Who gambles and who experiences gambling problems in Canada
Canadian society custom Who gambles and who experiences gambling problems in Canada
Gambling, like many other countries, is common in Canada. Most of the gambling people are harmless, but the minority is adversely affected. In Canada, gambling opportunities have increased with the times, and the introduction of new gambling technologies such as online poker and sports betting is increasingly important for regular and detailed monitoring.
In this study, gambling and gambling issues aged 15 or older are used to use data from the 2018 Canadian Regional Health Survey (CCHS), which is a quick response of gambling. Using the "Canada Problem Gambling Index", which evaluates the impact of gambling behavior and its behavior on the person or others, identifies the person with the risk of gambling.
- Nearly tw o-thirds (64, 5 %) of Canadians (18. 9 million) over 15 years old have reported that they have gambling in the past year, and 1, 6 % (304, 400 people) of last year's gamblers (304, 400) There was a severe risk from the middle of the gambling gambling.
- In all ages, men reported that they had gambling in the previous year than women. Men also tended to have a high risk of gambling issues from moderate degree.
- No n-immigrants (69, 7%) were higher than immigrants (51, 9%), which responded to gambling in the past year. The percentage of respondents who have gambling in the past year are South Asians (39, 8%), Chinese (45, 6%), and blacks (56, 6%), compared to white (69, 1%). It was lower.
- Indigenous people gambling in the past year higher than no n-indigenous people (72, 4 % to 64, 2 %), and the risk of gambling problems was more likely to be moderate to severe (4, 5 %. Try 1, 5 %).
- Lo w-income households were less likely to gamble than hig h-income households, but were more vulnerable to gambling problems. For example, 71, 5 % of hig h-income households reported that they had gambling in the past year, and 1, 1 % had the risk of gambling addiction. In lo w-income households, 53, 8 % had gambling in the past year, and 2, 7 % had the danger of gambling addiction.
- The higher the number of gambling, the higher the risk of gambling addiction. < SPAN> customs of Canadian society
- Gambling, like many other countries, is common in Canada. Most of the gambling people are harmless, but the minority is adversely affected. In Canada, gambling opportunities have increased with the times, and the introduction of new gambling technologies such as online poker and sports betting is increasingly important for regular and detailed monitoring.
Introduction
Nearly tw o-thirds (64, 5 %) of Canadians (18. 9 million) over 15 years old have reported that they have gambling in the past year, and 1, 6 % (304, 400 people) of last year's gamblers (304, 400) There was a severe risk from the middle of the gambling gambling.
In all ages, men reported that they had gambling in the previous year than women. Men also tended to have a high risk of gambling issues from moderate degree.
No n-immigrants (69, 7%) were higher than immigrants (51, 9%), which responded to gambling in the past year. The percentage of respondents who have gambling in the past year are South Asians (39, 8%), Chinese (45, 6%), and blacks (56, 6%), compared to white (69, 1%). It was lower.
Indigenous people gambling in the past year higher than no n-indigenous people (72, 4 % to 64, 2 %), and the risk of gambling problems was more likely to be moderate to severe (4, 5 %. Try 1, 5 %).
Lo w-income households were less likely to gamble than hig h-income households, but were more vulnerable to gambling problems. For example, 71, 5 % of hig h-income households reported that they had gambling in the past year, and 1, 1 % had the risk of gambling addiction. In lo w-income households, 53, 8 % had gambling in the past year, and 2, 7 % had the danger of gambling addiction.
The higher the number of gambling, the higher the risk of gambling addiction. Canadian society custom
Gambling, like many other countries, is common in Canada. Most of the gambling people are harmless, but the minority is adversely affected. In Canada, gambling opportunities have increased with the times, and the introduction of new gambling technologies such as online poker and sports betting is increasingly important for regular and detailed monitoring.
Two-thirds of Canadians reported gambling in the past 12 months
In this study, gambling and gambling issues aged 15 or older are used to use data from the 2018 Canadian Regional Health Survey (CCHS), which is a quick response of gambling. Using the "Canada Problem Gambling Index", which evaluates the impact of gambling behavior and its behavior on the person or others, identifies the person with the risk of gambling.
Nearly tw o-thirds (64, 5 %) of Canadians (18. 9 million) over 15 years old have reported that they have gambling in the past year, and 1, 6 % (304, 400 people) of last year's gamblers (304, 400) There was a severe risk from the middle of the gambling gambling.
In all ages, men reported that they had gambling in the previous year than women. Men also tended to have a high risk of gambling issues from moderate degree.
Indigenous people gambling in the past year higher than no n-indigenous people (72, 4 % to 64, 2 %), and the risk of gambling problems was more likely to be moderate to severe (4, 5 %. Try 1, 5 %). | Lo w-income households were less likely to gamble than hig h-income households, but were more vulnerable to gambling problems. For example, 71, 5 % of hig h-income households reported that they had gambling in the past year, and 1, 1 % had the risk of gambling addiction. In lo w-income households, 53, 8 % had gambling in the past year, and 2, 7 % had the danger of gambling addiction. | The higher the number of gambling, the higher the risk of gambling addiction. | In the multiple analysis, most of the characteristics, such as participation in multiple kinds of gambling activities, single, divorce or separation, and good mental health, were independently related to gambling. | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Text box end | Text box end | Text box end | ||||||||||
When gambling is a problem, both gambling and their families are affected. Gambling addiction can lead to marital relationships, bankruptcy, economic difficulties, suicide, crimes, health disorders, and an increase in the use of alcohol and other drugs. Note | % | Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note | to | When gambling is a problem, both gambling and their families are affected. Gambling addiction can lead to marital relationships, bankruptcy, economic difficulties, suicide, crimes, health disorders, and an increase in the use of alcohol and other drugs. Note | % | Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note | to | When gambling is a problem, both gambling and their families are affected. Gambling addiction can lead to marital relationships, bankruptcy, economic difficulties, suicide, crimes, health disorders, and an increase in the use of alcohol and other drugs. Note | % | Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note | to | |
There are various reasons for gambling people, which are generally social or entertained. Note At the same time, loneliness can be an important factor in gambling addiction. Most of the gamblers are useful, but be aware that the gamblers tend to recognize money as the main motive rather than the no n-predictive gambler. Note | When gambling is a problem, both gambling and their families are affected. Gambling addiction can lead to marital relationships, bankruptcy, economic difficulties, suicide, crimes, health disorders, and an increase in the use of alcohol and other drugs. Note | Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note | There is a concern that Cobit 19's trends have a negative effect on Canadian mental hygiene. Problem gambling is a type of addiction. Pandemic anxiety and obstacles can affect gambling activities as well as the use of alcohol and drugs. It is too time to determine, but because of the increase in time spent online during pandemics, accessing various gambling platforms and sites may be related to the increase in the risk of gambling. there is. | Most information about Canadian gambling is based on surveys in each state. In 2018, the CCHS-gambling module was collected to solve this data gap. In the multiple analysis, most of the characteristics, such as participation in multiple kinds of gambling activities, single, divorce or separation, and good mental health, were independently related to gambling. | Text box end | Gambling is common in Canada. Note that the majority of gambling people are harmless, but the minority is affected. Note | There are various reasons for gambling people, which are generally social or entertained. Note At the same time, loneliness can be an important factor in gambling addiction. Most of the gamblers are useful, but be aware that the gamblers tend to recognize money as the main motive rather than the no n-predictive gambler. Note | When gambling is a problem, both gambling and their families are affected. Gambling addiction can lead to marital relationships, bankruptcy, economic difficulties, suicide, crimes, health disorders, and an increase in the use of alcohol and other drugs. Note | Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note | There is a concern that Cobit 19's trends have a negative effect on Canadian mental hygiene. Problem gambling is a type of addiction. Pandemic anxiety and obstacles can affect gambling activities as well as the use of alcohol and drugs. It is too time to determine, but because of the increase in time spent online during pandemics, accessing various gambling platforms and sites may be related to the increase in the risk of gambling. there is. | Most information about Canadian gambling is based on surveys in each state. In 2018, the CCHS-gambling module was collected to solve this data gap. | A better understanding of the characteristics and factors that lead to gamblers, and of minorities who experience gambling-related problems, may help develop more effective education, prevention, and treatment strategies. This is especially important in the context of evolving gambling technologies and legal frameworks. For example, the Safe and Regulated Sports Wagering Act legalized single-event sports betting in Canada in 2021 and led to the launch of the Ontario iGaming market in April 2022. |
Gambling comes in many forms, including buying instant lottery tickets, betting at casino tables, playing electronic gambling machines, and sports betting (see Data Sources, Methods, and Definitions for a complete list). In the 2018 Community Health Survey (CCHS-GAM RR), respondents were considered to have gambled if they reported any of these activities at least once in the past 12 months. | ||||||||||||
According to the 2018 CCHS-GAM RR, about two-thirds (64, 5%) of Canadians aged 15 years and older (18, 9 million) reported at least one gambling memo in the past year. | People aged 45-64 years were most likely to have gambled in the past year (72, 3%), while people aged 15-24 years were least likely to have gambled in the past year (43, 9%) (Table 1). Across all age groups, more men than women reported gambling in the past year. | Table 1 Prevalence of past-year gambling by sex and selected charity, household population aged 15 years and older, Canada excluding territories, 2018 Table summary This table displays the results of past-year gambling prevalence. Information is grouped by characteristics (shown as row headers), total, male (reference), female, and 95% confidence interval (shown as column headers). | Characteristics | Total | Male (reference) | Female | 95% CI | 95% CI | 95% CI | Number '000 | From | Number '000 |
From | Number '000 | To | Total | 18. 885. 9 | 64. 5 | 63. 4 | 65. 6 | 9, 841. 8 | 68. 8 | 67. 2 | 70. 3 | 9. 044. 1 |
60. 4 Table 1 Note 1 | 58. 8 | 61, 9 | Age group | 15 to 24 years old | 1. 776. 9 | 43. 9 Note | 40. 7 | 47. 2 | 995. 3 | 47. 9 Note | 43. 3 | 52. 6 |
781. 6 | 39. 7 Note * Table 1 Note ‡. | 35. 1 | 44. 4 | 25 to 44 | 6, 251, 9 | 64. | 62. 5 | 66. 5 | 3. 357. 7 | 69. 1* | 66. 1 | 72. 0 |
2. 894. 2 | ||||||||||||
60. 0* | Table 1 | Note‡ | Note | 57. 3 | 62. 6 | 45 to 64 (reference value) | 7, 152, 1 | 72. 3 | 70. 4 | 74. 1 | 3. 694. 6 | 76. 3 |
73. 9 | 72. 3 | 3. 457. 6 | 68. 5 | Table 1 | Note | 1 | 65. 6 | 71. 2 | Over 65 | 3. 705. 0 | 65. 4 | Note |
63. 6 | 67. 1 | 1. 794. 2 | 44. 4 | 68. 1 | 73. 4 | 1. 910. 8 | 60. 9 Note * Table 1 Note ‡ Note | 58. 6 | 63. 2 | Province | New and Labrador | 317. 5 |
74. 6 | 69, 7 | 79. 0 | 156. 1 | 75. 4 | 68. 4 | 81. 3 | 161. 5 | 73. 9 | 67. 3 | 79, 6 | Prince Edward Island | 71. 2 |
67. 4 | 62. 3 | 63. 4 | 25 to 44 | 70. 2 | 62. 2 | 77. 1 | 1. 910. 8 | 64. 9 | 57. 8 | 71, 4 | Nova Scotia | 511. 2 |
66. 9 | 63. 6 | 65. 6 | 256. 4 | 69. 8 | 64. 5 | 74. 7 | Province | 64. 2 | 59. 3 | 68. 8 | New Brunswick | 437. 2 |
72. 1 | 66. 7 | 77. 0 | 210. 9 | 72. 4 | 64. 7 | 78. 9 | 226. 3 | 71. 9 | 66. 0 | 77. 1 | Quebec | 43. 3 |
69. 1 | 67. 1 | 71. 0 | 25 to 44 | 72. 8 | 69. 8 | 75. 7 | 2. 247. 1 | 72. 3 | *Table 1 | Notes‡ | 210. 9 | 62. 7 |
68. 0 | Ontario | 7, 130, 7 | 62. 2 | 60. 0 | 64. 4 | 3. 730. 8 | 25 to 44 | 15 to 24 years old | 70. 1 | 3. 399. 9 | 57. 5 Table 1 Note 1 | 54. 4 |
60. 5 | Manitoba | 625. 7 | 63. 0 | 59. 1 | 66. 8 | 316. 1 | 70. 3 | 78. 9 | 71. 1 | 309. 6 | 60. 4 | 256. 4 |
65. 6 | ||||||||||||
Saskatchewan | 613. 6 | 70. 9 Note | 67. 1 | 309. 6 | 330. 6 | 76. 9 Note | 71, 9 | 81. 3 | 283. 0 | 64. 9 Table 1 Note 1 | 59. 1 | 57. 5 Table 1 Note 1 |
2 | Alberta | 2. 195. 3 | 77. 1 | 62. 1 | 67. 0 | 1. 190. 9 | 69. 8 | 9, 841. 8 | 74. 1 | 1, 004, 4 | 58. 6 Table 1 Note 1 | 55. 1 |
3 | 61, 9 | British Columbia | 2. 261, 3 | 59. 0 | 56. 3 | 61. 8 | 1. 144. 8 | 61. 7 Note | 57. 3 | 65. 8 | 1, 116, 6 | 56. 6 |
4 | 53. 1 | 60. 0 | 156. 1 | Note | 2. 895. 6 | 53. 8 Note | 51. 0 | 56. 6 | 1. 353, 7 | 56. 6 Note | 62. 2 | 7, 152, 1 |
1. 541, 9 | 51. 48. 0 | 55. 1 | 3. 412. 5 | 63. 0 | 60. 4 | 65. 5 | 2. 247. 1 | 68. 4 | 64. 4 | 72. 0 | 60. 9 Note * Table 1 Note ‡ Note | 57. 8 |
* | ||||||||||||
Table 1 | Note‡ | 1. | 53. 9 | 61, 7 | 3. 624. 4 | 68. 0 | 71. 9 | 70. 5 | 1. 888. 6 | 71. 6 | 226. 3 | 74. 8 |
1. 735. 8 | 64. 4 | Table 1 | Note | 65. 4 | 60. 9 | 67. 8 | 3. 871, 9 | 69. 1 | 66. 7 | 71, 4 | 2. 035. 1 | 63. 0 |
69, 5 | 76. 1 | 1. 836. 8 | 1 | 62. 1 | 68. 4 | 5 (Maximum 20%) (Reference value) | 40. 7 | 71. 5 | 69. 3 | 73. 6 | 78. 9 | 74. 9 |
71, 9 | 77. 8 | 1. 804. 1 | 67. 7 Table 1 Note 1 | 64. 5 | 70. 8 | Marital status | Married or common law (Reference) | Note | 67. 6 | 66. 2 | 69. 0 | 72. 0 |
73. 1 | ||||||||||||
71. 1 | 75. 0 | Note | 62. 1 Table 1 Note 1 | 57. 8 | 64. 0 | 68. 0 | 55. 1 | 55. 6 | 53. 4 | 57. 8 | 2, 413, 0 | 511. 2 |
*. | 54. 7 | 60. 8 | 1. 971, 7 | 53. 1 | *Table 1 | Note‡ | 1. | 50. 0 | 56. 3 | Separated or divorced | 1. 634. 4 | 73. 2 |
70. 2 | 76. 0 | 693. 0 | 78. 3 | 73. 9 | 82. 0 | 941. 4 | Number '000 | *Table 1 | Note‡ | 65. 8 | 73. 7 | Over 65 |
782. 6 | 60. 5 | 57. 1 | 63. 8 | 170. 8 | 64. 2 Note *. | 56. 4 | 1, 116, 6 | Note | 59, 5 | 55. 7 | 63. 2 | Migration status |
Non-immigrants (reference) | ||||||||||||
14. 363. 7 | 69, 7 | 68. 5 | 70. 8 | 65. 6 | 73. 1 | 3. 412. 5 | 74. 6 | 7. 057. 4 | 66. 4 Table 1 Note 1 | 64. 9 | *Table 1 | Immigrants |
4. 291. 4 | 51. 9 Note | 66. 2 | 54. 5 | 2. 441, 5 | 59. 1 Note *. | 55. 2 | 62. 8 | 1. 850. 0 | 44. 7 Note * Table 1 Note ‡ Note | 53. 1 | 48. 2 | 59. 1 |
1. 041. 3 | ||||||||||||
43. 1 | 37. 8 | Province | 643. 4 | 51. 8 | 44. 4 | 317. 5 | 25 to 44 | Age group | * See Table 1 | Notes | 27. 5 | 41. 0 |
Years since migration: 10 years | 2. 893. 2 | 58. 5 | 55. 4 | 61, 6 | 1. 591. 1 | 15 to 24 years old | 60. 9 | 69, 7 | 1. 302. 1 | 64. | * See Table 1 | 62. 1 |
1. | 47. 7 | 56. 0 | 51. 0 | Heterosexual (Reference) | 17. 868, 5 | 65, 0 | 62. 1 Table 1 Note 1 | 66. 1 | 9, 353, 1 | 69. 3 | 69. 8 | 70, 9 |
8. 515, 4 | 60. 8 Table 1 Note 1 | 59. 2 | 62. 4 | Sexual minority | 553, 4 | 59, 5 | 53, 0 | 65, 7 | 308, 6 | 64. 3 | 53. 8 | 71. 2 |
244, 8 | 54, 5 | 47, 0 | 61, 8 | Inhabitants | No n-indigenous people (reference) | No n-indigenous people (reference) | 64. 2 | 64. 2 | No n-indigenous people (reference) | No n-indigenous people (reference) | 64. 2 | 64. 2 |
70. 4 | ||||||||||||
8. 508, 5 | 59. 9 Table 1 Note 1 | 60. 0 | 511. 2 | 1 | 779, 2 | 53. 8 Note | 52. 6 | 76. 2 | 391, 6 | 74. 1 | Province | 25 to 44 |
387, 6 | 70. 8 Note | 65. 1 | 76, 0 | Indigenous residents living in a protected area (single ethnic group) | 406. 1 | 76. 0 Note | 69, 5 | 65. 6 | 204. 9 Note e: Be careful when using. | 78. 6 Note | 68, 5 | 86. 1 |
201. 2 | 73. 6 Note | 64. 4 | 81. 1 | Methis (single ID card) | 324, 0 | 69, 6 | 62, 9 | Nova Scotia | 162, 8 | 65. 1 | 60, 7 | 78, 8 |
161. 2 | 68. 6 | 76. 9 Note | 77. 1 | 2, 413, 0 | 13. 4 Note e: Be careful when using | * See Table 1 | 40, 0 | 56. 6 | Note F: I can't disclose because my reliability is too low | Note F: I can't disclose because my reliability is too low | Note | Note |
Note F: I can't post it because my reliability is too low | Note F: I can't post it because my reliability is too low | Note | Note | 65. 4 | White only (reference) | 14. 451, 6 | 60. 4 | 2. 261, 3 | 70. 2 | 7. 292, 8 | 72, 9 | 71. 2 |
74, 5 | ||||||||||||
7. 158, 9 | 65. 7 Table 1 Note 1 ‡. | 55. 1 | 67. 1 | 62. 1 | 599, 1 | 39. 8 Note | 1. | 7. 057. 4 | 412. 4 | 52. 6 Note | 66. 1 | 59. 1 |
186, 7 | 25. 9 Note * Table 1 Note ‡ Note | 161. 5 | 33. 9 | 78. 9 | 583, 5 | Nova Scotia | 309. 6 | 7, 152, 1 | 309, 9 | 52. | 41. 7 | 78. 9 |
273, 6 | ||||||||||||
39. 8 Note *. | 31. 2 | 49, 0 | Black only | 424, 7 | 56. | 47, 8 | 64, 9 | 262. 1 Note e: Be careful when using. | 65. 1 | 52. 2 | 76. 1 | 162. 7 Note e: Use with care |
46. 7 Note * Table 1 Note ‡. | 36, 5 | 62. 4 | 55. 1 | 74. 8 | 53. 6 Note | 60. 9 | 2. 441, 5 | 1. 019, 9 | 59. 4 Note *. | 53. 1 | 67. 7 Table 1 Note 1 | 741. 1 |
47. 2 Note * Table 1 Note ‡ Note | ||||||||||||
39. 8 Note *. | 52, 9 | Mental health due to sel f-awareness | Well, it's bad | 1. 448, 8 | 61, 7 | 57, 9 | 65, 5 | 9. 209, 6 | 69. 2 Note *. | 67, 6 | 57. 8 | 8. 180, 6 |
46. 7 Note * Table 1 Note ‡. | 58. 6 | 41. 0 | Good, very good, or good (reference value) | 9. 044. 1 | 64, 7 | 62. 1 | 44. 4 | 3. 457. 6 | 62, 7 | 56. 6 | 68. 4 | 66. 2 |
61. 1 |
65, 8< 0.05)
Daily smoker< 0.05)
yes
2. 575, 3
76. 8 Note74, 0
1. 490, 9 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lo w-income households were less likely to gamble than hig h-income households, but were more vulnerable to gambling problems. For example, 71, 5 % of hig h-income households reported that they had gambling in the past year, and 1, 1 % had the risk of gambling addiction. In lo w-income households, 53, 8 % had gambling in the past year, and 2, 7 % had the danger of gambling addiction. | 72, 8 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 80, 9 | |
1. 084, 5 | ||||||
76. 4 Note | 186 | 111 | 155 | 200 | 206 | 256 |
73, 0 | ||||||
79, 5 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
None (reference) |
16. 309, 7
In this study, gambling and gambling issues aged 15 or older are used to use data from the 2018 Canadian Regional Health Survey (CCHS), which is a quick response of gambling. Using the "Canada Problem Gambling Index", which evaluates the impact of gambling behavior and its behavior on the person or others, identifies the person with the risk of gambling.
61, 7
64, 0
8. 351, 0
67, 5
65, 7
69. 2
7. 958, 7
Just over half of Canadians bought a lottery or raffle ticket in the past year
58. 7 Table 1 Note 1.
57. 1
60. 3
Drank very much
56. 165, 8< 0.05)
Lottery or raffle tickets are not only the most popular form of gambling, but also the most frequently played
77. 2 Note *.
79. 2 | Lo w-income households were less likely to gamble than hig h-income households, but were more vulnerable to gambling problems. For example, 71, 5 % of hig h-income households reported that they had gambling in the past year, and 1, 1 % had the risk of gambling addiction. In lo w-income households, 53, 8 % had gambling in the past year, and 2, 7 % had the danger of gambling addiction. | The higher the number of gambling, the higher the risk of gambling addiction. | In the multiple analysis, most of the characteristics, such as participation in multiple kinds of gambling activities, single, divorce or separation, and good mental health, were independently related to gambling. | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Text box end | Text box end | Text box end | |||||||
% | Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note | to | % | Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note | to | % | Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note | to | |
14. 350, 9 | |||||||||
61. 4 | 73. 2 | 62. 6 | Note | 65, 5 | 63. 6 | 67. 4 | 64. 9 Table 1 Note 1 | 57. 8 Table 1 Note 1 | 60. 4 |
59, 5 | Not applicable e Use carefully f because the reliability is too low, it cannot be announced | Note | It is significantly different from the reference category (ref.) (P) | It is significantly different from the estimated value corresponding to men (p) | In 2018, nearly three-quarters of Newfoundland and Labrador residents (74, 6%) and about seven in ten residents of New Brunswick (72, 1%), Saskatchewan (70, 9%) and Quebec (69, 1%) reported gambling in the past year. Meanwhile, residents of Ontario (62, 2%) and British Columbia (59, 0%) had lower-than-average participation rates. Problem gambling rates across Canada likely reflect socio-demographic, cultural and international variations in access to casinos, horse racing, video terminals and lotteries. | The percentage of Canadians who reported gambling in the past year varied by household income. Those with the highest incomes (20% of the income distribution) were more likely to gamble than those with the lowest incomes (households in the three lowest income quintiles). Other studies have also found that gambling participation increases with income. Notes | Beginning of text box | Data table for Figure 1 | Data table for Figure 1 Table overview This table is a calculation of the results from the data tables in Figure 1: Income, Total, 1 (lowest), 2, 3, 4, 5 (highest), using dollar and percentage units (shown as column headers). |
Income quintile | Total | 1 (lowest) | 5 (highest) | Dollars | Average expenditure | Percentage | Proportion of total expenditure on random games | Note: Pre-tax income of all households is ranked from lowest to highest. Ranked households are divided into five equal groups (quintiles). Games of chance include government lotteries and other games of chance. Expenditure figures are not adjusted for winnings. Also, households do not consistently report the amount they spend on gambling. Comparison with data from the Lottery Corporation, for example, showed that households spend more than 50% of their government lottery purchases on government lottery tickets. Source Statistics Canada. Table 11-10-0223-01 Household Expenditures by Household Income, Canada, Territories and Provinces. https://www150. statcan. gc. ca/t1/tbl1/ja/tv. action? pid=1110022301. | The 2018 CCHS-GAM RR did not collect information on the amount spent on gambling. However, data from the Household Expenditure Survey indicate that wealthier households spend more (in absolute terms) on gambling than lower-income households (Figure 1). For example, in 2019, the highest-income households (quintile 5) spent an average of $256 on gambling annually, while the lowest-income households (quintile 1) spent an average of $111. On the other hand, low-income households have less discretionary income (disposable income left over after paying for rent or mortgage, transportation, food, utilities, and other basic goods and services), which makes modest spending on gambling a larger share of low-income households' total expenditures (0. 3% for Quintile 1 vs. 0. 1% for Quintile 5). |
End of text box | Immigrants may have different gambling behaviors than non-immigrants. For example, American studies have shown that first-generation immigrants have lower prevalence of gambling and problem gambling than native-born Americans. Note Similar results were found in Canada. | In 2018, a higher proportion of non-immigrants (69, 7%) reported gambling in the past year compared with recent immigrants who landed 10 years or less ago (43, 1%) and long-term immigrants who arrived more than 10 years ago (58, 5%). | Whites (69, 1%) were more likely to report having gambled in the past year than South Asians (39, 8%), Chinese (45, 6%), and blacks (56, 6%). This association remained largely unchanged when accounting for income level. For example, among those with the highest incomes (top 40% of the income distribution), whites (71, 8%) were more likely to have gambled in the past year than South Asians (53, 9%), Chinese (57, 2%), and those who were “other” (60, 9%). | Note Black Canadians (71, 5%) were as likely to have gambled in the past year as white Canadians (data not shown). | Several studies in Canada, the United States and New Zealand have previously found that Indigenous people are more likely to gamble than non-Indigenous people. Note Suggested reasons for this difference include cultural beliefs, increased exposure to gambling and gambling as a temporary way to escape or cope with the effects of racism or trauma. Note Poverty and disadvantaged neighbourhoods are additional factors associated with problem gambling. Note | The CCHS-GAM RR data were largely consistent, with a higher proportion of Indigenous people overall (72, 4%) reporting gambling in the past year compared with non-Indigenous people (64, 2%). There were also differences across identity groups. For example, gambling rates were higher among First Nations men (78, 6%) and women (73, 6%) than among non-Indigenous people. | Gambling was more prevalent among those who reported daily smoking and high alcohol intake. Specifically, more than three-quarters of those who reported daily cigarette smoking (76, 8%) or excessive alcohol consumption (77, 2%) also reported gambling. Estimates were lower for non-daily smokers (62, 9%) and infrequent drinkers (61, 4%). | On the other hand, past-year gambling problem rates did not differ by sexual orientation or self-identified mental health status. | Some gambling types were more popular than others. In 2018, more than half of Canadians reported having purchased a lottery or raffle ticket in the past year (51, 8%), and one-third (33, 0%) reported purchasing or playing instant lottery tickets or instant games online (Table 2). Approximately one in ten (12, 6%) reported using electronic gambling machines, also known as video terminals, and one in thirteen reported placing bets at casino tables (7, 5%) or on sports (7, 9%). Bingo and speculative financial market activities were significantly less prevalent, at less than 4% each. |
According to the 2018 CCHS-GAM RR, more than one-quarter of Canadians (27, 3%) reported participating in only one of these gambling activities in the past 12 months (Table 2). Additionally, 23, 2% reported participating in two, 8, 7% in three, and the remaining 5, 2% in four or more gambling activities. More frequent gambling may increase the risk of gambling-related problems. This relationship, known as a dose-response, has been observed between frequency of gambling and problem gambling. Note | |||||||||
61. 4 | 60. 0 | Note | 62. 5 | Lottery and sweepstakes tickets are not only the most popular gambling in Canada, but also the most frequent activities (Table 3). Of the people who reported gambling in the past year, almost on e-quarter of the person who reported to be less than once (24, 4 %), one in seven people, one in seven people 1 ~ We reported three (13, 6 %) tickets (13, 6 %). Instant Win Lottery (scratch) or online game tickets were second, and online game consoles were third. | 3. 694. 6 | Age group | total | Male (reference) | 156. 1 |
59, 5 | 95%trust section | 95%trust section | from | Percentage | from | Lottery or lottery | Once | 48. 2 | 47. 1 |
Income quintile | 8.5 | 7.9 | 9.1 | 9.1 | 8.1 | 44. 6 | 7.8 | 7.1 | 8.6 |
End of text box | 4.7 | 4.3 | 5.2 | 5.0 | 4.4 | 5.6 | 4.5 | 3.9 | 5.2 |
46. 2 | |||||||||
61. 4 | 50. 2 | 53. 1 | Less than a month | 24. 4 | 23. 5 | 25. 4 | 23. 2 | 53. 1 | 24. 7 |
59, 5 | 9.8 | 9.2 | On the other hand, past-year gambling problem rates did not differ by sexual orientation or self-identified mental health status. | 9.4 | 8.5 | 26. 9 | 1-3 times a month | 9.2 | 13. 6 |
Income quintile | 2.3 | 2.0 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 3.4 | 14. 3 | 1.4 | 2.2 |
End of text box | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 14. 6 | 0.3 | 0.7 |
17. 0 | |||||||||
61. 4 | 10. 7 | 12. 4 | More than once a week | 13. 8 | 13. 1 | 14. 5 | 16. 4 | 15. 4 | 17. 5 |
59, 5 | 6.3 | 5.7 | 7.0 | 8.5 | 7.6 | 9.6 | 10. 4 | 3.6 | 5.1 |
one two three | 0.9 | 0.7 | 1.2 | Instant lottery or online instant game | 1.0 | 1.9 | do not have | 0.3 | 0.8 |
67, 0 | 65, 9 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 68. 1 | 0.3 | 0.6 | No n-indigenous people (reference) | 64. 2 | 64. 2 |
65. 2 Note | |||||||||
61. 4 | 66, 7 | Less than a month | 19. 8 | 18. 9 | 20. 7 | 17. 0 | 15. 8 | 18. 3 | 22. 4 Note |
59, 5 | 6.1 | 5.6 | 6.6 | 9.0 | 8.2 | 23. 7 | 1-3 times a month | 2.7 | 3.9 |
Income quintile | 1.1 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 2.2 | More than once a week | 0.3 | 0.6 |
End of text box | I have never done | 0.6 | 1.1 | Instant lottery or online instant game | 0.9 | 1.9 | No n-indigenous people (reference) | 64. 2 | 64. 2 |
86, 0 | |||||||||
61. 4 | 87, 7 | 86, 7 | 88, 7 | Less than a month | 10. 4 | 10. 5 | 10. 1 | 11. 1 | 1-3 times a month |
59, 5 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 2.0 | More than once a week | 3.1 | 4.1 |
Income quintile | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.8 | Casino table game (online or fac e-t o-face) | 0.2 | 0.5 | I have never done | 0.7 | 1.3 |
End of text box | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 65, 9 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 93. 2 | 0.9 | 1.4 |
Note F: I can't post it because my reliability is too low | |||||||||
61. 4 | 10. 4 | 95. | 94. 3 | 95, 9 | 87, 7 | 10. 4 | 1-3 times a month | 1. 3 Note e: Be careful to use | 0. 5 Note e: Note that carefully used *. |
59, 5 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 1.9 | 3.0 | 0. 2 Note e: Be careful to use | 1.0 | 1.7 |
Income quintile | 68. 1 | 0.2 | 0.7 | No n-indigenous people (reference) | 64. 2 | 64. 2 | Casino table game (online or fac e-t o-face) | 0.2 | 0.6 |
End of text box | Casino table game (online or fac e-t o-face) | 0.2 | 0.5 | Casino table game (online or fac e-t o-face) | 0.2 | 0.5 | 68. 1 | 0.2 | 0.7 |
86, 8 | |||||||||
61. 4 | 88, 7 | 95, 4 | 96, 7 | 15. 4 | 10. 0 | 3. 2 Note | 1-3 times a month | 0. 4 Note | More than once a week |
59, 5 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 2.3 | 3.0 | 2.4 | 3.7 | 1. 3 Note e: Be careful to use | 0.7 | 1.3 |
Income quintile | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.8 | Note | 0.1 | 0.4 |
End of text box | I have never done | 0.6 | 1.0 | Instant lottery or online instant game | 0.9 | 1.8 | No n-indigenous people (reference) | 64. 2 | 64. 2 |
61. 1 |
65, 8< 0.05)
About 300,000 Canadians were at moderate-to-severe risk of a gambling problem
94. 3 Note
93, 6
Less than a month | 6 Note | Lo w-income households were less likely to gamble than hig h-income households, but were more vulnerable to gambling problems. For example, 71, 5 % of hig h-income households reported that they had gambling in the past year, and 1, 1 % had the risk of gambling addiction. In lo w-income households, 53, 8 % had gambling in the past year, and 2, 7 % had the danger of gambling addiction. | The higher the number of gambling, the higher the risk of gambling addiction. | In the multiple analysis, most of the characteristics, such as participation in multiple kinds of gambling activities, single, divorce or separation, and good mental health, were independently related to gambling. | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Text box end | Text box end | Text box end | |||||||||||
When gambling is a problem, both gambling and their families are affected. Gambling addiction can lead to marital relationships, bankruptcy, economic difficulties, suicide, crimes, health disorders, and an increase in the use of alcohol and other drugs. Note | % | Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note | to | When gambling is a problem, both gambling and their families are affected. Gambling addiction can lead to marital relationships, bankruptcy, economic difficulties, suicide, crimes, health disorders, and an increase in the use of alcohol and other drugs. Note | % | Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note | to | When gambling is a problem, both gambling and their families are affected. Gambling addiction can lead to marital relationships, bankruptcy, economic difficulties, suicide, crimes, health disorders, and an increase in the use of alcohol and other drugs. Note | % | Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note | to | ||
96. 1 | 0 | 97. 4 | 98, 0 Note | 97, 6 | 98. 4 | Less than a month | 3 | More than once a week | 98, 0 Note | Note F: I can't disclose because my reliability is too low | Note: Not applicable | 98, 0 Note | 0. 3 Note e: Be careful to use |
At least once a week | 0. 3 Note e: Use with care | 0. 3 Note e: Use with care | 3.4 | 2.9 | 3.9 | 0. 4 Note e: Use with care | 3.8 | 3.1 | 4.7 | Specific financial market activities | 2.9 | 2.3 | 3.7 |
I have never done | 96, 5 | 96, 0 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 96, 9 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 94. 3 | 93. 4 | 0.7 | 1.5 |
95. 1 | 98, 5 Note | 98. 1 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 98, 9 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 2.5 | Less than a month | 1. 0 Note e: Note to use with caution *. | 0.9 | 1.7 |
1-3 times a month | 0. 2 Note E: Use with care. | More than once a week | Casino table game (online or fac e-t o-face) | 0.2 | 0.6 | 1. 3 Note e: Be careful to use | 14. 6 | 0.3 | 0.9 | Note None | Note None | 0.1 | 0.3 |
It is very reliable to use with not applicable. |
65, 8< 0.05)
Gambling problems are serious. According to the 2018 CCHS-GAM RR, the majority of Canadian (95, 0 %) reported that he had gambling in the past year is an unpredictable gambler, and the Canadian gambling index (CPGI) score is 0. It means that. It turned out that 3, 4 % (636. 000 people) had low risk (score of 1 or 2 in CPGI).
Indigenous people gambling in the past year higher than no n-indigenous people (72, 4 % to 64, 2 %), and the risk of gambling problems was more likely to be moderate to severe (4, 5 %. Try 1, 5 %). | Lo w-income households were less likely to gamble than hig h-income households, but were more vulnerable to gambling problems. For example, 71, 5 % of hig h-income households reported that they had gambling in the past year, and 1, 1 % had the risk of gambling addiction. In lo w-income households, 53, 8 % had gambling in the past year, and 2, 7 % had the danger of gambling addiction. | The higher the number of gambling, the higher the risk of gambling addiction. | In the multiple analysis, most of the characteristics, such as participation in multiple kinds of gambling activities, single, divorce or separation, and good mental health, were independently related to gambling. | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Text box end | Text box end | Text box end | |||||||
% | Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note | to | % | Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note | to | % | Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note | to | |
There are various reasons for gambling people, which are generally social or entertained. Note At the same time, loneliness can be an important factor in gambling addiction. Most of the gamblers are useful, but be aware that the gamblers tend to recognize money as the main motive rather than the no n-predictive gambler. Note | Numerous' 000 | from | Numerous' 000 | Numerous' 000 | Numerous' 000 | 17. 804. 4 | 95. 0 | 94. 4 | 95, 5 |
Gambling comes in many forms, including buying instant lottery tickets, betting at casino tables, playing electronic gambling machines, and sports betting (see Data Sources, Methods, and Definitions for a complete list). In the 2018 Community Health Survey (CCHS-GAM RR), respondents were considered to have gambled if they reported any of these activities at least once in the past 12 months. | |||||||||
According to the 2018 CCHS-GAM RR, about two-thirds (64, 5%) of Canadians aged 15 years and older (18, 9 million) reported at least one gambling memo in the past year. | No n-indigenous people (reference) | 64. 2 | 64. 2 | No n-indigenous people (reference) | 64. 2 | 64. 2 | No n-indigenous people (reference) | 64. 2 | 64. 2 |
From | 1.7 | 1.2 | 2.4 | 262. 5 | 1.5 | 3.7 | Medium risk | 0.5 | 1.5 |
60. 4 Table 1 Note 1 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 238. 8 | 1.1 | 2.2 | 143. 7 | 1.0 | 2.2 |
781. 6 | 1. 1 Note e: Use with care | 1.1 | 2.5 | Mediu m-strength risk | 1.5 | 4.2 | 3 or more | 0.6 | 1.4 |
304. 4 | |||||||||
196. 0 | 1. 1 Note e: Use with care | 1.1 | 2.7 | 1. 2 Note e: Note to use with caution *. | 1.7 | 4.8 | No n-indigenous people (reference) | 64. 2 | 64. 2 |
67. 4 | 52. 3 Note e: Use with care | 1.4 | 2.8 | 0, 5 Note e: Use with care | 1.8 | 4.3 | 13. 3 Note e: Use with care | 0.5 | 1.8 |
66. 9 | 93. 4 | 0.7 | 1.8 | Note | 0.7 | 2.0 | No n-indigenous people (reference) | 64. 2 | 64. 2 |
Characteristics | Total | 1.8 | 3.5 | Male (reference) | 1.7 | 4.3 | Female | 1.4 | 3.5 |
60. 5 | Note | 0.8 | 1.9 | Instant lottery or online instant game | 0.8 | 2.3 | 93. 4 | 0.6 | 2.2 |
65. 6 | |||||||||
Saskatchewan | Male (reference) | 1.8 | 3.9 | 1. 3 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 2. 0 | 1.2 | 3.3 |
2 | 2. 0 | 1.4 | 3.3 | 1. 6 | 1.3 | 3.3 | No n-indigenous people (reference) | 64. 2 | 64. 2 |
3 | Instant lottery or online instant game | 0.7 | 2.3 | Female | 1.2 | 4.2 | No n-indigenous people (reference) | 64. 2 | 64. 2 |
4 | Instant lottery or online instant game | 0.9 | 1.8 | 238. 8 | 1.0 | 2.5 | No n-indigenous people (reference) | 64. 2 | 64. 2 |
1. 541, 9 | 93. 4 | 0.7 | 1.7 | Note | 0.6 | 2.1 | No n-indigenous people (reference) | 64. 2 | 64. 2 |
* | |||||||||
Table 1 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 45-64 (reference value) | 1.0 | 2.2 | 1. 6 Note E: Use with caution | 0.5 | 1.1 |
1. 735. 8 | 65 years and older | 1.7 | 3.4 | 1. 7 Note E: Use with caution | 1.8 | 3.6 | No n-indigenous people (reference) | 64. 2 | 64. 2 |
69, 5 | 1. 7 Note E: Use with caution | 2.1 | 5.3 | 2. 9 Note E: Use with caution Note *. | 2.8 | 9.2 | 2. 0 | 1.1 | 3.8 |
71, 9 | Note | 0.6 | 2.1 | No n-indigenous people (reference) | 64. 2 | 64. 2 | 1. 0 Note E: Use with caution According to Table 5 Note‡. | 0.5 | 2.0 |
73. 1 | |||||||||
71. 1 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 45-64 (reference value) | 1.0 | 2.1 |
*. | 93. 4 | 0.6 | 1.9 | 1. 1 Note e: Use with care | 0.9 | 3.0 | No n-indigenous people (reference) | 64. 2 | 64. 2 |
Non-immigrants (reference) | |||||||||
14. 363. 7 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 2.4 | 1. 2 Note E: Use with caution | 0.8 | 1.7 |
4. 291. 4 | 1. 1 Note E: Use with caution | 1.8 | 5.7 | Household income | 2.2 | 8.5 | No n-indigenous people (reference) | 64. 2 | 64. 2 |
1. 041. 3 | |||||||||
2. 1 Note E: Use with caution Note * 2. | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 2.3 | 2. 1 Note E: Use with caution | 0.7 | 1.6 |
Years since migration: 10 years | Note | 2.8 | 7.1 | Note | 2.1 | 8.2 | 1. 3 Note E: Use with caution | 2.4 | 9.2 |
70. 4 | |||||||||
8. 508, 5 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 2.3 | 13. 3 Note e: Use with care | 0.7 | 1.3 |
Note | 262. 5 | 1.6 | 3.5 | Mediu m-strength risk | 1.6 | 3.9 | No n-indigenous people (reference) | 64. 2 | 64. 2 |
74, 5 | |||||||||
186, 7 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 2.3 | Medium risk | 0.6 | 1.2 |
7. 158, 9 | Note | 3.2 | 7.7 | Note: Not applicable | 3.4 | 8.2 | No n-indigenous people (reference) | 64. 2 | 64. 2 |
273, 6 | |||||||||
46. 7 Note * Table 1 Note ‡. | 1.2 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 2.1 | Medium risk | 0.5 | 1.3 |
39. 8 Note *. | Note F: Not available for publication due to low reliability. | 3.2 | 5.8 | Note F: Not available for publication due to low reliability. | 2.8 | 6.6 | Note | 2.8 | 6.4 |
47. 2 Note * Table 1 Note ‡ Note | |||||||||
46. 7 Note * Table 1 Note ‡. | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 45-64 (reference value) | 1.1 | 2.1 | 93. 4 | 0.7 | 1.8 |
39. 8 Note *. | 2. 0 | 1.5 | 2.9 | Mediu m-strength risk | 1.7 | 3.7 | 238. 8 | 0.9 | 2.7 |
Note | |||||||||
1. 0 Note E: Use with caution | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.9 | I have never done | 0.4 | 1.6 | No n-indigenous people (reference) | 64. 2 | 64. 2 |
2 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 143. 7 | 0.9 | 2.3 | I have never done | 0.5 | 1.3 |
3 | 3.1 | 2.2 | 4.3 | Note F: Unreliable to publish | 2.4 | 6.2 | Female | 1.3 | 3.5 |
Note: Not applicable | 7.3 | 5.0 | 26. 9 | Heterosexual (reference) | 4.5 | On the other hand, past-year gambling problem rates did not differ by sexual orientation or self-identified mental health status. | No n-indigenous people (reference) | 64. 2 | 64. 2 |
61. 1 |
65, 8< 0.05)
Daily smoker< 0.05)
Non-Indigenous (reference)
1. 1 Note E: Use with caution.
Indigenous
4. 5 Note E: Use with caution.
4. 2 Note E: Use with caution
4. 7 Note E: Use with caution Note *.
Race
White only (reference)
1. 0 Note e: Table 5 ‡. Note ‡.
Indigenous people gambling in the past year higher than no n-indigenous people (72, 4 % to 64, 2 %), and the risk of gambling problems was more likely to be moderate to severe (4, 5 %. Try 1, 5 %). | Lo w-income households were less likely to gamble than hig h-income households, but were more vulnerable to gambling problems. For example, 71, 5 % of hig h-income households reported that they had gambling in the past year, and 1, 1 % had the risk of gambling addiction. In lo w-income households, 53, 8 % had gambling in the past year, and 2, 7 % had the danger of gambling addiction. | The higher the number of gambling, the higher the risk of gambling addiction. | In the multiple analysis, most of the characteristics, such as participation in multiple kinds of gambling activities, single, divorce or separation, and good mental health, were independently related to gambling. | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Text box end | Text box end | Text box end | |||||||
0. 8 Note e: Table 5 Note ‡. | Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note | to | 0. 8 Note e: Table 5 Note ‡. | Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note | to | 0. 8 Note e: Table 5 Note ‡. | Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note | to | |
Note | |||||||||
I smoke on a daily basis | 14. 3 | 1.1 | 2.7 | 64. 2 | 64. 2 | 64. 2 | 64. 2 | 64. 2 | 64. 2 |
No (reference) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 64. 2 | 64. 2 | 64. 2 | 64. 2 | 64. 2 | 64. 2 |
Gambling comes in many forms, including buying instant lottery tickets, betting at casino tables, playing electronic gambling machines, and sports betting (see Data Sources, Methods, and Definitions for a complete list). In the 2018 Community Health Survey (CCHS-GAM RR), respondents were considered to have gambled if they reported any of these activities at least once in the past 12 months. | |||||||||
According to the 2018 CCHS-GAM RR, about two-thirds (64, 5%) of Canadians aged 15 years and older (18, 9 million) reported at least one gambling memo in the past year. | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 7.9 |
From | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | Note F: It cannot be disclosed because it lacks reliability. | 0.1 | 0.8 |
60. 4 Table 1 Note 1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
781. 6 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 4.7 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 1.9 |
304. 4 | |||||||||
196. 0 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 3.8 | 2.8 | 1.0 | 8.0 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 3.0 |
67. 4 | 2. 2 Note e: Be careful to use | 1.2 | 4.3 | 4 or more | 1.4 | 7.2 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 3.2 |
66. 9 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Characteristics | 2. 2 Note e: Be careful to use | 1.1 | 4.1 | Note F: Low reliability and cannot be disclosed | 1.0 | 5.4 | 2.4 | 0.9 | 6.1 |
60. 5 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 5.8 |
65. 6 | |||||||||
Not applicable e: Be careful F: cannot be disclosed because it is too low reliability | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Note | It is significantly different from the reference category (ref.) (P) | 1.1 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 2.2 | It is significantly different from the estimated value corresponding to men (p) | 1.4 | 5.0 |
* | |||||||||
Table 1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
1. 735. 8 | Daily smoking and a large amount of alcohol intake were related to the gambling. Note According to CCHS-GAM RR data, 4. 3%of last year's gamblers who are smoking cigarettes have a high risk of gambling addiction. In comparison, those who do not smoke (1, 2%) were very unlikely to become gambling addiction. | 1.1 | 3.1 | If 2. 1 % of last year's gamblers were drinking great alcohol, the risk of gambling addiction was high, but 1. 3 % if they did not drink too much. There are many studies related to gambling addiction and nicotine addiction. Note It is believed that smoking and gambling are positively affected by neurosite, genetic, and environmentally common. Note | 1.0 | 4.1 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 3.4 |
69, 5 | The relationship between lo w-income and the vulnerability between gambling has been repeatedly discovered. Note: There is a similar relationship between those who live in lo w-income areas, unemployed, and welfare recipients. Note: The most possible explanation is that, according to various definitions, lo w-income earners are unlikely to allow gambling losses. It is also possible that gambling is an opportunity to escape from lo w-income situations. | 1.2 | 5.2 | Daily smoking and a large amount of alcohol intake were related to the gambling. Note According to CCHS-GAM RR data, 4. 3%of last year's gamblers who are smoking cigarettes have a high risk of gambling addiction. In comparison, those who do not smoke (1, 2%) were very unlikely to become gambling addiction. | 1.3 | If 2. 1 % of last year's gamblers were drinking great alcohol, the risk of gambling addiction was high, but 1. 3 % if they did not drink too much. There are many studies related to gambling addiction and nicotine addiction. Note It is believed that smoking and gambling are positively affected by neurosite, genetic, and environmentally common. Note | 1.2 | 0.6 | 2.7 |
71, 9 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 2.2 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 8.3 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.8 |
73. 1 | |||||||||
71. 1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
*. | 1.6 | 0.7 | 3.5 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 2.0 | 5.2 | 0.8 | Also, those who have evaluated their mental health as "ok" or "bad" are considered to be moderate to gambling addiction than those who have more positively evaluated their mental health. There was a tendency. The relationship between a decrease in mental health and gambling addiction can be two-way, but human mental health may suffer from stress related to gambling itself-Gambling is other stressful life events such as unemployment. It has been used to deal with it. Note |
Non-immigrants (reference) | |||||||||
14. 363. 7 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
4. 291. 4 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 4.7 | Table 6 Gambling (Canada's gambling index & amp; gt; = 3) is a adjustment odds ratio related to the selected features, the population of households aged 14 or older, a Canadian summary, a summary of 2018. The problem of Canadian gambling index & amp; gt? = 3). Information is grouped in characteristics (displayed as a row header), total male, woman, 95 % confidence interval (displayed as a row header). | 1.1 | 8.4 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 4.4 |
1. 041. 3 | |||||||||
2. 1 Note E: Use with caution Note * 2. | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Years since migration: 10 years | woman | 1.1 | 4.8 | Table 6 Gambling (Canada's gambling index & amp; gt; = 3) is a adjustment odds ratio related to the selected features, the population of households aged 14 or older, a Canadian summary, a summary of 2018. The problem of Canadian gambling index & amp; gt? = 3). Information is grouped in characteristics (displayed as a row header), total male, woman, 95 % confidence interval (displayed as a row header). | 1.1 | 7.7 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 4.9 |
70. 4 | |||||||||
8. 508, 5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Note | It is significantly different from the estimated value corresponding to men (p) | 1.2 | 6.0 | 2. 2 Note e: Be careful to use | 1.1 | 4.4 | 2.9 | 0.5 | from |
74, 5 | |||||||||
186, 7 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
7. 158, 9 | 4 or more | 1.7 | 5.4 | Note F: Low reliability and cannot be disclosed | 1.3 | 4.5 | Note None | 1.4 | 8.6 |
273, 6 | |||||||||
46. 7 Note * Table 1 Note ‡. | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
39. 8 Note *. | woman | 1.4 | 3.7 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 3.5 | 1-3 times a month | 1.6 | 6.6 |
47. 2 Note * Table 1 Note ‡ Note | |||||||||
46. 7 Note * Table 1 Note ‡. | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 2.2 |
39. 8 Note *. | 0.9 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Note | |||||||||
1. 0 Note E: Use with caution | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
2 | 2.2 | 0.9 | 5.3 | 2.1 | 0.6 | 7.1 | Note There are no applicable matters. | 1.0 | 8.3 |
3 | No remarks | 2.4 | Total | 15 to 24 years old | 1.4 | 25-44 years old | 0, 3 Note *. | 3.0 | 45 years old or 64 years old (reference) |
Note: Not applicable | State or region | 7.2 | Atlantic Ocean | Quebec | 4.3 | 2. | 3. 1 Note | 9.7 | Ontario |
Prairie |
2. 4 Note< 0.05).
British Columbia
Head of household manager
40 % or less (reference)
Conclusion
Less than 40 %
1. 6 Note
2. 7 Note
Presence or absence of a spouse
Married or Common Row (Reference)
Data sources, methods and definitions
Unmarried (I have never got married)
1. 8 Note
2. 0 Note
Analytical technique
Separated or divorce
2. 5 (Note< 0.05 level were considered statistically significant.
Definitions
3. 8 (Note
10. 8
widow
Migration status
- No n-immigrant (reference)
- Immigrant
- 32. 6
- Sexual orientation
- Heterosexual (Reference)
- Sexual minority
- 3. 0 Note
- Indigenous identity
- No n-indigenous people (reference)
Inhabitants
2. 3 Note
3. 0 Note
Racial group
White only (reference)
White man
2. 7 Note
2. 2 Note
18. 7
Limitations
Mental health of sel f-awareness
Good, very good or good (reference)
OK
In this study, gambling and gambling issues aged 15 or older are used to use data from the 2018 Canadian Regional Health Survey (CCHS), which is a quick response of gambling. Using the "Canada Problem Gambling Index", which evaluates the impact of gambling behavior and its behavior on the person or others, identifies the person with the risk of gambling.
Notes
2. 4 points3. 5 Note
I smoke on a daily basis
No (reference)
yes
2. 3 Note
yes
Large consumer
None (reference value)
yes
Number of gambling times
1 (Reference)
2. 9 Note
5. 7 Note
13. 6
5. 0 Note
17. 7
8. 1 (Note
21. 5
4 or more
yes
42. 8
13. 9 Note
45. 2
32.
106. 4
yes
Note
It is significantly different from the reference category (ref.) Or other areas of Canada in the comparison by region and the state.
Of course, social population statistical characteristics, mental health, behavioral health, and other factors are not necessarily related to the gambling of the problem. Gender, age? Geography, income, presence or absence of spouse, whether or not the immigration, the identity of the population and indigenous people, sexual orientation, mental health, and the presence or absence of a problem gambling affect. Most of the previously identified danger factors, even if the presence or absence of immigrants, the identity of the population and indigenous people, sexual orientation, mental health, smoking, mass drinking, sexual orientation, and gambling are added to multiple analysis. Statistically remained significant (Table 6). Men, prime residents, lo w-income households, unmarried (single, divorce, separation), daily smokers, indigenous people, mental health, and participation in multiple types of gambling.
Perhaps because men are higher to male to severe to severe gambling addiction, only men are closer to the overall results than women.
Men's multiple analysis suggests that men with sexual minorities, such as gays, are more likely to be gambling more than men of heterosexuals. Although there is no research that can be compared directly, there are related documents that suggest that gambling, problem using the Internet, how to take notes, and alcohol and drugs may be more likely to have a possibility of unlike or sexual minorities.
Overall, the findings indicate that gambling addiction remains a problem in Canada, albeit for a minority of the population. Among those with a gambling addiction in the past year, 2% of men and about 1% of women have a severe or moderate risk of gambling-related problems, which equates to about 304. 000 Canadians.
Surveys that collect data on gambling are important to inform and support health promotion and surveillance programs. A significant number, and a minority, of the Canadian population develops gambling-related problems. The advent of online gambling has made gambling easier than ever before.
This study provides an updated profile of past-year gamblers, including data on gambling activity, frequency of gambling, household expenditures on games of chance, and characteristics of those at moderate to severe risk of developing gambling-related problems. The data presented here were collected before the pandemic and before the Safe and Regulated Sports Betting Act, which legalized single-event sports betting in Canada in 2021. The results serve as an important baseline for gambling behavior in Canada, allowing future monitoring of changes in gambling behavior over time and as a result of new legislation. This information can also be used by educators and public awareness campaigners.
Certain populations were more likely to engage in problem gambling, including men, those from low-income households, Indigenous peoples, those who perceive their mental health as fair or poor, those who smoke daily, and those who participate in multiple forms of gambling activities.
Michelle Roterman and Heather Gilmore are senior analysts in Statistics Canada's Health Analysis Division.
CCHS collects information on the health status, care utilization, and determinants of health in Canadians aged 12 years and older living in provinces and territories (Statistics Canada). The gaming module is funded by the Canadian Consortium for Gaming Research.
Overall, the findings indicate that problem gambling remains a problem in Canada, albeit in a minority of the population. Among those with a gambling problem in the past year, 2% of men and about 1% of women are at serious or moderate risk of developing a gambling-related problem, which equates to about 304. 000 Canadians.
Surveys that collect data on gambling are important to inform and support health promotion and surveillance programs. A significant number of the Canadian population, and a minority, develop gambling-related problems. The advent of online gambling has made gambling easier than ever before.
1 (Reference)
Certain populations were more susceptible to problem gambling, including men, people from low-income households, Indigenous peoples, people who perceive their mental health as fair or poor, people who smoke regularly, and people who participate in multiple forms of gambling activities.
Certain populations were more susceptible to problem gambling, including men, people from low-income households, Indigenous peoples, people who perceive their mental health as fair or poor, people who smoke regularly, and people who participate in multiple forms of gambling activities.
Certain populations were more susceptible to problem gambling, including men, people from low-income households, Indigenous peoples, people who perceive their mental health as fair or poor, people who smoke regularly, and people who participate in multiple forms of gambling activities.