Who gambles and who experiences gambling problems in Canada

Canadian society custom Who gambles and who experiences gambling problems in Canada

Gambling, like many other countries, is common in Canada. Most of the gambling people are harmless, but the minority is adversely affected. In Canada, gambling opportunities have increased with the times, and the introduction of new gambling technologies such as online poker and sports betting is increasingly important for regular and detailed monitoring.

In this study, gambling and gambling issues aged 15 or older are used to use data from the 2018 Canadian Regional Health Survey (CCHS), which is a quick response of gambling. Using the "Canada Problem Gambling Index", which evaluates the impact of gambling behavior and its behavior on the person or others, identifies the person with the risk of gambling.

  • Nearly tw o-thirds (64, 5 %) of Canadians (18. 9 million) over 15 years old have reported that they have gambling in the past year, and 1, 6 % (304, 400 people) of last year's gamblers (304, 400) There was a severe risk from the middle of the gambling gambling.
  • In all ages, men reported that they had gambling in the previous year than women. Men also tended to have a high risk of gambling issues from moderate degree.
  • No n-immigrants (69, 7%) were higher than immigrants (51, 9%), which responded to gambling in the past year. The percentage of respondents who have gambling in the past year are South Asians (39, 8%), Chinese (45, 6%), and blacks (56, 6%), compared to white (69, 1%). It was lower.
  • Indigenous people gambling in the past year higher than no n-indigenous people (72, 4 % to 64, 2 %), and the risk of gambling problems was more likely to be moderate to severe (4, 5 %. Try 1, 5 %).
  • Lo w-income households were less likely to gamble than hig h-income households, but were more vulnerable to gambling problems. For example, 71, 5 % of hig h-income households reported that they had gambling in the past year, and 1, 1 % had the risk of gambling addiction. In lo w-income households, 53, 8 % had gambling in the past year, and 2, 7 % had the danger of gambling addiction.
  • The higher the number of gambling, the higher the risk of gambling addiction. < SPAN> customs of Canadian society
  • Gambling, like many other countries, is common in Canada. Most of the gambling people are harmless, but the minority is adversely affected. In Canada, gambling opportunities have increased with the times, and the introduction of new gambling technologies such as online poker and sports betting is increasingly important for regular and detailed monitoring.
In this study, gambling and gambling issues aged 15 or older are used to use data from the 2018 Canadian Regional Health Survey (CCHS), which is a quick response of gambling. Using the "Canada Problem Gambling Index", which evaluates the impact of gambling behavior and its behavior on the person or others, identifies the person with the risk of gambling.

Introduction

Nearly tw o-thirds (64, 5 %) of Canadians (18. 9 million) over 15 years old have reported that they have gambling in the past year, and 1, 6 % (304, 400 people) of last year's gamblers (304, 400) There was a severe risk from the middle of the gambling gambling.

In all ages, men reported that they had gambling in the previous year than women. Men also tended to have a high risk of gambling issues from moderate degree.

No n-immigrants (69, 7%) were higher than immigrants (51, 9%), which responded to gambling in the past year. The percentage of respondents who have gambling in the past year are South Asians (39, 8%), Chinese (45, 6%), and blacks (56, 6%), compared to white (69, 1%). It was lower.

Indigenous people gambling in the past year higher than no n-indigenous people (72, 4 % to 64, 2 %), and the risk of gambling problems was more likely to be moderate to severe (4, 5 %. Try 1, 5 %).

Lo w-income households were less likely to gamble than hig h-income households, but were more vulnerable to gambling problems. For example, 71, 5 % of hig h-income households reported that they had gambling in the past year, and 1, 1 % had the risk of gambling addiction. In lo w-income households, 53, 8 % had gambling in the past year, and 2, 7 % had the danger of gambling addiction.

The higher the number of gambling, the higher the risk of gambling addiction. Canadian society custom

Gambling, like many other countries, is common in Canada. Most of the gambling people are harmless, but the minority is adversely affected. In Canada, gambling opportunities have increased with the times, and the introduction of new gambling technologies such as online poker and sports betting is increasingly important for regular and detailed monitoring.

Two-thirds of Canadians reported gambling in the past 12 months

In this study, gambling and gambling issues aged 15 or older are used to use data from the 2018 Canadian Regional Health Survey (CCHS), which is a quick response of gambling. Using the "Canada Problem Gambling Index", which evaluates the impact of gambling behavior and its behavior on the person or others, identifies the person with the risk of gambling.

Nearly tw o-thirds (64, 5 %) of Canadians (18. 9 million) over 15 years old have reported that they have gambling in the past year, and 1, 6 % (304, 400 people) of last year's gamblers (304, 400) There was a severe risk from the middle of the gambling gambling.

In all ages, men reported that they had gambling in the previous year than women. Men also tended to have a high risk of gambling issues from moderate degree.

No n-immigrants (69, 7%) were higher than immigrants (51, 9%), which responded to gambling in the past year. The percentage of respondents who have gambling in the past year are South Asians (39, 8%), Chinese (45, 6%), and blacks (56, 6%), compared to white (69, 1%). It was lower.
Indigenous people gambling in the past year higher than no n-indigenous people (72, 4 % to 64, 2 %), and the risk of gambling problems was more likely to be moderate to severe (4, 5 %. Try 1, 5 %). Lo w-income households were less likely to gamble than hig h-income households, but were more vulnerable to gambling problems. For example, 71, 5 % of hig h-income households reported that they had gambling in the past year, and 1, 1 % had the risk of gambling addiction. In lo w-income households, 53, 8 % had gambling in the past year, and 2, 7 % had the danger of gambling addiction. The higher the number of gambling, the higher the risk of gambling addiction. In the multiple analysis, most of the characteristics, such as participation in multiple kinds of gambling activities, single, divorce or separation, and good mental health, were independently related to gambling.
Text box end Text box end Text box end
When gambling is a problem, both gambling and their families are affected. Gambling addiction can lead to marital relationships, bankruptcy, economic difficulties, suicide, crimes, health disorders, and an increase in the use of alcohol and other drugs. Note % Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note to When gambling is a problem, both gambling and their families are affected. Gambling addiction can lead to marital relationships, bankruptcy, economic difficulties, suicide, crimes, health disorders, and an increase in the use of alcohol and other drugs. Note % Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note to When gambling is a problem, both gambling and their families are affected. Gambling addiction can lead to marital relationships, bankruptcy, economic difficulties, suicide, crimes, health disorders, and an increase in the use of alcohol and other drugs. Note % Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note to
There are various reasons for gambling people, which are generally social or entertained. Note At the same time, loneliness can be an important factor in gambling addiction. Most of the gamblers are useful, but be aware that the gamblers tend to recognize money as the main motive rather than the no n-predictive gambler. Note When gambling is a problem, both gambling and their families are affected. Gambling addiction can lead to marital relationships, bankruptcy, economic difficulties, suicide, crimes, health disorders, and an increase in the use of alcohol and other drugs. Note Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note There is a concern that Cobit 19's trends have a negative effect on Canadian mental hygiene. Problem gambling is a type of addiction. Pandemic anxiety and obstacles can affect gambling activities as well as the use of alcohol and drugs. It is too time to determine, but because of the increase in time spent online during pandemics, accessing various gambling platforms and sites may be related to the increase in the risk of gambling. there is. Most information about Canadian gambling is based on surveys in each state. In 2018, the CCHS-gambling module was collected to solve this data gap. In the multiple analysis, most of the characteristics, such as participation in multiple kinds of gambling activities, single, divorce or separation, and good mental health, were independently related to gambling. Text box end Gambling is common in Canada. Note that the majority of gambling people are harmless, but the minority is affected. Note There are various reasons for gambling people, which are generally social or entertained. Note At the same time, loneliness can be an important factor in gambling addiction. Most of the gamblers are useful, but be aware that the gamblers tend to recognize money as the main motive rather than the no n-predictive gambler. Note When gambling is a problem, both gambling and their families are affected. Gambling addiction can lead to marital relationships, bankruptcy, economic difficulties, suicide, crimes, health disorders, and an increase in the use of alcohol and other drugs. Note Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note There is a concern that Cobit 19's trends have a negative effect on Canadian mental hygiene. Problem gambling is a type of addiction. Pandemic anxiety and obstacles can affect gambling activities as well as the use of alcohol and drugs. It is too time to determine, but because of the increase in time spent online during pandemics, accessing various gambling platforms and sites may be related to the increase in the risk of gambling. there is. Most information about Canadian gambling is based on surveys in each state. In 2018, the CCHS-gambling module was collected to solve this data gap. A better understanding of the characteristics and factors that lead to gamblers, and of minorities who experience gambling-related problems, may help develop more effective education, prevention, and treatment strategies. This is especially important in the context of evolving gambling technologies and legal frameworks. For example, the Safe and Regulated Sports Wagering Act legalized single-event sports betting in Canada in 2021 and led to the launch of the Ontario iGaming market in April 2022.
Gambling comes in many forms, including buying instant lottery tickets, betting at casino tables, playing electronic gambling machines, and sports betting (see Data Sources, Methods, and Definitions for a complete list). In the 2018 Community Health Survey (CCHS-GAM RR), respondents were considered to have gambled if they reported any of these activities at least once in the past 12 months.
According to the 2018 CCHS-GAM RR, about two-thirds (64, 5%) of Canadians aged 15 years and older (18, 9 million) reported at least one gambling memo in the past year. People aged 45-64 years were most likely to have gambled in the past year (72, 3%), while people aged 15-24 years were least likely to have gambled in the past year (43, 9%) (Table 1). Across all age groups, more men than women reported gambling in the past year. Table 1 Prevalence of past-year gambling by sex and selected charity, household population aged 15 years and older, Canada excluding territories, 2018 Table summary This table displays the results of past-year gambling prevalence. Information is grouped by characteristics (shown as row headers), total, male (reference), female, and 95% confidence interval (shown as column headers). Characteristics Total Male (reference) Female 95% CI 95% CI 95% CI Number '000 From Number '000
From Number '000 To Total 18. 885. 9 64. 5 63. 4 65. 6 9, 841. 8 68. 8 67. 2 70. 3 9. 044. 1
60. 4 Table 1 Note 1 58. 8 61, 9 Age group 15 to 24 years old 1. 776. 9 43. 9 Note 40. 7 47. 2 995. 3 47. 9 Note 43. 3 52. 6
781. 6 39. 7 Note * Table 1 Note ‡. 35. 1 44. 4 25 to 44 6, 251, 9 64. 62. 5 66. 5 3. 357. 7 69. 1* 66. 1 72. 0
2. 894. 2
60. 0* Table 1 Note‡ Note 57. 3 62. 6 45 to 64 (reference value) 7, 152, 1 72. 3 70. 4 74. 1 3. 694. 6 76. 3
73. 9 72. 3 3. 457. 6 68. 5 Table 1 Note 1 65. 6 71. 2 Over 65 3. 705. 0 65. 4 Note
63. 6 67. 1 1. 794. 2 44. 4 68. 1 73. 4 1. 910. 8 60. 9 Note * Table 1 Note ‡ Note 58. 6 63. 2 Province New and Labrador 317. 5
74. ​​6 69, 7 79. 0 156. 1 75. 4 68. 4 81. 3 161. 5 73. 9 67. 3 79, 6 Prince Edward Island 71. 2
67. 4 62. 3 63. 4 25 to 44 70. 2 62. 2 77. 1 1. 910. 8 64. 9 57. 8 71, 4 Nova Scotia 511. 2
66. 9 63. 6 65. 6 256. 4 69. 8 64. 5 74. ​​7 Province 64. 2 59. 3 68. 8 New Brunswick 437. 2
72. 1 66. 7 77. 0 210. 9 72. 4 64. 7 78. 9 226. 3 71. 9 66. 0 77. 1 Quebec 43. 3
69. 1 67. 1 71. 0 25 to 44 72. 8 69. 8 75. 7 2. 247. 1 72. 3 *Table 1 Notes‡ 210. 9 62. 7
68. 0 Ontario 7, 130, 7 62. 2 60. 0 64. 4 3. 730. 8 25 to 44 15 to 24 years old 70. 1 3. 399. 9 57. 5 Table 1 Note 1 54. 4
60. 5 Manitoba 625. 7 63. 0 59. 1 66. 8 316. 1 70. 3 78. 9 71. 1 309. 6 60. 4 256. 4
65. 6
Saskatchewan 613. 6 70. 9 Note 67. 1 309. 6 330. 6 76. 9 Note 71, 9 81. 3 283. 0 64. 9 Table 1 Note 1 59. 1 57. 5 Table 1 Note 1
2 Alberta 2. 195. 3 77. 1 62. 1 67. 0 1. 190. 9 69. 8 9, 841. 8 74. 1 1, 004, 4 58. 6 Table 1 Note 1 55. 1
3 61, 9 British Columbia 2. 261, 3 59. 0 56. 3 61. 8 1. 144. 8 61. 7 Note 57. 3 65. 8 1, 116, 6 56. 6
4 53. 1 60. 0 156. 1 Note 2. 895. 6 53. 8 Note 51. 0 56. 6 1. 353, 7 56. 6 Note 62. 2 7, 152, 1
1. 541, 9 51. 48. 0 55. 1 3. 412. 5 63. 0 60. 4 65. 5 2. 247. 1 68. 4 64. 4 72. 0 60. 9 Note * Table 1 Note ‡ Note 57. 8
*
Table 1 Note‡ 1. 53. 9 61, 7 3. 624. 4 68. 0 71. 9 70. 5 1. 888. 6 71. 6 226. 3 74. 8
1. 735. 8 64. 4 Table 1 Note 65. 4 60. 9 67. 8 3. 871, 9 69. 1 66. 7 71, 4 2. 035. 1 63. 0
69, 5 76. 1 1. 836. 8 1 62. 1 68. 4 5 (Maximum 20%) (Reference value) 40. 7 71. 5 69. 3 73. 6 78. 9 74. 9
71, 9 77. 8 1. 804. 1 67. 7 Table 1 Note 1 64. 5 70. 8 Marital status Married or common law (Reference) Note 67. 6 66. 2 69. 0 72. 0
73. 1
71. 1 75. 0 Note 62. 1 Table 1 Note 1 57. 8 64. 0 68. 0 55. 1 55. 6 53. 4 57. 8 2, 413, 0 511. 2
*. 54. 7 60. 8 1. 971, 7 53. 1 *Table 1 Note‡ 1. 50. 0 56. 3 Separated or divorced 1. 634. 4 73. 2
70. 276. 0 693. 0 78. 3 73. 9 82. 0 941. 4 Number '000 *Table 1 Note‡ 65. 8 73. 7 Over 65
782. 6 60. 5 57. 1 63. 8 170. 8 64. 2 Note *. 56. 4 1, 116, 6 Note 59, 5 55. 7 63. 2 Migration status
Non-immigrants (reference)
14. 363. 7 69, 7 68. 5 70. 8 65. 6 73. 1 3. 412. 5 74. 6 7. 057. 4 66. 4 Table 1 Note 1 64. 9 *Table 1 Immigrants
4. 291. 4 51. 9 Note 66. 2 54. 5 2. 441, 5 59. 1 Note *. 55. 2 62. 8 1. 850. 0 44. 7 Note * Table 1 Note ‡ Note 53. 1 48. 2 59. 1
1. 041. 3
43. 1 37. 8 Province 643. 4 51. 8 44. 4 317. 5 25 to 44 Age group * See Table 1 Notes 27. 5 41. 0
Years since migration: 10 years 2. 893. 2 58. 5 55. 4 61, 6 1. 591. 1 15 to 24 years old 60. 9 69, 7 1. 302. 1 64. * See Table 1 62. 1
1. 47. 7 56. 0 51. 0 Heterosexual (Reference) 17. 868, 5 65, 0 62. 1 Table 1 Note 1 66. 1 9, 353, 1 69. 3 69. 8 70, 9
8. 515, 4 60. 8 Table 1 Note 1 59. 2 62. 4 Sexual minority 553, 4 59, 5 53, 0 65, 7 308, 6 64. 3 53. 8 71. 2
244, 8 54, 5 47, 0 61, 8 Inhabitants No n-indigenous people (reference) No n-indigenous people (reference) 64. 2 64. 2 No n-indigenous people (reference) No n-indigenous people (reference) 64. 2 64. 2
70. 4
8. 508, 5 59. 9 Table 1 Note 1 60. 0 511. 2 1 779, 2 53. 8 Note 52. 6 76. 2 391, 6 74. 1 Province 25 to 44
387, 6 70. 8 Note 65. 1 76, 0 Indigenous residents living in a protected area (single ethnic group) 406. 1 76. 0 Note 69, 5 65. 6 204. 9 Note e: Be careful when using. 78. 6 Note 68, 5 86. 1
201. 2 73. 6 Note 64. 4 81. 1 Methis (single ID card) 324, 0 69, 6 62, 9 Nova Scotia 162, 8 65. 1 60, 7 78, 8
161. 2 68. 6 76. 9 Note 77. 1 2, 413, 0 13. 4 Note e: Be careful when using * See Table 1 40, 0 56. 6 Note F: I can't disclose because my reliability is too low Note F: I can't disclose because my reliability is too low Note Note
Note F: I can't post it because my reliability is too low Note F: I can't post it because my reliability is too low Note Note 65. 4 White only (reference) 14. 451, 6 60. 4 2. 261, 3 70. 2 7. 292, 8 72, 9 71. 2
74, 5
7. 158, 9 65. 7 Table 1 Note 1 ‡. 55. 1 67. 1 62. 1 599, 1 39. 8 Note 1. 7. 057. 4 412. 4 52. 6 Note 66. 1 59. 1
186, 7 25. 9 Note * Table 1 Note ‡ Note 161. 5 33. 9 78. 9 583, 5 Nova Scotia 309. 6 7, 152, 1 309, 9 52. 41. 7 78. 9
273, 6
39. 8 Note *. 31. 2 49, 0 Black only 424, 7 56. 47, 8 64, 9 262. 1 Note e: Be careful when using. 65. 1 52. 2 76. 1 162. 7 Note e: Use with care
46. ​​7 Note * Table 1 Note ‡. 36, 5 62. 4 55. 1 74. 8 53. 6 Note 60. 9 2. 441, 5 1. 019, 9 59. 4 Note *. 53. 1 67. 7 Table 1 Note 1 741. 1
47. 2 Note * Table 1 Note ‡ Note
39. 8 Note *. 52, 9 Mental health due to sel f-awareness Well, it's bad 1. 448, 8 61, 7 57, 9 65, 5 9. 209, 6 69. 2 Note *. 67, 6 57. 8 8. 180, 6
46. ​​7 Note * Table 1 Note ‡. 58. 6 41. 0 Good, very good, or good (reference value) 9. 044. 1 64, 7 62. 1 44. 4 3. 457. 6 62, 7 56. 6 68. 4 66. 2
61. 1
56. 1

65, 8< 0.05)

Daily smoker< 0.05)

yes

2. 575, 3

76. 8 Note

74, 0

79. 4
1. 490, 9
Lo w-income households were less likely to gamble than hig h-income households, but were more vulnerable to gambling problems. For example, 71, 5 % of hig h-income households reported that they had gambling in the past year, and 1, 1 % had the risk of gambling addiction. In lo w-income households, 53, 8 % had gambling in the past year, and 2, 7 % had the danger of gambling addiction. 72, 8 2 3 4 80, 9
1. 084, 5
76. 4 Note 186 111 155 200 206 256
73, 0
79, 5 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1
None (reference)

16. 309, 7

In this study, gambling and gambling issues aged 15 or older are used to use data from the 2018 Canadian Regional Health Survey (CCHS), which is a quick response of gambling. Using the "Canada Problem Gambling Index", which evaluates the impact of gambling behavior and its behavior on the person or others, identifies the person with the risk of gambling.

61, 7

64, 0

8. 351, 0

67, 5

65, 7

69. 2

7. 958, 7

Just over half of Canadians bought a lottery or raffle ticket in the past year

58. 7 Table 1 Note 1.

57. 1

60. 3

Drank very much

56. 1

65, 8< 0.05)

Lottery or raffle tickets are not only the most popular form of gambling, but also the most frequently played

77. 2 Note *.

75. 2
79. 2 Lo w-income households were less likely to gamble than hig h-income households, but were more vulnerable to gambling problems. For example, 71, 5 % of hig h-income households reported that they had gambling in the past year, and 1, 1 % had the risk of gambling addiction. In lo w-income households, 53, 8 % had gambling in the past year, and 2, 7 % had the danger of gambling addiction. The higher the number of gambling, the higher the risk of gambling addiction. In the multiple analysis, most of the characteristics, such as participation in multiple kinds of gambling activities, single, divorce or separation, and good mental health, were independently related to gambling.
Text box end Text box end Text box end
% Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note to % Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note to % Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note to
14. 350, 9
61. 4 73. 2 62. 6 Note 65, 5 63. 6 67. 4 64. 9 Table 1 Note 1 57. 8 Table 1 Note 1 60. 4
59, 5 Not applicable e Use carefully f because the reliability is too low, it cannot be announced Note It is significantly different from the reference category (ref.) (P) It is significantly different from the estimated value corresponding to men (p) In 2018, nearly three-quarters of Newfoundland and Labrador residents (74, 6%) and about seven in ten residents of New Brunswick (72, 1%), Saskatchewan (70, 9%) and Quebec (69, 1%) reported gambling in the past year. Meanwhile, residents of Ontario (62, 2%) and British Columbia (59, 0%) had lower-than-average participation rates. Problem gambling rates across Canada likely reflect socio-demographic, cultural and international variations in access to casinos, horse racing, video terminals and lotteries. The percentage of Canadians who reported gambling in the past year varied by household income. Those with the highest incomes (20% of the income distribution) were more likely to gamble than those with the lowest incomes (households in the three lowest income quintiles). Other studies have also found that gambling participation increases with income. Notes Beginning of text box Data table for Figure 1 Data table for Figure 1 Table overview This table is a calculation of the results from the data tables in Figure 1: Income, Total, 1 (lowest), 2, 3, 4, 5 (highest), using dollar and percentage units (shown as column headers).
Income quintile Total 1 (lowest) 5 (highest) Dollars Average expenditure Percentage Proportion of total expenditure on random games Note: Pre-tax income of all households is ranked from lowest to highest. Ranked households are divided into five equal groups (quintiles). Games of chance include government lotteries and other games of chance. Expenditure figures are not adjusted for winnings. Also, households do not consistently report the amount they spend on gambling. Comparison with data from the Lottery Corporation, for example, showed that households spend more than 50% of their government lottery purchases on government lottery tickets. Source Statistics Canada. Table 11-10-0223-01 Household Expenditures by Household Income, Canada, Territories and Provinces. https://www150. statcan. gc. ca/t1/tbl1/ja/tv. action? pid=1110022301. The 2018 CCHS-GAM RR did not collect information on the amount spent on gambling. However, data from the Household Expenditure Survey indicate that wealthier households spend more (in absolute terms) on gambling than lower-income households (Figure 1). For example, in 2019, the highest-income households (quintile 5) spent an average of $256 on gambling annually, while the lowest-income households (quintile 1) spent an average of $111. On the other hand, low-income households have less discretionary income (disposable income left over after paying for rent or mortgage, transportation, food, utilities, and other basic goods and services), which makes modest spending on gambling a larger share of low-income households' total expenditures (0. 3% for Quintile 1 vs. 0. 1% for Quintile 5).
End of text box Immigrants may have different gambling behaviors than non-immigrants. For example, American studies have shown that first-generation immigrants have lower prevalence of gambling and problem gambling than native-born Americans. Note Similar results were found in Canada. In 2018, a higher proportion of non-immigrants (69, 7%) reported gambling in the past year compared with recent immigrants who landed 10 years or less ago (43, 1%) and long-term immigrants who arrived more than 10 years ago (58, 5%). Whites (69, 1%) were more likely to report having gambled in the past year than South Asians (39, 8%), Chinese (45, 6%), and blacks (56, 6%). This association remained largely unchanged when accounting for income level. For example, among those with the highest incomes (top 40% of the income distribution), whites (71, 8%) were more likely to have gambled in the past year than South Asians (53, 9%), Chinese (57, 2%), and those who were “other” (60, 9%). Note Black Canadians (71, 5%) were as likely to have gambled in the past year as white Canadians (data not shown). Several studies in Canada, the United States and New Zealand have previously found that Indigenous people are more likely to gamble than non-Indigenous people. Note Suggested reasons for this difference include cultural beliefs, increased exposure to gambling and gambling as a temporary way to escape or cope with the effects of racism or trauma. Note Poverty and disadvantaged neighbourhoods are additional factors associated with problem gambling. Note The CCHS-GAM RR data were largely consistent, with a higher proportion of Indigenous people overall (72, 4%) reporting gambling in the past year compared with non-Indigenous people (64, 2%). There were also differences across identity groups. For example, gambling rates were higher among First Nations men (78, 6%) and women (73, 6%) than among non-Indigenous people. Gambling was more prevalent among those who reported daily smoking and high alcohol intake. Specifically, more than three-quarters of those who reported daily cigarette smoking (76, 8%) or excessive alcohol consumption (77, 2%) also reported gambling. Estimates were lower for non-daily smokers (62, 9%) and infrequent drinkers (61, 4%). On the other hand, past-year gambling problem rates did not differ by sexual orientation or self-identified mental health status. Some gambling types were more popular than others. In 2018, more than half of Canadians reported having purchased a lottery or raffle ticket in the past year (51, 8%), and one-third (33, 0%) reported purchasing or playing instant lottery tickets or instant games online (Table 2). Approximately one in ten (12, 6%) reported using electronic gambling machines, also known as video terminals, and one in thirteen reported placing bets at casino tables (7, 5%) or on sports (7, 9%). Bingo and speculative financial market activities were significantly less prevalent, at less than 4% each.
According to the 2018 CCHS-GAM RR, more than one-quarter of Canadians (27, 3%) reported participating in only one of these gambling activities in the past 12 months (Table 2). Additionally, 23, 2% reported participating in two, 8, 7% in three, and the remaining 5, 2% in four or more gambling activities. More frequent gambling may increase the risk of gambling-related problems. This relationship, known as a dose-response, has been observed between frequency of gambling and problem gambling. Note
61. 4 60. 0 Note 62. 5 Lottery and sweepstakes tickets are not only the most popular gambling in Canada, but also the most frequent activities (Table 3). Of the people who reported gambling in the past year, almost on e-quarter of the person who reported to be less than once (24, 4 %), one in seven people, one in seven people 1 ~ We reported three (13, 6 %) tickets (13, 6 %). Instant Win Lottery (scratch) or online game tickets were second, and online game consoles were third. 3. 694. 6 Age group total Male (reference) 156. 1
59, 5 95%trust section 95%trust section from Percentage from Lottery or lottery Once 48. 2 47. 1
Income quintile 8.5 7.9 9.1 9.1 8.1 44. 6 7.8 7.1 8.6
End of text box 4.7 4.3 5.2 5.0 4.4 5.6 4.5 3.9 5.2
46. ​​2
61. 4 50. 2 53. 1 Less than a month 24. 4 23. 5 25. 4 23. 2 53. 1 24. 7
59, 5 9.8 9.2 On the other hand, past-year gambling problem rates did not differ by sexual orientation or self-identified mental health status. 9.4 8.5 26. 9 1-3 times a month 9.2 13. 6
Income quintile 2.3 2.0 2.6 2.8 2.3 3.4 14. 3 1.4 2.2
End of text box 0.5 0.4 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.8 14. 6 0.3 0.7
17. 0
61. 4 10. 7 12. 4 More than once a week 13. 8 13. 1 14. 5 16. 4 15. 4 17. 5
59, 5 6.3 5.7 7.0 8.5 7.6 9.6 10. 4 3.6 5.1
one two three 0.9 0.7 1.2 Instant lottery or online instant game 1.0 1.9 do not have 0.3 0.8
67, 0 65, 9 0.2 0.3 68. 1 0.3 0.6 No n-indigenous people (reference) 64. 2 64. 2
65. 2 Note
61. 4 66, 7 Less than a month 19. 8 18. 9 20. 7 17. 0 15. 8 18. 3 22. 4 Note
59, 5 6.1 5.6 6.6 9.0 8.2 23. 7 1-3 times a month 2.7 3.9
Income quintile 1.1 0.9 1.3 1.8 1.5 2.2 More than once a week 0.3 0.6
End of text box I have never done 0.6 1.1 Instant lottery or online instant game 0.9 1.9 No n-indigenous people (reference) 64. 2 64. 2
86, 0
61. 4 87, 7 86, 7 88, 7 Less than a month 10. 4 10. 5 10. 1 11. 1 1-3 times a month
59, 5 2.6 2.3 2.9 1.6 1.2 2.0 More than once a week 3.1 4.1
Income quintile 0.6 0.5 0.8 Casino table game (online or fac e-t o-face) 0.2 0.5 I have never done 0.7 1.3
End of text box 0.7 0.5 0.9 65, 9 0.1 0.4 93. 2 0.9 1.4
Note F: I can't post it because my reliability is too low
61. 4 10. 4 95. 94. 3 95, 9 87, 7 10. 4 1-3 times a month 1. 3 Note e: Be careful to use 0. 5 Note e: Note that carefully used *.
59, 5 1.8 1.5 2.2 2.4 1.9 3.0 0. 2 Note e: Be careful to use 1.0 1.7
Income quintile 68. 1 0.2 0.7 No n-indigenous people (reference) 64. 2 64. 2 Casino table game (online or fac e-t o-face) 0.2 0.6
End of text box Casino table game (online or fac e-t o-face) 0.2 0.5 Casino table game (online or fac e-t o-face) 0.2 0.5 68. 1 0.2 0.7
86, 8
61. 4 88, 7 95, 4 96, 7 15. 4 10. 0 3. 2 Note 1-3 times a month 0. 4 Note More than once a week
59, 5 2.0 1.6 2.3 3.0 2.4 3.7 1. 3 Note e: Be careful to use 0.7 1.3
Income quintile 0.8 0.6 1.0 1.4 1.1 1.8 Note 0.1 0.4
End of text box I have never done 0.6 1.0 Instant lottery or online instant game 0.9 1.8 No n-indigenous people (reference) 64. 2 64. 2
61. 1
56. 1

65, 8< 0.05)

About 300,000 Canadians were at moderate-to-severe risk of a gambling problem

94. 3 Note

93, 6

94, 9
Less than a month 6 Note Lo w-income households were less likely to gamble than hig h-income households, but were more vulnerable to gambling problems. For example, 71, 5 % of hig h-income households reported that they had gambling in the past year, and 1, 1 % had the risk of gambling addiction. In lo w-income households, 53, 8 % had gambling in the past year, and 2, 7 % had the danger of gambling addiction. The higher the number of gambling, the higher the risk of gambling addiction. In the multiple analysis, most of the characteristics, such as participation in multiple kinds of gambling activities, single, divorce or separation, and good mental health, were independently related to gambling.
Text box end Text box end Text box end
When gambling is a problem, both gambling and their families are affected. Gambling addiction can lead to marital relationships, bankruptcy, economic difficulties, suicide, crimes, health disorders, and an increase in the use of alcohol and other drugs. Note % Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note to When gambling is a problem, both gambling and their families are affected. Gambling addiction can lead to marital relationships, bankruptcy, economic difficulties, suicide, crimes, health disorders, and an increase in the use of alcohol and other drugs. Note % Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note to When gambling is a problem, both gambling and their families are affected. Gambling addiction can lead to marital relationships, bankruptcy, economic difficulties, suicide, crimes, health disorders, and an increase in the use of alcohol and other drugs. Note % Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note to
96. 1 0 97. 4 98, 0 Note 97, 6 98. 4 Less than a month 3 More than once a week 98, 0 Note Note F: I can't disclose because my reliability is too low Note: Not applicable 98, 0 Note 0. 3 Note e: Be careful to use
At least once a week 0. 3 Note e: Use with care 0. 3 Note e: Use with care 3.4 2.9 3.9 0. 4 Note e: Use with care 3.8 3.1 4.7 Specific financial market activities 2.9 2.3 3.7
I have never done 96, 5 96, 0 1.3 1.0 1.6 96, 9 1.5 1.2 1.9 94. 3 93. 4 0.7 1.5
95. 1 98, 5 Note 98. 1 1.6 1.3 2.0 98, 9 2.0 1.6 2.5 Less than a month 1. 0 Note e: Note to use with caution *. 0.9 1.7
1-3 times a month 0. 2 Note E: Use with care. More than once a week Casino table game (online or fac e-t o-face) 0.2 0.6 1. 3 Note e: Be careful to use 14. 6 0.3 0.9 Note None Note None 0.1 0.3
It is very reliable to use with not applicable.
56. 1

65, 8< 0.05)

Gambling problems are serious. According to the 2018 CCHS-GAM RR, the majority of Canadian (95, 0 %) reported that he had gambling in the past year is an unpredictable gambler, and the Canadian gambling index (CPGI) score is 0. It means that. It turned out that 3, 4 % (636. 000 people) had low risk (score of 1 or 2 in CPGI).

However, 1, 6 % (304. 000 people), who reported that they had gambling in the past year, had a risk of severe gambling from moderate (3 points or more in CPGI) (table). 4).
Indigenous people gambling in the past year higher than no n-indigenous people (72, 4 % to 64, 2 %), and the risk of gambling problems was more likely to be moderate to severe (4, 5 %. Try 1, 5 %). Lo w-income households were less likely to gamble than hig h-income households, but were more vulnerable to gambling problems. For example, 71, 5 % of hig h-income households reported that they had gambling in the past year, and 1, 1 % had the risk of gambling addiction. In lo w-income households, 53, 8 % had gambling in the past year, and 2, 7 % had the danger of gambling addiction. The higher the number of gambling, the higher the risk of gambling addiction. In the multiple analysis, most of the characteristics, such as participation in multiple kinds of gambling activities, single, divorce or separation, and good mental health, were independently related to gambling.
Text box end Text box end Text box end
% Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note to % Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note to % Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note to
There are various reasons for gambling people, which are generally social or entertained. Note At the same time, loneliness can be an important factor in gambling addiction. Most of the gamblers are useful, but be aware that the gamblers tend to recognize money as the main motive rather than the no n-predictive gambler. Note Numerous' 000 from Numerous' 000 Numerous' 000 Numerous' 000 17. 804. 4 95. 0 94. 4 95, 5
Gambling comes in many forms, including buying instant lottery tickets, betting at casino tables, playing electronic gambling machines, and sports betting (see Data Sources, Methods, and Definitions for a complete list). In the 2018 Community Health Survey (CCHS-GAM RR), respondents were considered to have gambled if they reported any of these activities at least once in the past 12 months.
According to the 2018 CCHS-GAM RR, about two-thirds (64, 5%) of Canadians aged 15 years and older (18, 9 million) reported at least one gambling memo in the past year. No n-indigenous people (reference) 64. 2 64. 2 No n-indigenous people (reference) 64. 2 64. 2 No n-indigenous people (reference) 64. 2 64. 2
From 1.7 1.2 2.4 262. 5 1.5 3.7 Medium risk 0.5 1.5
60. 4 Table 1 Note 1 1.5 1.2 2.0 238. 8 1.1 2.2 143. 7 1.0 2.2
781. 6 1. 1 Note e: Use with care 1.1 2.5 Mediu m-strength risk 1.5 4.2 3 or more 0.6 1.4
304. 4
196. 0 1. 1 Note e: Use with care 1.1 2.7 1. 2 Note e: Note to use with caution *. 1.7 4.8 No n-indigenous people (reference) 64. 2 64. 2
67. 4 52. 3 Note e: Use with care 1.4 2.8 0, 5 Note e: Use with care 1.8 4.3 13. 3 Note e: Use with care 0.5 1.8
66. 9 93. 4 0.7 1.8 Note 0.7 2.0 No n-indigenous people (reference) 64. 2 64. 2
Characteristics Total 1.8 3.5 Male (reference) 1.7 4.3 Female 1.4 3.5
60. 5 Note 0.8 1.9 Instant lottery or online instant game 0.8 2.3 93. 4 0.6 2.2
65. 6
Saskatchewan Male (reference) 1.8 3.9 1. 3 2.0 6.0 2. 0 1.2 3.3
2 2. 0 1.4 3.3 1. 6 1.3 3.3 No n-indigenous people (reference) 64. 2 64. 2
3 Instant lottery or online instant game 0.7 2.3 Female 1.2 4.2 No n-indigenous people (reference) 64. 2 64. 2
4 Instant lottery or online instant game 0.9 1.8 238. 8 1.0 2.5 No n-indigenous people (reference) 64. 2 64. 2
1. 541, 9 93. 4 0.7 1.7 Note 0.6 2.1 No n-indigenous people (reference) 64. 2 64. 2
*
Table 1 1.1 0.9 1.5 45-64 (reference value) 1.0 2.2 1. 6 Note E: Use with caution 0.5 1.1
1. 735. 8 65 years and older 1.7 3.4 1. 7 Note E: Use with caution 1.8 3.6 No n-indigenous people (reference) 64. 2 64. 2
69, 5 1. 7 Note E: Use with caution 2.1 5.3 2. 9 Note E: Use with caution Note *. 2.8 9.2 2. 0 1.1 3.8
71, 9 Note 0.6 2.1 No n-indigenous people (reference) 64. 2 64. 2 1. 0 Note E: Use with caution According to Table 5 Note‡. 0.5 2.0
73. 1
71. 1 1.7 1.4 2.1 2.0 1.6 2.6 45-64 (reference value) 1.0 2.1
*. 93. 4 0.6 1.9 1. 1 Note e: Use with care 0.9 3.0 No n-indigenous people (reference) 64. 2 64. 2
Non-immigrants (reference)
14. 363. 7 1.5 1.3 1.9 1.9 1.5 2.4 1. 2 Note E: Use with caution 0.8 1.7
4. 291. 4 1. 1 Note E: Use with caution 1.8 5.7 Household income 2.2 8.5 No n-indigenous people (reference) 64. 2 64. 2
1. 041. 3
2. 1 Note E: Use with caution Note * 2. 1.5 1.2 1.8 1.8 1.4 2.3 2. 1 Note E: Use with caution 0.7 1.6
Years since migration: 10 years Note 2.8 7.1 Note 2.1 8.2 1. 3 Note E: Use with caution 2.4 9.2
70. 4
8. 508, 5 1.4 1.1 1.7 1.8 1.4 2.3 13. 3 Note e: Use with care 0.7 1.3
Note 262. 5 1.6 3.5 Mediu m-strength risk 1.6 3.9 No n-indigenous people (reference) 64. 2 64. 2
74, 5
186, 7 1.3 1.1 1.7 1.8 1.4 2.3 Medium risk 0.6 1.2
7. 158, 9 Note 3.2 7.7 Note: Not applicable 3.4 8.2 No n-indigenous people (reference) 64. 2 64. 2
273, 6
46. ​​7 Note * Table 1 Note ‡. 1.2 0.9 1.5 1.6 1.2 2.1 Medium risk 0.5 1.3
39. 8 Note *. Note F: Not available for publication due to low reliability. 3.2 5.8 Note F: Not available for publication due to low reliability. 2.8 6.6 Note 2.8 6.4
47. 2 Note * Table 1 Note ‡ Note
46. ​​7 Note * Table 1 Note ‡. 1.3 1.0 1.7 45-64 (reference value) 1.1 2.1 93. 4 0.7 1.8
39. 8 Note *. 2. 0 1.5 2.9 Mediu m-strength risk 1.7 3.7 238. 8 0.9 2.7
Note
1. 0 Note E: Use with caution 0.5 0.3 0.9 I have never done 0.4 1.6 No n-indigenous people (reference) 64. 2 64. 2
2 1.1 0.8 1.5 143. 7 0.9 2.3 I have never done 0.5 1.3
3 3.1 2.2 4.3 Note F: Unreliable to publish 2.4 6.2 Female 1.3 3.5
Note: Not applicable 7.3 5.0 26. 9 Heterosexual (reference) 4.5 On the other hand, past-year gambling problem rates did not differ by sexual orientation or self-identified mental health status. No n-indigenous people (reference) 64. 2 64. 2
61. 1
56. 1

65, 8< 0.05)

Daily smoker< 0.05)

Non-Indigenous (reference)

1. 1 Note E: Use with caution.

Indigenous

4. 5 Note E: Use with caution.

4. 2 Note E: Use with caution

4. 7 Note E: Use with caution Note *.

Race

White only (reference)

1. 0 Note e: Table 5 ‡. Note ‡.

Other than white
Indigenous people gambling in the past year higher than no n-indigenous people (72, 4 % to 64, 2 %), and the risk of gambling problems was more likely to be moderate to severe (4, 5 %. Try 1, 5 %). Lo w-income households were less likely to gamble than hig h-income households, but were more vulnerable to gambling problems. For example, 71, 5 % of hig h-income households reported that they had gambling in the past year, and 1, 1 % had the risk of gambling addiction. In lo w-income households, 53, 8 % had gambling in the past year, and 2, 7 % had the danger of gambling addiction. The higher the number of gambling, the higher the risk of gambling addiction. In the multiple analysis, most of the characteristics, such as participation in multiple kinds of gambling activities, single, divorce or separation, and good mental health, were independently related to gambling.
Text box end Text box end Text box end
0. 8 Note e: Table 5 Note ‡. Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note to 0. 8 Note e: Table 5 Note ‡. Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note to 0. 8 Note e: Table 5 Note ‡. Problem gambling (recently called gambling disorders in mental disorders and statistical manuals) is currently recognized as public health concerns. It is estimated that the burden related to gambling is the same as the damage caused by depression disorder, alcohol disorder and dependence. Note to
Note
I smoke on a daily basis 14. 3 1.1 2.7 64. 2 64. 2 64. 2 64. 2 64. 2 64. 2
No (reference) 1.0 1.0 1.0 64. 2 64. 2 64. 2 64. 2 64. 2 64. 2
Gambling comes in many forms, including buying instant lottery tickets, betting at casino tables, playing electronic gambling machines, and sports betting (see Data Sources, Methods, and Definitions for a complete list). In the 2018 Community Health Survey (CCHS-GAM RR), respondents were considered to have gambled if they reported any of these activities at least once in the past 12 months.
According to the 2018 CCHS-GAM RR, about two-thirds (64, 5%) of Canadians aged 15 years and older (18, 9 million) reported at least one gambling memo in the past year. 0.5 0.2 1.6 0.4 0.1 1.2 0.8 0.1 7.9
From 0.6 0.4 1.1 1.0 0.5 2.0 Note F: It cannot be disclosed because it lacks reliability. 0.1 0.8
60. 4 Table 1 Note 1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
781. 6 1.5 0.8 2.7 2.0 0.9 4.7 0.9 0.4 1.9
304. 4
196. 0 1.7 0.7 3.8 2.8 1.0 8.0 0.7 0.2 3.0
67. 4 2. 2 Note e: Be careful to use 1.2 4.3 4 or more 1.4 7.2 1.2 0.5 3.2
66. 9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Characteristics 2. 2 Note e: Be careful to use 1.1 4.1 Note F: Low reliability and cannot be disclosed 1.0 5.4 2.4 0.9 6.1
60. 5 1.1 0.5 2.3 1.0 0.4 2.3 1.8 0.5 5.8
65. 6
Not applicable e: Be careful F: cannot be disclosed because it is too low reliability 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Note It is significantly different from the reference category (ref.) (P) 1.1 2.4 1.3 0.8 2.2 It is significantly different from the estimated value corresponding to men (p) 1.4 5.0
*
Table 1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
1. 735. 8 Daily smoking and a large amount of alcohol intake were related to the gambling. Note According to CCHS-GAM RR data, 4. 3%of last year's gamblers who are smoking cigarettes have a high risk of gambling addiction. In comparison, those who do not smoke (1, 2%) were very unlikely to become gambling addiction. 1.1 3.1 If 2. 1 % of last year's gamblers were drinking great alcohol, the risk of gambling addiction was high, but 1. 3 % if they did not drink too much. There are many studies related to gambling addiction and nicotine addiction. Note It is believed that smoking and gambling are positively affected by neurosite, genetic, and environmentally common. Note 1.0 4.1 1.5 0.7 3.4
69, 5 The relationship between lo w-income and the vulnerability between gambling has been repeatedly discovered. Note: There is a similar relationship between those who live in lo w-income areas, unemployed, and welfare recipients. Note: The most possible explanation is that, according to various definitions, lo w-income earners are unlikely to allow gambling losses. It is also possible that gambling is an opportunity to escape from lo w-income situations. 1.2 5.2 Daily smoking and a large amount of alcohol intake were related to the gambling. Note According to CCHS-GAM RR data, 4. 3%of last year's gamblers who are smoking cigarettes have a high risk of gambling addiction. In comparison, those who do not smoke (1, 2%) were very unlikely to become gambling addiction. 1.3 If 2. 1 % of last year's gamblers were drinking great alcohol, the risk of gambling addiction was high, but 1. 3 % if they did not drink too much. There are many studies related to gambling addiction and nicotine addiction. Note It is believed that smoking and gambling are positively affected by neurosite, genetic, and environmentally common. Note 1.2 0.6 2.7
71, 9 0.9 0.4 2.2 1.6 0.3 8.3 0.6 0.2 1.8
73. 1
71. 1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
*. 1.6 0.7 3.5 0.9 0.4 2.0 5.2 0.8 Also, those who have evaluated their mental health as "ok" or "bad" are considered to be moderate to gambling addiction than those who have more positively evaluated their mental health. There was a tendency. The relationship between a decrease in mental health and gambling addiction can be two-way, but human mental health may suffer from stress related to gambling itself-Gambling is other stressful life events such as unemployment. It has been used to deal with it. Note
Non-immigrants (reference)
14. 363. 7 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
4. 291. 4 2.1 0.9 4.7 Table 6 Gambling (Canada's gambling index & amp; gt; = 3) is a adjustment odds ratio related to the selected features, the population of households aged 14 or older, a Canadian summary, a summary of 2018. The problem of Canadian gambling index & amp; gt? = 3). Information is grouped in characteristics (displayed as a row header), total male, woman, 95 % confidence interval (displayed as a row header). 1.1 8.4 0.8 0.1 4.4
1. 041. 3
2. 1 Note E: Use with caution Note * 2. 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Years since migration: 10 years woman 1.1 4.8 Table 6 Gambling (Canada's gambling index & amp; gt; = 3) is a adjustment odds ratio related to the selected features, the population of households aged 14 or older, a Canadian summary, a summary of 2018. The problem of Canadian gambling index & amp; gt? = 3). Information is grouped in characteristics (displayed as a row header), total male, woman, 95 % confidence interval (displayed as a row header). 1.1 7.7 1.6 0.5 4.9
70. 4
8. 508, 5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Note It is significantly different from the estimated value corresponding to men (p) 1.2 6.0 2. 2 Note e: Be careful to use 1.1 4.4 2.9 0.5 from
74, 5
186, 7 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
7. 158, 9 4 or more 1.7 5.4 Note F: Low reliability and cannot be disclosed 1.3 4.5 Note None 1.4 8.6
273, 6
46. ​​7 Note * Table 1 Note ‡. 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
39. 8 Note *. woman 1.4 3.7 1.8 0.9 3.5 1-3 times a month 1.6 6.6
47. 2 Note * Table 1 Note ‡ Note
46. ​​7 Note * Table 1 Note ‡. 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.6 2.0 0.9 0.4 2.2
39. 8 Note *. 0.9 0.6 1.6 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Note
1. 0 Note E: Use with caution 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
2 2.2 0.9 5.3 2.1 0.6 7.1 Note There are no applicable matters. 1.0 8.3
3 No remarks 2.4 Total 15 to 24 years old 1.4 25-44 years old 0, 3 Note *. 3.0 45 years old or 64 years old (reference)
Note: Not applicable State or region 7.2 Atlantic Ocean Quebec 4.3 2. 3. 1 Note 9.7 Ontario
Prairie
56. 1

2. 4 Note< 0.05).

British Columbia

Head of household manager

40 % or less (reference)

Conclusion

Less than 40 %

1. 6 Note

2. 7 Note

Presence or absence of a spouse

Married or Common Row (Reference)

Data sources, methods and definitions

Unmarried (I have never got married)

1. 8 Note

2. 0 Note

Analytical technique

Separated or divorce

2. 5 (Note< 0.05 level were considered statistically significant.

Definitions

3. 8 (Note

10. 8

widow

Migration status

  • No n-immigrant (reference)
  • Immigrant
  • 32. 6
  • Sexual orientation
  • Heterosexual (Reference)
  • Sexual minority
  • 3. 0 Note
  • Indigenous identity
  • No n-indigenous people (reference)

Inhabitants

2. 3 Note

3. 0 Note

Racial group

White only (reference)

White man

2. 7 Note

2. 2 Note

18. 7

Limitations

Mental health of sel f-awareness

Good, very good or good (reference)

OK

In this study, gambling and gambling issues aged 15 or older are used to use data from the 2018 Canadian Regional Health Survey (CCHS), which is a quick response of gambling. Using the "Canada Problem Gambling Index", which evaluates the impact of gambling behavior and its behavior on the person or others, identifies the person with the risk of gambling.

Notes

2. 4 points

3. 5 Note

I smoke on a daily basis

No (reference)

yes

2. 3 Note

yes

Large consumer

None (reference value)

yes

Number of gambling times

1 (Reference)

2. 9 Note

5. 7 Note

13. 6

5. 0 Note

17. 7

8. 1 (Note

21. 5

4 or more

yes

42. 8

13. 9 Note

45. 2

32.

106. 4

yes

Note

It is significantly different from the reference category (ref.) Or other areas of Canada in the comparison by region and the state.

Of course, social population statistical characteristics, mental health, behavioral health, and other factors are not necessarily related to the gambling of the problem. Gender, age? Geography, income, presence or absence of spouse, whether or not the immigration, the identity of the population and indigenous people, sexual orientation, mental health, and the presence or absence of a problem gambling affect. Most of the previously identified danger factors, even if the presence or absence of immigrants, the identity of the population and indigenous people, sexual orientation, mental health, smoking, mass drinking, sexual orientation, and gambling are added to multiple analysis. Statistically remained significant (Table 6). Men, prime residents, lo w-income households, unmarried (single, divorce, separation), daily smokers, indigenous people, mental health, and participation in multiple types of gambling.

Perhaps because men are higher to male to severe to severe gambling addiction, only men are closer to the overall results than women.

Men's multiple analysis suggests that men with sexual minorities, such as gays, are more likely to be gambling more than men of heterosexuals. Although there is no research that can be compared directly, there are related documents that suggest that gambling, problem using the Internet, how to take notes, and alcohol and drugs may be more likely to have a possibility of unlike or sexual minorities.

Overall, the findings indicate that gambling addiction remains a problem in Canada, albeit for a minority of the population. Among those with a gambling addiction in the past year, 2% of men and about 1% of women have a severe or moderate risk of gambling-related problems, which equates to about 304. 000 Canadians.

Surveys that collect data on gambling are important to inform and support health promotion and surveillance programs. A significant number, and a minority, of the Canadian population develops gambling-related problems. The advent of online gambling has made gambling easier than ever before.

This study provides an updated profile of past-year gamblers, including data on gambling activity, frequency of gambling, household expenditures on games of chance, and characteristics of those at moderate to severe risk of developing gambling-related problems. The data presented here were collected before the pandemic and before the Safe and Regulated Sports Betting Act, which legalized single-event sports betting in Canada in 2021. The results serve as an important baseline for gambling behavior in Canada, allowing future monitoring of changes in gambling behavior over time and as a result of new legislation. This information can also be used by educators and public awareness campaigners.

Certain populations were more likely to engage in problem gambling, including men, those from low-income households, Indigenous peoples, those who perceive their mental health as fair or poor, those who smoke daily, and those who participate in multiple forms of gambling activities.

Michelle Roterman and Heather Gilmore are senior analysts in Statistics Canada's Health Analysis Division.

CCHS collects information on the health status, care utilization, and determinants of health in Canadians aged 12 years and older living in provinces and territories (Statistics Canada). The gaming module is funded by the Canadian Consortium for Gaming Research.

Overall, the findings indicate that problem gambling remains a problem in Canada, albeit in a minority of the population. Among those with a gambling problem in the past year, 2% of men and about 1% of women are at serious or moderate risk of developing a gambling-related problem, which equates to about 304. 000 Canadians.

Surveys that collect data on gambling are important to inform and support health promotion and surveillance programs. A significant number of the Canadian population, and a minority, develop gambling-related problems. The advent of online gambling has made gambling easier than ever before.

1 (Reference)

Certain populations were more susceptible to problem gambling, including men, people from low-income households, Indigenous peoples, people who perceive their mental health as fair or poor, people who smoke regularly, and people who participate in multiple forms of gambling activities.

Certain populations were more susceptible to problem gambling, including men, people from low-income households, Indigenous peoples, people who perceive their mental health as fair or poor, people who smoke regularly, and people who participate in multiple forms of gambling activities.

Certain populations were more susceptible to problem gambling, including men, people from low-income households, Indigenous peoples, people who perceive their mental health as fair or poor, people who smoke regularly, and people who participate in multiple forms of gambling activities.

avatar-logo

Elim Poon - Journalist, Creative Writer

Last modified: 27.08.2024

And men outnumber women at a ratio of about 2 to 1 among people with gambling addictions, although there are a growing number of women with the. Gambling is common in Canada, as it is in many other countries. The majority of people who gamble do so without harm, but a minority will be adversely affected. Who gambles and who experiences gambling problems in Canada. Insights on Canadian Society. lcusoccer.org

Play for real with EXCLUSIVE BONUSES
Play
enaccepted