risks so that employees can perform the essential functions of their duties and that they can be safe even if employees return to work. It is required to consider whether there is any consideration.
- Examining the possibility of rational consideration by the employer should include tw o-way processes with employees. If the employee is currently taking the workplace and has no convenience to reduce or remove the imminent threats in the workplace, the employer is relocated as a home, vacation, or a last resort (perhaps for employees). You should consider the convenience such as relocation to another work in a safer place or a place where you can work from home).
- The employer has concluded that after all of these steps, there is a risk of serious harm to the employee's own health and security, and that reasonable consideration cannot be reduced or removed. Only in this case, employees can prohibit employment based on imminent threat analysis. See Section D for general information on rational consideration under the ADA (that is, if the individual's request for rational consideration is not related to the potentially imminent threats).
Mandatory Employer Vaccination Programs

Ζ. 5. If there is no unreasonable difficulty, what are the rational consideration of rational consideration to remove (or reduce the tolerated level) to remove threats that are imminent in self or others? (Updated 7/12/22)

Addition or improvements are more than provided or requested by employers generally to employees who generally return to the workplace, to eliminate (or reduce the tolerable level) to eliminate threats that are imminent (or reduce to the tolerable level). It may contain protective clothing, masks, gloves, or other equipment. Rational considerations are separated between hig h-efficiency fine particle air (HEPA) filtration systems / units, or reinforced protection methods, reinforced workers and colleagues / public. Includes the creation of a barrier to provide, or the expansion of space between workers with disabilities and others. Another rational consideration is to eliminate or replace the specific "limit" function (low importance or associated duties, which is distinguished from the "required" function of a specific occupation). Furthermore, changing home work, changing working schedules (when contact with colleagues and commuting or commuting), or moving the work (for example, if the physical distance is far away, the production line is far away. You can also use it to the edge, not in the middle of the.

These are just one example. Effective convenience depends on employee's duties and workplace design. The Job Accommodation Network (www. askjan. org) is also useful for the convenience. As with all the rational consideration in this pandemic (global trend), employers and employees are encouraged to respond creatively and flexibly. See Section D for general information on rational consideration based on ADA.

Ζ 6. Is there a way to ask employees to make employees for flexibility in the form of work before some of the employees return to work as the best practices? (Updated 7/12/22) Eliminates the imminent threat to self or others (or reduces to a tolerant level) In terms of rational consideration, employees generally return to work. It may include additional or improved protective clothing, masks, gloves, or other equipment that are provided or requested. Rational considerations are separated between hig h-efficiency fine particle air (HEPA) filtration systems / units, or reinforced protection methods, reinforced workers and colleagues / public. Includes the creation of a barrier to provide, or the expansion of space between workers with disabilities and others. Another rational consideration is to eliminate or replace the specific "limit" function (low importance or associated duties, which is distinguished from the "required" function of a specific occupation). Furthermore, changing home work, changing working schedules (when contact with colleagues and commuting or commuting), or moving the work (for example, if the physical distance is far away, the production line is far away. You can also use it to the edge, not in the middle of the.

These are just one example. Effective convenience depends on employee's duties and workplace design. The Job Accommodation Network (www. askjan. org) is also useful for the convenience. As with all the rational consideration in this pandemic (global trend), employers and employees are encouraged to respond creatively and flexibly. See Section D for general information on rational consideration based on ADA.

Ζ 6. Is there a way to ask employees to make employees for flexibility in the form of work before some of the employees return to work as the best practices? (Updated 7/12/22) Reasonable consideration to eliminate (or reduce the tolerant level) to eliminate the imminent threat to the self or others, or provide employees who generally return to the workplace. In some cases, additional or improved protective clothing, masks, gloves, or other equipment may be included. Rational considerations are separated between hig h-efficiency fine particle air (HEPA) filtration systems / units, or reinforced protection methods, reinforced workers and colleagues / public. Includes the creation of a barrier to provide, or the expansion of space between workers with disabilities and others. Another rational consideration is to eliminate or replace the specific "limit" function (low importance or associated duties, which is distinguished from the "required" function of a specific occupation). Furthermore, changing home work, changing working schedules (when contact with colleagues and commuting or commuting), or moving the work (for example, if the physical distance is far away, the production line is far away. You can also use it to the edge, not in the middle of the.

These are just one example. Effective convenience depends on employee's duties and workplace design. The Job Accommodation Network (www. askjan. org) is also useful for the convenience. As with all the rational consideration in this pandemic (global trend), employers and employees are encouraged to respond creatively and flexibly. See Section D for general information on rational consideration based on ADA.

Ζ 6. Is there a way to ask employees to make employees for flexibility in the form of work before some of the employees return to work as the best practices? (Updated 7/12/22)

yes. ADA, Rehabilitation Law, and Civil Rights Law title VII requires employees to demand the rational consideration required for employers to return to work, religious beliefs, practices, or compliance with their obstacles. If you wish, we do not prohibit providing prior information about contact information to all employees. If the request is accepted, the employer can start a dialogue process. Employers will describe all of the medical conditions specified in the CDC guidance in this notification that if they are infected with COVID-19, they may increase the risk of becoming more severe, provide instructions on contacts. You can choose to explain that there is a intention to consider the request of an employee with other medical conditions that may be recognized as a medical condition or disability.

Or, the employer has a religious belief in religious and sincere religious beliefs, practice, and an employee who has no right to take rational consideration for employees who have compliant employees (eg, (for example) , Employees who demand the flexibility of age, can also send a general notification that explains that they have the intention to consider flexibility individually. The employer needs to clarify whether the window is different depending on whether the demands are disabled, the religious beliefs, pregnancy, age, and childcare obligations that are sincere.

All approaches match the age discrimination law (ADEA), ADA, rehabilitation method, and title VII in employment.

Regardless of the approach, the employer, for example, the religious beliefs, compliance, or practice that employees, for example, have a disability or sincere conception, or practical employee, for example It is necessary to confirm that the Federal Employment Discrimination Law, which may be applied to pregnancy requests, has been sufficiently trained on how to handle these requests. See Section D for additional information on reasonable consideration based on the ADA/ Rehabilitation Law.

Ζ. (6/11/20) Yes. ADA, Rehabilitation Law, and Civil Rights Law title VII requires employees to demand the rational consideration required for employers to return to work, religious beliefs, practices, or compliance with their obstacles. If you wish, we do not prohibit providing prior information about contact information to all employees. If the request is accepted, the employer can start a dialogue process. Employers will describe all of the medical conditions specified in the CDC guidance in this notification that if they are infected with COVID-19, they may increase the risk of becoming more severe, provide instructions on contact information. You can choose to explain that there is a intention to consider the request of an employee with other medical conditions that may be recognized as a medical condition or disability.

Or, the employer has a religious belief in religious and sincere religious beliefs, practice, and an employee who has no right to take rational consideration for employees who have compliant employees (eg, (for example) , Employees who demand the flexibility of age, can also send a general notification that explains that they have the intention to consider flexibility individually. The employer needs to clarify whether the window is different depending on whether the demands are disabled, the religious beliefs, pregnancy, age, and childcare obligations that are sincere.

All approaches match the age discrimination law (ADEA), ADA, rehabilitation method, and title VII in employment.

Regardless of the approach, the employer, for example, the religious beliefs, compliance, or practice that employees, for example, have a disability or sincere conception, or practical employee, for example It is necessary to confirm that the Federal Employment Discrimination Law, which may be applied to pregnancy requests, has been sufficiently trained on how to handle these requests. See Section D for additional information on reasonable consideration based on the ADA/ Rehabilitation Law.

Ζ. (6/11/20) Yes. ADA, Rehabilitation Law, and Civil Rights Law title VII requires employees to demand the rational consideration required for employers to return to work, religious beliefs, practices, or compliance with their obstacles. If you wish, we do not prohibit providing prior information about contact information to all employees. If the request is accepted, the employer can start a dialogue process. Employers will describe all of the medical conditions specified in the CDC guidance in this notification that if they are infected with COVID-19, they may increase the risk of becoming more severe, provide instructions on contacts. You can choose to explain that there is a intention to consider the request of an employee with other medical conditions that may be recognized as a medical condition or disability.

Voluntary Employer Vaccination Programs

Or, the employer has a religious belief in religious and sincere religious beliefs, practice, and an employee who has no right to take rational consideration for employees who have compliant employees (eg, (for example) , Employees who demand the flexibility of age, can also send a general notification that explains that they have the intention to consider flexibility individually. The employer needs to clarify whether the window is different depending on whether the demands are disabled, the religious beliefs, pregnancy, age, and childcare obligations that are sincere.

All approaches match the age discrimination law (ADEA), ADA, rehabilitation method, and title VII in employment.

Regardless of the approach, the employer, for example, the religious beliefs, compliance, or practice that employees, for example, have a disability or sincere conception, or practical employee, for example It is necessary to confirm that the Federal Employment Discrimination Law, which may be applied to pregnancy requests, has been sufficiently trained on how to handle these requests. See Section D for additional information on reasonable consideration based on the ADA/ Rehabilitation Law.

Ζ. (6/11/20)

This is a rational request, and the employer must proceed in the same way as other requests based on the ADA or rehabilitation method. If the demanded acomo is easy to provide and cheap, the employer can voluntarily choose to make it available without any dialogu e-type processes. Or, if the disability is not clear or is already known, the employer needs to make the employee a disability, and how specific restrictions are for employees. You can find information to prove. If necessary, the employer demands medical documents that support employee requests, and then determines whether the accommodation or the effective accommodation can be provided without overdoing. You can do it.

Similarly, if an employee requests an alternative to an alternative as a religious convenience, the employer must determine whether the convenience can be used under the title VII.

H. 1. The CDC explains that the risk of severe illness due to COVID-19 increases with age, and that the elderly are more risky. Are the elderly protected by the Federal Employment Discrimination Act? (Updated 7/12/22)

yes. The AD Law (ADEA) in employment prohibits employment discrimination for people over the age of 40. Even if the employer acts because of a benign reason, such as protecting employees because of a higher risk of serious illness than COVID-19, the employer is more careless because the employer is older. Prohibit eliminating individuals from the workplace. See C. 5 for details on postponement of joining the company based on the old age and cancellation of a job offer.

Unlike ADA, ADEA does not include the right to receive rational consideration for employees due to age. However, the employer has the freedom to provide flexibility to elderly workers. ADEA does not prohibit this, even if young employees are disadvantaged by age.

Elderly workers may also have a disabled person under the protection of ADA. Therefore, a rational consideration for disability can be requested.

H. 2. Is the equivalent elderly employee being disadvantaged by age if the employer chooses to provide flexibility to other employees? (September 8, 2006-March 27, 2012 Quoted from Webinar Question 12)

No. If an employer allows other comparable employees to work remotely, the employer should not treat older employees less favorably because of their age.

For more information about pandemic-related caregiver discrimination under EEOC-enforced laws, see EEOC's technical assistance document, "The COVID-19 Pandemic and Caregiver Discrimination Under Federal Employment Discrimination Laws."

I. 1. Can an employer provide telecommuting, modified schedules, or other benefits to employees with school-age children due to school closures or distance learning during the pandemic be a basis for sex discrimination? (3/14/22)

Employers may offer any flexibility as long as they do not treat employees differently because of their sex or other characteristics protected by the EEO. For example, under Title VII, an employer cannot treat a female employee more favorably than a male employee because of the sex-based case that she may have child care responsibilities.

I. 2. How can unlawful caregiver discrimination related to the COVID-19 pandemic arise under EEOC-enforced laws? (3/14/22)

Caregiver discrimination violates EEOC-enforced laws when it is based on an applicant's or employee's sex (including pregnancy, sexual orientation, and gender identity), race, national origin, disability, age (over age 40), or any other characteristic covered by federal employment discrimination laws. Caregiver discrimination is also unlawful when it is based on the caregiver's relationship to a disabled person or the care recipient's race, ethnicity, or other protected characteristic.

Nursing care discrimination related to pandemic may occur in various ways. For example, based on the VII Chapter, the employer shall not discriminate a gender stereotype associated with the responsibilities and roles of employees who are liable for pandemic by gender stereotypes. For example, employers are more likely to get a job, but are not able to assign women workers to assign a hig h-care responsibility and hig h-level projects that require a significant overtime or business trip to female workers. Similarly, the employer is based on the assumption that if a family member is infected or exposed to COVID-19, women caregivers cannot work overtime, or do not want to leave their families. A project cannot be assigned to other employees. Employers cannot refuse male employees who accept home work or adjust their schedule to perform pandemi c-related care such as child and parents, but is in a similar position. If an employee makes such a request, this can be accepted.

Title VII also banned employers from discriminating employees in pandemi c-related care with race and nationality. For example, an employer may not require a more burden procedure if a specific race or national employee requires a schedule change or a Cavid 19 care related to vacation. In addition, the employer rejects these demands more frequently to employees who have requested change of schedule, vacation for nursing care, or have received a vacation for nursing care based on the races of employees and the country of origin. Do not impose. Citizens and immigration qualifications for employees who are responsible for nursing care may also be illegal by the laws implemented by the Ministry of Justice. Nursing care discrimination related to pandemic may occur in various ways. For example, based on the VII Chapter, the employer shall not discriminate a gender stereotype associated with the responsibilities and roles of employees who are liable for pandemic by gender stereotypes. For example, employers are more likely to get a job, but are not able to assign women workers to assign a hig h-care responsibility and hig h-level projects that require a significant overtime or business trip to female workers. Similarly, the employer is based on the assumption that if a family member is infected or exposed to COVID-19, women caregivers cannot work overtime, or do not want to leave their families. A project cannot be assigned to other employees. Employers cannot refuse male employees who accept home work or adjust their schedule to perform pandemi c-related care such as child and parents, but is in a similar position. If an employee makes such a request, this can be accepted.

Title VII also banned employers from discriminating employees in pandemi c-related care with race and nationality. For example, an employer may not require a more burden procedure if a specific race or national employee requires a schedule change or a Cavid 19 care related to vacation. In addition, the employer rejects these demands more frequently to employees who have requested change of schedule, vacation for nursing care, or have received a vacation for nursing care based on the races of employees and the country of origin. Do not impose. Citizens and immigration qualifications for employees who are responsible for nursing care may also be illegal by the laws implemented by the Ministry of Justice. Nursing care discrimination related to pandemic may occur in various ways. For example, based on the VII Chapter, the employer shall not discriminate a gender stereotype associated with the responsibilities and roles of employees who are liable for pandemic by gender stereotypes. For example, employers are more likely to get a job, but are not able to assign women workers to assign a hig h-care responsibility and hig h-level projects that require a significant overtime or business trip to female workers. Similarly, the employer is based on the assumption that if a family member is infected or exposed to COVID-19, women caregivers cannot work overtime, or do not want to leave their families. A project cannot be assigned to other employees. Employers cannot refuse male employees who accept home work or adjust their schedule to perform pandemi c-related care such as child and parents, but is in a similar position. If an employee makes such a request, this can be accepted.

Title VII also banned employers from discriminating employees in pandemi c-related care with race and nationality. For example, an employer may not require a more burden procedure if a specific race or national employee requires a schedule change or a Cavid 19 care related to vacation. In addition, the employer rejects these demands more frequently to employees who have requested change of schedule, vacation for nursing care, or have received a vacation for nursing care based on the races of employees and the country of origin. Do not impose. Citizens and immigration qualifications for employees who are responsible for nursing care may also be illegal by the laws implemented by the Ministry of Justice.

Under the ADA, the employer is not allowed to discriminate employees based on the stereotypes and assumptions that employees are responsible for the disabled children, spouses, and parents. yeah. For example, if the applicant is a major caregiver with a high risk of complications of complications, the employer hires the applicant, fearing that the caregiver will increase the medical expenses of the employer. You cannot refuse. If the applicant is hired, the employer may not refuse to add the caregiver to the dependents of the employer's health insurance due to the disability of the caregiver. In addition, the employer cannot refuse the promotion of the employee, assuming an employee who is responsible for nursing care for the disabled taking a considerable amount of vacation for nursing care.

I. 3. Are these legal protection applied only to employees who take care of children, or are they applied to employees with other care? (3/14/22)

The answer includes hyperlinks to no n-government sources. EEOC posts these sources only for the purpose of providing information. EEOC does not guarantee an organization that provides these materials and materials, and does not guarantee the accuracy of information on no n-governmental materials described in this answer.

The employer is characteristics protected by the law implemented by the EEOC (the gender of caregivers (including pregnancy, sexual orientation, gender identity), race, skin color, religion, nationality (40 years old or older)) It is not allowed to discriminate the applicants and employees who are in charge of nursing based on the disability, the relationship with the disabled, the genetic information (including family medical history)). These prerequisites are as follows.

The state law or local law may provide additional protection for employees who are responsible for nursing care. Employees who are responsible for nursing care may have the right to be based on other laws, including family and medical leave, or other state laws and local laws.

I. 4. Employers and employees should pay attention to other issues related to pandemi c-related care discrimination? (3/14/22) Under the ADA, the employer is based on the stereotypes and assumptions that employees are responsible for the disabled children, spouses, and parents. It is not allowed to discriminate employees. For example, if the applicant is a major caregiver with a high risk of complications of complications, the employer hires the applicant, fearing that the caregiver will increase the medical expenses of the employer. You cannot refuse. If the applicant is hired, the employer may not refuse to add the caregiver to the dependents of the employer's health insurance due to the disability of the caregiver. In addition, the employer cannot refuse the promotion of the employee, assuming an employee who is responsible for nursing care for the disabled taking a considerable amount of vacation for nursing care.

I. 3. Are these legal protection applied only to employees who take care of children, or are they applied to employees with other care? (3/14/22)

ADA: Employer Incentives for Voluntary COVID-19 Vaccinations

The answer includes hyperlinks to no n-government sources. EEOC posts these sources only for the purpose of providing information. EEOC does not guarantee an organization that provides these materials and materials, and does not guarantee the accuracy of information on no n-governmental materials described in this answer.

The employer is characteristics protected by the law implemented by the EEOC (the gender of caregivers (including pregnancy, sexual orientation, gender identity), race, skin color, religion, nationality (40 years old or older)) It is not allowed to discriminate the applicants and employees who are in charge of nursing based on the disability, the relationship with the disabled, the genetic information (including family medical history)). These prerequisites are as follows.

The state law or local law may provide additional protection for employees who are responsible for nursing care. Employees who are responsible for nursing care may have the right to be based on other laws, including family and medical leave, or other state laws and local laws.

I. 4. Employers and employees should pay attention to other issues related to pandemi c-related care discrimination? (3/14/22) Under the ADA, the employer has an employee based on the stereotypes and beliefs that employees are responsible for nursing care for disabled children, spouses, and parents. Discrimination is not allowed. For example, if the applicant is a major caregiver with a high risk of complications of complications, the employer hires the applicant, fearing that the caregiver will increase the medical expenses of the employer. You cannot refuse. If the applicant is hired, the employer may not refuse to add the caregiver to the dependents of the employer's health insurance due to the disability of the caregiver. In addition, the employer cannot refuse the promotion of the employee, assuming an employee who is responsible for nursing care for the disabled taking a considerable amount of vacation for nursing care.

I. 3. Are these legal protection applied only to employees who take care of children, or are they applied to employees with other care? (3/14/22)

GINA: Employer Incentives for Voluntary COVID-19 Vaccinations

The answer includes hyperlinks to no n-government sources. EEOC posts these sources only for the purpose of providing information. EEOC does not guarantee an organization that provides these materials and materials, and does not guarantee the accuracy of information on no n-governmental materials described in this answer.

The employer is characteristics protected by the law implemented by the EEOC (the gender of caregivers (including pregnancy, sexual orientation, gender identity), race, skin color, religion, nationality (40 years old or older)) It is not allowed to discriminate the applicants and employees who are in charge of nursing based on the disability, the relationship with the disabled, the genetic information (including family medical history)). These prerequisites are as follows.

The state law or local law may provide additional protection for employees who are responsible for nursing care. Employees who are responsible for nursing care may have the right to be based on other laws, including family and medical leave, or other state laws and local laws.

I. 4. Employers and employees should pay attention to other issues related to pandemi c-related care discrimination? (3/14/22)

yes. EEOC features some potential discrimination in pandemic in this document. for example

A. 10 is an inquiry from employers about COVID-19 and family members with the symptoms related to it.

C. 5 describes the postponement of the company during pregnancy and the decline of a job offer.

D. 13 discusses whether employees have the right to avoid exposing their families to high-complications with COVID-19.

L. Vaccinations – Title VII Religious Objections to COVID-19 Vaccine Requirements

J. 1 and J. 2 describe employees from workplaces based on pregnancy and consideration for pregnancy.

K. 2 describes the convenience of pregnancy related to vaccination.

K. 3 states that employers encourage their family vaccination.

K. 13 discusses the decision not to vaccine for pregnancy.

K. 18 discusses the encouragement of vaccination for families provided by Gina and the employer, or the employer calls for a document for vaccination to the family.

K. 20 will take up the incentives for Gina and the employer to vaccinations provided by the employer.

K. 21 does not give incentives to Vaccinations on Gina and their families.

For general information about caregiver discrimination and federal employment discrimination law, EEOC

Policy guidance

connection

Fact seat

,,,

Best practices

document

J. 1. Can the pandemic forced employees from the workplace for pregnancy because of pregnancy? (6/11/20)

no. Gender discrimination based on the 7th Civil Rights Law also includes discrimination based on pregnancy. Even if it is considered by good intentions, it is not allowed that employers will be eligible for employment disadvantages such as no n-spontaneous vacation, dismissal, and return home holidays due to pregnancy. For more information on postponement of joining the company due to pregnancy and cancellation of recruitment offer, C. 5.

J. 2. Do you have the right to make the convenience of pregnancy based on pandemic (global epidemic)? (6/11/20)

This book was issued prior to the enactment of the "Pwfa Pwfa", which will be enforced on June 27, 2023. PWFA expands the rights of workers who suffer from pregnancy, childbirth, or relevant medical conditions. See what you need to know about PWFA's protection.

First, the pregnancy itself is not an ADA obstacle, but the condition related to pregnancy itself may be an ADA failure. If an employee requires a rational consideration for a medical condition related to pregnancy, the employer must consider the normal ADA rules.

Second, the title VII, which was revised by the Pregnancy Prohibition Law, treats women who have been affected by pregnancy, childbirth, and relevant medical conditions as other employees who have suffered the same in labor or inoperable. I am particularly obliged. In other words, pregnant employees have the right to change their duties within the range of employment and inability to work, such as working at home, changing the work schedule, changing missions, changing missions, and vacation. There is a possibility. The employer needs to know how supervisors, managers, and personnel representatives should deal with such demands to avoid discrimination treatment that violates the title VII. See below for information about pregnancy and COVID-19 vaccination. K. 13.

Precautions The court's ruling that supports or denies the inoculation requirements of the aggregate affects the statement of the rights and responsibilities based on the rights and equality of employees in employers who are obliged to vaccination of COVID-19. It is not something to give.

The avid-19 vaccination can be a problem based on the Federal Employment opportunity Law (EEO), which includes the US Disabled Law (ADA), rehabilitation, and genetic information (GINA). And the Title VII of the Civil Rights Law (ADA) Act, which has been revised by the Title VII (Title VII), (see Section J, EEO rights). Section J "EEO rights related to pregnancy", section L "Vaccination-Title VII COVID-19 Religious Opposition to Vaccine requirements").

This section was published on December 16, 2020 and updated on October 25, 2021, July 12, 2022, and May 15, 2013. First, pregnancy itself is not an ADA obstacle, but the condition related to pregnancy itself may be an ADA obstacle. If an employee requires a rational consideration for a medical condition related to pregnancy, the employer must consider the normal ADA rules.

Second, the title VII, which was revised by the Pregnancy Prohibition Law, treats women who have been affected by pregnancy, childbirth, and relevant medical conditions as other employees who have suffered the same in labor or inoperable. I am particularly obliged. In other words, pregnant employees have the right to change their duties within the range of employment and inability to work, such as working at home, changing the work schedule, changing missions, changing missions, and vacation. There is a possibility. The employer needs to know how supervisors, managers, and personnel representatives should deal with such demands to avoid discrimination treatment that violates the title VII. See below for information about pregnancy and COVID-19 vaccination. K. 13.

Precautions The court's ruling that supports or denies the inoculation requirements of the aggregate affects the statement of the rights and responsibilities based on the rights and equality of employees in employers who are obliged to vaccination of COVID-19. It is not something to give.

The avid-19 vaccination can be a problem based on the Federal Employment opportunity Law (EEO), which includes the US Disabled Law (ADA), rehabilitation, and genetic information (GINA). And the Title VII of the Civil Rights Law (ADA) Act, which has been revised by the Title VII (Title VII), (see Section J, EEO rights). Section J "EEO rights related to pregnancy", section L "Vaccination-Title VII COVID-19 Religious Opposition to Vaccine requirements").

M. Retaliation and Interference

This section was published on December 16, 2020 and updated on October 25, 2021, July 12, 2022, and May 15, 2013. First, the pregnancy itself is not an ADA obstacle, but the condition related to pregnancy itself may be an ADA failure. If an employee requires a rational consideration for a medical condition related to pregnancy, the employer must consider the normal ADA rules.

Second, the title VII, which was revised by the Pregnancy Prohibition Law, treats women who have been affected by pregnancy, childbirth, and relevant medical conditions as other employees who have suffered the same in labor or inoperable. I am particularly obliged. In other words, pregnant employees have the right to change their duties within the range of employment and inability to work, such as working at home, changing the work schedule, changing missions, changing missions, and vacation. There is a possibility. The employer needs to know how supervisors, managers, and personnel representatives should deal with such demands to avoid discrimination treatment that violates the title VII. See below for information about pregnancy and COVID-19 vaccination. K. 13.

Precautions The court's ruling that supports or denies the inoculation requirements of the aggregate affects the statement of the rights and responsibilities based on the rights and equality of employees in employers who are obliged to vaccination of COVID-19. It is not something to give.

The avid-19 vaccination can be a problem based on the Federal Employment opportunity Law (EEO), which includes the US Disabled Law (ADA), rehabilitation, and genetic information (GINA). And the Title VII of the Civil Rights Law (ADA) Act, which has been revised by the Title VII (Title VII), (see Section J, EEO rights). Section J "EEO rights related to pregnancy", section L "Vaccination-Title VII COVID-19 Religious Opposition to Vaccine requirements").

This section was published on December 16, 2020, updated on October 25, 2021, July 12, 2022, and May 15, 2013.
- EEOC has received many inquiries from employers and employees about the permissions of the COVID-19 vaccine given by the US Ministry of Health and Welfare (HHS). On August 23, 2021, the FDA approved the application for a biotech COVID-19 vaccine approval for Pfizer Biotec for aged 16 or older. Previously, the FDA gave an emergency use approval (EUAS) to the other two vaccines (one made by Modena, the other, by Johnsen/ Johnson End Johnson) and over 18 years old in the United States. Permanent use for people. For the current status of vaccines approved or approved by FDA, see HTTPS: // www. CDC. Gov/vaccines/Covid-19/clinical-conSidelations/Covid-19-vaccines-US.
- Also, on July 6, 2021, the US Department of Justice concluded that the Federal Federal Food Pharmaceutical Cosmetics Cosmetics Law does not prohibit the public or private organizations that impose vaccination obligations for EUA target vaccines. We announced our opinions.
- Other federal laws, state laws, local laws and regulations apply to the vaccination of COVID-19 employees, including the requirements of the federal government as employers. The federal government as an employer follows the EEOC law. Federal governments should refer to the website of Safer Federal Workforce Task Force for the latest guidance on federal agencies at the time of COVID-19 pandemic.
- This vaccination technical assistance was written by employees and employers how the federal law on workplaces was applied during COVID-19 pandemic. The EEOC questions and answers described here are the legal standards of the applied EEO based on the Federal Civil Rights Law, EEOC rules, Guidance, and Technical Assistance. Also, whether the employer meets the EEO standards depends on whether the standard is applied to specific facts.
Vaccination: Overview of EEO

Q. 1. Is the employer obliged all employees for vaccination for all employees based on ADA, title VII, and other federal discrimination laws? (Updated 7/12/22)

The Federal EEO Law does not hinder the employer to oblige the vaccination of the COVID-19 for all employees in accordance with the rational consideration of the title VII and ADA and the other EEO standard described below. (See also the religious opposition of the title VII for sections L "Vaccination-COVID-19 VII for vaccine requirements". If there is such an employer's requirements, the EEO method is a vaccine for employers. It does not hinder a document or other confirmation that proves that the vaccination is upset (see K. 9.), but the EEO method is vaccinated by the employer to a specific employee. It may be requested that the requirements are exceptional.

The ADA and the title VII are employers who have not been vaccinated for the religious beliefs, practice, and compliance with employers who have not been vaccinated by the religious beliefs, practice, and compliance with the employer. We are seeking a reasonable convenience, except for unreasonable hardships in business management. An analysis of unreasonable hardships depends on whether the accommodation facility is disability (including pregnanc y-related diseases) (see K. 6.) or religion (see K. 12.).

As with all employment policies, the employer who is obliged to vaccination is the nationality of races, skin color, religion, gender, or title VII (or aged 40) It may be necessary to respond to the claim to have a disadvantageous impact on the employees or eliminate employees. Employers are likely to have a specific individual or population group facing a disability in receiving vaccination of COVID-19, so that some employees are likely to be adversely affected by vaccination obligations. You should be in mind.

Also, unless there is a legitimate no n-discriminatory reason, discriminates from employees based on disability, race, skin color, religion, gender (including pregnancy, sexual orientation, gender), nationality, age, and genetic information. It is illegal to apply vaccination obligations to employees in a way that is handled.

Q. 2. What are the rational consideration and changes that the employer needs to provide for employees who are not vaccinated due to disability? Religious beliefs, comparison, compliance, pregnancy? (Updated 5/15/23) The Federal EEO law requires all employees to vaccinated COVID-19 in accordance with the rational consideration of the title VII and ADA and the other EEO standard described below. It does not hinder that. (See also the religious opposition of the title VII for sections L "Vaccination-COVID-19 VII for vaccine requirements". If there is such an employer's requirements, the EEO method is a vaccine for employers. It does not hinder a document or other confirmation that proves that the vaccination is upset (see K. 9.), but the EEO method is vaccinated by the employer to a specific employee. It may be requested that the requirements are exceptional.

The ADA and the title VII are employers who have not been vaccinated for the religious beliefs, practice, and compliance with employers who have not been vaccinated by the religious beliefs, practice, and compliance with the employer. We are seeking a reasonable convenience, except for unreasonable hardships in business management. An analysis of unreasonable hardships depends on whether the accommodation facility is disability (including pregnanc y-related diseases) (see K. 6.) or religion (see K. 12.).

As with all employment policies, the employer who is obliged to vaccination is the nationality of races, skin color, religion, gender, or title VII (or aged 40) It may be necessary to respond to the claim to have a disadvantageous impact on the employees or eliminate employees. Employers are likely to have a specific individual or population group facing a disability in receiving vaccination of COVID-19, so that some employees are likely to be adversely affected by vaccination obligations. You should be in mind.

Also, unless there is a legitimate no n-discriminatory reason, discriminates from employees based on disability, race, skin color, religion, gender (including pregnancy, sexual orientation, gender), nationality, age, and genetic information. It is illegal to apply vaccination obligations to employees in a way that is handled.

Q. 2. What are the rational consideration and changes that the employer needs to provide for employees who are not vaccinated due to disability? Religious beliefs, comparison, compliance, pregnancy? (5/15/23 Updated) The Federal EEO Law prevents the employer from obliging all employees to vaccinations for all employees in accordance with the rational consideration of the title VII and ADA and the other EEO standard described below. Not a thing. (See also the religious opposition of the title VII for sections L "Vaccination-COVID-19 VII for vaccine requirements". If there is such an employer's requirements, the EEO method is a vaccine for employers. It does not hinder a document or other confirmation that proves that the vaccination is upset (see K. 9.), but the EEO method is vaccinated by the employer to a specific employee. It may be requested that the requirements are exceptional.

The ADA and the title VII are employers who have not been vaccinated for the religious beliefs, practice, and compliance with employers who have not been vaccinated by the religious beliefs, practice, and compliance with the employer. We are seeking a reasonable convenience, except for unreasonable hardships in business management. An analysis of unreasonable hardships depends on whether the accommodation facility is disability (including pregnanc y-related diseases) (see K. 6.) or religion (see K. 12.).

As with all employment policies, the employer who is obliged to vaccination is the nationality of races, skin color, religion, gender, or title VII (or aged 40) It may be necessary to respond to the claim to have a disadvantageous impact on the employees or eliminate employees. Employers are likely to have a specific individual or population group facing a disability in receiving vaccination of COVID-19, so that some employees are likely to be adversely affected by vaccination obligations. You should be in mind.

N. COVID-19 and the Definition of “Disability” Under the ADA/Rehabilitation Act

Also, unless there is a legitimate no n-discriminatory reason, discriminates from employees based on disability, race, skin color, religion, gender (including pregnancy, sexual orientation, gender), nationality, age, and genetic information. It is illegal to apply vaccination obligations to employees in a way that is handled.

Q. 2. What are the rational consideration and changes that the employer needs to provide for employees who are not vaccinated due to disability? Religious beliefs, comparison, compliance, pregnancy? (5/15/23 update)

Employees who have not been vaccinated due to disability (targets of ADA), religious beliefs, practice, and compliance (targeting title VIIs) should have rational consideration that will not cause excessive difficulties in the business management of the employer. You can receive it. For example, as a reasonable consideration, if an employee who has not been vaccinated enters the workplace, wearing a face mask, the presence or absence of social distance with a colleague, the change in the shift, the regular COVID-19 inspection (but its own). It must be a condition that the test meets the "business needs" standards for medical tests.

Employees who chose not to be vaccinated due to pregnancy will have the convenience of continuing to work (based on the title VII) if the employer takes an amendment or exceptional measures for other employees. It may have rights. Such corrections may be the same as consideration for employees due to disability or religion.

Q. 3. How can the employer encourage employees and their families to vaccines for COVID-19 without violating the EEO method, especially ADA and GINA? (10/13/21 update)
- Employers can provide employees and their families with information about COVID-19 vaccines, increase awareness of vaccination, and deal with general questions and concerns. Employers can cooperate with local health authorities, medical providers, and pharmacies to allow employees who have not vaccinated to be vaccinated at work. Under certain situations, as described in K. 16 to K. 21, the employer may provide incentives to employees in vaccinated COVID-19 vaccine. The federal government offers a free COVID-19 vaccine to everyone over the age of 5.COVID-19 employees seeking detailed information on how to vaccine have a lot of sources:
- The federal government's vaccine information site, Vaccunas. gov, allows you to check vaccination locations nationwide (in Spanish in the case of https: // www. Vacunas. gov). You can also find three nearby vaccination facilities by entering the postal code "GETVAX" (438829) and in Spanish to "Vacuna" (822862). Employees who have not been vaccinated due to disability (target of ADA) or religious beliefs, practice, and compliance (target VII), do not have excessive difficulties in the business management of the employer You can receive a matter of consideration. For example, as a reasonable consideration, if an employee who has not been vaccinated enters the workplace, wearing a face mask, the presence or absence of social distance with a colleague, the change in the shift, the regular COVID-19 inspection (but its own). It must be a condition that the test meets the "business needs" standards for medical tests.Employees who chose not to be vaccinated due to pregnancy will have the convenience of continuing to work (based on the title VII) if the employer takes an amendment or exceptional measures for other employees. It may have rights. Such corrections may be the same as consideration for employees due to disability or religion.
- Q. 3. How can the employer encourage employees and their families to vaccines for COVID-19 without violating the EEO method, especially ADA and GINA? (10/13/21 update)Employers can provide employees and their families with information about COVID-19 vaccines, increase awareness of vaccination, and deal with general questions and concerns. Employers can cooperate with local health authorities, medical providers, and pharmacies to allow employees who have not vaccinated to be vaccinated at work. Under certain situations, as described in K. 16 to K. 21, the employer may provide incentives to employees in vaccinated COVID-19 vaccine. The federal government offers a free COVID-19 vaccine to everyone over the age of 5.
COVID-19 employees seeking detailed information on how to vaccine have a lot of sources:

The federal government's vaccine information site, Vaccunas. gov, allows you to check vaccination locations nationwide (in Spanish in the case of https: // www. Vacunas. gov). You can also find three nearby vaccination facilities by entering the postal code "GETVAX" (438829) and in Spanish to "Vacuna" (822862). Employees who have not been vaccinated due to disability (targets of ADA), religious beliefs, practice, and compliance (targeting title VIIs) should have rational consideration that will not cause excessive difficulties in the business management of the employer. You can receive it. For example, as a reasonable consideration, if an employee who has not been vaccinated enters the workplace, wearing a face mask, the presence or absence of social distance with a colleague, the change in the shift, the regular COVID-19 inspection (but its own). It must be a condition that the test meets the "business needs" standards for medical tests.

Employees who chose not to be vaccinated due to pregnancy will have the convenience of continuing to work (based on the title VII) if the employer takes an amendment or exceptional measures for other employees. It may have rights. Such corrections may be the same as consideration for employees due to disability or religion.

Q. 3. How can the employer encourage employees and their families to vaccines for COVID-19 without violating the EEO method, especially ADA and GINA? (10/13/21 update)

Employers can provide employees and their families with information about COVID-19 vaccines, increase awareness of vaccination, and deal with general questions and concerns. Employers can cooperate with local health authorities, medical providers, and pharmacies to allow employees who have not vaccinated to be vaccinated at work. Under certain situations, as described in K. 16 to K. 21, the employer may provide incentives to employees in vaccinated COVID-19 vaccine. The federal government offers a free COVID-19 vaccine to everyone over the age of 5.

COVID-19 employees seeking detailed information on how to vaccine have a lot of sources:

The federal government's vaccine information site, Vaccunas. gov, allows you to check vaccination locations nationwide (in Spanish in the case of https: // www. Vacunas. gov). You can also find three nearby vaccination facilities by entering the postal code "GETVAX" (438829) and in Spanish to "Vacuna" (822862).

In order for employees with disabilities (or families with employee disabilities) to be vaccinated, further support, such as means of transportation and vaccinations at home, may be required. HHS/Administration for Community Living has opened the Disability INFORMATION And Assistance HelpLine (Dial) so that people with disabilities can receive this kind of support. The phone number is 888-677-1199, which is accepted by Monday to Friday 9 am to 8:00 pm (Eastern standard time) or by e-mail dial@n4a. org.The CDC website has a link to the local health bureau list, giving you more detailed information on local vaccination initiatives.

In addition, the CDC offers a complete "communication toolkit" for employers to educate employees about COVID-19 vaccination in vaccination. Originally written for major workers and employees, it is useful for all workers and employees. Vaccination program at work | See CDC.Staff who cannot speak English or have poor English proficiency and make a reservation for vaccination over the phone may not be able to access the Internet to find a vaccination location. The CDC has a toll-free number that can handle multilinguals to those who seek information about vaccination: 800-232-4636; TTY 888-232-6348.

In addition, some people concerned may need to support transportation to the vaccination venue. Employers provide a vaccinated vaccination venue that can be used in the local community, especially if they are not easily used outside of normal working hours, and provide paid time for vaccination. You can collect information about and inform employees.Employers are managed for employees who need to demand rational consideration for disability, religious beliefs, practice, and compliance with employees who need to guarantee indiscriminate employees during pregnancy. You should provide contact information for the person in charge.

Vaccination of ADA and COVID-19

K. 4. COVID-19 Is the information on the vaccination of employees a medical-based confidential information based on ADA? (Updated 7/12/22) In order for employees with disabilities (or families with employees with disabilities) need to be vaccinated, further support such as transportation and vaccination at home is required. There is. HHS/Administration for Community Living has opened the Disability INFORMATION And Assistance HelpLine (Dial) so that people with disabilities can receive this kind of support. The phone number is 888-677-1199, which is accepted by Monday to Friday 9 am to 8:00 pm (Eastern standard time) or by e-mail dial@n4a. org.The CDC website has a link to the local health bureau list, giving you more detailed information on local vaccination initiatives.

In addition, the CDC offers a complete "communication toolkit" for employers to educate employees about COVID-19 vaccination in vaccination. Originally written for major workers and employees, it is useful for all workers and employees. Vaccination program at work | See CDC.

Staff who cannot speak English or have poor English proficiency and make a reservation for vaccination over the phone may not be able to access the Internet to find a vaccination location. The CDC has a toll-free number that can handle multilinguals to those who seek information about vaccination: 800-232-4636; TTY 888-232-6348.In addition, some people concerned may need to support transportation to the vaccination venue. Employers provide a vaccinated vaccination venue that can be used in the local community, especially if they are not easily used outside of normal working hours, and provide paid time for vaccination. You can collect information about and inform employees.

Employers are managed for employees who need to demand rational consideration for disability, religious beliefs, practice, and compliance with employees who need to guarantee indiscriminate employees during pregnancy. You should provide contact information for the person in charge.

Vaccination of ADA and COVID-19

K. 4. COVID-19 Is the information on the vaccination of employees a medical-based confidential information based on ADA? (Updated on 7/12/22) In order for employees with disabilities (or families with employee disabilities) to be vaccinated, it may require further support, such as means of transportation and vaccination at home. HHS/Administration for Community Living has opened the Disability INFORMATION And Assistance HelpLine (Dial) so that people with disabilities can receive this kind of support. The phone number is 888-677-1199, which is accepted by Monday to Friday 9 am to 8:00 pm (Eastern standard time) or by e-mail dial@n4a. org.

The CDC website has a link to the local health bureau list, giving you more detailed information on local vaccination initiatives.

In addition, the CDC offers a complete "communication toolkit" for employers to educate employees about COVID-19 vaccination in vaccination. Originally written for major workers and employees, it is useful for all workers and employees. Vaccination program at work | See CDC.
- Staff who cannot speak English or have poor English proficiency and make a reservation for vaccination over the phone may not be able to access the Internet to find a vaccination location. The CDC has a toll-free number that can handle multilinguals to those who seek information about vaccination: 800-232-4636; TTY 888-232-6348.
- In addition, some people concerned may need to support transportation to the vaccination venue. Employers provide a vaccinated vaccination venue that can be used in the local community, especially if they are not easily used outside of normal working hours, and provide paid time for vaccination. You can collect information about and inform employees.
- Employers are managed for employees who need to demand rational consideration for disability, religious beliefs, practice, and compliance with employees who need to guarantee indiscriminate employees during pregnancy. You should provide contact information for the person in charge.
- Vaccination of ADA and COVID-19
K. 4. COVID-19 Is the information on the vaccination of employees a medical-based confidential information based on ADA? (Updated 7/12/22)
- yes. ADA requires employers to maintain medical information for employees. The ADA Law does not hinder the employer to submit employees to submit vaccination confirmation documents, etc., but this information is based on ADA, as well as all medical information, as an employee's personnel record. Must be stored separately as confidential information.
- Employers can share confidential medical information such as confirmation of vaccination of employees (or COVID-19 test results) with the employees who need them to carry out their duties. However, these employees must also keep the secrets of the information. The following scenarios can be considered:
Advanced management employees who have been appointed to manage employee documents on vaccination may be given the right to access the information required for this purpose, but must follow the confidentiality of this information. Not.

Employees who have been appointed to allow only employees who comply with business restrictions, such as vaccination, inspections, and insurance of COVID-19, will receive only a list of people who can enter (or not). You should not receive confidential medical information about the reasons on the list (or not listed).

Staff who are responsible for guaranteeing the compliance with the examination requirements for employees must confirm the inspection documents submitted by the employees, but must keep the secrets of the inspection information.

Q. 5. Employer asks employees to comply with the employee if the employee has applied for the vaccination requirements of the COVID-19 applied to all employees who enter the workplace. Is it good? (Updated 7/12/22) Yes. ADA requires employers to maintain medical information for employees. The ADA Law does not hinder the employer to submit employees to submit vaccination confirmation documents, etc., but this information is based on ADA, as well as all medical information, as an employee's personnel record. Must be stored separately as confidential information.

Employers can share confidential medical information such as confirmation of vaccination of employees (or COVID-19 test results) with the employees who need them to carry out their duties. However, these employees must also keep the secrets of the information. The following scenarios can be considered:

Advanced management employees who have been appointed to manage employee documents on vaccination may be given the right to access the information required for this purpose, but must follow the confidentiality of this information. Not.

Employees who have been appointed to allow only employees who comply with business restrictions, such as vaccination, inspections, and insurance of COVID-19, will receive only a list of people who can enter (or not). You should not receive confidential medical information about the reasons on the list (or not listed).

Staff who are responsible for guaranteeing the compliance with the examination requirements for employees must confirm the inspection documents submitted by the employees, but must keep the secrets of the inspection information.

Q. 5. Employer asks employees to comply with the employee if the employee has applied for the vaccination requirements of the COVID-19 applied to all employees who enter the workplace. Is it good? (Updated 7/12/22) Yes. ADA requires employers to maintain medical information for employees. The ADA Law does not hinder the employer to submit employees to submit vaccination confirmation documents, etc., but this information is based on ADA, as well as all medical information, as an employee's personnel record. Must be stored separately as confidential information.

Employers can share confidential medical information such as confirmation of vaccination of employees (or COVID-19 test results) with the employees who need them to carry out their duties. However, these employees must also keep the secrets of the information. The following scenarios can be considered:
- Advanced management employees who have been appointed to manage employee documents on vaccination may be given the right to access the information required for this purpose, but must follow the confidentiality of this information. Not.
- Employees who have been appointed to allow only employees who comply with business restrictions, such as vaccination, inspections, and insurance of COVID-19, will receive only a list of people who can enter (or not). You should not receive confidential medical information about the reasons on the list (or not listed).
Staff who are responsible for guaranteeing the compliance with the examination requirements for employees must confirm the inspection documents submitted by the employees, but must keep the secrets of the inspection information.

Q. 5. Employer asks employees to comply with the employee if the employee has applied for the vaccination requirements of the COVID-19 applied to all employees who enter the workplace. Is it good? (Updated 7/12/22)

Under the ADA, an employer may require an individual with a disability to meet a qualification standard that applies to all employees, such as a safety-related standard requiring a COVID-19 vaccination, if that standard is job-related and consistent with business necessity applicable to that employee. An employer does not have to prove that the qualification standard meets the “business necessity” standard generally (i. e., as applicable to all employees). Under the ADA, the employer must meet this standard only for employees who have notified the employer that they cannot comply because of their disability. If an employee cannot meet such a disability-related safety-related qualification standard, the employer may not require the employee to comply unless the employer can demonstrate that the employee poses a “direct threat” to the health or safety of the employee or others in performing the job. A “direct threat” is a “substantial risk of harm” that cannot be eliminated or reduced by reasonable accommodation. 29 C. F. R. 1630. 2(r). This determination can be broken down into two steps: determining whether there is a “substantial risk of substantial harm” and, if there is a “substantial risk of substantial harm,” evaluating whether a reasonable accommodation can reduce or eliminate that threat.

In order to determine whether workers who have not been vaccinated will bring an "imminent threat" in the workplace, the employer first has the current ability to safely carry out the essential function of the duties. Must be evaluated. The elements that make up this evaluation are as follows. (2) The nature and significance of potential harm, (3) potential harm, (4) imminent and potential harm. The decision that a specific worker has an imminent threat should be based on a rational medical judgment based on the latest medical knowledge about COVID-19. Such medical knowledge includes, for example, the spread level in the local community at the time of evaluation. A statement from CDC is an important source of information on the latest medical knowledge about COVID-19. With the consent of employees, employee medical providers can provide useful information to employees. Furthermore, in an emergency threat assessment, you should take into account the following types of work environment: Use whether employees work alone, work with others, work indoors or outdoors. Possible ventilation, the frequency and time of direct interactions that employees usually have with other employees and / or no n-employees, partial or complete vaccination found in the workplace.

If a disabled worker who has not been vaccinated is revealed in an evaluation that it will bring an imminent threat to himself or others, the employer is rationally adjusted unreasonably. We must consider whether or not the threat can be reduced or eliminated. If you can wear masks, go to work, change your work environment (improve ventilation systems, limit contact with other employees or no n-employees), and if possible. , Relocation of another workplace to vacant seats. In order to determine whether workers who have not been vaccinated in vaccinations will bring an "imminent threat" in the workplace, the employer first, the current workers can safely carry out the essential functions of their duties. Ability must be evaluated individually. The elements that make up this evaluation are as follows. (2) The nature and significance of potential harm, (3) potential harm, (4) imminent and potential harm. The decision that a specific worker has an imminent threat should be based on a rational medical judgment based on the latest medical knowledge about COVID-19. Such medical knowledge includes, for example, the spread level in the local community at the time of evaluation. A statement from CDC is an important source of information on the latest medical knowledge about COVID-19. With the consent of employees, employee medical providers can provide useful information to employees. Furthermore, in an emergency threat assessment, you should take into account the following types of work environment: Use whether employees work alone, work with others, work indoors or outdoors. Possible ventilation, the frequency and time of direct interactions that employees usually have with other employees and / or no n-employees, partial or complete vaccination found in the workplace.
- If a disabled worker who has not been vaccinated is revealed in an evaluation that it will bring an imminent threat to himself or others, the employer is rationally adjusted unreasonably. We must consider whether or not the threat can be reduced or eliminated. If you can wear masks, go to work, change your work environment (improve ventilation systems, limit contact with other employees or no n-employees), and if possible. , Relocation of another workplace to vacant seats. In order to determine whether workers who have not been vaccinated will bring an "imminent threat" in the workplace, the employer first has the current ability to safely carry out the essential function of the duties. Must be evaluated. The elements that make up this evaluation are as follows. (2) The nature and significance of potential harm, (3) potential harm, (4) imminent and potential harm. The decision that a specific worker has an imminent threat should be based on a rational medical judgment based on the latest medical knowledge about COVID-19. Such medical knowledge includes, for example, the spread level in the local community at the time of evaluation. A statement from CDC is an important source of information on the latest medical knowledge about COVID-19. With the consent of employees, employee medical providers can provide useful information to employees. Furthermore, in an emergency threat assessment, you should take into account the following types of work environment: Use whether employees work alone, work with others, work indoors or outdoors. Possible ventilation, the frequency and time of direct interactions that employees usually have with other employees and / or no n-employees, partial or complete vaccination found in the workplace.
- If a disabled worker who has not been vaccinated is revealed in an evaluation that it will bring an imminent threat to himself or others, the employer is rationally adjusted unreasonably. We must consider whether or not the threat can be reduced or eliminated. If you can wear masks, go to work, change your work environment (improve ventilation systems, limit contact with other employees or no n-employees), and if possible. , Relocation of another workplace to vacant seats.
- As a best practice, employers who have implemented a COVID-19 vaccination policy and require documentation or other verification of vaccination should inform all employees that the employer will consider requests for reasonable accommodations based on disability on an individual basis (see also K. 12, which suggests similar best practices for religious accommodations).
K. 6. If an employer requires employees who physically enter the workplace to be vaccinated against COVID-19 under the ADA, how should an employee who has not been vaccinated against COVID-19 because of a disability notify the employer and what should the employer do? (Updated 5/28/21)
- Employees with disabilities who have not been vaccinated against COVID-19 because of a disability must notify their employer that they need an exception to the requirement or a change in work duties, known as a reasonable accommodation. When requesting an accommodation, you do not need to mention the ADA or use the words "reasonable accommodation."
Managers and supervisors responsible for communicating with employees about the employer’s compliance with the vaccination mandate should know how to recognize and refer requests for accommodations from employees with disabilities to ensure that the requests are fully considered. As a best practice, before adopting a mandatory vaccination policy, employers should provide clear information to managers, supervisors, and policy implementers about how to handle accommodation requests related to the policy.

Typically, employers and employees will engage in a flexible, interactive process to identify workplace accommodation options that do not impose undue hardship on the employer. This process may also include determining whether it is necessary to obtain medical documentation of the employee’s disability.

Employers and employees may find the Job Accommodation Network (JAN) website useful for resources on various types of accommodations. JAN resources related to COVID-19 are available at https://askjan. org/topics/COVID-19. cfm.

Employers may also refer to the latest Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) materials specific to COVID. If there is no reasonable accommodation that would allow an unvaccinated employee to be physically present to perform the employee's current job duties without posing an imminent threat, employers should still consider whether telecommuting is an option for that particular job and, as a last resort, whether reassignment to other duties is possible.

The ADA requires employers to provide accommodations that do not cause undue hardship (meaning substantial difficulty or expense) if they are available. Employers are encouraged to consider all options before denying a request for accommodation. The percentage of employees in the workplace who are partially or fully vaccinated against COVID-19 and the degree of contact with employees other than employees who are not eligible to be vaccinated or whose vaccination status is unknown may affect undue hardship for ADA visas. Employers may rely on CDC recommendations when determining whether effective accommodations that do not cause undue hardship are available.

K. 7. If an employer requires an employee to be vaccinated against COVID-19 by the employer or its agent, do the ADA restrictions apply to the employer making disability-related inquiries or medical examinations of the employee as part of the vaccination process? (Updated 5/28/21)

Yes. The ADA restrictions apply to screening questions that must be asked immediately prior to the administration of the vaccine by the employer or its agent. An agent of the employer is an individual or entity authorized to act on behalf of or under the employer's direction.

The ADA generally limits when employers can require medical examinations (procedures or tests that request information about a person's physical or mental disability or health) or disability inquiries (questions that may elicit information about a person's disability). The act of administering a vaccine is not a "medical examination" under the ADA because it does not request information about the employee's physical or mental health.

However, the questions before vaccination are likely to bring out information about disability, so when the employer or agent is inoculated with the Cobid 19 vaccine, it is "related to duties and the need for business. It is stipulated that it must be "matched". In order to meet this standard, the employer does not answer questions, so employees who cannot inoculate the vaccine directly, directly threaten the health and safety of employees, or the health and safety of other people in the workplace. You have to have a reasonable belief based on evidence. (Therefore, if the employer requires employees to vaccinate by the employer or their agent, the employer may disagree in the forced survey before vaccination, and the employer is ADA. It should be noted that it must be justified under

The ADA also requires employers to preserve the medical information of employees in the employer's vaccination program.

Κ. 8. Under the ADA, the employer or its agent does not meet the criteria that "in line with the need for business," before vaccinating the COVID-19 vaccine. Is there a situation where you can ask questions about disability? (5/28/21 update)

yes. If the employer voluntarily provides an employee a vaccination, that is, if an employer can choose whether to receive a COVID-19 vaccine from the employer or its agent, the employer asks the pre-vaccinated question. There is no need to show that it matches the need for business. However, the employee's decision to answer the question must be spontaneous. (See also questions K. 16-17.) ADA will take disadvantages, including harassment of employees, because the employer refused to participate in the voluntary vaccine program. It is prohibited. Employers also need to maintain the secrets of medical information obtained from any vaccination program.

Κ. 9. Does ADA prevent employees from investigating employees that they have been vaccinated by COVID-19 or seeking documents or other confirmation? (10/13/21 Update) However, the question before the vaccination is likely to bring out information about the disability, so when the employer or its agent is inoculating the Cobid 19 vaccine, "" It stipulates that it must be in line with the duties and match the need for business. In order to meet this standard, the employer does not answer questions, so employees who cannot inoculate the vaccine directly, directly threaten the health and safety of employees, or the health and safety of other people in the workplace. You have to have a reasonable belief based on evidence. (Therefore, if the employer requires employees to vaccinate by the employer or their agent, the employer may disagree in the forced survey before vaccination, and the employer is ADA. It should be noted that it must be justified under

The ADA also requires employers to preserve the medical information of employees in the employer's vaccination program.

Κ. 8. Under the ADA, the employer or its agent does not meet the criteria that "in line with the need for business," before vaccinating the COVID-19 vaccine. Is there a situation where you can ask questions about disability? (5/28/21 update)

yes. If the employer voluntarily provides an employee a vaccination, that is, if an employer can choose whether to receive a COVID-19 vaccine from the employer or its agent, the employer asks the pre-vaccinated question. There is no need to show that it matches the need for business. However, the employee's decision to answer the question must be spontaneous. (See also questions K. 16-17.) ADA will take disadvantages, including harassment of employees, because the employer refused to participate in the voluntary vaccine program. It is prohibited. Employers also need to maintain the secrets of medical information obtained from any vaccination program.

Elim Poon - Journalist, Creative Writer
Last modified: 27.08.2024

The EEOC gives particular guidance on such topics as disability-related inquiries and medical exams, reasonable accommodation, pandemic-related. What You Should Know About COVID and the ADA, the Rehabilitation Act, and Other EEO Laws Source: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC); Long. 2. What You Should Know About COVID and the ADA, the Rehabilitation Act, and Other EEO Laws, U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Jun. 17, ).

Play

accepted

What You Should Know About COVID-19 and the ADA the Rehabilitation Act and Other EEO Laws U. S.

What You Should Know About COVID-19 and the ADA, the Rehabilitation Act, and Other EEO Laws

INTRODUCTION

A. Disability-Related Inquiries and Medical Exams

B. Confidentiality of Medical Information

C. Hiring and Onboarding

D. Disability and Reasonable Accommodation

E. Pandemic-Related Harassment Due to National Origin, Race, or Other Protected Characteristics

F. Furloughs and Layoffs

G. Return to the Workplace

H. Age

I. Caregivers/Family Responsibilities

J. Pregnancy

Notice concerning the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act of 2022

K. Vaccinations - Overview, ADA, Title VII, and GINA

Mandatory Employer Vaccination Programs

Voluntary Employer Vaccination Programs

No. If an employer allows other comparable employees to work remotely, the employer should not treat older employees less favorably because of their age.

I. 3. Are these legal protection applied only to employees who take care of children, or are they applied to employees with other care? (3/14/22)

ADA: Employer Incentives for Voluntary COVID-19 Vaccinations

GINA: Employer Incentives for Voluntary COVID-19 Vaccinations

L. Vaccinations – Title VII Religious Objections to COVID-19 Vaccine Requirements

M. Retaliation and Interference

N. COVID-19 and the Definition of “Disability” Under the ADA/Rehabilitation Act